Technical Papers
May 18, 2013

Application of Gamma Process for Building Deterioration Prediction

Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 27, Issue 6

Abstract

Deterioration trends derived using discrete condition data are commonly used in management of civil infrastructure assets. However, the high variability of condition data often makes the derivation of deterministic models difficult and unreliable. Therefore, reliability-based methods such as Markov chain have been used to establish trends using highly variable condition data. Although these methods have been explored in assets such as bridges and roads, the use of reliability-based methods in deterioration prediction of buildings is less common. The second-largest class of infrastructure assets owned by the local governments in Australia is community buildings. Because most existing community buildings are maturing, the local government agencies seek more reliable asset management strategies. Physical condition–based forecasting is a major component of such asset management approaches. This paper presents the development of a reliability-based methodology for the deterioration prediction of community buildings. The gamma process is considered to be an appropriate approach for predicting building element deterioration because of the associated temporal variability of degradation. The gamma deterioration process presented in this paper is a stochastic process with independent nonnegative increments having a gamma distribution with an identical scale parameter. Building inspection data from one of the local governments in Victoria are used in the model. Further, the paper discusses the analysis of the data and practical application.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the insightful discussions and guidance provided by Dr. Malihe Abdollahiani at the School of Math and Geospatial Sciences at RMIT University. Funding provided by the Australian Research Council and partner organizations (Municipal Association of Victoria, Kingston City Council, Glen Eira City Council, City of Monash, Mornington Peninsula Shire Council, City of Greater Dandenong, and Brimbank City Council) is appreciated.

References

Abdel-Hameed, M. (1975). “A gamma wear process.” IEEE Trans. Reliab., 24(2), 152–153.
Aboura, K., Samali, B., Crews, K., and Li, J. (2009). Stochastic processes for modeling bridge deterioration futures in mechanics of structures and materials, Taylor & Francis, London, 533–538.
Al-Barqawi, H., and Zayed, T. (2006). “Condition rating model for underground infrastructure sustainable water mains.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 20(2), 126–135.
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (2001). The Australian Bureau of Statistics estimates, Canberra, Australia.
Baik, H. S., Jeong, H. S., and Abraham, D. M. (2006). “Estimating transition probabilities in Markov chain-based deterioration models for management of wastewater systems.” J. Water Resour. Plan. Manage., 132(1), 15–24.
Cattan, J., and Mohammadi, J. (1997). “Analysis of bridge condition rating data using neural networks.” Comput.-Aid. Civil Eng., 12(6), 419–429.
Cinlar, E., Bazant, Z. P., and Osman, E. (1977). “Stochastic process for extrapolating concrete creep.” J. Eng. Mech. Div., 103(1), 1069–1088.
Edirisinghe, R., Setunge, S., Zhang, G., and Wakefield, R. 2011, “Council building management practices, case study and road ahead.” Proc., 5th World Congress on Engineering Asset Management (WCEAM 2010): Engineering Asset Management and Infrastructure Sustainability, J. Mathew, M. Ma, A. Tan, M. Weijnen, and J. Lee, eds., Springer, Berlin, 165–180.
Frangopol, D. M., Kallen, M. J., and van Noortwijk, J. M. (2004). “Probabilistic models for life-cycle performance of deteriorating structures review and future directions.” Prog. Struct. Eng. Mater., 6(4), 197–212.
Frangopol, D. M., Kong, J. S., and Gharaibeh, E. S. (2001). “Reliability-based life-cycle management of highway bridges.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 15(1), 27–34.
Hahn, M., Palmer, R. N., and Merrill, M. S. (1999). “Prioritizing sewer line inspection with an expert system.” Proc., 26th Annual Water Resources Planning and Management Conf. WRPMD’99: Preparing for the 21st Century, ASCE, Reston, VA, 1–9.
Kallen, M. J., and van Noortwijk, J. M. (2005). “Optimal maintenance decisions under imperfect inspection.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 90(2–3), 177–185.
Kim, D. K., Lee, J. J., Lee, J. H., and Chang, S. K. (2005). “Application of probabilistic neural networks for prediction of concrete strength.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 17(3), 353–362.
Kleiner, Y., and Rajani, B. (2001). “Comprehensive review of structural deterioration of water mains: Statistical models.” Urban Water J., 3(3), 131–150.
Lawless, J., and Crowder, M. (2004). “Covariates and random effects in a gamma process model with application to degradation and failure.” Lifetime Data Anal., 10(3), 213–227.
Lou, Z., Gunaratne, M., Lu, J. J., and Dietrich, B. (2001). “Application of neural network model to forecast short-term pavement crack condition: Florida case study.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 7(4), 166–171.
Luis, F. S. F., and Naim, H. (2001). “Neural networks in water resources management.” Proc., World Water and Environmental Resources Congress 2001, ASCE, Reston, VA.
Madanat, S., and Ibrahim, W. H. W. (1995). “Poisson regression models of infrastructure transition probabilities.” J. Transp. Eng., 121(3), 267–272.
Madanat, S., Mishanlani, R., and Ibrahim, W. H. W. (1995). “Estimation of infrastructure transition probabilities from condition rating data.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 1(2), 120–125.
Makropoulos, C. K., Butler, D., and Maksimovic, C. (2003). “Fuzzy logic spatial decision support system for urban water management.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 129(1), 69–77.
Micevski, T., Kuczera, G., and Coombes, P. (2002). “Markov model for storm water pipe deterioration.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 8(2), 49–56.
Mishalani, R. G., and Madanat, S. M. (2002). “Computation of infrastructure transition probabilities using stochastic duration models.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 8(4), 139–148.
Morcous, G., Rivard, H., and Hanna, A. M. (2002). “Modeling bridge deterioration using case-based reasoning.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 8(3), 86–95.
Pandey, M. D., and vanNoortwijk, J. M. (2004). “Gamma process model for time-dependent structural reliability analysis.” Proc., 2nd International Conf. on Bridge Maintenance, Safety and Management (IABMAS): Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Cost, E. Watanabe, D. M. Frangopol, and T. Utsonomiya, eds., Taylor & Francis, London.
Samali, B., Crews, K. I., and Aboura, K. K., eds. (2011). A system for bridge network condition assessment and prediction, Taylor & Francis, London.
Singpurwalla, N. D., and Wilson, S. P. (1998). “Failure models indexed by two scales.” Adv. Appl. Probab., 30(4), 1058–1072.
Sinha, S. K., and Pandey, M. D. (2002). “Probabilistic neural network for reliability assessment of oil and gas pipelines.” Comput.-Aid. Civil Infrastruct. Eng., 17(5), 320–329.
Tran, H. D. (2007). “Investigation of deterioration models for storm water pipe systems.” Ph.D. dissertation, Victoria Univ., Melbourne, Australia.
vanNoortwijk, J. M. (2009). “A survey of the application of gamma processes in maintenance.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 94(1), 2–21.
Wirahadikusumah, R., Abraham, M. D., and Iseley, T. (2001). “Challenging issues in modeling deterioration of combined sewers.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 7(2), 77–84.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 27Issue 6December 2013
Pages: 763 - 773

History

Received: Aug 31, 2011
Accepted: Jul 23, 2012
Published online: May 18, 2013
Published in print: Dec 1, 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ruwini Edirisinghe [email protected]
Research Fellow, School of Civil, Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology Univ., 376-392 Swanston St., Melbourne, VIC 3001, Australia (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Sujeeva Setunge [email protected]
Associate Professor, School of Civil, Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology Univ., 376-392 Swanston St., Melbourne, VIC 3001, Australia. E-mail: [email protected]
Guomin Zhang [email protected]
Associate Professor, School of Civil, Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology Univ., 376-392 Swanston St., Melbourne, VIC 3001, Australia. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share