Mesh-Independent Framework for the Bidimensional Analysis of CFRP–Concrete Debonding Shear Tests with Discrete Fracture
Publication: Journal of Composites for Construction
Volume 26, Issue 3
Abstract
The performance of concrete structures strengthened with carbon fiber–reinforced polymer (CFRP) systems can depend heavily on the bond strength of the interface between the concrete and the reinforced polymer. Even though experimental testing can be used to derive suitable constitutive models, their interpretation and analysis is often limited by the reliability of available numerical/analytical models. The debonding in shear tests can be controlled by the highly nonlinear interaction of the bonded interface with the microcracks developing in the substrate. This process cannot be efficiently predicted by simplifying assumptions, which is why robust models accounting for those features, while relying only on material parameters that can be easily measured and interpreted, need to be developed. This paper introduces a framework for developing such models based on the discrete representation of fracture that can be easily deployed into existing finite-element codes. The substrate bond failure, in addition to the interface bond failure and any combination thereof, are automatically accounted for, and the cracks are not prespecified to the underlying finite-element mesh, which means that the results are mesh-insensitive and discretization-independent. A validation of the proposed framework was performed using modified double-shear bond tests between CFRP and concrete. An in-depth analysis was carried out to assess the influence of bond length and CFRP reinforcement area on the debonding behavior and ductility of the connection.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
F.M. Mukhtar acknowledges the support of King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals. D. Dias-da-Costa acknowledges the Sydney Research Accelerator (SOAR) program of the University of Sydney in support of mid-career researchers.
Notation
The following symbols are used in this paper:
- Af
- cross-sectional; area of CFRP strip;
- Af,Ref.
- cross-sectional; area of reference CFRP strip with a width of 50 mm;
- total displacement vector at the nodes of an element;
- regular displacement vector at the nodes of an element;
- strain-displacement matrix of an element;
- body forces;
- bc
- width of concrete block;
- bf
- CFRP width;
- constitutive matrix of an element;
- d(·)
- incremental variation of (·);
- dσe
- incremental stress within an element;
- dΓ
- boundary of the discontinuity;
- dΩ
- boundary of a cracked body;
- ft
- concrete tensile strength;
- regular external vector force at the regular nodes;
- enhanced external vector force at the regular nodes;
- external vector force at the additional nodes;
- Gf
- concrete fracture energy;
- diagonal matrix containing the Heaviside function at each degree of freedom;
- Heaviside function;
- stiffness matrix of a standard finite element;
- enhanced bulk stiffness matrices;
- penalty matrix;
- lb
- bonded length of CFRP strip;
- bonded length of reference CFRP strip with a width of 50 mm;
- length of the discontinuity inside an element;
- lu
- unbonded bond length of CFRP strip;
- rigid body movement matrix composed by evaluating Mwek at each node of the element;
- rigid body movement matrix for node k of the element;
- shape function matrix for the openings of the crack;
- unit vector normal to the discontinuity;
- s
- bond−slip at the loaded end of the FRP strip;
- s0
- slip factor dependent on βw and ft;
- smax
- slip corresponding to complete debonding;
- slip corresponding to the maximum bond shear stress;
- constitutive matrix for the discontinuity;
- total traction vetor;
- traction vector within an element;
- tf
- thickness of CFRP strip;
- continuous displacement field approximation within Ω;
- total displacement field approximation;
- enhanced displacement field;
- regular displacement field;
- jump in u;
- nodal jump vector associated with the discontinuity opening;
- (xi, yi)
- coordinates of the reference node of the discontinuity;
- (xk, yk)
- coordinates of the regular node;
- factor dependent on Gf, s0, and τmax;
- α1
- factor with a value of 1.5;
- βe
- angle of the discontinuity inside an element;
- βw
- width factor accounting for the out−of−plane stresses in 2D versus 3D models;
- δ(·)
- virtual variation in (·);
- Dirac delta function along the discontinuity;
- ɛ
- total strain in the body;
- total strain field corresponding to the continuous part of the displacement;
- strain field within an element;
- τ
- FRP–concrete interfacial bond shear stress;
- τmax
- maximum bond shear stress at debonding initiation;
- Γd
- crack discontinuity;
- crack discontinuity belonging to an element;
- crack/traction boundary;
- Ω
- domain of cracked body;
- Ωe
- domain of an element in the mesh;
- (· · ·)+
- quantity pertaining to the first (+) subdomain resulting from the Γd split;
- (· · ·)−
- quantity pertaining to the second (−) subdomain resulting from the Γd split;
- (·)
- single contraction;
- (:)
- double contraction;
- (· · ·)s
- symmetric part of (· · ·);
- [[· · ·]]
- a jump in a quantity between the first (+) and second (−) split subdomains;
- ∇(· · ·)
- gradient of a scalar − valued differentiable function (· · ·); and
- ⊗
- dyadic product.
References
ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2008. Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary. ACI 318-08. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
Alfaiate, J., G. N. Wells, and L. J. Sluys. 2002. “On the use of embedded discontinuity elements with crack path continuity for mode-I and mixed-mode fracture.” Eng. Fract. Mech. 69 (6): 661–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7944(01)00108-4.
An, F. C., W. Liu, and B. Fu. 2019. “A predictive 2D finite element model for modelling FRP-to-concrete bond behavior.” Compos. Struct. 226: 111189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111189.
Benvenuti, E., and N. Orlando. 2018. “Intermediate flexural detachment in FRP-plated concrete beams through a 3D mechanism-based regularized extended finite element method.” Composites, Part B 145: 281–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.03.012.
Camata, G., E. Spacone, R. Al-Mahaidi, and V. Saouma. 2004. “Analysis of test specimens for cohesive near-bond failure of fiber-reinforced polymer-plated concrete.” J. Compos. Constr. 8 (6): 528–538. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2004)8:6(528).
Chen, G. M., J. G. Teng, and J. F. Chen. 2011. “Finite-element modeling of intermediate crack debonding in FRP-plated RC beams.” J. Compos. Constr. 15 (3): 339–353. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000157.
Coronado, C. A., and M. M. Lopez. 2007. “Damage approach for the prediction of debonding failure on concrete elements strengthened with FRP.” J. Compos. Constr. 11 (4): 391–400. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2007)11:4(391).
Coronado, C. A., and M. M. Lopez. 2008. “Experimental characterization of concrete-epoxy interfaces.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 20 (4): 303–312. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2008)20:4(303).
Diab, H., and Z. Wu. 2007. “Nonlinear constitutive model for time-dependent behavior of FRP-concrete interface.” Compos. Sci. Technol. 67 (11–12): 2323–2333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.01.018.
Dias-da-Costa, D., J. Alfaiate, L. J. Sluys, and E. N. B. S. Júlio. 2009. “A discrete strong discontinuity approach.” Eng. Fract. Mech. 76 (9): 1176–1201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2009.01.011.
Dias-da-Costa, D., V. Cervenka, and R. Graça-e-Costa. 2018a. “Model uncertainty in discrete and smeared crack prediction in RC beams under flexural loads.” Eng. Fract. Mech. 199: 532–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.06.006.
Dias-da-Costa, D., R. Graça-e-Costa, G. Ranzi, and S. T. Smith. 2018b. “Assessment of the behavior of FRP-strengthened RC slabs using a discrete crack model.” J. Compos. Constr. 22 (6): 04018045. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000881.
Graça-e-Costa, R., J. Alfaiate, D. Dias-da-Costa, and L. J. Sluys. 2012. “A non-iterative approach for the modelling of quasi-brittle materials.” Int. J. Fract. 178 (1-2): 281–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-012-9768-1.
Haddad, R. H., R. Al-Rousan, and A. Almasry. 2013. “Bond-slip behavior between carbon fiber reinforced polymer sheets and heat-damaged concrete.” Composites, Part B 45 (1): 1049–1060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.09.010.
Li, W., P. Huang, Z. Chen, and X. Zheng. 2021. “Testing method of critical energy release rate for interfacial mode II crack.” Eng. Fract. Mech. 248: 107708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.107708.
Lu, X., M. Ridha, V. B. C. Tan, and T. E. Tay. 2019. “Adaptive discrete-smeared crack (A-DiSC) model for multi-scale progressive damage in composites.” Composites, Part A 125: 105513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.105513.
Lu, X. Z., J. G. Teng, L. P. Ye, and J. J. Jiang. 2005a. “Bond–slip models for FRP sheets/plates bonded to concrete.” Eng. Struct. 27 (6): 920–937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.01.014.
Lu, X. Z., L. P. Ye, J. G. Teng, and J. J. Jiang. 2005b. “Meso-scale finite element model for FRP sheets/plates bonded to concrete.” Eng. Struct. 27 (4): 564–575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.11.015.
Mazzotti, C., M. Savoia, and B. Ferracuti. 2005. “A new set-up for FRP-concrete stable delamination test.” In Proc., 7th Int. Symp. of the Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Reinforcement for Reinforced Concrete Structures, 230, 165–180. Kansas City, MO: ACI Symposium Publication.
McSweeney, B. M., and M. M. Lopez. 2005. “FRP-concrete bond behavior: A parametric study through pull-off testing.” In Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Reinforcement for Reinforced Concrete Structures, 230, 441–460. Kansas City, Missouri, MO: ACI Symposium Publication.
Mukhtar, F. M. 2019. “Customized shear test for bond-slip characterization of EBR FRP-concrete system: Influence of substrate aggregate type.” Composites, Part B 163: 606–621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.150.
Mukhtar, F. M., and R. M. Faysal. 2018. “A review of test methods for studying the FRP-concrete interfacial bond behavior.” Constr. Build. Mater. 169: 877–887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.163.
Mukhtar, F. M., and A. Peiris. 2021. “FRP-concrete bond performance under accelerated hygrothermal conditions.” Constr. Build. Mater. 270: 121403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121403.
Mukhtar, F. M., and M. E. Shehadah. 2021a. “Experimental verification of 2- and 3-D numerical models for bond-slip behavior of CFRP-concrete.” Constr. Build. Mater. 287: 122814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122814.
Mukhtar, F. M., and M. E. Shehadah. 2021b. “Shear behavior of flexural CFRP-strengthened RC beams with crack-induced delamination: Experimental investigation and strength model.” Compos. Struct. 268: 113894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113894.
Nakaba, K., T. Kanakubo, T. Furuta, and H. Yoshizawa. 2001. “Bond behavior between fiber-reinforced polymer laminates and concrete.” ACI Struct. J. 98 (3): 359–367. https://doi.org/10.14359/10224.
Pham, H. B., R. Al-Mahaidi, and V. Saouma. 2006. “Modelling of CFRP–concrete bond using smeared and discrete cracks.” Compos. Struct. 75 (1–4): 145–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.04.039.
Rots, J. G., and S. Invernizzi. 2004. “Regularized sequentially linear saw-tooth softening model.” Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 28 (7–8): 821–856. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.371.
Salomoni, V., G. Mazzucco, C. Pellegrino, and C. Majorana. 2011. “Three-dimensional modelling of bond behaviour between concrete and FRP reinforcement.” Eng. Comput. 28 (1): 5–29. https://doi.org/10.1108/02644401111096993.
Serbescu, A., M. Guadagnini, and K. Pilakoutas. 2013. “Standardised double-shear test for determining bond of FRP to concrete and corresponding model development.” Composites, Part B 55: 277–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.06.019.
Shadravan, B., and F. M. Tehrani. 2017. “A review of direct shear testing configurations for bond between fibre-reinforced polymer sheets on concrete and masonry substrates.” Period. Polytech., Civ. Eng. 61 (4): 740–751. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPci.9090.
Tao, Y., and J. F. Chen. 2015. “Concrete damage plasticity model for modeling FRP-to-concrete bond behavior.” J. Compos. Constr. 19 (1): 04014026. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000482.
Wells, G. N. 2001. “Discontinuous modelling of strain localisation and failure.” Ph.D. thesis, Faculty of Aerospace Engineering/Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft Univ. of Technology.
Wells, G. N., and L. J. Sluys. 2001. “Three-dimensional embedded discontinuity model for brittle fracture.” Int. J. Solids Struct. 38 (5): 897–913. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7683(00)00029-9.
Wu, Y., Z. Zhou, Q. Yang, and W. Chen. 2010. “On shear bond strength of FRP-concrete structures.” Eng. Struct. 32 (3): 897–905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.12.017.
Zhang, P., H. Zhu, G. Wu, S. P. Meng, and Z. S. Wu. 2016. “Shear capacity comparison of four different composite interfaces between FRP plates and concrete substrate.” J. Compos. Constr. 20 (4): 04016006. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000666.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2022 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jul 13, 2021
Accepted: Jan 19, 2022
Published online: Mar 28, 2022
Published in print: Jun 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Aug 28, 2022
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
Cited by
- Yushi Yin, Jun Zhang, Guanhua Zhang, Effect of hygrothermal acid rain environment on the shear bonding performance of CFRP-concrete interface, Construction and Building Materials, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.130002, 364, (130002), (2023).