Ordinal Logistic Regression Model for Predicting AC Overlay Cracking
Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 27, Issue 3
Abstract
Predicting performance of asphalt concrete (AC) overlay is important for both pavement design and management. Based on 328 AC overlay sections from the long-term pavement performance (LTPP) program, ordinal logistic regression models were developed in this study to predict the probability of severity levels for alligator cracking. It was found that the alligator cracking is significantly affected by alligator cracking of the existing pavement, thickness of overlay, thickness of the existing AC, age of pavements after resurfacing, truck volume, freeze-thaw cycles, and the amount of precipitation per wet day. In addition, it was found that the use of recycled asphalt pavement in the amount specified in the SPS 3 experiment and preoverlay treatment significantly affect overlay cracking. Both statistical conformance tests and empirical verification using independent data indicate that the developed models are reasonably accurate. The model can generate the probability of a pavement staying at a certain distress level and the odds ratio, which enables highway agencies not only predict probability of cracking but also assess the confidence of making such predictions.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
AASHTO. (1987). Summary results of 1987 AASHTO rideability survey, AASHTO, Washington, DC.
AASHTO. (1993). Guide for design of pavement structures, AASHTO, Washington, DC.
Abaza, K. A., Ashur, S. A., and Al-Khatib, I. A. (2004). “Integrated pavement management system with a Markovian prediction model.” J. Transp. Eng., 130(1), 24–33.
Albuquerque, F. S., and Nunez, W. P. (2011). “Development of roughness prediction models for low-volume road networks in northeast Brazil.” J. Transport. Res. Board, 2205, 198–205.
Allison, P. D. (1999). Logistic regression using the SAS system: Theory and application, SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
Applied Research Associates (ARA). (2003). “Guide for mechanistic-empirical design of new and rehabilitated pavement structures.” NCHRP Research 1-37A Rep., National Research Council, Washington, DC.
Asphalt Institute (AI). (1983). Asphalt overlays for highway and street rehabilitation, manual series No. 17, Asphalt Institute, Lexington, KY.
Ceylan, H., Gopalakrishnan, K., and Lytton, R. L. (2011). “Neural networks modeling of stress growth in asphalt overlays due to load and thermal effects during reflection cracking.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 23(3), 221–229.
Chen, C. T., Hung, C. T., Chou, C. C., Chiang, Z., and Lin, J. D. (2008). “The predicted model of international roughness index for drainage asphalt pavement.” Lect. Notes in Comput. Sci., 5226, 937–945.
Chughtai, F., and Zayed, T. (2008). “Infrastructure condition prediction models for sustainable sewer pipelines.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 22(5), 333–341.
Federal Highway Adminsitration (FHwA). (2008). “LTPP Data Collection,” 〈http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/pavement/ltpp/data.cfm〉 (Jul. 3, 2008).
Hall, K. T., Correa, C. E., and Simpson, A. L. (2002). “LTPP data analysis: Effectiveness of maintenance and rehabilitation options.” NCHRP Web Document 47 (Project 20-50[3/4]): Contractor’s Final Rep., Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Hu, S., Zhou, F., and Scullion, T. (2011). “Development, calibration, and validation of a new M-E rutting model for HMA overlay design and analysis.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 23(2), 89–99.
Huang, Y. H. (2003). Pavement analysis and design, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Huang, Y. H. (2010). “Artificial neural network model of bridge deterioration.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 24(6), 597–602.
Miller, J. S., and Bellinger, W. Y. (2003). “The distress identification manual for the long-term pavement performance project (4th revised edition).” Publication No. FHWA-RD-03-031, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC.
Morcous, G. (2006). “Performance prediction of bridge deck systems using Markov chains.” J. Perform. of Constr. Facil., 20(2), 146–155.
Paterson, W. D. (2001). Road deterioration, works effects and calibration, World Bank, Seattle, WA.
Von Quintus, H. L., and Moulthrop, J. S. (2007). “Mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide flexible pavement performance prediction models for Montana, volume III field guide.” FHWA/MT-07-008/8158-3, Fugro Consultants LP, Austin, TX.
Walls, J., III, and Smith, M. R. (1998). “Life-cycle cost analysis in pavement design—Interim technical bulletin.” Technical Rep. FHWA-SA-98-079, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
Wang, Y., and Allen, D. (2008). “Staged survival models for overlay performance prediction.” Int. J. Pavement Eng., 9(1), 33–44.
Yau, J. T., Chou, E. Y. J., Lin, J. D., and Yu, J. X. (2008). “Pavement overlay effectiveness and optimal timing determination using receiver operating characteristic curve and data envelopment analysis methods.” Transportation Research Board 87th Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.
Zayed, T. M., Chang, L. M., and Fricker, J. D. (2002). “Life-cycle cost analysis using deterministic and stochastic methods: Conflicting results.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 16(2), 63–74.
Zhou, F., Hu, S., Hu, X., Scullion, T., Mikhail, M., and Walubita, L. F. (2010). “Development, calibration, and verification of a new mechanistic-empirical reflective cracking model for HMA overlay thickness design and analysis.” J. Transp. Eng., 136(4), 353–369.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2013 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jan 6, 2011
Accepted: Jan 12, 2012
Published online: Jan 16, 2012
Published in print: Jun 1, 2013
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.