Technical Papers
Jan 13, 2015

Flexural Behavior of Sandwich Panels with Bio-FRP Skins Made of Flax Fibers and Epoxidized Pine-Oil Resin

Publication: Journal of Composites for Construction
Volume 19, Issue 6

Abstract

Structural sandwich panels with fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) skins are becoming an increasingly popular system because of their remarkable light weight, ease and speed of installation, and high thermal insulation capabilities. This paper looks into the potential for replacing conventional glass fiber–reinforced polymer (GFRP) skins with bio-based skins made of unidirectional flax fibers and a resin blend consisting of epoxidized pine oil. A comprehensive material testing program was first carried out on 70 standard tension and compression coupons. Then, 36 sandwich panels of 1,000×150×75mm were tested under four-point loading. The number of flax fiber–reinforced polymer layers of skin was varied from one to five [in comparison to one layer of GFRP, an epoxidized pine oil resin blend to epoxy, and the wet layup (WL) fabrication method to vacuum bag molding]. Sandwich panels with three layers of flax fibers provided equivalent strength and stiffness, but better deformability, compared to panels with one layer of glass fibers. Epoxidized pine oil-based skins decreased strength by up to 23% compared to epoxy-based skins. Vacuum-bagged panels decreased strength by up to 27% compared to WL as a result of thinner skins. As the number of flax layers increased from one to five, failure modes transitioned from skin wrinkling in the constant moment region to core shear failure or compression skin crushing in the shear span.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The writers would like to acknowledge the in-kind support provided by Fyfe Company and Northern Composites.

References

ASTM. (2008a). “Standard test method for compressive properties of polymer matrix composite materials with unsupported gage section by shear loading.”, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2008b). “Standard test method for tensile properties of polymer matrix composite materials.”, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2010). “Standard test method for flatwise tensile strength of sandwich constructions.”, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2011). “Standard test method for flatwise compressive properties of sandwich cores.”, West Conshohocken, PA.
Cicala, G., Cristaldi, G., Recca, G., and Laterri, A. (2010). Woven fabric engineering, P. D. Dubrovski, ed., Sciyo, Rijeka, Croatia.
Composites Evolution. (2012). “Biotex flax unidirectional fabric, technical data sheet.” 〈http://www.compositesevolution.com/Portals/0/Biotex%20Flax%20Unidirectional%20TDS%20March%202012.pdf〉 (Dec. 20, 2014).
Elliott Company. (2012). “ELFOAM® P400 polyisocyanurate foam.” 〈http://www.elliottfoam.com/pdf/ELFOAM%20P400%20Technical%20Data%20Sheet%201204.pdf〉 (Dec. 20, 2014).
Fam, A., and Sharaf, T. (2010). “Flexural performance of sandwich panels comprising polyurethane core and GFRP skins and ribs of various configurations.” Compos. Struct., 92(12), 2927–2935.
Fyfe Company. (2012). “Tyfo SHE-51A composite using Tyfo® S epoxy.” 〈http://www.fyfeco.com/Products/∼/media/Files/Fyfe/2013-Products/Tyfo%20SEH-51A%20Comp.ashx〉 (Dec. 20, 2014).
Joshi, S. V., Drzal, L. T., Mohanty, A. K., and Arora, S. (2003). “Are natural fiber composites environmentally superior to glass fiber reinforced composites?” Compos. Part A, 35(3), 371–376.
Ku, H., Wang, H., Pattarachaiyakoop, N., and Trada, M. (2011). “A review of the tensile properties of natural fiber reinforced polymer composites.” Compos. Part B, 42(4), 856–873.
Mathieson, H., and Fam, A. (2014). “High cycle fatigue under reversed bending of sandwich panels with GFRP skins and polyurethane foam core.” Compos. Struct., 113, 31–39.
Peirick, L., and Dawood, M. (2012). “In-plane shear behavior of full-scale structural GFRP sandwich panels for building applications.” Proc., Conf. on Fiber Reinforced Polymer (FRP) Composites in Civil Engineering, International Institute for FRP in Construction (IIFC), Rome.
Reis, E. M., and Rizkalla, S. H. (2008). “Material characteristics of 3-D FRP sandwich panels.” Constr. Build. Mater., 22(6), 1009–1018.
Rudd, A., and Chandra, S. (1994). “Side-by-side evaluation of a stressed-skin insulated-core panel house and a conventional stud-frame house.”, Cape Canaveral, FL.
Sharaf, T., Shawkat, W., and Fam, A. (2010). “Structural performance of sandwich wall panels with different foam core densities in one-way bending.” J. Compos. Mater., 44(19), 2249–2263.
Shawkat, W., Honickman, H., and Fam, A. (2008). “Investigation of a novel composite cladding wall panel in flexure.” J. Compos. Mater., 42(3), 315–330.
White, D. J., Take, W. A., and Bolton, M. D. (2003). “Soil deformation measurement using particle image velocimetry (PIV) and photogrammetry.” Géotechnique, 53(7), 619–631.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Composites for Construction
Journal of Composites for Construction
Volume 19Issue 6December 2015

History

Received: Sep 9, 2014
Accepted: Dec 11, 2014
Published online: Jan 13, 2015
Discussion open until: Jun 13, 2015
Published in print: Dec 1, 2015

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Kenneth Mak
M.S. Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Queen’s Univ., Kingston, ON, Canada K7L 3N6.
Amir Fam, M.ASCE [email protected]
Donald and Sarah Munro Chair Professor in Engineering and Applied Science, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Queen’s Univ., Kingston, ON, Canada K7L 3N6 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Colin MacDougall
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Queen’s Univ., Kingston, ON, Canada K7L 3N6.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share