Technical Papers
Oct 12, 2022

Mixed-Mode FRP–Concrete Bond Failure Analysis Using a Novel Test Apparatus and 3D Nonlinear FEM

Publication: Journal of Composites for Construction
Volume 26, Issue 6

Abstract

This study introduces a novel test apparatus that can be used to test the adhesive bond between fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) laminate and concrete in both double shear and mixed mode (shear/peeling). It was deployed to evaluate the behavior of carbon FRP (CFRP)–concrete interfaces at six peel angles. The apparatus is usable with any servohydraulic load test frame and requires only one-half of the traditional concrete block specimen used in both double shear and mixed-mode tests. Experimental results revealed a decrease in bond capacity as peel angle increased. The reduction is quantified using a power-law relationship with respect to the tangent of the peel angle. A three-dimensional (3D) finite-element model utilizing a cohesive zone model to characterize the FRP–concrete interface was developed to corroborate experimental results and carry out parametric studies. The percentage increase in CFRP–concrete bond capacity resulting from an increase in the FRP modulus or its thickness declined as the peel angle increased.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

F. M. Mukhtar acknowledges the financial support provided by the Deanship of Research Oversight and Coordination at King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals under Research Grant IN161031. The authors also thank Dr. Chris Van Dyke and Mr. Cody Hutchinson of the University of Kentucky for their assistance in reviewing the manuscript.

Notation

The following symbols are used in this paper:
Af
FRP cross-sectional area;
bf
FRP width;
dm
parameter controlling the debonding process in the bond–slip relation;
Efrp
FRP tensile modulus;
fc
compressive strength of concrete;
ffrp
tensile stress in each FRP arm;
Gcn
critical normal fracture energy in the bond–slip relation;
Gct
critical tangential fracture energy in the bond–slip relation;
Gn
normal fracture energy in the bond–slip relation;
Gn
tangential fracture energy in the bond–slip relation;
i
index of discrete point for strain measurement;
Kn
normal contact stiffness in the bond–slip relation;
Kt
tangential contact stiffness in the bond–slip relation;
L
initial bonded length of FRP strip;
Lbonded
Lb = instantaneous bonded length of FRP strip during partial debonding;
Lunbonded
unbonded length of FRP strip;
P
Load applied to the bonded FRP–concrete specimen;
P0
Peak load of the pure shear (Mode II) specimen;
Pmax
maximum load for the FRP-bonded concrete specimen;
t
FRP sheet thickness;
ux
lateral displacement in the x-axis;
β
tangent of the peel angle between the FRP plate/sheet and the concrete substrate;
β0
initial value of β prior to debonding initiation;
ΔL
spacing between the strain gauges;
δ
relative movement between the apparatus and the concrete block;
δ0.75
relative movement between the apparatus and the concrete specimen having β = 0.75;
δn
normal slip in the bond–slip relation;
δn
normal slip accompanying σmax, in the bond–slip relation;
δnc
maximum normal slip in the bond–slip relation;
δt
tangential slip in the bond–slip relation;
δt
tangential slip accompanying τmax in the bond–slip relation;
δtc
maximum tangential slip in the bond–slip relation;
ɛ
strain gauge reading;
θ
peel angle between the FRP plate/sheet and the concrete substrate;
σ
normal stress in the bond–slip relation;
σmax
maximum normal stress in the bond–slip relation;
τ
FRP–concrete bond shear stress;
τmax
maximum shear stress in the bond–slip relation;
(τmax.aver.)0
average bond shear strength under a pure shear (Mode II) condition; and
(τmax.aver.)mixed-mode
average bond shear strength under a mixed-mode condition.

References

ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2017. Guide for the design and construction of externally bonded FRP systems for strengthening concrete structures. ACI 440.2R-17. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
Alam, M. S., T. Kanakubo, and A. Yasojima. 2012. “Shear-peeling bond strength between continuous fiber sheet and concrete.” ACI Struct. J. 109 (1): 75–82.
An, F. C., W. Liu, and B. Fu. 2019. “A predictive 2D finite element model for modelling FRP-to-concrete bond behavior.” Compos. Struct. 226: 111189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111189.
ANSYS. 2021. Release 21 R1 documentation for ANSYS. Canonsburg, PA: ANSYS.
ASTM International. 2008. Standard test method for tensile properties of polymer matrix composite materials. ASTM D3039/D3039M-08. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2017. Standard test method for splitting tensile strength of cylindrical concrete. ASTM C496/C 496M. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2018. Standard test method for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete specimens. ASTM C39. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Atadero, R. A., D. G. Allen, and O. R. Mata. 2013. Long-term monitoring of mechanical properties of FRP repair materials. CDOT-2013-13. Fort Collins, CO: Colorado State Univ.
Chen, G. M., J. G. Teng, and J. F. Chen. 2011. “Finite-element modeling of intermediate crack debonding in FRP-plated RC beams.” J. Compos. Constr. 15 (3): 339–353. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000157.
CSA (Canadian Standards Association). 2017. Design and construction of building components with fibre-reinforced polymers. CSA-S806-12(R2017). Mississauga, ON, Canada: CSA.
Dai, J., T. Ueda, and Y. Sato. 2007. “Bonding characteristics of fiber-reinforced polymer sheet–concrete interfaces under dowel load.” J. Compos. Constr. 11 (2): 138–148. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2007)11:2(138).
Dolan, C. W., J. Tanner, D. Mukai, H. R. Hamilton, and E. Douglas. 2008. Design guidelines for durability of bonded CFRP repair/strengthening of concrete beams.” NCHRP Project 12-73. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
fib (Fédération Internationale du Béton). 2013. fib model code for concrete structures 2010. Lausanne, Switzerland: fib.
fib. 2019. Externally bonded FRP reinforcement for RC structures. Task Group 5.1, Bulletin No. 90, Technical Rep. Lausanne, Switzerland: fib.
Feldfogel, S., and O. Rabinovitch. 2018. “Interfacial debonding propagation in orthotropic layered plates with a compliant internal layer.” Eng. Fract. Mech. 192: 77–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.02.005.
Ghorbani, M., D. Mostofinejad, and A. Hosseini. 2017. “Bond behavior of CFRP sheets attached to concrete through EBR and EBROG joints subject to mixed-mode I/II loading.” J. Compos. Constr. 21 (5): 04017034. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000816.
Giurgiutiu, V., J. Lyons, M. Petrou, D. Laub, and S. Whitley. 2001. “Fracture mechanics testing of the bond between composite overlays and a concrete substrate.” J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 15 (11): 1351–1371. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685610152599386.
Hollaway, L. C., and M. B. Leeming. 2000. Strengthening of reinforced concrete structures using externally bonded FRP composites in structural and civil engineering. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press LLC.
ICRI (International Concrete Repair Institute). 2013. Selecting and specifying concrete surface preparation for sealers, coatings, and polymer overlays. Technical Guideline No. 310.2R-2013. Rosemont, IL: ICRI.
Jawdhari, A., A. H. Adheem, and M. M. Kadhim. 2020. “Parametric 3D finite element analysis of FRCM-confined RC columns under eccentric loading.” Eng. Struct. 212: 110504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110504.
Jawdhari, A., and A. Fam. 2018. “Numerical study on mechanical and adhesive splices for ribbed GFRP plates used in concrete beams.” Eng. Struct. 174: 478–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.07.085.
Jawdhari, A., and A. Fam. 2020. “A New studded precast concrete sandwich wall with embedded glass-fiber-reinforced polymer channel sections: Part 2, finite element analysis and parametric studies.” PCI Journal 65 (4): 51–70. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij65.4-02.
Jawdhari, A., A. Fam, and I. Harik. 2018. “Numerical study on the bond between CFRP rod panels (CRPs) and concrete.” Constr. Build. Mater. 177: 522–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.138.
Jawdhari, A. R. 2016. “Behavior of RC beams strengthened in flexure with spliced CFRP rod panels.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Kentucky.
Kadhim, M. M. A., A. R. Jawdhari, M. J. Altaee, and A. H. Adheem. 2020. “Finite element modelling and parametric analysis of FRP strengthened RC beams under impact load.” Journal of Building Engineering 32: 101526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101526.
Kadhim, M. M. A., A. Jawdhari, and A. Peiris. 2021. “Development of hybrid UHPC-NC beams: A numerical study.” Eng. Struct. 233: 111893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.111893.
Karbhari, V. M., and M. Engineer. 1996. “Investigation of bond between concrete and composites: Use of a peel test.” J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 15: 208–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/073168449601500206.
Khan, Q. S., M. N. Sheikh, and M. N. S. Hadi. 2015. “Tension and compression testing of fibre reinforced polymer (FRP) bars.” In Proc., Joint Conf. of the 12th Int. Symp. on Fiber Reinforced Polymers for Reinforced Concrete Structures-12 and the 5th Asia-Pacific Conf. on Fiber Reinforced Polymers in Structures-2015, 1–6. Indianapolis, IN: American Concrete Institute.
Li, G., K. H. Tan, T. C. Fung, Q. J. Yu, and M. May. 2021. “A coupled dynamic cohesive zone model for FRP-concrete mixed-mode separation.” Compos. Struct. 268: 113872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113872.
Mazzotti, C., M. Savoia, and B. Ferracuti. 2005. “A new set-up for FRP-concrete stable delamination test.” In Proc., 7th Int. Symp. of the Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Reinforcement for Reinforced Concrete Structures-7, Geotechnical Special Publication 230, edited by C. K. Shield and J. P. Busel, 165–180. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Mukhtar, F. M. 2019. “Customized shear test for bond-slip characterization of EBR FRP–concrete system: Influence of substrate aggregate type.” Composites Part B: Engineering 163: 606–621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.150.
Mukhtar, F. M., and A. Peiris. 2021. “FRP–concrete bond performance under accelerated hygrothermal conditions.” Constr. Build. Mater. 270: 121403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121403.
Mukhtar, F. M., and M. E. Shehadah. 2021. “Experimental verification of 2- and 3-D numerical models for bond-slip behavior of CFRP-concrete.” Constr. Build. Mater. 287: 122814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122814.
Nakaba, K., T. Kanakubo, T. Furuta, and H. Yoshizawa. 2001. “Bond behavior between fiber-reinforced polymer laminates and concrete.” ACI Struct. J. 98 (3): 359–367.
Neto, P., J. Alfaiate, D. Dias-da-Costa, and J. Vinagre. 2016. “Mixed-mode fracture and load misalignment on the assessment of FRP–concrete bond connections.” Compos. Struct. 135: 49–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.08.139.
Pan, J., and C. K. Y. Leung. 2007. “Debonding along the FRP–concrete interface under combined pulling/peeling effects.” Eng. Fract. Mech. 74: 132–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.01.022.
Peiris, A., and I. E. Harik. 2021. “Impact damage retrofit of RC bridge girder previously retrofitted with CFRP fabric.” American Concrete Institute, ACI Special Publication 346: 31–50.
Sika. 2017a. Sikawrap®-530 C product datasheet. Lyndhurst, NJ: Sika.
Sika. 2017b. Sikadur®-330 product datasheet. Lyndhurst, NJ: Sika.
Tao, Y., and J. F. Chen. 2015. “Concrete damage plasticity model for modeling FRP-to-concrete bond behavior.” J. Compos. Constr. 19 (1): 04014026. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000482.
Teng, J. G., S. T. Smith, J. Yao, and J. F. Chen. 2003. “Intermediate crack-induced debonding in RC beams and slabs.” Constr. Build. Mater. 17 (6–7): 447–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-0618(03)00043-6.
Wan, B., M. A. Sutton, M. F. Petrou, K. A. Harries, and N. Li. 2004. “Investigation of bond between fiber reinforced polymer and concrete undergoing global mixed mode I/II loading.” J. Eng. Mech. 130 (12): 1467–1475. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2004)130:12(1467).
Wang, J. 2007. “Cohesive zone model of FRP-concrete interface debonding under mixed-mode loading.” Int. J. Solids Struct. 44: 6551–6568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2007.02.042.
Willam, K. J., and E. P. Warnke. 1974. “Constitutive model for triaxial behavior of concrete.” In Proc., of the Int. Association of Bridge and Structural Engineering Conf., 174–191. Pathum Thani, Thailand: Asian Institute of Technology.
Wu, Z., H. Yuan, Y. Kojima, and E. Ahmed. 2005. “Experimental and analytical studies on peeling and spalling resistance of unidirectional FRP sheets bonded to concrete.” Compos. Sci. Technol. 65: 1088–1097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.11.018.
Yao, J., J. G. Teng, and J. F. Chen. 2005. “Experimental study on FRP-to-concrete bonded joints.” Composites Part B: Engineering 36: 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2004.06.001.
Yu, H., Y.-L. Bai, J.-G. Dai, and W.-Y. Gao. 2017. “Finite element modeling for debonding of FRP-to-concrete interfaces subjected to mixed-mode loading.” Polymers 9: 438. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym9090438.
Zhang, W. 2016. “Experimental study on shear-peeling bond strength between a CFRP plate and concrete.” Mag. Concr. Res. 68 (11): 568–580. https://doi.org/10.1680/jmacr.15.00162.
Zhang, W., Z. Tang, Y. Yang, and J. Wei. 2021. “Assessment of FRP–concrete interfacial debonding with coupled mixed-mode cohesive zone model.” Journal of Composites for Construction 25 (2): 04021002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0001114.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Composites for Construction
Journal of Composites for Construction
Volume 26Issue 6December 2022

History

Received: Feb 4, 2022
Accepted: Aug 12, 2022
Published online: Oct 12, 2022
Published in print: Dec 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Mar 12, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, King Fahd Univ. of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia; Interdisciplinary Research Center for Construction and Building Materials, King Fahd Univ. of Petroleum and Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5276-4828. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Mechanical and Civil Engineering, Purdue Univ. Northwest, Hammond, IN 46323. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9540-5040
Research Engineer, Kentucky Transportation Center, Univ. of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2799-5012

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Beams without Stirrups and Strengthened with Basalt Fiber–Reinforced Polymer Sheets, Journal of Composites for Construction, 10.1061/JCCOF2.CCENG-4082, 27, 2, (2023).
  • Monitoring and characterizing the debonding in CFRP retrofitted RC beams using acoustic emission technology, Developments in the Built Environment, 10.1016/j.dibe.2023.100141, (100141), (2023).
  • Effect of hygrothermal acid rain environment on the shear bonding performance of CFRP-concrete interface, Construction and Building Materials, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.130002, 364, (130002), (2023).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share