Technical Papers
Feb 27, 2015

Supplementing Current Visual Highway Bridge Inspections with Gigapixel Technology

Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 30, Issue 2

Abstract

Developing an efficient bridge condition evaluation procedure is economically critical to a state highway department; however, any adopted bridge condition approach needs to be accurate. A state highway department typically conducts a bridge condition evaluation by visual inspection on a 24-month cycle. During the evaluation, a bridge inspector visually inspects bridge components to derive a bridge condition rating on a 0–9 scale; a 0 value represents failure. The intrinsic weakness in a visual inspection system is the nonuniformity in the process due to the subjective nature of the approach. This paper proposes an approach to supplement visual bridge inspections by implementing gigapixel technology to promote quality assurance and control in a state bridge management system. The discussed approach supplements the visual inspection of a bridge with panoramic images to be later reviewed by a trained group of bridge engineers. This trained group of bridge engineers is enlisted in the inspection review process to promote uniformity in the bridge rating process. Additionally, the presented approach creates a bridge panorama that can be cataloged as a permanent bridge condition record in a state DOT’s structural health monitoring system. The presented approach uses gigapixel technology to create high-resolution panoramas that can be reviewed by an engineer using Google Earth tools. The hardware needed for gigapixel technology is inexpensive, but can greatly improve conditional bridge rating consistency between bridge sites.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the Arkansas Highway and Transportation Department (AHTD) for its financial support of this research work. The authors thank Mr. Alan Meadors, Ms. Jessie Jones, and Mr. Daniel Siskowski of AHTD for their guidance during this project. The contents of this paper reflect the views and opinions of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of AHTD.

References

AASHTO. (2013). “Manual for bridge element inspection.” Washington, DC.
Arkansas State Highway Commission. (1944). “Layout of bridge over White River at Beaver, Arkansas.”, Little Rock, AR.
Arkansas State Highway Commission. (1951). “Layout of bridge over White River Busch relocation.”.
ASCE/Structural Engineering Institute-AASHTO Ad-Hoc Group on Bridge Inspection, Rating, Rehabilitation, and Replacement. (2009). “White paper on bridge inspection and rating.” J. Bridge Eng., 1–5.
BridgeHunter.com. (2012). “White River US 62 bridge.” 〈http://bridgehunter.com/ar/carroll/white-62/〉 (May 28, 2014).
BridgeHunter.com. (2013). “Beaver bridge.” 〈http://bridgehunter.com/ar/carroll/beaver/〉 (May 28, 2014).
Code of Federal Regulations. (2005). “Title 23: Highways, part 650—Bridges, structures, and hydraulics.” U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). (2013). “Bridges by posting status.” 〈http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/nbi/no10/posting13.cfm#d〉 (May 22, 2014).
Frenkel, K. A. (2010). “Panning for science.” Science, 330(6005), 748–749.
GigaPan. (2012a). “GigaPan EPIC pro user guide.” 〈http://gigapan.com/cms/manuals/epic-introduction〉 (Jul. 27, 2012).
GigaPan. (2012b). “Stitch 2.0, Stitch. Efx, and upload user manual.” Portland, OR.
GigaPan. (2013). “Frequently asked questions.” 〈http://gigapan.com/cms/frequently-asked-questions〉 (Sep. 11, 2014).
Hearn, G. (2007). “Bridge inspection practices.”, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Heymsfield, E., and Kuss, M. L. (2014). “Implementing gigapixel technology to highway bridge inspections.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 04014074.
Jáuregui, D. V., Tian, Y., and Jiang, R. (2006). “Photogrammetry applications in routine bridge inspection and historic bridge documentation.”, 24–32.
Jáuregui, D. V., White, K. R., Pate, J. W., and Woodward, C. B. (2005). “Documentation of bridge inspection projects using virtual reality approach.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 172–179.
Lattanzi, D. A., and Miller, G. (2013). “A prototype imaging and visualization system for robotic infrastructure inspection.” Structures Congress 410-421, ASCE, Reston, VA.
Miranda, R. (2014). “Gigapixel photography equipment.” 〈http://www.gigapixel.com/panoheads/〉 (Sep. 5, 2014).
Phares, B. M., Washer, G. A., Rolander, D. D., Graybeal, B. A., and Moore, M. (2004). “Routine highway bridge inspection condition documentation accuracy and reliability.” J. Bridge Eng., 403–413.
Riveiro, B., Jáuregui, D. V., Arias, P., Armesto, J., and Jiang, R. (2012). “An innovative method for remote measurement of minimum vertical under clearance in routine bridge inspection.” Autom. Constr., 25, 34–40.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 30Issue 2April 2016

History

Received: Jun 19, 2014
Accepted: Jan 21, 2015
Published online: Feb 27, 2015
Discussion open until: Jul 27, 2015
Published in print: Apr 1, 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ernie Heymsfield, Ph.D., F.ASCE [email protected]
P.E.
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Mark L. Kuss [email protected]
Master Tech., Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share