Abstract

The seismic behavior of fiber-reinforced polymer-reinforced concrete (FRP-RC) columns is far from being fully explored. Therefore, numerical and analytical studies were performed to address the effects of different parameters and evaluate the current design provisions for confinement reinforcement under seismic loading. Using a commercially available software package, a three-dimensional nonlinear finite-element model (FEM) was constructed and validated against the experimental results of full-scale glass FRP (GFRP)-RC circular columns previously tested by the authors. The validated FEM was, then, used to conduct an extensive parametric study investigating the effect of concrete compressive strength, spiral pitch, axial load level, and column aspect ratio (i.e., shear span-to-depth ratio). It was found that increasing the concrete strength caused an increase in lateral load capacity and initial stiffness, whereas the drift capacity decreased. The latter property was also significantly affected by the variation of spiral pitch and axial load level. On the other hand, the aspect ratio had a marginal effect on moment or drift capacities. Using the results of the FEMs, two new design models were proposed. The proposed models showed remarkably better predictions than the equation adopted by the Canadian standard for the design of FRP-RC structures.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors express their sincere appreciation to the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) and the Manitoba Graduate Scholarship (MGS) for financial support.

Notation

The following symbols are used in this paper:
Ac
cross-sectional area of column core;
Ag
gross cross-sectional area of the column;
Ash
required area of confinement reinforcement;
cts
tension stiffening factor;
D
column diameter;
ds
nominal cross-sectional diameter of the hoop;
Ec
elastic modulus of concrete in compression;
EEXP
experimental total energy dissipation;
EFEM
total energy dissipation estimated by FEM;
Ef
elastic modulus of FRP reinforcement in tension;
fc
specified concrete compressive strength;
fFh
design stress level in FRP confinement reinforcement;
fFu
ultimate strength of the GFRP reinforcement;
ft-cr
tensile stress at the crack location;
ft
tensile strength of concrete;
GF
specific fracture energy of concrete;
hc
cross-sectional dimension of column core;
KEXP
experimental initial stiffness;
KFEM
initial stiffness estimated by FEM;
KP
proposed coefficient that denotes the synergistic effect of axial load level and the concrete strength;
Kn
normal shear crack stiffness of cracked concrete;
Ks
proposed coefficient combining the effects of spiral pitch and concrete compressive strength;
Kt
tangential shear crack stiffness of cracked concrete;
kc
confinement efficiency coefficient;
L
column shear span;
P
axial load applied to the column;
Po
nominal unconfined axial capacity of the column;
rclim
reduction factor of compressive strength;
SF
shear factor coefficient of concrete;
s
spiral pitch;
wd
critical compressive displacement of concrete;
VEXP
experimental lateral load capacity in pushing direction;
VFEM
lateral load capacity in pushing direction as estimated by FEM;
V′EXP
experimental lateral load capacity in pulling direction;
V′FEM
lateral load capacity in pulling direction as estimated by FEM;
wcr
crack width;
β
multiplier for the specific flow direction;
Δ
lateral displacement at the column tip;
δ
design drift ratio;
δCSA
failure drift estimated as per CSA S806-12 (CSA 2017);
δEXP
experimental failure drift;
δFEM
failure drift estimated by FEM;
δI
failure drift estimated using Model I [Eq. (6)];
δII
failure drift estimated using Model II [Eqs. (9) or (10), as appropriate];
ɛcp
plastic strain at compressive strength;
ɛzz
plastic strain of concrete in the longitudinal direction of the column;
µ
Poisson's ratio;
ρ
specific material weight;
ρf
GFRP longitudinal reinforcement ratio; and
ϕf
material resistance factor for FRP reinforcement, taken equal to unity.

References

AASHTO (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials). 2018. AASHTO LRFD bridge design guide specifications for GFRP–reinforced concrete. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Abdallah, A. E. M., and E. El-Salakawy. 2021a. “Confinement properties of GFRP-reinforced concrete circular columns under simulated seismic loading.” J. Compos. Constr. 25 (2): 04020088. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0001108.
Abdallah, A. E., and E. F. El-Salakawy. 2021b. “Seismic behavior of HSC circular columns reinforced with GFRP bars.” ACI Struct. J. 118 (5): 221–234.
ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2015. Guide for the design and construction of structural concrete reinforced with fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) bars. ACI 440.1R-15. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2019. Acceptance criteria for moment frames based on structural testing and commentary. ACI 374.1-05 (R2019). Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
Ali, M. A., and E. El-Salakawy. 2016. “Seismic performance of GFRP-reinforced concrete rectangular columns.” J. Compos. Constr. 20 (3): 04015074. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000637.
Alnajmi, L., and F. Abed. 2020. “Evaluation of FRP bars under compression and their performance in RC columns.” Materials 13 (20): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13204541.
Alves, J., A. El-Ragaby, and E. El-Salakawy. 2011. “Durability of GFRP bars’ bond to concrete under different loading and environmental conditions.” J. Compos. Constr. 15 (3): 249–262. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000161.
Attia, K., A. El Refai, and W. Alnahhal. 2020. “Flexural behavior of basalt fiber-reinforced concrete slab strips with BFRP bars: Experimental testing and numerical simulation.” J. Compos. Constr. 24 (2): 04020007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0001002.
Bae, S., and O. Bayrak. 2008. “Seismic performance of full-scale reinforced concrete columns.” ACI Struct. J. 105 (2): 123–133.
CEB (Comité Euro-International du Béton). 1993. CEB-FIB model code 90. London: CEB.
Červenka, V., J. Červenka, D. Pryl, and Z. Janda. 2020a. ATENA manual for ATENA–GiD interface. Prague, Czech Republic: Červenka Consulting.
Červenka, V., L. Jendele, and J. Červenka. 2020b. ATENA program documentation. Part 1: Theory. Prague, Czech Republic: Červenka Consulting.
CSA (Canadian Standards Association). 2017. Design and construction of building structures with fibre-reinforced polymers. CSA S806-12 (R2017). Toronto, ON: CSA.
CSA (Canadian Standards Association). 2019. Canadian highway bridge design code. CSA S6-19. Toronto, ON: CSA.
Deng, Z., L. Gao, and X. Wang. 2018. “Glass fiber-reinforced polymer-reinforced rectangular concrete columns under simulated seismic loads.” J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 40 (2): 111.1–111.12.
Elchalakani, M., A. Karrech, M. Dong, M. S. Ali, and B. Yang. 2018. “Experiments and finite element analysis of GFRP reinforced geopolymer concrete rectangular columns subjected to concentric and eccentric axial loading.” Structures 14: 273–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2018.04.001.
El-Gendy, M. G., and E. F. El-Salakawy. 2020. “GFRP shear reinforcement for slab–column edge connections subjected to reversed cyclic lateral load.” J. Compos. Constr. 24 (2): 04020003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0001000.
El-Gendy, M. G., and E. F. El-Salakawy. 2021. “Finite-element analysis of FRP-reinforced concrete slab–column edge connections subjected to reversed-cyclic lateral loads.” J. Compos. Constr. 25 (1): 04020082. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0001098.
Elshamandy, M. G., A. S. Farghaly, and B. Benmokrane. 2018. “Experimental behavior of glass fiber-reinforced polymer-reinforced concrete columns under lateral cyclic load.” ACI Struct. J. 115 (2): 337–349. https://doi.org/10.14359/51700985.
Ghomi, S. K., and E. El-Salakawy. 2018. “Seismic behavior of exterior GFRP-RC beam–column connections: Analytical study.” J. Compos. Constr. 22 (4): 04018022. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000858.
Hasaballa, M., and E. El-Salakawy. 2018. “Anchorage performance of GFRP headed and bent bars in beam–column joints subjected to seismic loading.” J. Compos. Constr. 22 (6): 04018060. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000888.
Hosseini, F., B. Gencturk, A. Jain, and K. Shahzada. 2019. “Optimal design of bridge columns constructed with engineered cementitious composites and Cu-Al-Mn superelastic alloys.” Eng. Struct. 198: 109531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109531.
Kharal, Z., and S. A. Sheikh. 2020. “Seismic behavior of square and circular concrete columns with GFRP reinforcement.” J. Compos. Constr. 24 (1): 04019059. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000988.
Kharal, Z., J. K. Carrette, and S. A. Sheikh. 2021. “Large concrete columns internally reinforced with GFRP spirals subjected to seismic loads.” J. Compos. Constr. 25 (3): 04021014. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0001121.
Lehman, D. E., and J. P. Moehle. 2000. “Seismic performance of well-confined concrete bridge columns.” Pac. Earthq. Eng. Res. Cent. 295.
Nagy-György, T., G. Sas, A. C. Dâescu, J. A. O. Barros, and V. Stoian. 2012. “Experimental and numerical assessment of the effectiveness of FRP-based strengthening configurations for dapped-end RC beams.” Eng. Struct. 44: 291–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.06.006.
Naqvi, S., and E. El-Salakawy. 2017. “Lap splice in GFRP-RC rectangular columns subjected to cyclic-reversed loads.” J. Compos. Constr. 21 (4): 04016117. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000777.
NRCC (National Research Council of Canada). 2020. National building code of Canada (NBCC). Ottawa, ON: NRCC.
Pultrall Inc. 2019. V-ROD—Technical data sheet. Thetford Mines, QC, Canada: ADS Comp. Group.
Raza, A., A. Rehman, B. Masood, and I. Hussain. 2020. “Finite element modelling and theoretical predictions of FRP-reinforced concrete columns confined with various FRP-tubes.” Structures 26: 626–638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.04.033.
Razvi, S. R., and M. Saatcioglu. 1996. Design of R/C columns for confinement based on lateral drift. Carleton, Ottawa: Ottawa Carleton Earthquake Engineering Research Center.
Roehm, C., S. Sasmal, B. Novák, and R. Karusala. 2015. “Numerical simulation for seismic performance evaluation of fibre reinforced concrete beam–column sub-assemblages.” Eng. Struct. 91: 182–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.02.015.
Saatcioglu, M. 1991. “Deformability of reinforced concrete columns.” Earthquake-Resistant Structures—Inelastic Response and Design, SP-127, American Concrete Institute (ACI), 421–452.
Sakai, K., and S. A. Sheikh. 1989. “What do we know about confinement in reinforced concrete columns? (A critical review of previous work and code provisions).” ACI Struct. J. 86 (2): 192–207.
Sasmal, S., C. P. Khatri, K. Ramanjaneyulu, and V. Srinivas. 2013. “Numerical evaluation of bond–slip relations for near-surface mounted carbon fiber bars embedded in concrete.” Constr. Build. Mater. 40: 1097–1109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.11.073.
Setiawan, A., R. L. Vollum, and L. Macorini. 2019. “Numerical and analytical investigation of internal slab–column connections subject to cyclic loading.” Eng. Struct. 184: 535–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.01.089.
Sharbatdar, M. K. 2003. “Concrete columns and beams reinforced with FRP bars and grids under monotonic and reversed cyclic loading.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Ottawa.
Tahir, M., Z. Wang, Z. Wei, and R. Jameel. 2021. “Numerical and analytical modeling of FRP-reinforced concrete columns subjected to compression loading.” Aust. J. Struct. Eng. 22 (2): 96–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/13287982.2021.1923158.
Tavassoli, A., J. Liu, and S. Sheikh. 2015. “Glass fiber-reinforced polymer-reinforced circular columns under simulated seismic loads.” ACI Struct. J. 112 (1): 103–114. https://doi.org/10.14359/51687227.
Van Mier, J. 1986. “Multiaxial strain-softening of concrete.” Mater. Struct. 19: 179–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02472034.
Vecchio, F., and M. Collins. 1986. “Modified compression-field theory for reinforced concrete beams subjected to shear.” ACI J. Proc. 83 (2): 219–231.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Composites for Construction
Journal of Composites for Construction
Volume 26Issue 2April 2022

History

Received: Aug 11, 2021
Accepted: Dec 2, 2021
Published online: Feb 2, 2022
Published in print: Apr 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Jul 2, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Manitoba, 15 Gillson St., Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3T 5V6; Assistant Lecturer, Civil Engineering Dept., Assiut Univ., Assiut 71515, Egypt. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5211-5182. Email: [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Manitoba, 15 Gillson St., Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3T 5V6; Assistant Lecturer, Civil Engineering Dept., Suez Canal Univ., Ismailia 41522, Egypt. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6534-730X. Email: [email protected]
Professor of Civil Engineering, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Manitoba, 15 Gillson St., Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3T 5V6 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4551-5839. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Performance-Based Seismic Design of Hybrid GFRP–Steel Reinforced Concrete Bridge Columns, Journal of Composites for Construction, 10.1061/JCCOF2.CCENG-3991, 27, 2, (2023).
  • Seismic Behavior of Concrete Bridge Piers Reinforced with Steel or GFRP Bars, Journal of Composites for Construction, 10.1061/JCCOF2.CCENG-3945, 27, 2, (2023).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share