Technical Papers
May 20, 2019

Experimental Investigation of the Lateral Load–Carrying Capacity of a Developed GFRP-Reinforced TL-5 Bridge Barrier Using Special Profile Hooked Bars

Publication: Journal of Composites for Construction
Volume 23, Issue 4

Abstract

Old concrete bridge barriers suffer from corrosion-induced degradation due to the effects of freeze–thaw cycles and the application of winter deicing salt. To replace such deteriorated bridge barriers while aiming to reduce maintenance costs and improve their life expectancy, rust-free high-modulus (HM) glass fiber–reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars with 180° hooks are utilized as primary reinforcement in the barrier wall. A proposed TL-5 bridge barrier developed in this research incorporated 15M and 13M GFRP bars as vertical (transverse) reinforcement in the barrier front and back faces at a 300-mm spacing, respectively, and 15M GFRP bars as horizontal (longitudinal) reinforcement in the barrier wall. The connection between the deck slab and the barrier wall utilized GFRP bars with 180° hooks for proper anchorage. To study the structural behavior, the crack pattern and the ultimate load–carrying capacity of the proposed barrier wall under an equivalent transverse vehicle collision force, a 40-m-long GFRP-reinforced TL-5 barrier was constructed and statically tested to failure under transverse line load at interior and end locations. While trapezoidal flexural cracks were developed at the traffic side of the barrier wall during loading, punching shear crack occurred at the loading location, leading to barrier failure. The experimental ultimate load–carrying capacities of the barriers were observed to be far greater than the load capacity required by current design codes. GFRP bar strain and concrete strain readings at the barrier deck showed very low strains at failure compared to the material’s nominal failure strain. To study the pullout capacity of the GFRP bars with 180° hooks reinforcing the lower tapered portion of the barrier wall and embedment into the deck slab, a representative concrete slab with various embedded GFRP bars was constructed. Pullout tests on GFRP bars with straight ends, hooked ends, and hooked ends with unbonded straight portions of the bar were performed. The results showed that the average pullout capacities of the tested bars are far greater than the pullout capacity of 100 kN specified in current standards for TL-5 HM-GFRP concrete barriers. The GFRP bar’s experimental pullout capacity can be used to determine the resisting moment at the barrier deck connection for compliance with the code-specified factored applied moment at this location.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge TemCorp Industries Inc. of Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, for supporting this research project. Also, the authors thank Mr. Nidal Jaalouk, the lead technical officer of Ryerson University, for his contribution in performing the tests.

References

AASHTO. 2009. AASHTO-LRFD bridge guide specifications for GFRP-reinforced concrete bridge decks and traffic railings. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2017. AASHTO-LRFD bridge design specifications. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2015. Guide for the design and construction of externally bonded FRP systems for strengthening concrete structures. ACI 440.1R. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
Alberson, D., W. Williams, C. Boyd, and M. Bloschock. 2005a. Analysis and design of concrete traffic railings, 1–12. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Alberson, D., W. Williams, C. Boyd, and M. Bloschock. 2005b. “Analysis and testing of the Florida Jersey safety shaped bridge rail.” In Proc., TRB 2005 Annual Meeting, 1–24. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
ASTM. 2018. Standard specification for deformed and plain carbon-steel bars for concrete reinforcement. ASTM A615/A615M-18e1. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Azimi, H., K. Sennah, E. Tropynina, S. Goremykin, S. Lucic, and M. Lam. 2014. “Anchorage capacity of concrete bridge barriers reinforced with GFRP bars with headed ends.” J. Bridge Eng. 19 (9): 04014030. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000606.
CSA (Canadian Standard Association). 2006. Canadian highway bridge design code. CAN/CSA-S6. Toronto, ON, Canada: CSA.
CSA (Canadian Standard Association). 2010. Specification for fiber-reinforced polymers. CSA-S807. Toronto, ON, Canada: CSA.
CSA (Canadian Standard Association). 2012. Design and construction of building structures with fibre reinforced polymers. CSA-S806. Toronto, ON, Canada: CSA.
CSA (Canadian Standard Association). 2014a. Canadian highway bridge design code. CAN/CSA-S6. Toronto, ON, Canada: CSA.
CSA (Canadian Standard Association). 2014b. Canadian highway bridge design code commentaries. CAN/CSA-S6. Toronto, ON, Canada: CSA.
El-Gamal, S., E. El-Salakawy, and B. Benmokrane. 2005. “A new punching shear equation for two-way concrete slabs reinforced with FRP bars.” ACI Spec. Publ. 230: 877–894.
El-Ghandour, A., K. Pilakoutas, and P. Waldron. 1999. “New approach for punching shear capacity prediction of fiber reinforced polymer reinforced concrete flat slabs.” ACI J. 188: 135–144.
El-Ghandour, A., K. Pilakoutas, and P. Waldron. 2000. “Punching shear behavior and design of FRP RC flat slabs.” In Proc., Int. Workshop on Punching Shear Capacity of RC Slab, 359–366. Stockholm, Sweden: Royal Institute of Technology.
Jacobson, D., L. Bank, M. Oliva, and J. Russell. 2005. “Punching shear capacity of double layer FRP grid reinforced slabs.” ACI Spec. Publ. 230: 857–875.
Jeon, S., M. S. Choi, and Y. J. Kim. 2008. “Ultimate strength of concrete barrier by the yield line theory.” Int. J. Concr. Struct. Mater. 2 (1): 57–62. https://doi.org/10.4334/IJCSM.2008.2.1.057.
JSCE (Japan Society of Civil Engineers). 1997. Recommendation for design and construction of concrete structures using continuous fiber reinforcing materials: Concrete engineering series no. 23, 325. Tokyo: JSCE.
Karbhari, V. M. 2000. “Determination of materials design values for the use of fibre-reinforced polymer composites in civil infrastructure.” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part L: J. Mater. Des. Appl. 214 (3): 163–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/146442070021400305.
Khederzadeh, H., and K. Sennah. 2014a. “AASHTO-LRFD yield-line analysis for flexural resistance of bridge barrier wall: Re-visited.” In Proc., 9th Int. Conf. on Short and Medium Span Bridges, 1–10. Montreal, QC, Canada: Canadian Society for Civil Engineering.
Khederzadeh, H., and K. Sennah. 2014b. “Development of cost-effective TL-5 concrete bridge barrier reinforced with sand-coated GFRP bars: Static load tests.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 41 (4): 368–379. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2013-0394.
Khederzadeh, H., and K. Sennah. 2014c. “Experimental investigation of steel-reinforced TL-5 bridge barriers subjected to transverse static loading.” In Proc., 9th Int. Conf. on Short and Medium Span Bridges, 1–9. Montreal, QC, Canada: Canadian Society for Civil Engineering.
Khederzadeh, H., and K. Sennah. 2015. “Finite-element modelling of bridge barrier walls reinforced with GFRP bars and subjected to equivalent transverse impact loading.” In Proc., 4th Specialty Conf. on Material Engineering and Applied Mechanics, 1–10. Montreal, QC, Canada: Canadian Society for Civil Engineering.
Matta, F., and A. Nanni. 2009. “Connection of concrete railing post and bridge deck with internal FRP reinforcement.” J. Bridge Eng. 14 (1): 66–76. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2009)14:1(66).
Matthys, S., and L. Taerwe. 2000. “Concrete slabs reinforced with FRP grids. Part II: Punching resistance.” J. Compos. Constr. 4 (3): 154–161. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2000)4:3(154).
Ospina, C., S. Alexander, and J. Cheng. 2003. “Punching of two-way concrete slabs with fiber-reinforced polymer reinforcing bars or grids.” ACI Struct. J. 100 (5): 589–598.
Rostami, M., K. Sennah, and S. Dehnadi. 2016. “Experimental study on the capacity of barrier-deck anchorage in MTQ PL-3 barrier reinforced with HM-GFPP bars with headed ends.” In Proc., 5th Int. Structural Specialty Conf., 1–10. London, Canada: Canadian Society for Civil Engineering.
Sennah, K., B. Juette, A. Weber, and C. Witt. 2011. “Vehicle crash testing of a GFRP-reinforced TL-5 concrete bridge barrier.” In Proc., 4th Int. Conf. on Durability and Sustainability of Fibre Reinforced Polymer Composites for Construction and Rehabilitation, 417–424. Sherbrook, QC, Canada: Univ. of Sherbrook.
Sennah, K., and H. Khederzadeh. 2014. “Development of cost-effective PL-3 concrete bridge barrier reinforced with sand-coated glass fibre reinforced polymer (GFRP) Bars: Vehicle crash test.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 41 (4): 357–367. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2013-0393.
Sennah, K., and A. Mostafa. 2018. “Performance of a developed TL-5 concrete bridge barrier reinforced with GFRP hooked bars: Vehicle crash testing.” J. Bridge Eng. 23 (2): 04017139. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001184.
Sennah, K., and M. Rostami. 2016. Experimental study on the transverse load carrying capacity of MTO PL-3 barrier reinforced with special profile TemBars. Stoney Creek, ON, Canada: TemCorp Industries.
Sennah, K., E. Tropynina, S. Goremykin, M. Lam, and S. Lucic. 2010. “Concrete bridge barriers reinforced with GFRP bars with headed ends.” In Proc., 8th Int. Conf. on Short and Medium Span Bridges, 1–10. Montreal, QC, Canada: Canadian Society for Civil Engineering.
Sennah, K., E. Tropynina, and Z. Mahmoud. 2012. “Ultimate load tests on TL-5 bridge barrier reinforced with GFRP bars with ribbed surface and headed ends.” In Proc., 3rd Int. Structural Specialty Conf., 1–10. Edmonton, Canada: Canadian Society for Civil Engineering.
TemCorp Industries. 2016. “GFRP data sheet.” Accessed January 5, 2016. www.temcorp.ca.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Composites for Construction
Journal of Composites for Construction
Volume 23Issue 4August 2019

History

Received: Jul 13, 2017
Accepted: Sep 6, 2018
Published online: May 20, 2019
Published in print: Aug 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Oct 20, 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Michael Rostami
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Ryerson Univ., Toronto, ON, Canada M5B 2K3.
Khaled Sennah, M.ASCE
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Ryerson Univ., Toronto, ON, Canada M5B 2K3.
Ahmed Mostafa [email protected]
Director, Construction Material Testing and Engineering, Inc., 160 Centennial Pkwy. North, Unit 5, Hamilton, ON, Canada L8E 1H9; Adjunct Professor, Ryerson Univ., Toronto, ON, Canada (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share