Behavior of Light-Framed Wood Roof-to-Wall Connectors Using Aged Lumber and Multiple Connection Mechanisms
Publication: Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities
Volume 26, Issue 1
Abstract
Ensuring a complete load path in light-framed wood structures is critical in providing proper load transfer during wind and seismic events. Roof-to-wall metal-connectors are often used to accomplish this goal. Currently, the design and construction community utilizes published metal connector capacities found in manufacturer documentation or other design aids to properly size connectors for a given demand. However, with the ever-increasing trend of using recycled dimensioned lumber and in situ retrofits of older buildings, the limited supply of research in this area is becoming more apparent. At present, the state-of-the-practice does not provide guidance to account for changes in material properties in structurally sound reclaimed or aged lumber. This study uses dimensioned lumber that was extracted from decommissioned buildings, originally built in the 1960s, to examine the effect of reclaimed dimensioned lumber on the design strength of connections by using metal-connectors. Through the use of testing on over 150 samples, this study identifies issues with the current design practice. The metal-connectors show a 20% reduction in uplift design strength, whereas they exhibit a 21% increase in the in-plane design capacity when used in conjunction with the reclaimed lumber. The difference in design capacity for out-of-plane loading appears to be statistically insignificant. As a secondary portion of this study, the design capacities of roof-to-wall connections utilizing two 16d common toenails and a commercially available metal connector were examined. Independent and combined capacities are evaluated. The presence of toenails in roof-to-wall connections is a common situation, as toenails can be used as a construction aid during framing, or toenails can be artifacts left from the original time of construction in retrofit applications. The design capacities of the toenails were determined to be additive to the design capacities of the metal connector for uni-axial loading in uplift or out-of-plane. As a result of rafter splitting, the presence of toenails detracted from the design capacity of the metal connector when loaded uni-axially in-plane.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
American Forest & Paper Association (AF&PA). (2005). National design specification for wood construction—ASD/ LRFD, Washington, DC.
ASTM. (2000). “Standard test methods for mechanical fasteners.” D1761-88, American Society for Testing Materials, West Conshohoken, PA.
ASTM. (2009). “Standard test methods for small clear specimens of timber.” D143-09, American Society for Testing Materials, West Conshohoken, PA.
Cheng, J. (2004). “Testing and analysis of the toe-nailed connection in the residential roof-to-wall system.” For. Prod. J., 54(4), 58–65.
Falk, R. H., Green, D., and Lantz, S. C. (1999). “Evaluation of lumber recycled from an industrial military building.” For. Prod. J., 49(5), 49–55.
Falk, R. H., Green, D., Rammer, D., and Lantz, S. F. (2000). “Engineering evaluation of 55-year-old timber columns recycled from an industrial military building.” For. Prod. J., 50(4), 71–76.
Falk, R. H., Maul, D. G., Cramer, S. M., Evans, J., and Herian, V. (2008). “Engineering properties of douglas-fir lumber reclaimed from deconstructed buildings.” FPL-RP-650, USDA, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, WI.
USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory (FPL). (1965). Nail-withdrawal resistance of American woods, U.S. Forest Service Research Note, USDA, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, WI.
USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory (FPL). (1999). Wood handbook—Wood as an engineering material, USDA, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, WI.
Green, D. W., and Kretschmann, D. E. (1994). “Moisture content and the properties of clear southern pine.” FPL-RP-531, USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, WI.
Haldar, A., and Mahadevan, S. (2000). Probability, reliability and statistical methods in engineering design, Wiley, New York.
International Code Council (ICC). (2007). “Acceptance criteria for joist hangers and similar devices.” AC-13, International Code Council, Whittier, CA.
International Code Council (ICC). (2008). “Simpson Strong-Tie hurricane and seismic straps and ties for wood framing.” ESR-2613, International Code Council Evaluation Service, Whittier, CA.
Reed, T. D., Rosowsky, D. V., and Schiff, S. D. (1997). “Uplift capacity of light-frame rafter to top plate connections.” J. Archit. Eng., 3(4), 156–163.
Shanmugam, B., Nielson, B. G., and Gleason, A. (2008) “Fragility assessment of light-framed wood roof system subject to high wind loads.” Inaugural Int. Conf. of the Engineering Mechanics Institute, ASCE, Reston, VA.
Shanmugam, B., Nielson, B. G., and Prevatt, D. O. (2009). “Statistical and analytical models for roof components in existing light-framed wood structures.” Eng. Struct., 31(11), 2607–2616.
Shanmugam, B., Nielson, B. G., and Schiff, S. D. (2011). “Multi-axial assessment of typical light-frame roof-to-wall metal connectors.” Eng. Struct., 33(12), 3125–3135.
Simpson Strong-Tie. (2009). “Wood construction connectors, 2009–2010—catalog.” Pleasanton, CA.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2012 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jul 2, 2010
Accepted: Dec 27, 2010
Published online: Dec 30, 2010
Published in print: Feb 1, 2012
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.