Optimizing Inspection Policies for Buried Municipal Pipe Infrastructure
Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 26, Issue 3
Abstract
Condition assessment is an integral component in any infrastructure asset management system. Without condition information, asset managers lack the ability to make appropriate decisions regarding needed maintenance, rehabilitation, and replacement of infrastructure. Existing and emerging technologies for assessing the condition of water and sewer pipes provide a better picture of the state of these buried assets. Unfortunately, many of these technologies are costly and provide results that are not always highly reliable. This paper presents a methodology to assist asset managers in balancing the value of information revealed by a condition assessment technology with the cost of obtaining this information. The paper describes the computational platform of the developed methodology and focuses primarily on the optimization process that utilizes the partially observable Markov decision process (POMDP) and genetic algorithms. This policy determines the most appropriate condition assessment technology and interval between inspections. The developed methodology takes into consideration direct and indirect costs of infrastructure failure. Optimization models are developed at both the asset and network levels. A case study of the water distribution network for the city of Hamilton, Canada, is presented to demonstrate the use and capabilities of the developed methodology. At the asset level, results allow the asset manager to select the most suitable condition assessment technology and inspection interval for a particular pipe. At the network level, results enable the proper allocation of a condition assessment budget across all pipes in the system.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
ASCE. (2009). “2009 Grades.” Report card for America’s infrastructure, American Society of Civil Engineers, 〈http://www.asce.org/reportcard/2009/index.cfm〉.
Atef, A. (2010). “Optimal condition assessment policies for water and sewer infrastructure.” M.Sc. thesis, Nile Univ., Cairo, Egypt.
Baik, H., Jeong, H. S., and Abraham, D. (2006). “Estimating transition probabilities in Markov chain-based deterioration models for management of wastewater systems.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage.JWRMD5, 132(1), 15–24.
Cassandra, A. R. (1994). “Excat and approximate algorithms for partiality observable Markov decision processes.” Ph.D. thesis, Brown Univ., Providence, RI.
CERIU. (1997). “Manuel de standardisation des observations—inspections télévisées de conduites d’égout.” CERIU, Montréal, PQ (in French).
Cromwell, J. E., Reynolds, H., and Pearson, N. (2002). Cost of infrastructure failure, American Water Works Association Research Foundation, Denver.
Ellis, H., Jiang, M., and Corotis, B. (1995). “Inspection, maintenance, and repair with partial observability.” J. Infrastruct. Syst.JITSE4, 1(2), 92–99.
EPA. (2002). “The clean water and drinking water infrastructure gap analysis.” U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
EPA. (2010). “Ageing water infrastructure (AWI) research: Water distribution systems.” 〈http://www.epa.gov/awi/distributionsys.html〉.
Golroo, A., and Tighe, S. (2009). “Use of soft computing applications to model pervious concrete pavement condition in cold climates.” J. Transp. Eng.JTPEDI, 135(11), 791–800.
Hanemann, W. M. (1984). “Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses.” Am. J. Agric. Econ.AJAEBA, 66(3), 332–341.
Howard, R. A. (1966). “Information value theory.” IEEE Trans. Syst. Sci. and Cybern.IESCAA, 2(1), 22–26.
InfraGuide. (2004). “An integrated approach to assessment and evaluation of municipal road, sewer and water networks.” DMIP best practice, National Research Council of Canada, Canada.
McCann, M. (2000). “Value of information in structural performance assessment ” Ph.D. thesis, John Hopkins Univ., Baltimore, MD.
Micevski, T., Kuczera, G., and Coombes, P. (2002). “Markov model for storm water pipe deterioration.” J. Infrastruct. Syst.JITSE4, 8(2), 49–56.
Morcous, G. (2006). “Performance prediction of bridge deck systems using Markov chains.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil.JPCFEV, 20(2), 146–155.
National Asset Management Steering Committee (NAMS). (1996). International infrastructure management manual. Wellington, New Zealand.
NASSCO. (2001). Pipeline assessment and certification program manual: Pipeline assessment and certification program (PACP), 2nd Ed., NASSCO, Owings Mills, MD.
Ningyuan, L., We-Chau, X., and Haas, R. (1996). “Reliability-based processing of Markov chains for modeling pavement network deterioration.” Transportation Research Record 1524, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 62B67.
Orcesi, A. D., and Cremona, C. F. (2009). “Optimization of management strategies applied to the national reinforced concrete bridge stock in France.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., 5(5), 355–366.
Osman, H., Bainbridge, K., Gibbons, M., Macey, C., and Homeniuk, R. (2008). “An integrated approach for managing critical water mains.” ASCE Pipelines Conference, ASCE, Reston, VA.
Pure Technologies. (2012). PipeDiver specification sheet, 〈http://www.puretechltd.com/products/pipediver/pipediver-pccp.shtml〉 (Mar. 25, 2012).
RedZone. (2010). RedZone Robotics Inc. 〈http://www.redzone.com/〉 (Apr. 26, 2012).
Scherer, W., and Glagola, D. (1994). “Markovian models for bridge maintenance management.” J. Transp. Eng.JTPEDI, 120(1), 37–51.
Sheils, E., O’Connor, A., Breysse, D., Schoefs, F., and Yotte, S. (2010). “Development of a two-stage inspection process for the assessment of deteriorating infrastructure.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf.RESSEP, 95(3), 182–194.
Water Research Centre (WRC). (2001). Manual of sewer condition classification, 4th Ed., Water Research Centre, Swindon, Wiltshire, UK.
Whittington, D. (1988). “Guidelines for conducting willingness-to-pay studies for improved water services in developing countries.” WASH Technical Rep. No. 56, USAID Water and Sanitation for Health Project, Washington, DC.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2012. American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Sep 6, 2010
Accepted: Feb 16, 2011
Published online: Feb 18, 2011
Published in print: Jun 1, 2012
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.