Technical Papers
Oct 5, 2022

Design and Performance of a Tuned Vibration Absorber for a Full-Scale Lightweight FRP Pedestrian Structure

Publication: Journal of Composites for Construction
Volume 26, Issue 6

Abstract

Fiber-reinforced polymers (FRPs) have enabled the construction of lightweight footbridges, whose structural design is often governed by a serviceability limit state. A suitable approach to avoid overdimensioning an FRP footbridge may be to adopt a motion-based design strategy, where excessive human-induced vibrations are mitigated through the installation of tuned vibration absorbers (TVAs). In this sense, human–structure interaction (HSI) phenomena should be considered to estimate accurately the acceleration response of lightweight footbridges and size TVAs properly. Thus, this paper presents the design, installation, and performance assessment of a passive inertial controller for completing the construction of a full-scale FRP pedestrian structure. First, a general frequency-domain procedure to design TVAs for structures susceptible to HSI is proposed. The methodology considers a multiobjective optimization problem that minimizes simultaneously the structural response and the controller inertial mass. Second, the HSI load model of a bouncing pedestrian is identified experimentally to be used within the proposal to design TVAs. Third, a TVA of 25 kg is designed, assembled, and installed in the lightweight FRP structure, employing the proposed procedure. Then, the enhancement of the dynamic response due to the controller is assessed considering a person bouncing and two streams of walking pedestrians. For the different load scenarios, the TVA exhibits an adequate behavior to mitigate the vertical acceleration, demonstrating the feasibility to deliver an ultralightweight FRP footbridge with an inertial controller to meet requirements at different limit states.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and codes generated or used during the study appear in the published article.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the grant RTI2018-099639-B-I00, “Structural efficiency enhancement for bridges subjected to dynamic loading: integrated smart damper,” funded by MCIN/ AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and by “ERDF: A way of making Europe.” Christian Gallegos-Calderón expresses his gratitude to the Secretariat of Higher Education, Science, Technology and Innovation of Ecuador (SENESCYT) for the scholarship CZ02-000167-2018. Javier Naranjo-Pérez thanks the Ministry of Universities of Spain for the grant funded through the program “European Union—Next Generation EU.”

Notation

The following symbols are used in this paper:
apeak,nth
peak acceleration of the nth percentile (m/s2);
A
cross section area (mm2);
Aw
cross section area for shear (mm2);
alim
acceleration limit (m/s2);
apeak
maximum acceleration (m/s2);
apeak,nth
peak acceleration of nth percentile (m/s2);
bC
strip width (mm);
bf
flange width (mm);
d
density of pedestrians (pedestrians/m2);
Ec1
compressive modulus of GFRP in Direction 1 (GPa);
Ec2
compressive modulus of GFRP in Direction 2 (GPa);
Et1
tensile modulus of GFRP in Direction 1 (GPa);
Et1C
tensile modulus of CFRP in Direction 1 (GPa);
Et2
tensile modulus of GFRP in Direction 2 (GPa);
Fc1
compressive strength of GFRP in Direction 1 (MPa);
Fc1C
compressive strength of CFRP in Direction 1 (MPa);
Fc2
compressive strength of GFRP in Direction 2 (MPa);
Ff1
flexural strength of GFRP in Direction 1 (MPa);
Ff2
flexural strength of GFRP in Direction 2 (MPa);
Fh
resulting force acting on structure (N);
Fha
human force without considering structure movement (N);
Fhsi
human interacting force (N);
Fp1
pin bearing strength of GFRP in Direction 1 (MPa);
Fp2
pin bearing strength of GFRP in Direction 2 (MPa);
FT12
shear strength perpendicular to plane 12 (MPa);
Ft
force transmitted from TVA to structure (N);
Ft1
tensile strength of GFRP in Direction 1 (MPa);
Ft1C
tensile strength of CFRP in Direction 1 (MPa);
Ft2
tensile strength of GFRP in Direction 2 (MPa);
F12
in-plane shear strength (MPa);
F6
interlaminar shear strength (MPa);
fa
frequency of human action (Hz);
fh
natural frequency of person (Hz);
fs
natural frequency of structure (Hz);
ft
natural frequency of TVA (Hz);
GCL
TF of human–structure–controller system (m/(s2 N));
GH
TF between human driving force and Fha (N/N);
GHSI
TF related to interaction phenomenon (N/(m s2));
GS
TF of structural system (m/(s2 N));
GT
TF of inertial controller (N/(m s2));
G12
in-plane shear modulus (GPa);
GLF
generated load factor;
H
maximum value of TF (N/(m s2));
h
depth of profile (mm);
Iy
moment of inertia with respect to major axis (mm4);
Iz
moment of inertia with respect to minor axis (mm4);
J
objective function;
j
imaginary unit;
MTVV
maximum transient vibration value (m/s2);
mh
mass of pedestrian (kg);
ms
modal mass of structure (kg);
mt
inertial mass of TVA (kg);
N
normal distribution;
Nr
number of considered harmonics;
P
number of multivariate stochastic samples;
p
multivariate stochastic sample;
s
Laplace variable;
tC
thickness of strip (mm);
tf
thickness of flange (mm);
tw
thickness of web (mm);
W
Weibull distribution;
Wh
weight of pedestrian (N);
w
weight of panel per unit of area (kg/m2);
Xs
Laplace transform of structural displacement;
x¨s
acceleration of structure (m/s2);
zfac
vector containing GLF2 and GLF3;
zh
vector containing parameters of human body;
zs
vector containing modal parameters of structure;
zt
vector containing parameters of TVA;
ζh
damping ratio of human body (%);
ζs
damping ratio of structure (%);
ζt
damping ratio of TVA (%);
ν12
in-plane Poisson’s ratio 12;
ν21
in-plane Poisson’s ratio 21;
ω
angular frequency (rad/s);
ωh
angular frequency of human body (rad/s);
ωs
angular frequency of structure (rad/s); and
ωt
angular frequency of TVA (rad/s).

References

ACMA (American Composites Manufacturers Association). 2010. Pre standard for load and resistance factor design (LRFD) of pultruded fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) structures. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Ahmadi, E., C. Caprani, S. Živanović, and A. Heidarpour. 2018. “Vertical ground reaction forces on rigid and vibrating surfaces for vibration serviceability assessment of structures.” Eng. Struct. 172: 723–738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.06.059.
Ahmadi, E., C. Caprani, S. Živanović, and A. Heidarpour. 2019. “Assessment of human–structure interaction on a lively lightweight GFRP footbridge.” Eng. Struct. 199: 109687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109687.
APS. 2013. APS 400 ELECTRO-SEIS® - long stroke shaker with linear ball bearings. San Juan Capistrano, CA: APS Dynamics.
Bakis, C. E., L. C. Bank, V. L. Brown, E. Cosenza, J. F. Davalos, J. J. Lesko, A. Machida, S. H. Rizkalla, and T. C. Triantafillou. 2002. “Fiber-reinforced polymer composites for construction–state-of-the-art review.” J. Compos. Constr. 6 (2): 73–87. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2002)6:2(73).
Boniface, V., V. Bui, P. Bressolette, P. Charles, and X. Cespedes. 2006. Footbridges: Assessment of vibrational behaviour of footbridges under pedestrian loading. Paris: Service d’Études Techniques des Routes et Autoroutes.
Butz, C., et al. 2008. HIVOSS: Design of footbridges guideline. Research Fund for Coal and Steel. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
Casado, C. M., I. M. Díaz, J. de Sebastián, A. V. Poncela, and A. Lorenzana. 2013. “Implementation of passive and active vibration control on an in-service footbridge.” Struct. Control Health Monit. 20 (1): 70–87. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.v20.1.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2021a. Basis of structural and geotechnical design, Annex A.2. Applications for bridges. Draft prEN 1990:2021. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2021b. Actions on structures – Part 2: Traffic loads on bridges and other civil engineering works. Draft prEN 1991-2:2021. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2021c. Design of fibre-polymer composite structures. Draft prTS 19101:2021. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
Den Hartog, J. P. 1934. Mechanical vibrations. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Díaz, I. M., C. A. Gallegos-Calderón, J. Ramírez Senent, and C. M. C. Renedo. 2021. “Interaction phenomena to be accounted for human-induced vibration control of lightweight structures.” Front. Built Environ. 7: 49.
Dougill, J. W., J. R. Wright, J. G. Parkhouse, and R. E. Harrison. 2006. “Human structure interaction during rhythmic bobbing.” Struct. Eng. 84 (22): 32–39.
Duarte, E., and T. Ji. 2009. “Action of Individual Bouncing on Structures.” J. Struct. Eng. 135 (7): 818–827. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2009)135:7(818).
Fiberline Composites A/S. 2018. General design certification. Middelfart, Denmark: Fiberline Composites A/S.
Firth, I. 2002. “A tale of two bridges: The lockmeadow and halgavor bridges.” Inst. Struct. Eng. 80 (5): 26–32.
Fukada, S., Y. Kajikawa, I. Nishizaki, T. Kishima, and H. Hosonuma. 2011. “Vibration characteristics and serviceability of the FRP girder bridge.” In Proc., 2nd International MultiConference on Complexity, Informatics and Cybernetics. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.474.8257&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
Gallegos-Calderón, C., J. Naranjo-Pérez, I. M. Díaz, and J. M. Goicolea. 2021a. “Identification of a human–structure interaction model on an ultra-lightweight FRP footbridge.” Appl. Sci. 11 (14): 6654. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11146654.
Gallegos-Calderón, C., J. Naranjo-Pérez, M. D. G. Pulido, and I. M. Díaz. 2021b. “Design, construction and structural response of a lightweight FRP footbridge.” In Proc., IABSE Congress: Structural Engineering for Future Societal Needs, 2053–2061. https://doi.org/10.2749/ghent.2021.2053.
Hollaway, L. C. 2010. “A review of the present and future utilisation of FRP composites in the civil infrastructure with reference to their important in-service properties.” Constr. Build. Mater. 24 (12): 2419–2445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.04.062.
ISE (Institution of Structural Engineers). 2008. Dynamic performance requirements for permanent grandstands subject to crowd action: Recommendations for management, design and assessment. London: Institution of Structural Engineers.
ISO. 2007. Bases for design of structures - serviceability of buildings and walkways against vibrations. ISO 10137:2007. Geneva: ISO.
Jones, C. A., P. Reynolds, and A. Pavic. 2011. “Vibration serviceability of stadia structures subjected to dynamic crowd loads: A literature review.” J. Sound Vib. 330 (8): 1531–1566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2010.10.032.
Keller, T., Y. Bai, and T. Vallée. 2007. “Long-term performance of a glass fiber-reinforced polymer truss bridge.” J. Compos. Constr. 11 (1): 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2007)11:1(99).
Kim, Y. J. 2019. “State of the practice of FRP composites in highway bridges.” Eng. Struct. 179: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.10.067.
Kumada, T., S. Yamada, E. Johansen, and R. Wilson. 2009. “Static and dynamic behavior of a pultruded FRP truss footbridge.” In Proc., 2nd Official Int. Conf. of Int. Institute for FRP in Construction for Asia-Pacific Region, 355–361. https://www.iifc.org/proceedings/APFIS_2009/PAPER/T3B1.pdf.
Manalo, A., T. Aravinthan, A. Fam, and B. Benmokrane. 2017. “State-of-the-art review on FRP sandwich systems for lightweight civil infrastructure.” J. Compos. Constr. 21 (1): 16. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000729.
Mathworks. 2019a. MATLAB - Getting started guide. Matick.
Mathworks. 2019b. Simulation and model-based design - documentation. Matick.
Parkhouse, J. G., and D. J. Ewins. 2006. “Crowd-induced rhythmic loading.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Struct. Build. 159 (5): 247–259. https://doi.org/10.1680/stbu.2006.159.5.247.
Renedo, C. M., I. M. Díaz, J. M. Russell, and S. Živanovic. 2020. “Performance of inertial mass controllers for ultra-lightweight footbridges: A case study.” In Vol. 1 of Proc., XI Int. Conf. on Structural Dynamics EURODYN, 1741–1746. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
Russell, J., X. Wei, S. Živanović, and C. Kruger. 2020. “Vibration serviceability of a GFRP railway crossing due to pedestrians and train excitation.” Eng. Struct. 219: 110756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110756.
Shahabpoor, E., A. Pavic, and V. Racic. 2016. “Interaction between walking humans and structures in vertical direction: A literature review.” Shock Vib. 2016: 1–22.
Shave, J., S. Denton, and I. Frostick. 2010. “Design of the St Austell fibre-reinforced polymer Footbridge, UK.” Struct. Eng. Int. 20 (4): 427–429. https://doi.org/10.2749/101686610793557780.
Sika Services AG. 2017. Sikadur-330 data sheet. Zürich, Switzerland: Sika Services AG.
Silva, R., R. L. Pimentel, and A. Pavic. 2020. “Performance of biodynamic models to represent the action of a pedestrian in the vertical direction.” In Vol. 40 of Proc., XI Int. Conf. on Structural Dynamic, EURODYN, 1824–1834. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
Sobrino, J. A., and M. D. G. Pulido. 2002. “Towards advanced composite material footbridges.” Struct. Eng. Int. 12 (2): 84–86. https://doi.org/10.2749/101686602777965568.
Stratford, T. 2012. “The condition of the Aberfeldy Footbridge after 20 years in service.” In Proc., Structural Faults and Repair. https://www.research.ed.ac.uk/en/publications/the-condition-of-the-aberfeldy-footbridge-after-20-years-in-servi.
Triandafilou, L. N., and J. S. O’Connor. 2009. “FRP composites for bridge decks and superstructures: State of the practice in the US.” In Proc., Int. Conf. on Fiber Reinforced Polymer (FRP) Composites for Infrastructure Applications. Stockton, CA: University of the Pacific.
Van Nimmen, K., P. Verbeke, G. Lombaert, G. De Roeck, and P. Van den Broeck. 2016. “Numerical and experimental evaluation of the dynamic performance of a footbridge with tuned mass dampers.” J. Bridge Eng. 21 (8): C4016001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000815.
Votsis, R. A., T. J. Stratford, M. K. Chryssanthopoulos, and E. A. Tantele. 2017. “Dynamic assessment of a FRP suspension footbridge through field testing and finite element modelling.” Steel Compos. Struct. 23 (2): 205–215. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2017.23.2.205.
Wei, X., J. Russell, S. Živanović, J. T. Mottram. 2019. “Measured dynamic properties for FRP footbridges and their critical comparison against structures made of conventional construction materials.” Compos. Struct. 223: 110956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.110956.
Živanović, S., G. Feltrin, J. T. Mottram, and J. M. W. Brownjohn. 2014. Vibration performance of bridges made of fibre reinforced polymer. In Proc. IMAC-XXXII, 155–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9831-6.
Živanović, S., and A. Pavia. 2009. “Probabilistic assessment of human response to footbridge vibration.” J. Low Freq. Noise Vibr. Act. Control 28 (4): 255–268. https://doi.org/10.1260/0263-0923.28.4.255.
Zureick, A. H., R. M. Bennett, and B. R. Ellingwood. 2006. “Statistical characterization of fiber-reinforced polymer composite material properties for structural design.” J. Struct. Eng. 132 (8): 1320–1327. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2006)132:8(1320).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Composites for Construction
Journal of Composites for Construction
Volume 26Issue 6December 2022

History

Received: Apr 18, 2022
Accepted: Jul 31, 2022
Published online: Oct 5, 2022
Published in print: Dec 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Mar 5, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

E.T.S.I. Caminos, Canales y Puertos, Univ. Politécnica de Madrid, Calle Profesor Aranguren 3, 28040 Madrid, Spain (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0358-8810. Email: [email protected]
Javier Naranjo-Pérez
E.T.S. Ingeniería, Univ. de Sevilla, Camino de los Descubrimientos s/n, 41092 Seville, Spain; E.T.S.I. Caminos, Canales y Puertos, Univ. Politécnica de Madrid, Calle Profesor Aranguren 3, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Jaime H. García-Palacios
E.T.S.I. Caminos, Canales y Puertos, Univ. Politécnica de Madrid, Calle Profesor Aranguren 3, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
E.T.S.I. Caminos, Canales y Puertos, Univ. Politécnica de Madrid, Calle Profesor Aranguren 3, 28040 Madrid, Spain. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9283-5109

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share