Technical Papers
Jan 11, 2021

Assessment of FRP–Concrete Interfacial Debonding with Coupled Mixed-Mode Cohesive Zone Model

Publication: Journal of Composites for Construction
Volume 25, Issue 2

Abstract

External bonding (EB) of fiber–reinforced polymer (FRP) laminates has emerged as a popular method to strengthen reinforced concrete (RC) structures. The premature failure of these structures is induced by debonding across the FRP–concrete interface. The mixed-mode debonding of the FRP–concrete interface will be analyzed by a cohesive zone model (CZM) derived from the modified Mohr–Coulomb strength criterion. The partial derivatives of the normal and tangential stresses that concern the interfacial separations will be presented in this study, which will facilitate the program coding to implement the proposed model. The coupled mixed-mode CZM provided a detailed description of the initial debonding and propagation of the FRP–concrete interface through a full range mixed-mode debonding process. Parametric studies will be conducted to provide a clear understanding of the mixed-mode loading-dependent debonding process of the FRP–concrete interface. The proposed model could be utilized to effectively and efficiently analyze the mixed-mode debonding of the FRP–concrete interface.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This research work was financially supported by grants from the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20191441), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51708485), the Jiangsu Planned Projects for Postdoctoral Research Funds (1701191B), and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2017M611925).

Notation

The following symbols are used in this paper:
ac
variables in the calculation of Δm;
c0
cohesion in the Mohr–Coulomb strength criterion;
d, e
variables in the calculation of k;
D
damage index that describes the damage evolution in mixed-mode conditions;
ft
tensile strength of the concrete;
GI
energy release rate in the normal direction;
GIc
pure mode I fracture energy;
GII
energy release rate in the tangential direction;
GIIc
pure Mode II fracture energy;
Kn
initial stiffness of the cohesive relation in the normal direction;
Kt
initial stiffness of the cohesive relationship in the tangential direction;
k
damage evolution parameter;
Le
effective bond length of the interface;
lb
bond length of the FRP plate;
Pmax
peak peel load;
Ppeel
peeling load at steady state;
Pshear
peak load in pure Mode II load condition;
s
slip of the interface;
sm
slip in the interface that corresponds to the ultimate strength;
sm0
tangential relative displacement at the onset of interfacial softening;
s0
upper limit slip of the linear branch of the cohesive relation in the tangential direction;
tf
thickness of the FRP plate;
w
opening of the interface;
wm
opening in the interface that corresponds to the ultimate strength;
wm0
normal relative displacement at the onset of interfacial softening;
α
descending slope of the normal cohesive relation characteristic parameter;
β
descending slope of the tangential cohesive relation characteristic parameter;
γ
mode–mixity ratio;
Δ
effective relative displacement under mixed-mode conditions;
Δm
effective relative displacement that corresponds to the damage initiation;
Δu
effective relative displacement that corresponds to the failure state;
ζ
power exponent in PL criterion;
η
power exponent in BK criterion;
θ
peel angle;
τ
shear stress at the interface in the tangential direction;
τm
shear strength of the cohesive relationship under pure Mode II condition;
τm0
instantaneous tangential strength under mixed-mode condition;
σ
stress at the interface in the normal direction;
σm
traction strength of the cohesive relation under pure Mode I condition;
σm0
instantaneous normal strength under mixed-mode condition; and
φ
internal friction angle in the Mohr–Coulomb strength criterion.

References

Au, C., and O. Büyüköztürk. 2006. “Debonding of FRP plated concrete: A tri-layer fracture treatment.” Eng. Fract. Mech. 73 (3): 348–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2005.07.007.
Benzeggagh, M. L., and M. Kenane. 1996. “Mixed-mode delamination fracture toughness of unidirectional glass/epoxy composites with mixed-mode bending apparatus.” Compos. Sci. Technol. 56 (4): 439–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-3538(96)00005-X.
Biscaia, H. C., C. Chastre, and M. A. G. Silva. 2012. “Double shear tests to evaluate the bond strength between GFRP/concrete elements.” Compos. Struct. 94 (2): 681–694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.09.003.
Biscaia, H. C., C. Chastre, and M. A. G. Silva. 2013. “Linear and nonlinear analysis of bond-slip models for interfaces between FRP composites and concrete.” Composites, Part B 45 (1): 1554–1568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.08.011.
Camanho, P. P., C. G. Davila, and M. F. de Moura. 2003. “Numerical simulation of mixed-mode progressive delamination in composite materials.” J. Compos. Mater. 37 (16): 1415–1438. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998303034505.
Chen, J. F., and J. G. Teng. 2001. “Anchorage strength models for FRP and steel plates bonded to concrete.” J. Struct. Eng. 127 (7): 784–791. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:7(784).
Coronado, C. A., and M. M. Lopez. 2008. “Experimental characterization of concrete-epoxy interfaces.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 20 (4): 303–312. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2008)20:4(303).
Dai, J. G., T. Ueda, and Y. Sato. 2007. “Bonding characteristics of fiber-reinforced polymer sheet-concrete interfaces under dowel load.” J. Compos. Constr. 11 (2): 138–148. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2007)11:2(138).
De Lorenzis, L., and G. Zavarise. 2009a. “Cohesive zone modeling of interfacial stresses in plated beams.” Int. J. Solids Struct. 46 (24): 4181–4191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2009.08.010.
De Lorenzis, L., and G. Zavarise. 2009b. “Interfacial stress analysis and prediction of debonding for a thin plate bonded to a curved substrate.” Int. J. Non Linear Mech. 44 (4): 358–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2009.01.002.
De Lorenzis, L., and G. Zavarise. 2010. “Debonding analysis of thin plates from curved substrates.” Eng. Fract. Mech. 77 (16): 3310–3328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.08.013.
Dimitri, R., M. Trullo, L. De Lorenzis, and G. Zavarise. 2015. “Coupled cohesive zone models for mixed-mode fracture: A comparative study.” Eng. Fract. Mech. 148: 145–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2015.09.029.
Ghorbani, M., D. Mostofinejad, and A. Hosseini. 2017. “Bond-behavior of CFRP sheets attached to concrete through EBR and EBROG joints subject to Mixed-Mode I/II loading.” J. Compos. Constr. 21 (5): 04017034. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000816.
Högberg, J. L. 2006. “Mixed-mode cohesive law.” Int. J. Fract. 141 (3–4): 549–559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-006-9014-9.
Kishi, N., G. F. Zhang, and H. Mikami. 2005. “Numerical cracking and debonding analysis of RC beams reinforced with FRP sheet.” J. Compos. Constr. 9 (6): 507–514. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2005)9:6(507).
Ko, H., and Y. Sato. 2007. “Bond stress-slip relationship between FRP sheet and concrete under cyclic load.” J. Compos. Constr. 11 (4): 419–426. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2007)11:4(419).
Lee, J. H., R. M. Chacko, and M. M. Lopez. 2010. “Use of mixed-mode fracture interfaces for the modeling of large-scale FRP-strengthened beams.” J. Compos. Constr. 14 (6): 845–855. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000143.
Lu, X. Z., J. G. Teng, L. P. Ye, and J. J. Jiang. 2005. “Bond-slip models for FRP sheets/plates bonded to concrete.” Eng. Struct. 27 (6): 920–937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.01.014.
Michels, J., E. Zile, C. Czaderski, and M. Motavalli. 2014. “Debonding failure mechanisms in prestressed CFRP/epoxy/concrete connections.” Eng. Fract. Mech. 132: 16–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.10.012.
Mohammadi, T., B. Wan, K. A. Harries, and M. E. Sweriduk. 2017. “Bond behavior of FRP–concrete in the presence of intermediate crack debonding failure.” J. Compos. Constr. 21 (5): 04017018. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000797.
Neto, P., J. Alfaiate, J. R. Almeida, and E. P. Pires. 2004. “The influence of mode II fractures on concrete strengthened with CFRP.” Comput. Struct. 82 (17–19): 1495–1502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2004.03.045.
Niu, H., V. M. Karbhari, and Z. Wu. 2006. “Diagonal macro-crack induced debonding mechanisms in F-RP rehabilitated concrete.” Composites, Part B 37 (7–8): 627–641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2006.03.001.
Pan, J., and C. K. Y. Leung. 2007. “Debonding along with the FRP-concrete interface under combined pulling/peeling effects.” Eng. Fract. Mech. 74 (1–2): 132–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.01.022.
Razaqpur, A. G., M. Lamberti, and F. Ascione. 2020a. “Debonding evolution in nonlinear FRP-retrofitted RC beams with cohesive interface.” Compos. Struct. 236: 111858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.111858.
Razaqpur, A. G., M. Lamberti, and F. Ascione. 2020b. “A nonlinear semi-analytical model for predicting debonding of FRP laminates from RC beams subjected to uniform or concentrated load.” Constr. Build. Mater. 233: 117838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117838.
Seręga, S., R. Kotynia, and K. Lasek. 2018. “Numerical modeling of preloaded RC beams strengthened with prestressed CFRP laminates.” Eng. Struct. 176: 917–934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.09.023.
SIMULIA. 2014. ABAQUS/analysis user’s manual, version 6.14. Providence, RI: SIMULIA.
Teng, J. G., J. F. Chen, S. T. Smith, and L. Lam. 2002. FRP-Strengthened RC structures. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Van de Bosch, M. J., P. J. G. Schreurs, and M. G. D. Geers. 2006. “An improved description of the exponential Xu and Needleman cohesive zone law for mixed-mode decohesion.” Eng. Fract. Mech. 73 (9): 1220–1234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2005.12.006.
Wan, B. L., M. A. Sutton, M. F. Petrou, K. Harries, and U. Ning. 2004. “Investigation of bond between fiber-reinforced polymer and concrete undergoing global mixed-mode I/II loading.” J. Eng. Mech. 130 (12): 1467–1475. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2004)130:12(1467).
Wang, J. 2007a. “Cohesive zone model of FRP-concrete interface debonding under mixed-mode loading.” Int. J. Solids Struct. 44 (20): 6551–6568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2007.02.042.
Wang, J. 2007b. “Cohesive-bridging zone model of FRP-concrete interface debonding.” Eng. Fract. Mech. 74 (17): 2643–2658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.02.013.
Wang, J., and C. Zhang. 2008. “Nonlinear fracture mechanics of flexural-shear crack induced debonding of FRP strengthened concrete beams.” Int. J. Solids Struct. 45 (10): 2916–2936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.01.004.
Wu, Z. S., H. Yuan, T. Asakura, H. Yoshizawa, A. Kobayashi, Y. Kojima, and E. Ahmed. 2005. “Peeling behavior and spalling resistance of bonded bidirectional fiber-reinforced polymer sheets.” J. Compos. Constr. 9 (3): 214–226. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2005)9:3(214).
Xu, X. P., and A. Needleman. 1993. “Void nucleation by inclusion debonding in a crystal matrix.” Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 1 (2): 111–132. https://doi.org/10.1088/0965-0393/1/2/001.
Yao, J., J. G. Teng, and J. F. Chen. 2005. “Experimental study on FRP-to-concrete bonded joints.” Composites, Part B 36 (2): 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2004.06.001.
Zhou, Y. W., Z. H. Fan, J. Du, L. L. Sui, and F. Xing. 2015. “Bond behavior of FRP-to-concrete interface under sulfate attack: An experimental study and modeling of bond degradation.” Constr. Build. Mater. 85: 9–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.031.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Composites for Construction
Journal of Composites for Construction
Volume 25Issue 2April 2021

History

Received: Jun 24, 2020
Accepted: Nov 18, 2020
Published online: Jan 11, 2021
Published in print: Apr 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Jun 11, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Professor, College of Civil Engineering, Fujian Univ. of Technology, Fuzhou, Fujian 350118, China; Researcher, Institute of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague 190 00, Czech Republic. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8020-4190. Email: [email protected]
Researcher, Dept. of Applied Mechanics and Structures, Institute of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague 190 00, Czech Republic (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4543-7225. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, College of Civil Engineering, Fuzhou Univ., Fuzhou, Fujian 350116, China. Email: [email protected]
Jiangang Wei [email protected]
Professor, College of Civil Engineering, Fujian Univ. of Technology, Fuzhou, Fujian 350118, China; Professor, College of Civil Engineering, Fuzhou Univ., Fuzhou, Fujian 350116, China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share