Development of a Robust Wastewater Pipe Performance Index
Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 29, Issue 1
Abstract
Wastewater pipes age and deteriorate over time, and utilities face great challenges in operating and maintaining their wastewater pipe infrastructure. Thus, systematic assessment and evaluation programs are required for efficient monitoring of the conditions and performance of wastewater pipes. This paper presents a rating system for use in evaluating the condition of wastewater pipes that can assist utilities in planning, prioritization, maintenance, and repair/rehabilitation/replacement decisions. A condition-rating system also can be an extremely useful tool in benchmarking pipe conditions, which allows the comparison of pipe segments within the system with each other and with similar segments in other systems. Currently, many utilities use the National Association of Sewer Service Companies’ (NASSCO’s) pipeline assessment and certification program (PACP) or have developed their own, in-house condition-rating system based on PACP. Most of the condition-rating systems currently in use are based on structural and operational defects of pipes. The proposed methodology considers defects identified from inspections, e.g., cracks, holes, and corrosion, and other parameters that affect the conditions and performance of wastewater pipes, such as soil characteristics, loading, and flow velocity. The proposed performance-rating system evaluates each parameter and combines them mathematically through a weighted summation and a fuzzy inference system that reflects the importance of the various factors. The framework provides a noticeable improvement from the conventional practice of using solely inspection data as a means to evaluate the wastewater pipe infrastructure system, because the model accounts for inspection data and other parameters that influence wastewater pipe performance. The fuzzy logic was good for approximate reasoning and incomplete information. The fuzzy inference model was found to have many advantages over the weighted factor model. The fuzzy inference model provided more sensitive results, whereas the weighted factor model provided more static results since the weights assigned to each parameter were fixed and distributed throughout all parameters in the model. In addition, the fuzzy inference model accounted for the combination effect of dependent parameters.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This research project is funded by Water Environmental Research Foundation (WERF). The authors also would like to acknowledge the contributions of the following participating utilities: Seattle Public Utilities Seattle, Seattle, WA; Western Virginia Water Authority, Roanoke, VA; Orange County Sanitation District, Orange County, CA; Pittsburgh Water and Sewer Authority, Pittsburgh, PA; Massachusetts Water Resources Authority, Boston, MA; Town of Blacksburg, Blacksburg, VA; Atlanta Public Utilities, Atlanta, GA; Cobb County Water System, Cobb County, GA; Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission, Washington, DC; Aurora Water, Aurora, CO; and City of Anchorage, Anchorage, AK.
References
Ana, E., Jr., and Bauwens, W. (2007). “Sewer network asset management decision-support tools: A review.” Int. Symp. on New Directions in Urban Water Management, UNESCO, Paris, France.
ArcMAP: Release 10 [Computer software]. Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI), Redlands, CA.
Azamathulla, H. M., Ghani, A. A., and Fei, S. Y. (2012). “ANFIS-based approach for predicting sediment transport in clean sewer.” Appl. Soft Comput., 12(3), 1227–1230.
Bai, H., Sadiq, R., Najjaran, H., and Rajani, B. (2008). “Condition assessment of buried pipes using hierarchical evidential reasoning model.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 114–122.
Bengassem, J., and Bennis, S. (2000). “Fuzzy expert system for sewer networks diagnosis.” Proc., Int. Conf. on Decision Making in Urban and Civil Engineering, INSA, Lyon, France, 18.
Bennis, S., Bengassem, J., and Lamarre, P. (1999). “Methodologies de partage des responsabilites de refoulement entre les troncons.” Vecteur Environ., 32(2), 34–45.
Brainmaker Version 2.0 [Computer software]. California Scientific Software, Sierra Madre, CA.
Chughtai, F., and Zayed, T. (2007). “Sewer pipeline operational condition prediction using multiple regression.” Proc., Pipelines 2007: Advances and Experiences with Trenchless Pipeline Projects, ASCE, Reston, VA.
Mamdani, E. H. (1977). “Application of fuzzy logic to approximate reasoning using linguistic synthesis.” IEEE Trans. Comput., 26(12), 1182–1191.
MATLAB R2013a (Version 8.1) [Computer software]. The MathWorks, Natick, MA.
Mehle, J. J., O’Keefe, S. M., and Wrase, P. E. (2001). An examination of methods for condition rating of sewer pipes, Master of Science in Infrastructural Systems Engineering, Univ. of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
Najafi, M., and Kulandaivel, G. (2005). “Pipeline condition prediction using neural network models.” Proc., ASCE Int. Pipeline Conf., ASCE, Reston, VA.
Najjaran, H., Rajani, B., and Sadiq, R. (2004). “A fuzzy expert system for deterioration modeling of buried metallic pipes.” NAFIPS Int. Conf., North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society, 1–6.
National Association of Sewer Service Companies (NASSCO). (2003). “Pipeline assessment and certification program (PACP) reference manual.” Pikeville, MD.
National Research Council Canada (NRC). (2004). “Deterioration and inspection of water distribution systems, a best practice by the national guide to sustainable municipal infrastructure.” Ottawa, ON.
Netmaker version 1.0 [Computer software]. California Scientific Software, Sierra Madre, CA.
Siler, W., and Buckley, J. J. (2005). Fuzzy expert systems and fuzzy reasoning, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
Tabesh, M., and Madani, S. (2006). “A performance indicator for wastewater collection systems.” Water Pract. Technol., 1(4), 7–14.
Vanier, D. J., and Rahman, S. (2004). “An evaluation of condition assessment protocols for sewer management.”, NRC Institute for Research in Construction, National Research Council Canada, Ottawa, ON.
Water Research Center (WRc). (2001). Sewer rehabilitation manual, 4th Ed., Swindon, U.K.
Zadeh, L. A. (1965). “Fuzzy sets.” Inf. Control, 8(3), 338–353.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 29 • Issue 1 • February 2015
Copyright
© 2014 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Feb 28, 2013
Accepted: Jul 19, 2013
Published online: Jul 8, 2014
Discussion open until: Dec 8, 2014
Published in print: Feb 1, 2015
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.