Forensic Evaluation of the LTPP Specific Pavement Study Projects in Arizona
Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 26, Issue 5
Abstract
This paper presents a forensic investigation of selected Arizona specific pavement study (SPS) SPS-5 test sections. The investigation focused on identifying the causes of pavement failures, examining the pavement structural and functional performances, and measuring within-section layer thicknesses and material properties. In addition, the investigation addressed the potential effects of overlay thickness and overlay materials used (recycled and virgin asphalt) and the extent of surface preparation (minimum and intensive) on pavement performance. Destructive and nondestructive tests were conducted following the long-term pavement performance (LTPP) program test protocols. The main pavement distresses identified in the test sections included fatigue cracking, longitudinal cracking, transverse cracking, rutting, block cracking, and pumping. Based on the observations of the coring and trenching operations, most of the cracks were top-down cracks exhibiting high severity at the top and low severity at the bottom of the layer. Wheelpath rutting was observed in the overlay layer only, and virtually no rutting was detected in the lower layers. The maintenance activities (fog seals and crack sealing) applied over the years appeared to have reduced the propagation of fatigue and transverse cracks temporarily and did not significantly improve the postrehabilitation structural performance. While all sections performed well compared with the virgin asphalt overlay, the recycled overlay test sections exhibited the largest postrehabilitation rate of increase in roughness and rutting (with thinner overlays) over their monitoring period. Pavement deterioration was not associated with the base and subgrade layers. The extent of distress was also found to be associated with high binder content and air voids.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This work could not have been completed without the assistance of Mr. Jack Springer of the FHwA. The authors also express their sincere appreciation to Dr. Murari Pradhan, Mr. Jim Delton, and the field crew members of the ADOT for their support.
References
AASHTO. (1993). Guide for design of pavement structures, AASHTO, Washington, DC.
Chen D., Bilyeu, J., Scullion, T., Lin, D., and Zhou, F. (2003). “Forensic evaluation of premature failures of Texas specific pavement study. I. sections.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 17(2), 67–74.
Chen D., Scullion, T., Bilyeu, J., Yuan, D., and Nazarian, S. (2002). “Forensic study of warranty project on US82.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 16(1), 21–32.
Federal Highway Administration (FHwA). (2001). Guide to LTPP traffic data collection and processing, FHwA, Washington, DC.
Hossain, M., Lattin, D., and Scofield, L. (1996). “SPS-5: Rehabilitation of asphalt concrete pavements.” Construction Rep., Arizona Dept. of Transportation, Phoenix.
MACTEC Engineering and Consulting of Georgia, Inc. (MACTEC). (2004). “Framework for LTPP forensic investigations—Final.” Technical Rep. FHWA-HRDI-13, U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, McLean, VA.
Miller, J., and Bellinger, W. (2003). “Distress identification manual for the long-term pavement performance program (LTPP).” Technical Rep. FHWA-RD-03-031, Office of Infrastructure Research and Development, Federal Highway Administration, McLean, VA.
Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). (2005). Everseries user’s guide: Pavement analysis computer software and case studies, WSDOT, Olympia, WA.
Zelelew, H., Senn, K., Puccinelli, J., and Punnackal, T. (2010). “Long-term pavement performance (LTPP) forensic evaluation: SPS-5 project (040500)—Casa Grande, Arizona.” Draft Rep., Arizona Dept. of Transportation, Phoenix.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2012 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Nov 23, 2011
Published online: Sep 14, 2012
Accepted: Sep 21, 2012
Published in print: Oct 1, 2012
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.