Technical Papers
Jun 15, 2022

Large Rupture Strain FRP-Confined Concrete Columns of Different Sizes: Experiments and Stress–Strain Models

Publication: Journal of Composites for Construction
Volume 26, Issue 4

Abstract

Extensive experimental and theoretical studies of large rupture strain (LRS) fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP)-confined concrete columns have been conducted based on small-scale columns, mostly with a diameter of 150 mm. This paper presents the first-ever study on the axial performance of LRS polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and polyethylene naphthalate (PEN) FRP-confined large-scale concrete columns. Twenty PET FRP-confined circular concrete columns and 20 PEN FRP-confined square concrete columns were loaded concentrically. The cross-sectional diameter or side length ranged from 100 to 400 mm. The effects of specimen size and FRP volume ratio on the failure mode, axial stress–strain relationship, and dilation behavior were investigated. The load-carrying capacity and ductility of LRS FRP-confined concrete increased with an increase of the FRP volume ratio. As the specimen size increased, the confinement efficiency of the FRP decreased, resulting in a lower strength enhancement. The accuracy of existing size-dependent strength models was also evaluated using the residual error. Furthermore, a modified size-dependent model for LRS FRP-confined circular/square concrete columns was developed, which was shown to have a more satisfactory performance than the existing models. The proposed model can serve as a basic model for the seismic analysis of strengthened reinforced concrete (RC) columns with LRS FRP, with the possible size effect duly accounted.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All the data, models, or codes that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This research was jointly funded by the National Natural Science Fund of China (Grant Nos. 51778019 and 51978017) and Beijing Municipal Education Commission (Grant No. IDHT20190504). This support is gratefully acknowledged. The results and conclusions presented in the paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the view of the sponsors. The authors also sincerely thank Professor Togay Ozbakkaloglu for his valuable suggestions during the preparation of the experimental programs and the revisions of the article.

Notation

The following symbols are used in this paper:
B
empirical coefficient in size effect law;
b
cross-sectional side length;
C
intercept of the second branch of the tensile stress–strain curve on the stress axis;
D
cross-sectional diameter;
Deq
equivalent diameter of a noncircular section;
D0
the other empirical coefficient in size effect law;
da
maximum aggregate size;
Eco
elastic modulus of concrete;
Efrp1
elastic modulus of the first branch in the tensile stress–strain curve;
Efrp2
elastic modulus of the second branch;
Expe.
experimental result;
fcf
final axial stress of confined concrete;
fcf/fco,s
final strength enhancement ratio;
fco
standard cylindrical compressive strength of unconfined concrete;
fco,s
compressive strength of unconfined concrete considering the size effect;
fcu
ultimate axial stress of confined concrete considering the size effect;
fcu,150
ultimate strength of FRP-confined concrete with a diameter/side length of 150 mm;
fcu/fco,s
ultimate strength enhancement ratio;
ffrp
tensile strength of fibers;
fl
lateral confining pressure;
flf
confining stress of final condition;
flu,a
confining stress of ultimate condition;
H
height of specimen;
k1
strength enhancement coefficient;
k2
strain enhancement coefficient;
kɛ
strain reduction coefficient of FRP;
rc
corner radius;
tfrp
total nominal thickness of FRP fibers;
Theo.
theoretical result;
β
size effect weakening factor;
ɛc
axial strain of confined concrete;
ɛcf
final axial strain corresponding to fcf;
ɛcf/ɛco,s
final axial strain enhancement ratio;
ɛco
axial strain corresponding to fco;
ɛco,s
axial strain corresponding to fco,s;
ɛcu
ultimate axial strain corresponding to fcu;
ɛcu/ɛco,s
ultimate axial strain enhancement ratio;
ɛcu,150
ultimate axial strain corresponding to fcu,150;
ɛf
tensile strain of fibers;
ɛfrp
ultimate elongation of fibers;
ɛfrp0
strain at the intersection of the first branch and the second branch;
ɛh,f
FRP final hoop strain;
ɛh,rup
FRP hoop rupture strain;
ɛhc,f
FRP average final hoop strain of corners;
ɛhc,rup
FRP average hoop rupture strain of corners;
ɛhm,f
FRP average final hoop strain of midsection flat sides;
ɛhm,rup
FRP average hoop rupture strain of the midsection flat sides;
ɛl
FRP lateral strain;
σc
axial stress of confined concrete;
σf
tensile stress of fibers;
σNu
nominal stress;
ρf
FRP volume ratio;
ω
residual error; and
2rc/Deq
corner radius ratio.

References

ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2019. Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary. ACI 318R-19. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2017. Guide for the design and construction of externally bonded FRP systems for strengthening concrete structures. ACI 440.2R-17. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
Akogbe, R.-K., M. Liang, and Z.-M. Wu. 2011. “Size effect of axial compressive strength of CFRP confined concrete cylinders.” Int. J. Concr. Struct. 5 (1): 49–55.
ASTM. 2017. Standard test method for tensile properties of polymer matrix composite materials. ASTM D3039/D3039M-17. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2018. Standard test method for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete specimens. ASTM C39. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Bai, Y.-L., J.-G. Dai, M. Mohammadi, G. Lin, and S.-J. Mei. 2019. “Stiffness-based design-oriented compressive stress–strain model for large-rupture-strain (LRS) FRP-confined concrete.” Compos. Struct. 223: 110953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.110953.
Bai, Y.-L., J.-G. Dai, and J. G. Teng. 2014. “Cyclic compressive behavior of concrete confined with large rupture strain FRP composites.” J. Compos. Constr. 18 (1): 04013025. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000386.
Bai, Y.-L., J.-G. Dai, and J.-G. Teng. 2017. “Monotonic stress–strain behavior of steel rebars embedded in FRP-confined concrete including buckling.” J. Compos. Constr. 21 (5): 04017043. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000823.
Bai, Y.-L., S.-J. Mei, C.-W. Chan, and Q.-Q. Li. 2021. “Compressive behavior of large-size square PEN FRP-concrete-steel hybrid multi-tube concrete columns.” Eng. Struct. 246: 113017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113017.
Bažant, Z. P. 1984. “Size effect in blunt fracture: Concrete, rock, metal.” J. Eng. Mech. 110 (4): 518–535. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1984)110:4(518).
Bazant, Z. P., and J. Planas. 1997. Fracture and size effect in concrete and other quasibrittle materials. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Cao, Y., M. Liu, and Y.-F. Wu. 2020. “Effect of low strain rate on the axial behavior of concrete in CFRP-confined circular cylinders.” Constr. Build. Mater. 255: 119351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119351.
CEB-fib (International Federation for Structural Concrete). 2001. Externally bonded FRP reinforcement for RC structures, 1–138. fib Bulletin 14. Lausanne, Switzerland: CEB-fib.
Chen, G. M., J. J. Zhang, T. Jiang, C. J. Lin, and Y. H. He. 2018. “Compressive behavior of CFRP-confined recycled aggregate concrete in different-sized circular sections.” J. Compos. Constr. 22 (4): 04018021. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000859.
Chen, G., J. Zhang, Y. Wu, G. Lin, and T. Jiang. 2021. “Stress–strain behavior of FRP-confined recycled aggregate concrete in square columns of different sizes.” J. Compos. Constr. 25 (5): 04021040. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0001150.
Chen, J. F., S. Q. Li, and L. A. Bisby. 2013. “Factors affecting the ultimate condition of FRP-wrapped concrete columns.” J. Compos. Constr. 17 (1): 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000314.
Chen, Y., P. Visintin, and D. J. Oehlers. 2016. “Extracting size-dependent stress–strain relationships from FRP-confined concrete cylinders for varying diameters and heights.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 28 (5): 04015182. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001482.
CSA (Canadian Standard Association). 2002. Design and construction of building components with fibre-reinforced polymers. CSA S806-2002. Rexdale, ON: CSA.
Dai, J.-G., Y.-L. Bai, and J. G. Teng. 2011. “Behavior and modeling of concrete confined with FRP composites of large deformability.” J. Compos. Constr. 15 (6): 963–973. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000230.
Demir, C., K. Kolcu, and A. Ilki. 2010. “Effects of loading rate and duration on axial behavior of concrete confined by fiber-reinforced polymer sheets.” J. Compos. Constr. 14 (2): 146–151. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000054.
Elsanadedy, H. M., Y. A. Al-Salloum, S. H. Alsayed, and R. A. Iqbal. 2012. “Experimental and numerical investigation of size effects in FRP-wrapped concrete columns.” Constr. Build. Mater. 29: 56–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.10.025.
fib (International Federation for Structural Concrete). 2006. Retrofitting of concrete structures by externally bonded FRPs with emphasis on seismic application. Technical Rep. Bulletin 35. Lausanne, Switzerland: fib.
GB (Guobiao Standards). 2020. Technical standard for fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) in construction [S]. [In Chinese.] GB 50608-2020. Beijing: China Planning Press.
Han, Q., W. Yuan, Y. Bai, and X. Du. 2020a. “Compressive behavior of large rupture strain (LRS) FRP-confined square concrete columns: Experimental study and model evaluation.” Mater. Struct. 53 (4): 1–20.
Han, Q., W.-Y. Yuan, T. Ozbakkaloglu, Y.-L. Bai, and X.-L. Du. 2020b. “Compressive behavior for recycled aggregate concrete confined with recycled polyethylene naphthalate/terephthalate composites.” Constr. Build. Mater. 261: 120498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120498.
Huang, L., L. Chen, L. Yan, B. Kasal, Y. Jiang, and C. Liu. 2017. “Behavior of polyester FRP tube encased recycled aggregate concrete with recycled clay brick aggregate: Size and slenderness ratio effects.” Constr. Build. Mater. 154: 123–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.07.197.
Jamatia, R., and A. Deb. 2017. “Size effect in FRP-confined concrete under axial compression.” J. Compos. Constr. 21 (6): 04017045. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000825.
Jiang, C., Y.-F. Wu, and J.-F. Jiang. 2017. “Effect of aggregate size on stress–strain behavior of concrete confined by fiber composites.” Compos. Struct. 168: 851–862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.02.087.
Jin, L., X. Li, L. Fan, and X. Du. 2020. “Size effect on compressive strength of GFRP-confined concrete columns: Numerical simulation.” J. Compos. Constr. 24 (5): 04020038. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0001041.
Kim, J.-K. 1990. “Size effect in concrete specimens with dissimilar initial cracks.” Mag. Concr. Res. 42 (153): 233–238. https://doi.org/10.1680/macr.1990.42.153.233.
Kim, J.-K., S.-T. Yi, C.-K. Park, and S.-H. Eo. 1999. “Size effect on compressive strength of plain and spirally reinforced concrete cylinders.” Struct. J. 96 (1): 88–94.
Lam, L., and J. G. Teng. 2003. “Design-oriented stress–strain model for FRP-confined concrete.” Constr. Build. Mater. 17 (6–7): 471–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-0618(03)00045-X.
Liang, M., Z.-M. Wu, T. Ueda, J.-J. Zheng, and R. Akogbe. 2012. “Experiment and modeling on axial behavior of carbon fiber reinforced polymer confined concrete cylinders with different sizes.” J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 31 (6): 389–403. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731684412439347.
Long, Y. L., and J. Zhu. 2013. “Experimental study on axially-loaded concrete columns with various sizes confined by CFRP.” Appl. Mech. Mater. 405-408: 706–709. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.405-408.706.
Long, Y. L., and J. Zhu. 2014. “Experimental study on concrete columns with various sizes confined by BFRP and hybrid FRP under axial compression.” Adv. Mater. Res. 838: 407–411.
Ma, G., X. Chen, E. Biçici, C. Hou, and H. Sezen. 2021. “Effect of size and slenderness on the axial-compressive behavior of basalt FRP-confined predamaged concrete.” J. Compos. Constr. 25 (3): 04021012. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0001118.
Masia, M. J., T. N. Gale, and N. G. Shrive. 2004. “Size effects in axially loaded square-section concrete prisms strengthened using carbon fibre reinforced polymer wrapping.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 31 (1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1139/l03-064.
Owen, L. M. 1998. “Stress–strain behavior of concrete confined by carbon fiber jacketing.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Washington.
Ozbakkaloglu, T. 2013. “Compressive behavior of concrete-filled FRP tube columns: Assessment of critical column parameters.” Eng. Struct. 51: 188–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.01.017.
Ozbakkaloglu, T., J. C. Lim, and T. Vincent. 2013. “FRP-confined concrete in circular sections: Review and assessment of stress–strain models.” Eng. Struct. 49: 1068–1088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.06.010.
Pimanmas, A., and S. Saleem. 2019. “Evaluation of existing stress–strain models and modeling of PET FRP–confined concrete.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 31 (12): 04019303. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002941.
Popovics, S. 1973. “A numerical approach to the complete stress–strain curve of concrete.” Cem. Concr. Res. 3 (5): 583–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-8846(73)90096-3.
Saleem, S., Q. Hussain, and A. Pimanmas. 2017. “Compressive behavior of PET FRP–confined circular, square, and rectangular concrete columns.” J. Compos. Constr. 21 (3): 04016097. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000754.
Shan, B., F. C. Gui, G. Monti, and Y. Xiao. 2019. “Effectiveness of CFRP confinement and compressive strength of square concrete columns.” J. Compos. Constr. 23 (6): 04019043. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000967.
Silva, M. A., and C. C. Rodrigues. 2006. “Size and relative stiffness effects on compressive failure of concrete columns wrapped with glass FRP.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 18 (3): 334–342. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2006)18:3(334).
Sirach, N., S. Smith, T. Yu, and A. Mostafa. 2020. “Concrete columns confined with large rupture strain composites: An emerging field.” In Proc., 25th Australasian Conf. on Mechanics of Structures and Materials, edited by C. M. Wang, J. C. M. Ho, and S. Kitipornchai, 277–285. Singapore: Springer.
Sirach, N., S. T. Smith, T. Yu, and A. Mostafa. 2021. “Experimental study on the confinement of concrete cylinders with large rupture-strain FRP composites.” J. Compos. Constr. 25 (4): 04021026. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0001137.
Thériault, M., K. W. Neale, and S. Claude. 2004. “Fiber-reinforced polymer-confined circular concrete columns: Investigation of size and slenderness effects.” J. Compos. Constr. 8 (4): 323–331. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2004)8:4(323).
Tong, G., Y. Liu, and Q. Wu. 2009. “Size effect on square section column concrete confined with basalt fiber sheets.” [In Chinese.] Concrete 3: 6–8.
Toutanji, H., M. Han, J. Gilbert, and S. Matthys. 2010. “Behavior of large-scale rectangular columns confined with FRP composites.” J. Compos. Constr. 14 (1): 62–71. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000051.
Wang, D. Y., Z. Y. Wang, S. T. Smith, and T. Yu. 2016. “Size effect on axial stress–strain behavior of CFRP-confined square concrete columns.” Constr. Build. Mater. 118: 116–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.04.158.
Wang, Y.-f., and H.-l. Wu. 2011. “Size effect of concrete short columns confined with aramid FRP jackets.” J. Compos. Constr. 15 (4): 535–544. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000178.
Wang, Z., D. Wang, S. T. Smith, and D. Lu. 2012. “CFRP-confined square RC columns. I: Experimental investigation.” J. Compos. Constr. 16 (2): 150–160. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000245.
Wu, Y.-F., and Y.-Y. Wei. 2010. “Effect of cross-sectional aspect ratio on the strength of CFRP-confined rectangular concrete columns.” Eng. Struct. 32 (1): 32–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.08.012.
Yuan, W.-Y., Q. Han, and Y.-L. Bai. 2022a. “A unified stress–strain model for LRS FRP-confined concrete columns with square and circular cross-sections.” Eng. Struct. 255: 113900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.113900.
Yuan, W.-Y., Q. Han, Y.-L. Bai, X.-L. Du, and Q.-L. Liu. 2022b. “A unified confinement model of FRP-wrapped concrete cylinder.” [In Chinese.] China J. Highw. Transp. 35 (2): 146–158.
Yuan, W.-Y., Q. Han, Y.-L. Bai, X.-L. Du, and Z.-W. Yan. 2021. “Compressive behavior and modelling of engineered cementitious composite (ECC) confined with LRS FRP and conventional FRP.” Compos. Struct. 272: 114200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114200.
Zeng, J. J., G. Lin, J. G. Teng, and L. J. Li. 2018. “Behavior of large-scale FRP-confined rectangular RC columns under axial compression.” Eng. Struct. 174: 629–645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.07.086.
Zeng, J.-J., Y.-Y. Ye, W.-Y. Gao, S. T. Smith, and Y.-C. Guo. 2020. “Stress–strain behavior of polyethylene terephthalate fiber-reinforced polymer-confined normal-, high- and ultra high-strength concrete.” J. Build. Eng. 30: 101243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101243.
Zhou, J., F. Bi, Z. Wang, and J. Zhang. 2016. “Experimental investigation of size effect on mechanical properties of carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) confined concrete circular specimens.” Constr. Build. Mater. 127: 643–652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.10.039.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Composites for Construction
Journal of Composites for Construction
Volume 26Issue 4August 2022

History

Received: Sep 21, 2021
Accepted: Apr 5, 2022
Published online: Jun 15, 2022
Published in print: Aug 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Nov 15, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Wan-Ying Yuan [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, Key Laboratory of Urban Security and Disaster Engineering of Ministry of Education, Beijing Univ. of Technology, Beijing 100124, China. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Key Laboratory of Urban Security and Disaster Engineering of Ministry of Education, Beijing Univ. of Technology, Beijing 100124, China. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Key Laboratory of Urban Security and Disaster Engineering of Ministry of Education, Beijing Univ. of Technology, Beijing 100124, China (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1664-3065. Email: [email protected]
Si-Man Zhang [email protected]
Master’s Student, Key Laboratory of Urban Security and Disaster Engineering of Ministry of Education, Beijing Univ. of Technology, Beijing 100124, China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Cyclic Stress–Strain Behavior and Model for FRP-Confined Engineered Cementitious Composite, Journal of Composites for Construction, 10.1061/JCCOF2.CCENG-4177, 27, 4, (2023).
  • Effect of ultra-high lateral strain capability on the performance of damaged concrete strengthening with PET-FRP: Test and modeling, Construction and Building Materials, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128717, 350, (128717), (2022).
  • Size effect on compressive behavior of FRP-confined engineered cementitious composites (ECC), Construction and Building Materials, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128610, 348, (128610), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share