Structural Assessment of Reinforced-Concrete Arch Underpasses Subjected to Vehicular Overloads
Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 28, Issue 2
Abstract
In most countries, the maximum dimensions and weights of vehicles that circulate on national roads and highways are legally regulated. However, several economic activities imply the circulation of exceptional vehicles or overloads, raising concerns not only about road surface deterioration but also about the structural safety of the bridges that are to be crossed. In a previous publication, the authors proposed a methodology for permit checking of vehicular overloads applicable to girder bridge decks that involves a comparison of code design-load effects with those resulting from the special vehicle being analyzed. The software developed therein [Bridge Investigation for Special Trucks (BIST)] performs a structural safety analysis of the bridges that are to be crossed, providing simplified safety factors associated with a particular overload, based on which the permit decision is made. This paper presents an update of the BIST software that extends the permit-checking methodology to underpass arch bridges. The first part of the paper describes the general methodology of BIST and its application to RC underpass arch bridges. Extension of the methodology involved the development of two- and three-dimensional finite-element (FE) models of a wide range of arch underpasses that were validated and calibrated based on full-scale experimental tests and the assumption of a set of proper conservative simplifications. The second part of the paper presents a study carried out to evaluate the conservativeness and accuracy of the method proposed by comparing the safety factors provided by BIST with those obtained from numerical models of real arch underpasses subjected to a wide range of real vehicular overloads. The safety factors provided by the BIST software were always conservative and reasonably accurate, thereby validating the methodology proposed and enabling fast, economical, and safe permit decision making.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Instituto de Engenharia de Estruturas, Território e Construção, Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, and Agência da Inovação (Grant No. 003456/2009) for funding this study.
References
Bakht, B., and Jaeger, L. G. (1984). “A rational procedure for overweight permits.” Transportation Research Record 950, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 59–70.
Branco, F. A., Arruda, M. R., and Correia, J. R. (2011). “Experimental and numerical investigations on the structural response of precast concrete underpasses subjected to live loads.” Baltic J. Road Bridge Eng, 8(1), 48–57.
Branco, F. A., and de Brito, J. (2004). Handbook of concrete bridge management, ASCE, Reston, VA.
Computers and Structures. (2007). SAP 2000 user's manual (version 11.0), Computers and Structures Inc., Walnut Creek, CA.
Correia, J. R., and Branco, F. A. (2004). “BIST–Bridge investigation for special trucks.” Portuguese National Registration 386124 of 24/11/2004, IGAC–General Inspection of Cultural Activities, Lisbon, Portugal.
Correia, J. R., and Branco, F. A. (2006). “New methodology: Permit checking of vehicular overloads.” J. Bridge Eng., 274–281.
Farhey, D. N. (2010). “Performance of bridge materials by structural deficiency analysis.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 345–352.
Farhey, D. N. (2011). “Operational structural performances of bridge types.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 554–563.
Fu, G., and Hag-Elsafi, O. (2000). “Vehicular overloads: Load model, bridge safety, and permit checking.” J. Bridge Eng., 49–57.
Fu, G., and Moses, F. (1991). “Overload permit checking based on structural reliability.” Transportation Research Record 1290, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 279–289.
Ghosn, M. (2000). “Development of truck weight regulations using bridge reliability model.” J. Bridge Eng., 293–303.
Ghosn, M., and Moses, F. (1987). “Calibration of a bridge rating formula for overload permits.” Proc., ASCE Structural Congress, L. Tall, ed., ASCE, Reston, VA, 15–25.
Hambly, E. C. (1976). Bridge deck behaviour, 1st Ed., Chapman & Hall, London.
Kim, S., Frangopol, S. D., and Zhu, B. (2011). “Probabilistic optimum inspection/repair planning to extend lifetime of deteriorating structures.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 534–544.
Phares, B. M., Wipf, T. J., Klaiber, F. W., and Wood, D. L. (2004). “Bridge load rating for superloads using testing.” Proc., 2nd Int. Conf. on Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Cost, E. Watanabe, D. M. Frangopol, and T. Utsunomiya, eds., International Association for Bridge Maintenance and Safety, Lisbon, Portugal.
Regulamento de Segurança e Acções (RSA). (1983). Portuguese loads code for structural safety of buildings and bridges, Lisbon, Portugal.
Tserng, P. H., Yin, S. Y. L., and Chung, C. L. (2009). “Maintenance strategy for bridge components on the basis of performance.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 234–243.
Vigh, A., and Kollár, L. P. (2006). “Approximate analysis of bridges for the routing and permitting procedures of overweight vehicles.” J. Bridge Eng., 282–292.
Vigh, A., and Kollár, L. P. (2007). “Routing and permitting techniques of overweight vehicles.” J. Bridge Eng., 774–784.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 28 • Issue 2 • April 2014
Pages: 321 - 329
Copyright
© 2014 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: May 30, 2012
Accepted: Sep 26, 2012
Published online: Sep 29, 2012
Published in print: Apr 1, 2014
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.