Technical Papers
May 5, 2021

Shear Behavior of Post-Tensioned Concrete Beams with Draped FRP Tendons and without Transverse Reinforcement

Publication: Journal of Composites for Construction
Volume 25, Issue 4

Abstract

To investigate the shear behavior of post-tensioned concrete beams with fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) reinforcements, six large-scale post-tensioned beams without transverse reinforcement and with a shear span-to-effective depth ratio of approximately 3.0 were tested to failure. All beams were longitudinally reinforced with draped prestressed carbon FRP tendons and non-prestressed glass FRP bars. The test variables included the amount of flexural reinforcement and the prestressing level. With the aid of full-field measurement on the beam surface using digital image correlation, the kinematics of the critical shear crack of each beam were tracked. Two shear failure modes, including shear compression and shear tension, were observed in the tested beams. Generally, when the amount of flexural reinforcement increased, there was a corresponding increase in the maximum shear force. When the total prestressing force was increased from 360 to 440 kN, the shear cracking strength and the maximum shear strength increased by 6.9% and 10.0%, respectively. It was demonstrated that an arch mechanism formed in the tested FRP post-tensioned beams, although the contribution of aggregate interlock to the shear capacity was negligible. The predictions of the shear capacity calculated from various shear design models showed that the American and Japanese recommendations were highly conservative, whereas the Canadian recommendations were more consistent with the experimental results.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support provided by the Project of National Key R&D Plan of China (No. 2017YFC0703000), the National Natural Science Foundation (No. 51678433 and No. 52008165), and Changsha Municipal Natural Science Foundation (No. kq2014053).

Notation

The following symbols are used in this paper:
Af
area of the tensile FRP bar;
Afp
area of the prestressing FRP tendon;
Ag
total cross-sectional area of beam;
bw
web width of beam;
d
effective depth of beam;
dv
effective shear depth, taken as the greater of 0.9d or 0.72h;
Ef
modulus of elasticity of the FRP bar;
Efp
modulus of elasticity of the FRP tendon;
Es
modulus of elasticity of steel;
fc
specified compressive strength of concrete;
fcd
design compressive strength of concrete;
fcr
cracking strength of concrete;
ffp0
stress in prestressing tendon when strain in the surrounding concrete is zero;
fmcd
design compressive strength of concrete allowing for the size effect;
ka
factor accounting for the effect of arch action of shear strength of the member;
km
factor accounting for the effect of moment at a section of the member on its shear strength;
kr
factor accounting for longitudinal reinforcement;
ks
factor accounting for the effect of member size on its shear strength;
lcr
crack length;
Md
design bending moment;
Mdc
decompression moment;
Mfa
factored applied bending moment;
Nd
design axial compressive force;
Nfa
factored applied axial load;
Np0
factored applied axial load;
Ped
effective tensile force in prestressing tendons;
sze
equivalent value of the crack spacing parameter that accounts for influence of aggregate size;
Vag
shear contribution of aggregate interlock;
Vcr
shear cracking force;
Vfa
=factored applied shear force;
Vn
predicted shear capacity;
Vp
vertical component of the prestressing force;
Vu
experimental shear capacity;
w
shear crack width;
αp
angle between prestressing tendon acting as shear reinforcement and member axis;
β
factor accounting for aggregate interlock in concrete sections;
Δ
shear crack slip;
ɛx
longitudinal strain at middepth;
ρfl
longitudinal reinforcement ratio;
σag
normal stress acting on the cracked plane; and
τag
shear stress acting on the cracked plane.

References

ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2004. Prestressing concrete structures with FRP tendons. ACI 440.4R. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2012. Guide test methods for fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) composites for reinforcing or strengthening concrete and masonry structures. ACI 440.3R-12. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2019. Building code requirements for structural concrete. ACI 318. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
Alam, M. S., and A. Hussein. 2012. “Effect of member depth on shear strength of high-strength fiber-reinforced polymer–reinforced concrete beams.” J. Compos. Constr. 16 (2): 119–126. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000248.
Alam, M. S., and A. Hussein. 2013. “Size effect on shear strength of FRP reinforced concrete beams without stirrups.” J. Compos. Constr. 17 (4): 575–583. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000346.
ASCE-ACI Committee 445 on Shear and Torsion. 1998. “Recent approaches to shear design of structural concrete.” J. Struct. Eng. 124 (12): 1375–1417. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1998)124:12(1375).
Bažant, Z. P., and Q. Yu. 2005. “Designing against size effect on shear strength of reinforced concrete beams without stirrups: I. Formulation.” J. Struct. Eng. 131 (12): 1877–1885. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:12(1877).
Cavagnis, F., J. T. Simões, M. F. Ruiz, and A. Muttoni. 2020. “Shear strength of members without transverse reinforcement based on development of critical shear crack.” ACI Struct. J. 117 (1): 103–118. https://doi.org/10.14359/51718012.
CNS (China National Standard). 2019. Standard for test methods of concrete physical and mechanical properties. GB/T 50081. Beijing: China Architecture and Building Press.
CSA (Canadian Standards Association). 2012. Design and construction of building components with fibre-reinforced polymers. CSA S806-12. Rexdale, ON, Canada: CSA.
CSA (Canadian Standards Association). 2014. Canadian highway bridge design code. CSA S6-14. Rexdale, ON, Canada: CSA.
El Refai, A., and F. Abed. 2016. “Concrete contribution to shear strength of beams reinforced with basalt fiber-reinforced bars.” J. Compos. Constr. 20 (4): 04015082. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000648.
Grace, N., M. Bebawy, and K. Ushijima. 2014. “Field application of composite post-tensioning system.” Concr. Int. 36 (11): 39–42.
Grace, N. F., S. K. Rout, K. Ushijima, and M. Bebawy. 2015. “Performance of carbon-fiber-reinforced polymer stirrups in prestressed-decked bulb T-beams.” J. Compos. Constr. 19 (3): 04014061. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000524.
Grace, N. F., S. B. Singh, M. M. Shinouda, and S. S. Mathew. 2005. “Concrete beams prestressed with CFRP.” Concr. Int. 27 (2): 60–64.
Grace, N. F., K. Ushijima, P. Baah, and M. Bebawy. 2013. “Flexural behavior of a carbon fiber–reinforced polymer prestressed decked bulb T-beam bridge system.” J. Compos. Constr. 17 (4): 497–506. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000345.
Huber, P., T. Huber, and J. Kollegger. 2016. “Investigation of the shear behavior of RC beams on the basis of measured crack kinematics.” Eng. Struct. 113: 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.01.025.
Huber, P., T. Huber, and J. Kollegger. 2018. “Influence of loading conditions on the shear capacity of post-tensioned beams with low shear reinforcement ratios.” Eng. Struct. 170: 91–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.05.079.
Huber, P., T. Huber, and J. Kollegger. 2020. “Experimental and theoretical study on the shear behavior of single- and multi-span T- and I-shaped post-tensioned beams.” Struct. Concr. 21 (1): 393–408. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.201900085.
JSCE (Japan Society of Civil Engineers). 1997. Recommendation for design and construction of concrete structures using continuous fibre reinforcing materials. CLI31-1. Tokyo: JSCE.
Kaszubska, M., R. Kotynia, J. A. O. Barros, and H. Baghi. 2018. “Shear behavior of concrete beams reinforced exclusively with longitudinal glass fiber reinforced polymer bars: Experimental research.” Struct. Concr. 19 (1): 152–161. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.201700174.
Kueres, S., N. Will, and J. Hegger. 2020. “Shear strength of prestressed FRP reinforced concrete beams with shear reinforcement.” Eng. Struct. 206: 110088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.110088.
Muttoni, A., and M. F. Ruiz. 2008. “Shear strength of members without transverse reinforcement as function of critical shear crack width.” ACI Struct. J. 105 (2): 163–172. https://doi.org/10.14359/19731.
Nabipay, P., and D. Svecova. 2014. “Shear behavior of CFRP prestressed concrete T-beams.” J. Compos. Constr. 18 (2): 04013049. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000450.
Noël, M., and K. Soudki. 2013. “Effect of prestressing on the performance of GFRP-reinforced concrete slab bridge strips.” J. Compos. Constr. 17 (2): 188–196. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000326.
Park, S. Y., and A. E. Naaman. 1999. “Shear behavior of concrete beams prestressed with FRP tendons.” PCI J. 44 (1): 74–85. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.01011999.74.85.
Peng, F., and W. Xue. 2017. “Evaluation of shear design provisions of prestressed concrete beams with FRP reinforcements.” In Proc., 6th Asia-Pacific Conf. on FRP in Structures, 1–4. Singapore: FRP Application Committee of Chinese Civil Engineering Society.
Peng, F., and W. Xue. 2018a. “Design approach for flexural capacity of concrete T-beams with bonded prestressed and nonprestressed FRP reinforcements.” Compos. Struct. 204: 333–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.07.091.
Peng, F., and W. Xue. 2018b. “Analytical approach for flexural capacity of FRP prestressed concrete T-beams with non-prestressed steel bars.” J. Compos. Constr. 22 (6): 04018063. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000903.
Peng, F., and W. Xue. 2020. “Database evaluation of shear strength of slender fiber-reinforced polymer-reinforced concrete members.” ACI Struct. J. 117 (3): 273–281. https://doi.org/10.14359/51723504.
Razaqpur, A. G., B. O. Isgor, S. Greenaway, and A. Selley. 2004. “Concrete contribution to the shear resistance of fiber reinforced polymer reinforced concrete members.” J. Compos. Constr. 8 (5): 452–460. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2004)8:5(452).
Razaqpur, A. G., and S. Spadea. 2015. “Shear strength of FRP reinforced concrete members with stirrups.” J. Compos. Constr. 19 (1): 04014025. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000483.
Reineck, K. H. 1991. “Ultimate shear force of structural concrete members without transverse reinforcement derived from a mechanical model (SP-885).” ACI Struct. J. 88 (5): 592–602. https://doi.org/10.14359/2784.
Saqan, E. I., and R. J. Frosch. 2009. “Influence of flexural reinforcement on shear strength of prestressed concrete beams.” ACI Struct. J. 106 (1): 60–68. https://doi.org/10.14359/56284.
Shield, C., V. Brown, C. E. Bakis, and S. Gross. 2019. “A recalibration of the crack width bond-dependent coefficient for GFRP-reinforced concrete.” J. Compos. Constr. 23 (4): 04019020. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000978.
Sneed, L. H., and J. A. Ramirez. 2014. “Influence of cracking on behavior and shear strength of reinforced concrete beams.” ACI Struct. J. 111 (1): 157–166. https://doi.org/10.14359/51686438.
Tureyen, A. K., and R. J. Frosch. 2002. “Shear tests of FRP-reinforced concrete beams without stirrups.” ACI Struct. J. 99 (4): 427–434. https://doi.org/10.14359/12111.
Vecchio, F. J., and M. P. Collins. 1986. “The modified compression-field theory for reinforced concrete elements subjected to shear.” ACI J. Proc. 83 (2): 219–231. https://doi.org/10.14359/10416.
Walraven, J. C. 1980. “Aggregate interlock: A theoretical and experimental analysis.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Delft Univ. of Technology.
Wang, Z., Y. Yao, D. Liu, Y. Cui, and W. Liao. 2019. “Shear behavior of concrete beams pre-stressed with carbon fiber reinforced polymer tendons.” Adv. Mech. Eng. 11 (1): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814018816879.
Xie, L., E. C. Bentz, and M. P. Collins. 2011. “Influence of axial stress on shear response of reinforced concrete elements.” ACI Struct. J. 108 (6): 745–754. https://doi.org/10.14359/51683373.
Yonekura, A., E. Tazawa, and H. Nakayama. 1993. Flexural and shear behavior of prestressed concrete beams using FRP rods as prestressing tendons. SP138-32, 525-548. Farmington Hills, MI: American Concrete Institute.
Yost, J. R., S. P. Gross, and D. W. Dinehart. 2001. “Shear strength of normal strength concrete beams reinforced with deformed GFRP bars.” J. Compos. Constr. 5 (4): 268–275. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2001)5:4(268).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Composites for Construction
Journal of Composites for Construction
Volume 25Issue 4August 2021

History

Received: Apr 16, 2020
Accepted: Feb 27, 2021
Published online: May 5, 2021
Published in print: Aug 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Oct 5, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Fei Peng, Ph.D., S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, Key Laboratory of Building Safety and Energy Efficiency of the Ministry of Education, College of Civil Engineering, Hunan Univ., Changsha 410082, China; formerly, Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Structural Engineering, Tongji Univ., Siping Rd., 1239, Shanghai 200092, China. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Key Laboratory of Performance Evolution and Control for Engineering Structures of the Ministry of Education, Tongji Univ., Siping Rd., 1239, Shanghai 200092, China; Professor, Dept. of Structural Engineering, Tongji Univ., Siping Rd., 1239, Shanghai 200092, China (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9779-5676. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share