Building Commissioning: What Can Denmark Learn from the U.S. Experience?
Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 26, Issue 3
Abstract
Building commissioning has been gaining momentum and awareness within the building industry as a comprehensive quality assurance process that can be used throughout the buildings life cycle to ensure that the needs and requirements the owner has for the building are met. Although building commissioning is gaining momentum it is still far away from being viewed as normal practice within the building industry. Of the countries that are the closest to succeeding in making building commissioning normal practice, the United States is the leader. To decrease the time it will take for commissioning to become normal practice in countries were commissioning is taking its first steps or has not yet been used, it would be beneficial to learn from the leading nations on how they have implemented commissioning. Because the United States is among the leading nations in implementing commissioning, there is a lot that can be learned from on how that process has evolved and all the effort that has been put into research on building commissioning. This article investigates how the commissioning process is undertaken at a leading commissioning providing consulting company in Denmark, and presents a case study with a comparison between two shopping malls out of which one has not been through a commissioning process, while the other has. The benefits of commissioning are outlined and proposals for how the process can be improved in the Danish consulting company compared to the well-established ASHRAE 0-2005 guideline. Finally, the article discusses and concludes what the future steps for commissioning in a country like Denmark should be based on how commissioning has evolved in the United States.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Ágústsson, R. Ö. (2010). “Building commissioning—advantages and disadvantages of the process and how it has been applied in Denmark.” Master thesis, Technical Univ. of Denmark, Copenhagen.
ASHRAE. (2005). ASHRAE Guideline 0–2005, The commissioning process, American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Atlanta.
BESL. (2007). “The viability of commissioning in new school construction.” 〈http://www.beslab.org/The%20Viability%20of%20Commissioning%20in%20New%20School%20Construction%20Final%20Report%20(May%2007).pdf〉, (February 20, 2010).
California Commissioning Collaborative (CACx). (2006). “California commissioning guide: New buildings.” CACx, Portland, OR.
CA Commissioning Collaborative. (2010). “Commissioning case studies.” 〈http://www.cacx.org/resources/commissioning.php〉, (Sept. 5, 2010).
CIBSE. (2003). CIBSE commissioning code M: Commissioning management, Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers, London.
ELO-sekretariatet. (2010). “Energiledelsesordningen (ELO).” Teknologisk Institut, ELO Nłgletal 〈http://elo.femsek.dk/NGLrap/08_2005/rapport(320-5210-3).htm〉, (May 29, 2010).
Grondzik, W. T. (2009). Principles of building commissioning, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
Heinz, J. A., and Casault, R. B. (2004). The building commissioning handbook, 2nd Ed., Building Commissioning Association, Portland, OR.
Liu, M., Claridge, D. E., and Turner, W. D. (2002). “Continuous commissioning guidebook for energy managers.” Rep. Prepared for U.S. Dept. of Energy. Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX, and University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE.
Mills, E. P. (2009). “Building commission—A golden opportunity for reducing energy costs and greenhouse gas emissions.” Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berekely, CA.
National Energy Management Institute. (2001). “Building commissioning market—Industry analysis.” 〈http://www.nemionline.org/downloads/hvac/1_Building%20fCommissioning.pdf〉, (March 8, 2010).
Portland Energy Conservation, Inc. (PECI). (2010). “History of commissioning.” 〈http://www.peci.org/ncbc/about/cx-history.html〉, (April 19, 2010).
Portland Energy Conservation, Inc (PECI). (1997). “Commissioning for better buildings in Oregon.” 〈http://www.oregon.gov/ENERGY/CONS/BUS/comm/docs/commintr.pdf〉, (Sept. 3, 2010).
Pietiläinen, J. et al. (2007). Guidebook for lifecycle commissioning of buildings’ energy efficiency and indoor climate, VTT Research, Espoo, Finland, (In Finnish), Notes 2413.
U.S. Dept. of Energy. (2010). “Commissioning phase.” 〈http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/commercial/commissioning.html〉, (May 10, 2010).
U.S. General Services Administration (USGSA). (2005). “The building commission guide.” USGSA, Washington, DC.
Visier, J. C. ed. (2004). “Commissioning tools for improved energy performance.” Results of IEA ECBCS Annex 40. 〈www.commissioning-hvac.org〉 (May 10, 2010).
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 26 • Issue 3 • June 2012
Pages: 271 - 278
Copyright
© 2012. American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Oct 8, 2010
Accepted: Feb 9, 2011
Published online: Feb 11, 2011
Published in print: Jun 1, 2012
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.