Role of Communication and Coordination in Project Success: Case Study
Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 29, Issue 4
Abstract
Communication and coordination are key issues for successful project management. Coordination is specifically a challenging task for industrial projects where a number of interdependent role players are needed to achieve the desired project outcomes. In this context, a two-stage case study of construction phase delay control for an oil and gas industrial project is presented. A process improvement methodology was carried out in the first stage and the root causes for the delays were identified. The investigation results revealed that the scope of one item of work, piping, dominated a large portion of delays. It was found that piping packages were not processed smoothly due to four main causes: incomplete testing, frequent piping modifications, incomplete as-built drawings, and incomplete punch listing. Seventy percent of the delays were caused by incomplete testing activities and incomplete as-built drawings. The improvement study suggested establishing a new unit for piping test package control and coordination. The review process was improved and the dedicated control team was implemented for the second unit, resulting in a substantial drop in the number of delayed test packages (down from 48 to 8%) and punch list items (down from 3,075 to 2,371). The findings of the case study demonstrate the importance of communication and coordination in successful project management for complex projects. The case presented is an example of process improvement use for successful delay management.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia, for its research support and encouragement.
References
Abd El-Razek, M. E., Bassioni, H. A., and Mobarak, A. M. (2008). “Causes of delay in building construction projects in Egypt.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 831–841.
Abdul-Rahman, H., Berawi, M. A., Berawi, A. R., Mohamed, O., Othman, M., and Yahya, I. A. (2006). “Delay mitigation in the Malaysian construction industry.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 125–133.
Alkass, S., Mazerolle, M., and Harris, F. C. (1996). “Construction delay analysis techniques.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 14(5), 375–394.
Assaf, S. A., and Al-Hejji, S. (2006). “Causes of delay in large construction projects.” Int. J. Proj. Manage., 24(4), 349–357.
Bubshait, A. A., and Cunningham, M. J. (1998). “Comparison of delay analysis methodologies.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 315–322.
Conlin, J., and Retik, A. (1997). “Applicability of project management software and advanced IT techniques in construction delays mitigation.” Int. J. Proj. Manage., 15(2), 107–120.
Doloi, H., Sawhney, A., Iyer, K. C., and Rentala, S. (2012). “Analysing factors affecting delays in Indian construction projects.” Int. J. Proj. Manage., 30(4), 479–489.
Gitlow, H. S., Oppenheim, A. V., and Oppenheim, R. (2004). Quality management, McGraw-Hill, New York, London.
Hegazy, T., Said, M., and Kassab, M. (2011). “Incorporating rework into construction schedule analysis.” Autom. Constr., 20(8), 1051–1059.
Hegazy, T., and Zhang, K. (2005). “Daily windows delay analysis.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 505–512.
Hossain, L. (2009). “Communication and coordination in construction projects.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 27(1), 25–39.
Meng, X. (2012). “The effect of relationship management on project performance in construction.” Int. J. Proj. Manage., 30(2), 188–198.
Minami, N. A., Soto, L. L., and Rhodes, D. H. (2010). “Dynamic lean management of the naval construction process.” Eng. Manage. J., 22(2), 36–43.
Shi, J. J., Cheung, S. O., and Arditi, A. (2001). “Construction delay computation method.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 60–65.
Simon, T. (2007). Communicate in the workplace, Software Publication, Chatswood, NSW, Australia, 20.
Stewart, R. A., and Spencer, C. A. (2006). “Six-sigma as a strategy for process improvement on construction projects: A case study.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 24(4), 339–348.
Yang, J.-B., and Tsai, M.-K. (2011). “Computerizing ICBF method for schedule delay analysis.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 583–591.
Yin, R. K. (1984). Case study research: Design and methods, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 29 • Issue 4 • August 2015
Copyright
© 2014 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Nov 8, 2013
Accepted: Mar 11, 2014
Published online: Mar 13, 2014
Discussion open until: Jan 27, 2015
Published in print: Aug 1, 2015
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.