Technical Papers
Oct 5, 2020

Evaluation by Hybrid Simulation of Earthquake-Damaged RC Walls Repaired for In-Plane Bending with Single-Sided CFRP Sheets

Publication: Journal of Composites for Construction
Volume 24, Issue 6

Abstract

The realistic seismic response of two damaged reinforced concrete (RC) shear walls repaired using externally bonded carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) sheets was evaluated using hybrid simulation. The CFRP repair used horizontal and vertical CFRP layers applied to a single side of the wall that were anchored with a steel tube anchor system and CFRP fan anchors. The objective of the CFRP repair was to restore the initial stiffness and restore or increase the strength, ductility, and energy dissipation capacity of the damaged walls. Hybrid simulation was used to evaluate the effectiveness of the repair strategy under real earthquake ground motion records with realistic boundary conditions, including the effects of axial load, shear force, and overturning moment. The results show that the single-sided application of the CFRP sheets restored the seismic performance of the damaged RC shear walls tested in this study. Hybrid simulation is shown to be an efficient test method to experimentally study the seismic response of a structural component with realistic boundary conditions over a range of earthquake hazard levels.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The financial support provided by the Natural Sciences Engineering Research Council (NSERC) and the Canadian Foundation for Innovation (CFI) are gratefully acknowledged. The CFRP materials were provided by Fyfe Co., LLC. The technical assistance provided by Mr. Scott Arnold, P.E. of Fyfe Co., LLC in this research is also acknowledged.

Notation

The following symbols are used in this paper:
Ae
effective shear wall area, taken as 80% of the total shear wall area (mm2);
Ah
area of one leg of the transverse reinforcement (mm2);
bw
thickness of the wall (mm);
c
cohesive stress (MPa);
D
core dimension from center-to-center of the peripheral hoops (mm);
DOFs
degrees of freedom;
d
distance from extreme fiber in comparison with centroid of tensile force (mm);
Ec
concrete modulus of elasticity (MPa);
Ef
tensile modulus of elasticity of the CFRP (MPa);
Es
modulus of elasticity of steel (MPa);
fc
28-day concrete compressive strength (MPa);
fF,flexure
ultimate tensile strength of CFRP composites in flexure (MPa);
fF,shear
ultimate tensile strength of CFRP composites in shear (MPa);
ffu
ultimate tensile strength of CFRP composites (MPa);
fy
steel yield stress of the vertical steel reinforcement (MPa);
fyh
yield stress of the horizontal steel reinforcement (MPa);
hw
height of the wall (mm);
lw
length of the wall (mm);
Mr
moment resistance without CFRP reinforcement (kN-m);
Mr,FRP
moment resistance with CFRP reinforcement (kN-m);
Mu
ultimate moment (kN-m);
My
yield moment (kN-m);
m
number of faces reinforced with CFRP;
n
number of legs of horizontal steel reinforcement;
nF
number of layers of CFRP reinforcement;
Pf
factored axial load;
ro
outer radius of the steel tube anchor (mm);
s
spacing between horizontal steel reinforcing bars (mm);
SA
area scale factor for similitude;
SE
modulus of elasticity scale factor for similitude;
SF
force scale factor for similitude;
SL
length scale factor for similitude;
SM
moment scale factor for similitude;
SM
reinforcement ratio scale factor for similitude;
tf
thickness of a single sheet of FRP laminate in the defined state (mm);
VF
CFRP reinforcement contribution to diagonal tension shear strength (kN);
Vc
concrete contribution to diagonal tension shear strength (kN);
Vr
total diagonal tension shear strength without CFRP sheets (kN);
Vr,FRP
total diagonal tension shear strength with CFRP reinforcement (kN);
Vs
steel reinforcement contribution to diagonal tension shear strength (kN);
Vu
equivalent ultimate force (kN), taken as Mu/hw;
Vy
equivalent yield force (kN), taken as My/hw;
αF
orientation angle of the fibers with respect to the longitudinal axis;
Δres
residual drift (%);
Δu
ultimate displacement (mm);
Δy
equivalent yield displacement (mm);
ɛc
concrete strain at maximum compressive stress (mm/mm);
ɛF
strain in the horizontal CFRP layers (mm/mm);
ɛFmax
maximum strain in the vertical CFRP layers (mm/mm);
ɛfu
ultimate strain in the FRP reinforcement (mm/mm);
ɛr
steel rupture strain (mm/mm);
ɛsh
steel strain hardening strain (mm/mm);
ɛu
concrete strain at 15% drop from maximum compressive stress (mm/mm);
ɛy
yield strain for steel reinforcement (mm/mm);
θy
yield rotation (rad);
θu
ultimate rotation (rad);
κv
bond reduction coefficient for the horizontal CFRP reinforcement;
λ
factor accounting for lightweight concrete;
μ
coefficient of friction;
μΔ
displacement ductility ratio (mm/mm);
μθ
rotational ductility ratio (rad/rad);
ρh
horizontal steel reinforcement ratio (%); and
ρv
vertical steel reinforcement ratio (%).

References

Abbiati, G., O. S. Bursi, E. Cazzador, R. Ceravolo, Z. Mei, F. Paolacci, and P. Pegon. 2015. “Pseudo-dynamic testing based on non-linear dynamic substructuring of a reinforced concrete bridge.” In Experimental Research in Earthquake Engineering, 83–98. Berlin: Springer.
ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2017. Guide for the design and construction of externally bonded FRP systems for strengthening concrete structures. ACI 440.2-17. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
Antoniades, K. K., T. N. Salonikios, and A. J. Kappos. 2003. “Cyclic tests on seismically damaged reinforced concrete walls strengthened using fiber-reinforced polymer reinforcement.” ACI Struct. J. 100 (4): 510–518.
ASCE. 2013. Seismic evaluation and retrofit rehabilitation of existing buildings. ASCE 41-13. New York: ASCE.
ASTM. 2014. Standard test method for static modulus of elasticity and poisson’s ratio of concrete in compression. ASTM C469. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2017. Standard test method for tensile properties of polymer matrix composite materials. ASTM D3039. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2019. Standard test methods and definitions for mechanical testing of steel products. ASTM A370. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2020a. Standard specification for deformed and plain carbon-steel bars for concrete reinforcement. ASTM A615. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2020b. Standard test method for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete specimens. ASTM C39. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Atkinson, G. M. 2005. “Ground motions for earthquakes in southwestern British Columbia and northwestern Washington: Crustal, in-slab, and offshore events.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 95 (3): 1027–1044. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120040182.
Balendra, T., K.-Y. Lam, C.-N. Liaw, and S.-L. Lee. 1987. “Behavior of eccentrically braced frame by pseudo-dynamic test.” J. Struct. Eng. 113 (4): 673–688. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1987)113:4(673).
Charlet, A. 2007. “Hybrid simulation and its application to the gravity load collapse of reinforced concrete frames.” M.S. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of British Columbia
Cruz-Noguez, C., D. Lau, E. Sherwood, S. Hiotakis, J. Lombard, S. Foo, and M. Cheung. 2014. “Seismic behavior of RC shear walls strengthened for in-plane bending using externally bonded FRP sheets.” J. Compos. Constr. 19 (1): 04014023. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000478.
CSA (Canadian Standard Association). 2012. Design and construction of building components with fibre-reinforced polymers. CSA S806-12. Rexdale, ON, Canada: CSA.
CSA (Canadian Standard Association). 2019. Design of concrete structures. CSA A23.3-19. Rexdale, ON, Canada: CSA.
Del Carpio Ramos, M., G. Mosqueda, and M. J. Hashemi. 2016. “Large-scale hybrid simulation of a steel moment frame building structure through collapse.” J. Struct. Eng. 142 (1): 04015086. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001328.
del Rey Castillo, E., D. Dizhur, M. Griffith, J. Ingham. 2019. “Strengthening RC structures using FRP spike anchors in combination with EBR systems.” Compos. Struct. 209: 668–685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.10.093.
Eatherton, M. R., and J. F. Hajjar. 2010. Large-scale cyclic and hybrid simulation testing and development of a controlled-rocking steel building system with replaceable fuses. Rep. No. NSEL-025. Urbana, IL: Newmark Structural Engineering Laboratory Report, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC) Report.
El-Sokkary, H., K. Galal, I. Ghorbanirenani, P. Léger, and R. Tremblay. 2012. “Shake table tests on FRP-rehabilitated RC shear walls.” J. Compos. Constr. 17 (1): 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000312.
Elnady, M. 2008. “Seismic rehabilitation of RC structural walls.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, McMaster Univ.
Ghobarah, A., and A. Khalil. 2004. “Seismic rehabilitation of reinforced concrete walls using fibre composites.” In Proc., 13th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo, Japan: International Association for Earthquake Engineering.
Hiotakis, S. 2004. “Repair and strengthening of reinforced concrete shear walls for earthquake resistance using externally bonded carbon fibre sheets and a novel anchor system.” M.S. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Carleton Univ.
Hiotakis, S., D. Lau, and N. Londono. 2004. “Research on seismic retrofit and rehabilitation of reinforced concrete shear walls using FRP materials.” In Proc., Joint National Science Council Taiwan - National Research Council Canada NSC-NRC Workshop on Construction Technologies, 17–26. Ottawa, Canada: National Research Council of Canada.
Jeong, S.-H., and A. S. Elnashai. 2005. “Analytical assessment of an irregular RC frame for full-scale 3D pseudo-dynamic testing part ii: Condition assessment and test deployment.” J. Earthquake Eng. 9 (2): 265–284.
Kalfat, R., J. Gadd, R. Al-Mahaidi, and S. T. Smith. 2018. “An efficiency framework for anchorage devices used to enhance the performance of FRP strengthened RC members.” Constr. Build. Mater. 191: 354–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.10.022.
Kam, W. Y., S. Pampanin, and K. Elwood. 2011. “Seismic performance of reinforced concrete buildings in the 22 February Christchurch (Lyttleton) earthquake.” Bull. N. Z. Soc. Earthquake Eng. 44 (4): 239–278. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.44.4.239-278.
Kammula, V., J. Erochko, O.-S. Kwon, and C. Christopoulos. 2014. “Application of hybrid-simulation to fragility assessment of the telescoping self-centering energy dissipative bracing system.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 43 (6): 811–830. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.v43.6.
Karavasilis, T. L., J. M. Ricles, R. Sause, and C. Chen. 2011. “Experimental evaluation of the seismic performance of steel MRFs with compressed elastomer dampers using large-scale real-time hybrid simulation.” Eng. Struct. 33 (6): 1859–1869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.01.032.
Lau, D. T., and J. E. Woods. 2018. “A concentric tube anchor system for fiber-reinforced polymer retrofit of reinforced concrete structural walls under extreme loads.” Int. J. Protective Struct. 9 (1): 77–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041419617732353.
Lombard, J., D. T. Lau, J. L. Humar, S. Foo, and M. Cheung. 2000. “Seismic strengthening and repair of reinforced concrete shear walls.” In Proc., 12th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, 1–8. Tokyo, Japan: International Association for Earthquake Engineering.
McKenna, F., G. Fenves, H. Scott, and B. Jeremic. 2000. “Open system for earthquake engineering simulation (OpenSees) [computer software].” Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California at Berkeley. Accessed December 2018. http://opensees.berkeley.edu/.
McKenna, F., M. H. Scott, and G. L. Fenves. 2010. “Nonlinear finite-element analysis software architecture using object composition.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 24 (1): 95–107. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000002.
Molina, F., G. Verzeletti, G. Magonette, P. Buchet, and M. Geradin. 1999. “Bi-directional pseudodynamic test of a full-size three-storey building.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 28 (12): 1541–1566. https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1096-9845.
Molina, F., et al. 2002. “Pseudodynamic tests on rubber base isolators with numerical substructuring of the superstructure and strain-rate effect compensation.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 31 (8): 1563–1582. https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1096-9845.
Negro, P., E. Mola, F. J. Molina, and G. E. Magonette. 2004. “Full-scale psd testing of a torsionally unbalanced three-storey non-seismic RC frame.” In Proc., 13th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, 1–15. Tokyo, Japan: International Association for Earthquake Engineering.
NRC (National Research Council). 2015. National building code of Canada. Ottawa, ON: NRC.
Paterson, J., and D. Mitchell. 2003. “Seismic retrofit of shear walls with headed bars and carbon fiber wrap.” J. Struct. Eng. 129 (5): 606–614. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:5(606).
Saouma, V., G. Haussmann, D.-H. Kang, and W. Ghannoum. 2013. “Real-time hybrid simulation of a nonductile reinforced concrete frame.” J. Struct. Eng. 140 (2): 04013059. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000813.
Sarebanha, A., A. H. Schellenberg, M. J. Schoettler, G. Mosqueda, and S. A. Mahin. 2019. “Real-time hybrid simulation of seismically isolated structures with full-scale bearings and large computational models.” Comput. Model. Eng. Sci. 120 (3): 693–717.
Schellenberg, A., S. Mahin, and G. Fenves. 2009. Advanced implementation of hybrid simulation. PEER Rep. No. 2009/104. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, College of Engineering, Univ. of California, Berkeley.
Shing, P. B., O. S. Bursi, and M. T. Vannan. 1994. “Pseudodynamic tests of a concentrically braced frame using substructuring techniques.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 29 (1–3): 121–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/0143-974X(94)90059-0.
Teng, J., S. T. Smith, J. Yao, and J. Chen. 2003. “Intermediate crack-induced debonding in RC beams and slabs.” Constr. Build. Mater. 17 (6–7): 447–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-0618(03)00043-6.
Tsai, K.-C., P.-C. Hsiao, K.-J. Wang, Y.-T. Weng, M.-L. Lin, K.-C. Lin, C.-H. Chen, J.-W. Lai, and S.-L. Lin. 2008. “Pseudo-dynamic tests of a full-scale CFT/BRB frame-part i: Specimen design, experiment and analysis.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 37 (7): 1081–1098. https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1096-9845.
Turek, M., C. E. Ventura, and S. Kuan. 2007. “In-plane shake-table testing of GFRP-strengthened concrete masonry walls.” Earthquake Spectra 23 (1): 223–237. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2429564.
Wallace, J. 2015. “Performance of structural walls in recent earthquakes and test and implications for US building codes.” In Proc., 15th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, 1–10. Tokyo, Japan: International Association for Earthquake Engineering.
Whyte, C. A., and B. Stojadinovic. 2013. “Effect of ground motion sequence on response of squat reinforced concrete shear walls.” J. Struct. Eng. 140 (8): A4014004.
Woods, J. 2019. “Advances in retrofit and testing of reinforced concrete shear walls Part 1 - seismic retrofit of deficient walls with fibre-reinforced polymer sheets Part 2 - building scale performance evaluation using hybrid simulation.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Carleton Univ.
Woods, J., C. Cruz-Noguez, and D. Lau. 2016. “In-plane seismic strenthening of nonductile reinforced concrete shear walls using externally bonded CFRP sheets.” J. Compos. Constr. 20 (6): 04016052. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000705.
Woods, J., D. Lau, C. Cruz-Noguez, and I. Shaheen. 2017. “Repair of earthquake damaged squat reinforced concrete shear walls using externally bonded CFRP sheets.” In Proc., 16th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, 1–8. Tokyo, Japan: International Association for Earthquake Engineering.
Yang, T., B. Stojadinovic, and J. Moehle. 2009. “Hybrid simulation of a zipper-braced steel frame under earthquake excitation.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 38 (1): 95–113. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.v38:1.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Composites for Construction
Journal of Composites for Construction
Volume 24Issue 6December 2020

History

Received: Mar 9, 2020
Accepted: Jul 23, 2020
Published online: Oct 5, 2020
Published in print: Dec 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Mar 5, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Queen’s Univ., Kingston, ON, Canada K7L 3N6 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1352-3700. Email: [email protected]
David T. Lau, Aff.M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Carleton Univ., Ottawa, ON, Canada K1S 5B6. Email: [email protected]
Jeffrey Erochko [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Carleton Univ., Ottawa, ON, Canada K1S 5B6. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share