Technical Papers
Feb 14, 2022

Textile-Reinforced Mortar Strengthening of Masonry Piers Containing Industrial Waste Coal Gangue Sintered Bricks

Publication: Journal of Composites for Construction
Volume 26, Issue 2

Abstract

The diffusion and adoption of coal gangue sintered bricks can effectively relieve the negative impact of coal gangue on the ecological environment. In China, this type of brick has been widely used for the construction of masonry structures. Existing masonry structures that use these types of bricks can experience severe problems related to safety, and strengthening by textile-reinforced mortar (TRM) is a valid measure for improving their performance. In this paper, the compressive performance of TRM-confined coal gangue sintered brick masonry piers was experimentally investigated. The influences of the number of textile layers, textile types (carbon and basalt), and additional FRP confinement at the upper and lower ends of the specimens on the compressive performance were mainly considered. The failure mode and increased effectiveness of the compressive strength, ultimate strain, and energy dissipation after TRM confinement were discussed. An existing model was also used to analyze the compressive strength. The results indicated that the compressive behavior of gangue sintered brick masonry piers could be significantly improved after TRM confinement, and the existing equation demonstrated relatively good prediction ability.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the Six Talent Peaks Project in Jiangsu Province (JZ-029) and the Science Research Project of Inner Mongolia University of Technology (ZZ202116). Lei Jing acknowledges the support from the China Scholarship Council and the University of Western Australia for hosting his visiting research.

Notation

The following symbols are used in this paper:
b
length of the masonry pier cross section, mm;
D
length of the diagonal for square or rectangular cross sections, mm;
E
stiffness of the masonry pier specimens, MPa;
Ea
energy dissipation capacity of the masonry pier specimens, J;
Ef
Young’s modulus of the textiles, MPa;
fc,mat
compressive strength of the TRM matrix, MPa;
fl,eff
effective confined pressure provided by the external TRM confinement layer, MPa;
fmax
peak compressive strength of the masonry pier specimens, MPa;
fmc
compression strength of the confined masonry piers, MPa;
fmo
compression strength of the unconfined masonry piers, MPa;
gm
mass density of the masonry, kg/m3;
h
width of the masonry pier cross section, mm;
k
effectiveness action coefficient of the external TRM;
kmat
effective confinement coefficient of the TRM matrix;
ke
ratio of the effectively confined area;
n
number of textile layers;
rc
circular radius of the masonry pier, mm;
tf
equivalent thickness of the textiles, mm;
tmat
thickness of the TRM matrix; mm;
ɛfd
calculated tensile strain of the textiles, mm/mm;
ɛfu
ultimate tensile strain of the textiles, mm/mm;
ɛu
ultimate strain of the masonry pier specimens mm/mm;
ηa
environmental conversion factor; and
ρmat
geometrical percentage of the applied matrix in TRM.

References

Alecci, V., M. De Stefano, R. Luciano, L. Rovero, and G. Stipo. 2016. “Experimental investigation on bond behavior of cement-matrix-based composites for strengthening of masonry structures.” J. Compos. Constr. 20 (1): 04015041. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000598.
Askouni, P. D., and C. G. Papanicolaou. 2017. “Experimental investigation of bond between glass textile reinforced mortar overlays and masonry: The effect of bond length.” Mater. Struct. 50 (2): 164. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-017-1033-7.
ASTM. 2016. Standard test method for compressive strength of masonry prisms. ASTM C1314. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Babaeidarabad, S., F. De Caso, and A. Nanni. 2014a. “URM walls strengthened with fabric-reinforced cementitious matrix composite subjected to diagonal compression.” J. Compos. Constr. 18 (2): 04013045. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000441.
Babaeidarabad, S., F. De Caso, and A. Nanni. 2014b. “Out-of-plane behavior of URM walls strengthened with fabric-reinforced cementitious matrix composite.” J. Compos. Constr. 18 (4): 04013057. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000457.
Bui, T. L., A. Si Larbi, N. Reboul, and E. Ferrier. 2015. “Shear behaviour of masonry walls strengthened by external bonded FRP and TRC.” Compos. Struct. 132: 923–932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.06.057.
Caggegi, C., F. G. Carozzi, S. De Santis, F. Fabbrocino, F. Focacci, L. Hojdys, E. Lanoye, and L. Zuccarino. 2017. “Experimental analysis on tensile and bond properties of PBO and aramid fabric reinforced cementitious matrix for strengthening masonry structures.” Composites, Part B 127: 175–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.05.048.
Carloni, C., C. Mazzotti, M. Savoia, and K. V. Subramaniam. 2014. “Confinement of masonry columns with PBO FRCM composites.” Key Eng. Mater. 624: 644–651. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.624.644.
Carozzi, F. G., et al. 2017. “Experimental investigation of tensile and bond properties of carbon-FRCM composites for strengthening masonry elements.” Composites, Part B 128: 100–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.06.018.
Carozzi, F. G., C. Poggi, E. Bertolesi, and G. Milani. 2018. “Ancient masonry arches and vaults strengthened with TRM, SRG and FRP composites: Experimental evaluation.” Compos. Struct. 187: 466–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.12.075.
Cascardi, A., F. Longo, F. Micelli, and M. A. Aiello. 2017. “Compressive strength of confined column with fiber reinforced mortar (FRM): New design-oriented-models.” Constr. Build. Mater. 156: 387–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.004.
Cascardi, A., M. A. Aiello, and T. Triantafillou. 2017. “Analysis-oriented model for concrete and masonry confined with fiber reinforced mortar.” Mater. Struct. 50 (4): 202. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-017-1072-0.
Cascardi, A., F. Micelli, and M. A. Aiello. 2018. “FRCM-confined masonry columns: Experimental investigation on the effect of the inorganic matrix properties.” Constr. Build. Mater. 186: 811–825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.020.
CNR (Consiglio Nazionale Delle Ricerche). 2018. “Istruzioni per la Progettazione, l'Esecuzione ed il Controllo di Interventi di Consolidamento Statico mediante l'utilizzo di Compositi Fibrorinforzati a Matrice Inorganica.” CNR-DT 215. Accessed October 10, 2020. https://www.cnr.it/it/node/9347.
De Santis, S., F. Ceroni, G. de Felice, M. Fagone, B. Ghiassi, A. Kwiecień, G. P. Lignola, M. Morganti, M. Santandrea, et al. 2017. “Round robin test on tensile and bond behaviour of steel reinforced grout systems.” Composites, Part B 127: 100–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.03.052.
De Santis, S., F. Roscini, and G. de Felice. 2018. “Full-scale tests on masonry vaults strengthened with steel reinforced grout.” Composites, Part B 141: 20–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.12.023.
Di Ludovico, M., C. D’Ambra, A. Prota, and G. Manfredi. 2010. “FRP confinement of tuff and clay brick columns: Experimental study and assessment of analytical models.” J. Compos. Constr. 14 (5): 583–596. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000113.
Dizhur, D., S. Bailey, M. Griffith, and J. Ingham. 2015. “Earthquake performance of two vintage URM buildings retrofitted using surface bonded GFRP: Case study.” J. Compos. Constr. 19 (5): 05015001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000561.
Fossetti, M., and G. Minafò. 2017. “Comparative experimental analysis on the compressive behaviour of masonry columns strengthened by FRP, BFRCM or steel wires.” Composites, Part B 112: 112–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.12.048.
Garmendia, L., P. Larrinaga, R. San-Mateos, and J. T. San-Jose. 2015. “Strengthening masonry vaults with organic and inorganic composites: An experimental approach.” Mater. Des. 85: 102–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.06.150.
Giamundo, V., G. P. Lignola, G. Maddaloni, A. Balsam, A. Prota, and G. Manfredi. 2015 “Experimental investigation of the seismic performances of IMG reinforcement on curved masonry elements.” Composites, Part B 70: 53–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.10.039.
Guo, T., W. Xu, L. Song, and L. Wei. 2014. “Seismic-isolation retrofits of school buildings: Practice in China after recent devastating earthquakes.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 28 (1): 96–107. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000411.
Incerti, A., A. Vasiliu, B. Ferracuti, and C. Mazzotti. 2015. “Uniaxial compressive tests on masonry columns confined by FRP and FRCM.” In Proc., 12th Int. Symp. on Fiber Reinforced Polymers for Reinforced Concrete Structures and the 5th Asia-Pacific Conf. on Fiber Reinforced Polymers in Structures. Nanjing, China.
Kouris, L. A. S., and T. C. Triantafillou. 2018. “State-of-the-art on strengthening of masonry structures with textile reinforced mortar (TRM).” Constr. Build. Mater. 188: 1221–1233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.039.
Leone, M., et al. 2017. “Glass fabric reinforced cementitious matrix: Tensile properties and bond performance on masonry substrate.” Composites, Part B 127: 196–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.06.028.
Li, J., and J. Wang. 2019. “Comprehensive utilization and environmental risks of coal gangue: A review.” J. Cleaner Prod. 239: 117946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117946.
Lignola, G. P., et al. 2017. “Performance assessment of basalt FRCM for retrofit applications on masonry.” Composites, Part B 128 (128): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.05.003.
Mahmood, H., and J. M. Ingham. 2011. “Diagonal compression testing of FRP-retrofitted unreinforced clay brick masonry wallettes.” J. Compos. Constr. 15 (5): 810–820. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000209.
Maras, M. M., and H. C. Kilinc. 2016. “Comparison on repair and strengthening techniques for unreinforced masonry structures.” J. Eng. Res. Appl. 6 (11): 1–5.
Marcari, G., M. Basili, and F. Vestroni. 2017. “Experimental investigation of tuff masonry panels reinforced with surface bonded basalt textile-reinforced mortar.” Composites, Part B 108: 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.09.094.
Maddaloni, G., A. Cascardi, A. Balsamo, M. Di Ludovico, F. Micelli, M. A. Aiello, and A. Prota. 2017. “Confinement of full-scale masonry columns with FRCM systems.” Key Eng. Mater. 747: 374–381. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.747.374.
Wang, J., C. Wan, Q. Zeng, L. Shen, and M. A. Malik. 2020. “Effect of eccentricity on retrofitting efficiency of basalt textile reinforced concrete on partially damaged masonry columns.” Compos. Struct. 232: 111585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111585.
Mezrea, P. E., I. A. Yilmaz, M. Ispir, E. Binbir, I. E. Bal, and A. Ilki. 2017. “External jacketing of unreinforced historical masonry piers with open-grid basalt-reinforced mortar.” J. Compos. Constr. 21 (3): 04016110. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000770.
Minafò, G., and L. La Mendola. 2018. “Experimental investigation on the effect of mortar grade on the compressive behaviour of FRCM confined masonry columns.” Composites, Part B 146: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.03.033.
Minafò, G., M. C. Oddo, C. Cucchiara, and L. La Mendola. 2020. “Effect of corner over-reinforcing strips on the compressive behaviour of TRM confined masonry columns.” Mater. Struct. 53 (4): 97. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-020-01533-5.
National Standard of the People’s Republic of China. 2011. Code for design of strengthening masonry structures (GB 50702-2011). [In Chinese.] Beijing: China Architecture and Building Press.
Ombres, L., N. Mancuso, S. Mazzuca, and S. Verre. 2019. “Bond between carbon fabric-reinforced cementitious matrix and masonry substrate.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 31 (1): 04018356. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002561.
Papanicolaou, C. G., T. C. Triantafillou, M. Papathanasiou, and K. Karlos. 2007. “Textile reinforced mortar (TRM) versus FRP as strengthening material of URM walls: Out-of-plane cyclic loading.” Mater. Struct. 41 (1): 143–157. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-007-9226-0.
Parisi, F., I. Iovinella, A. Balsamo, N. Augenti, and A. Prota. 2013. “In-plane behaviour of tuff masonry strengthened with inorganic matrix-grid composites.” Composites, Part B 45 (1): 1657–1666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.09.068.
Prota, A., G. Marcari, G. Fabbrocino, G. Manfredi, and C. Aldea. 2006. “Experimental in-plane behavior of tuff masonry strengthened with cementitious matrix–grid composites.” J. Compos. Constr. 10 (3): 223–233. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2006)10:3(223).
Ramaglia, G., G. P. Lignola, A. Balsamo, A. Prota, and G. Manfredi. 2017. “Seismic strengthening of masonry vaults with abutments using textile-reinforced mortar.” J. Compos. Constr. 21 (2): 04016079. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000733.
Sagar, S. L., V. Singhal, D. C. Rai, and P. Gudur. 2017. “Diagonal shear and out-of-plane flexural strength of fabric-reinforced cementitious matrix–strengthened masonry walletes.” J. Compos. Constr. 21 (4): 04017016. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000796.
Sun, B., H. Zhao, and P. Yan. 2017. “The influence of construction measurement and structure storey on seismic performance of masonry structure.” IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environ. Sci. 81: 012135. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/81/1/012135.
Tan, W. F., L. A. Wang, and C. Huang. 2016. “Environmental effects of coal gangue and its utilization.” Energy Sources A: Recovery Util. Environ. Eff. 38 (24): 3716–3721. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2012.700997.
Theofanis, K. D. 2019. “Experimental study on carbon fiber textile reinforced mortar system as a means for confinement of masonry columns.” Constr. Build. Mater. 208: 723–733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.033.
Valluzzi, M. R., C. Modena, and G. de Felice. 2014. “Current practice and open issues in strengthening historical buildings with composites.” Mater. Struct. 47 (12): 1971–1985. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-014-0359-7.
Wang, J., Q. Qin, S. Hu, and K. Wu. 2016. “A concrete material with waste coal gangue and fly ash used for farmland drainage in high groundwater level areas.” J. Cleaner Prod. 112: 631–638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.138.
Wu, J., G. L. Bai, P. Wang, and Y. Liu. 2018. “Mechanical properties of a new type of block made from shale and coal gangue.” Constr. Build. Mater. 190: 796–804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.130.
Xu, H., W. Song, W. Cao, G. Shao, H. Lu, D. Yang, D. Chen, and R. Zhang. 2017. “Utilization of coal gangue for the production of brick.” J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manage. 19 (3): 1270–1278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-016-0521-0.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Composites for Construction
Journal of Composites for Construction
Volume 26Issue 2April 2022

History

Received: Jun 1, 2021
Accepted: Dec 21, 2021
Published online: Feb 14, 2022
Published in print: Apr 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Jul 14, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Lei Jing, Ph.D. [email protected]
Senior Lecturer, School of Civil Engineering, Inner Mongolia Univ. of Technology, Hohhot 010051, China; Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Environmental Impact and Structural Safety in Engineering, China Univ. of Mining and Technology, Jiangsu, Xuzhou 221116, China. Email: [email protected]
Shi-ping Yin, Ph.D. [email protected]
Professor, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Environmental Impact and Structural Safety in Engineering, China Univ. of Mining and Technology, Jiangsu, Xuzhou 221116, China (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Senior Lecturer, Materials and Structures Innovation Group, School of Engineering, Univ. of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6009, Australia. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7640-711X. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Experimental Study on Preparation of Dry-Mixed Mortar from Coal Gangue, Coatings, 10.3390/coatings13030518, 13, 3, (518), (2023).
  • Post-earthquake damage assessments of unreinforced masonry (URM) buildings by shake table test and numerical visualization, Engineering Failure Analysis, 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106858, 143, (106858), (2023).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share