Technical Papers
Sep 25, 2013

Adaptively Weighted Support Vector Regression: Prognostic Application to a Historic Masonry Fort

Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 29, Issue 2

Abstract

Prognostic evaluation involves constructing a prediction model based on available measurements to forecast the health state of an engineering system. One particular prognostic technique, support vector regression, has had successful applications because of its ability to compromise between fitting accuracy and model complexity in training prediction models. In civil engineering applications, compromise between fitting accuracy and model complexity depends primarily on the measured response of the system to loads other than those that are of interest for prognostic evaluation, referred to as extraneous noise in this paper. To achieve accurate prognostic evaluation in the presence of such extraneous noise, this paper presents an approach for optimally weighing fitting accuracy and complexity of a support vector regression model in an iterative manner as new measurements become available. The proposed approach is demonstrated in prognostic evaluation of the structural condition of a historic masonry coastal fortification, Fort Sumter located in Charleston, South Carolina, considering differential settlement of supports. Within this case study, the adaptive optimal weighting approach had increased forecasting accuracy over the nonweighted option.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This work was sponsored in part by the PTT Grants program of the National Center for Preservation Technology and Training (NCPTT) of the Department of Interior: the Grant Agreement Number MT-2210-11-NC-02.

References

Ansys 13.0 [Computer software]. Ansys, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA.
Anzani, A., Binda, L., Carpinteri, A., Invernizzi, S., and Lacidogna, G. (2010). “A multilevel approach for the damage assessment of historic masonry towers.” J. Cultural Heritage, 11(4), 459–470.
Atamturktur, S., and Prabhu, S. (2013). “Simulation based structural analysis of Fort Sumter considering foundation settlement.” Struct. Mag., 26–29.
Atamturktur, S., and Sevim, B. (2012). “Seismic performance assessment of masonry tile domes through non-linear finite element analysis.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 410–423.
Atamturktur, S., Bornn, L., and Hemez, F. (2011). “Vibration characteristics of vaulted masonry monuments undergoing differential support settlement.” Eng. Struct., 33, 2472–2484.
Atamturktur, S., Li, T., Ramage, M., and Farajpour, I. (2012). “Load carrying capacity assessment of a scaled masonry dome: Simulations validated with non-destructive and destructive measurements.” Constr. Build. Mater., 34, 418–429.
Burges, C. J. (1998). “A tutorial on support vector machines for pattern recognition.” Data Min. Knowl. Discovery, 2(2), 121–167.
Drucker, H., Burges, C., Kaufman, L., Smola, A., and Vapnik, V. (1997). “Support vector regression machines.” Advances in neural information processing systems, M. Mozer, M. Jordan, and T. Petsche, eds., Vol. 9, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 155–161.
Jaoude, A. A., Kadry, S., El-Tawil, K., Noura, H., and Ouladsine, M. (2011). “Analytic prognostic for petrochemical pipelines.” J. Mech. Eng. Res., 3(3), 64–74.
Gunn, S. R. (1998). “Support vector machines for classification and regression.” ISIS Technical Rep., 14.
Holbrook Field Trips. (2013). 〈http://www.busfieldtrips.com/charleston.html〉 (Dec. 5, 2013).
Jaakkola, T., and Haussler, D. (1999). “Probabilistic kernel regression models.” Proc., 1999 Conf. on AI and Statistics, (126), 1–4.
James, W., and Stein, C. (1961). “Estimation with quadratic loss.” Proc., Fourth Berkeley Symp. on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, 1, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, 361–379.
Joseph, V. R. (2004). “Quality loss functions for nonnegative variables and their applications.” J. Qual. Technol., 36(2), 129–138.
Kammer, D. C. (1991). “Sensor placement for on-orbit modal identification and correlation of large space structures.” J. Guidance Control Dyn., 14(2), 251–259.
Karush, W. (1939). “Minima of functions of several variables with inequalities as side constraints.” M.S. dissertation, Univ. of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Li, T., and Atamturktur, S. (2013). “Fidelity and robustness of detailed micro-, simplified micro-and macro-modeling techniques for a masonry dome.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 480–490.
Liu, G., Houlsby, G. T., and Augarde, C. E. (2001). “2-dimensional analysis of settlement damage to masonry buildings caused by tunnelling.” Struct. Eng., 79(1), 19–25.
Mahini, S. S., Ronagh, H. R., and Eslami, A. (2007). “Seismic rehabilitation of historical masonry vaults using FRPs. A case study.” Proc., 1st Asia-Pacific Conf. on FRP in Structures, International Institute for FRP in Construction, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, 565–570.
Mammen, E. (1997). “Locally adaptive regression splines.” Ann. Stat., 25(1), 387–413.
McGovern, T., and Smith, B. (2006). American coastal defences 1885–1950, Osprey Publishing, Oxford, U.K.
Müller, K. R., Smola, A. J., Rätsch, G., Schölkopf, B., Kohlmorgen, J., and Vapnik, V. (1997). “Predicting time series with support vector machines.” Proc., ICANN’97, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 999–1004.
Myung, I. J. (2000). “The importance of complexity in model selection.” J. Math. Psychol., 44(1), 190–204.
Na, W. B., Kundu, T., and Ehsani, M. R. (2002). “Ultrasonic guided waves for steel bar concrete interface testing.” ARIEL, 129, 31–248.
National Park Service. Division of Publications. (1984). Fort Sumter: Anvil of war: Fort Sumter National Monument, South Carolina, 127, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
Özen, G. Ö. (2006). “Comparison of elastic and inelastic behavior of historic masonry structures at the low load levels.” Ph.D. dissertation, Middle East Technical Univ., Çankaya Ankara, Turkey.
Prabhu, S., and Atamturktur, S. (2012). “Selection of optimal sensor locations based on modified effective independence method: Case study on a gothic revival cathedral.” J. Archit. Eng., 288–301.
Prabhu, S., and Atamturktur, S. (2013). “Feature assimilation in condition based infrastructure management.” J. Nondestr. Test. Eval. (ASTM), 41(1), 1–11.
Rajasekaran, S., Gayathri, S., and Lee, T. (2008). “Support vector regression methodology for storm surge predictions.” Ocean Eng., 35(16), 1578–1587.
Samanta, B., and Nataraj, C. (2008). “Prognostics of machine condition using soft computing.” Rob. Comput. Integr. Manuf., 24(6), 816–823.
Sansalone, M., and Carino, N. J. (1986). Impact-echo: A method for flaw detection in concrete using transient stress waves, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards, Gaithersburg, MD.
Saxena, A., Celaya, J., Saha, B., Saha, S., and Goebel, K. (2009). “Evaluating algorithm performance metrics tailored for prognostics.” Aerospace Conf., IEEE, 1–13.
Saxena, A., Celaya, J., Saha, B., Saha, S., and Goebel, K. (2010). “Metrics for offline evaluation of prognostic performance.” Int. J. Prognostics Health Manage., 1(1), 1–20.
Schölkopf, B., Burges, C., and Vapnik, V. (1995). “Extracting support data for a given task.” Proc., First Int. Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, AAAI Press, Palo Alto, CA, 252–257.
Smola, A., and Schölkopf, B. (2004). “A tutorial on support vector regression.” Stat. Comput., 14(3), 199–222.
Stone, M. (1974). “Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictors (with discussion).” J. Royal Stat. Soc., 36(2), 111–147.
Vapnik, V. (1998). Statistical learning theory, Springer, New York, NY.
Xu, Y., Lv, X., and Xi, W. (2012). “A weighted multi-output support vector regression and its application.” J. Comput. Inf. Syst., 8(9), 3807–3814.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 29Issue 2April 2015

History

Received: Apr 30, 2013
Accepted: Sep 23, 2013
Published online: Sep 25, 2013
Discussion open until: Dec 22, 2014
Published in print: Apr 1, 2015

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Sez Atamturktur, M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, Glenn Dept. of Civil Engineering, Clemson Univ., Clemson, SC 29634 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Ismail Farajpour, S.M.ASCE
Ph.D. Candidate, Glenn Dept. of Civil Engineering, Clemson Univ., Clemson, SC 29634.
Saurabh Prabhu, S.M.ASCE
Ph.D. Student, Glenn Dept. of Civil Engineering, Clemson Univ., Clemson, SC 29634.
Ashley Haydock
Structural Engineer, URS Corporation, 3023 HSBC Way, Fort Mill, SC 29715.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share