Axial Loading Tests and Simplified Modeling of Sandwich Panels with GFRP Skins and Soft Core at Various Slenderness Ratios
Publication: Journal of Composites for Construction
Volume 19, Issue 2
Abstract
Experimental and analytical studies were conducted to investigate the axial strength and failure modes of sandwich panels with glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) skins and soft polyurethane core. A total of 45 specimens of cross-section and of lengths varying from 500 to 2,400 mm [i.e., slenderness ratio () of 15–70, where is the radius of gyration] were tested concentrically using pin-ends (). The effects of skin thickness and an internal GFRP rib on axial behavior were studied. The study first assessed the level of out-of-straightness and concluded that all specimens generally fall within an acceptable limit of . A model based on sandwich panel theory, accounting for excessive shear deformations of the soft core, was used to predict axial strength at a wide range of and then used in a parametric study. It was shown that short panels with of 15–17 experienced local failure, outwards skin wrinkling in non-ribbed panels, or skin crushing in ribbed panels. Slender panels with of 41–70 experienced global buckling followed by secondary local failure. Panels with intermediate slenderness (17–41) showed mixed failure modes. The load at which local failure governs at low appears to be a constant, independent of , whereas the global buckling load decreases significantly with increasing . Increasing skin thickness appears to be more effective at high whereas increasing core shear modulus appears to be more effective at low .
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to acknowledge financial support provided by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC).
References
Allen, H. G. (1969). Analysis and design of structural sandwich panels, Pergamon Press, Oxford, U.K.
Davies, J. M. (1993). “Sandwich panels.” Thin Walled Struct., 16(1–4), 179–198.
Dawe, D. J., and Yuan, W. X. (2001). “Overall and local buckling of sandwich plates with laminated faceplates. Part I: Analysis.” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 190(40–41), 5197–5213.
Fam, A., and Sharaf, T. (2010). “Flexural performance of sandwich panels comprising polyurethane core and GFRP skins and ribs of various configurations.” Compos. Struct., 92(12), 2927–2935.
Frostig, Y. (1997). “Buckling of sandwich panels with a flexible core—High-order theory.” Int. J, Solids Struct., 35(3–4), 183–204.
Frostig, Y., and Baruch, M. (1993). “High-order buckling analysis of sandwich beams with transversely flexible core.” J. Eng. Mech., 476–495.
Frostig, Y., Baruch, M., Vilnay, O., and Sheinman, I. (1992). ‘‘High-order theory for sandwich-beam behavior with transversely flexible core.’’ J. Eng. Mech, 1026–1043.
Galambos, T. V. (1998). Guide to stability design criteria for metal structures, 5th Ed., Wiley.
Hermann, A. S., Zahlen, P. C., and Zuardy, I. (2005). “Sandwich structures technology in commercial aviation—Present applications and future trends.” Sandwich Structures 7: Advancing with sandwich structures and materials, 13–26.
Lindstrom, A. (2007). “Strength of sandwich panels loaded in in-plane compression.” KTH Engineering Sciences, Dept. of Aeronautical and Vehicle Engineering, Teknikringen, Stockholm, Sweden, 27.
Liu, Q. (2006). “Literature review: Materials with negative poisson’s ratios and potential applications to aerospace and defence.”, Australian Dept. of Defense, Australia, 47.
March, H. W. (1955). Effects of shear deformation in the core of a flat rectangular sandwich panel, United States Dept. of Agriculture Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, 39.
Mathieson, H., and Fam, A. (2013a). “The effect of internal ribs on fatigue performance of sandwich panels with GFRP skins and polyurethane foam core.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng., A4014005.
Mathieson, H., and Fam, A. (2013b). “Static and fatigue behavior of sandwich panels with GFRP skins and governed by soft core shear failure.” J. Compos. Constr., 04013046.
MATLAB [Computer software]. Mathworks, Natick, MA.
Sharaf, T., and Fam, A. (2011). “Experimental investigation of large-scale cladding sandwich panels under out-of-plane transverse loading for building applications.” J. Compos. Constr., 422–430.
Sharaf, T., and Fam, A. (2012). “Numerical modelling of sandwich panels with soft core and different rib configurations.” J. Reinf. Plast. Compos., 31(11), 771–784.
Sharaf, T., Shawkat, W., and Fam, A. (2010). “Structural performance of sandwich wall panels with different foam core densities in one-way bending.” J. Compos. Mater., 44(19), 2249–2263.
Sokolinsky, V., and Frostig, Y. (1999). “Boundary condition effects in buckling of ‘‘soft’’ core sandwich panels.” J. Eng. Mech., 865–874.
Steeves, C. A., and Fleck, N. A. (2004). “Material selection in sandwich beam construction.” Scr. Mater., 50(10), 1335–1339.
Thomsen, O. T., and Frostig, Y. (1997). “Localized bending effects in sandwich panels: Photoelastic investigation versus high-order sandwich theory results.” Compos. Struct., 37(1), 97–108.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2014 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Dec 29, 2013
Accepted: Apr 7, 2014
Published online: Jul 14, 2014
Discussion open until: Dec 14, 2014
Published in print: Apr 1, 2015
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.