Technical Papers
Nov 13, 2014

Validation of a Questionnaire for Objective Evaluation of Performance of Built Facilities

Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 30, Issue 1

Abstract

Meeting user needs, expectations, and aspirations are the prime objectives of a facility provider; hence, it is necessary to evaluate a built facility while considering meeting user needs/expectations. Among present methods in vogue to elicit user feedback, the questionnaire remains the foremost and most common tool. The quality of feedback and its subsequent analysis entirely depend on the robustness of the questionnaire, which in turn depends on its content. Because questionnaires currently used to gauge user satisfaction are subjective, obtained feedback does not necessarily reflect actual performance. It is necessary to develop a survey instrument that can gauge user satisfaction as objectively as possible, that truly reflects ground reality. A questionnaire was developed based on carefully chosen attributes and the characteristics describing these attributes. A pilot survey was conducted to check its translation, construct, and consistency validity. Despite the increased number of questions, the offered objectivity will have a highly productive immediate and long-term impact on the performance of built facilities.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Energy System Research Unit. (2010). Post occupancy evaluation questionnaire, Univ. of Strathcylde, Glasgow, Scotland.
Government of India. (2005). National building code, New Delhi, India.
Ibem, E. O., Opoko, A. P., Adeboye, A. B., and Amole, D. (2013). “Performance evaluation of residential buildings in public housing estates in Ogun State, Nigeria: Users’ satisfaction perspective.” Front. Archit. Res., 2(2), 178–190.
Jiboye, A. D. (2012). “Post occupancy evaluation of residential satisfaction in Lagos, Nigeria: Feedback for residential improvement.” J. Front. Archit. Res., 1(3), 236–243.
Kaiser, H. (1974). “An index of factoral simplicity.” Pyschometrika, 39(1), 31–36.
Khair, N., Ali, H. M., Wilson, A. J., and Juhari, N. H. (2012). “Physical environment for post occupancy evaluation in public low cost housing.” 3rd Int. Conf. on Business and Economic Research.
Khalil, N., Husin, H. N., Hamimah, A., and Nawawi, A. H. (2010). “Correlation analysis of building performance and occupants’ satisfaction via post occupancy evaluation for Malaysia’s public buildings.” Munich personal RePEc archives.
Khalil, N., and Nawawi, A. H. (2008). “Performance assessment of government and public buildings via post occupancy evaluation.” Asian Sch. Sci., 4(9), 103–112.
Kian, P. S., Feriadi, H., Sulistio, W., and Seng, K. C. (2001). “A case study on total building performance evaluation an intelligent office building in Singapore.” Civil Eng. Dimension, 3(1), 9–15.
Kim, S., Yang, I., Yeo, M., and Kim, K. (2005). “Development of a housing performance evaluation model for multifamily residential building in Korea.” J. Build. Environ., 40(8), 1103–1116.
Lavy, S., Garcia, J. A., and Dixit, M. K. (2010). “Establishment of KPIs for facility performance measurement: Review of literature.” J. Facil., 28(9/10), 440–464.
Meir, I. A., Garb, Y., Jiao, D., and Cicelsky, A. (2009). “Post occupancy evaluation: An inevitable step towards sustainability.” Adv. Build. Energy Res., 3(1), 189–219.
Mohammad, M. A., and Azim, M. (2012). “Assessment of residential satisfaction with public housing in Hulhumale’, Maldives.” J. Social Behav. Sci., 50, 756–770.
Nik-Mat, N. E. M., Kamaruzzaman, S. N, and Pitt, M. (2011). “Assessing the maintenance aspect of facilities management through a performance measurement system: A Malaysian case study.” Procedia Eng. J., 20, 329–338.
Olanrewaju, A. L., Khamidi, M. F., and Idrus, A. (2011). “Validation of building maintenance performance model for Malaysian universities.” Int. J. Hum. Social Sci., 6(3), 159–163.
O’Sullivan, D. T. J., Keane, M. M., Kelliher, D., and Hitchcock, R. J. (2004). “Improving building operation by tracking performance metrics.” J. Energy Build., 36(11), 1075–1090.
Parsian, N., and Dunning, T. (2009). “Developing and validating a questionnaire—A psychometric process.” Global J. Health Sci., 1(1), 2–10.
Shohet, I. M., Lavy-Leibovich, S., and Bar-On, D. (2003). “Integrated maintenance management of hospital buildings in Israel.” J. Constr. Manage. Econ., 21(2), 197–208.
Vischer, J. C. (2008). “Towards a user centred theory of built environment.” J. Build. Res. Inf., 36(3), 231–240.
XLSTAT 2014 [Computer software]. New York, Addinsoft.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 30Issue 1February 2016

History

Received: Apr 17, 2014
Accepted: Oct 14, 2014
Published online: Nov 13, 2014
Discussion open until: Apr 13, 2015
Published in print: Feb 1, 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Gopikrishnan Seshadhri, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Postgraduate Student, Civil and Environmental Engineering Dept., Veermata Jijabai Technological Institute, Mumbai 400019, India (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Vinay Topkar, Ph.D. [email protected]
Professor, Civil and Environmental Engineering Dept., Veermata Jijabai Technological Institute, Mumbai 400019, India. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share