Static and Fatigue Behavior of Sandwich Panels with GFRP Skins and Governed by Soft-Core Shear Failure
Publication: Journal of Composites for Construction
Volume 18, Issue 2
Abstract
Sandwich panels composed of glass fiber–reinforced polymer (GFRP) skins and low-density polyurethane core are investigated for potential structural applications such as lightweight insulated roofing or cladding systems. Ten panels, including three control specimens, were tested under high-cycle fatigue at maximum load levels of 45–70% of the ultimate static load. Fatigue tests were carried out to failure, thereby enabling the development of the complete fatigue life () curve and stiffness degradation. Digital imaging correlation was used to map shear deformations and showed that shear contributes about 90% of the deflection. Both static and fatigue failure modes were due to core shear failure. The study showed that fatigue threshold was 37% of the ultimate static capacity, and that to sustain at least 2 million cycles, service load should be limited to 45% of ultimate. The maximum design service live and snow loads, as well as wind load based on the most critical conditions in Canada, were all below the fatigue threshold of the panel. The panels had a strength safety factor of 2.1 relative to the factored maximum design live and snow load, and 6.5 relative to the factored maximum wind load. Deflection limits may govern for some service load conditions, but is not critical when only wind load considered. Stiffness degradation reached a maximum of 15–20%, but residual deflections upon unloading were insignificant.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Allen, H. G. (1969). Analysis and design of structural sandwich panels, Pergamon Press, London.
Bozhevolnaya, E., Lyckegaard, A., and Thomsen, O. T. (2008). “Novel design of foam core junctions in sandwich panels.” Compos. Part B, 39(1), 185–190.
Cheng, Q. H., Lee, H. P., and Lu, C. (2006). “A numerical analysis approach for evaluating elastic constants of sandwich structures with various cores.” Compos. Struct., 74(2), 226–236.
Dawood, M., Taylor, E., Ballew, W., and Rizkalla, S. (2010). “Static and fatigue bending behavior of pultruded GFRP sandwich panels with through-thickness fiber insertions.” Compos. Part B, 41(5), 363–374.
Degrieck, J., and Van Paepegem, W. (2001). “Fatigue damage modeling of fibre-reinforced composite materials: Review.” Appl. Mech. Rev., 54(4), 279–300.
Fam, A., and Sharaf, T. (2010). “Sandwich panels comprising polyurethane core and GFRP skins and ribs of various configurations: Materials and flexural load tests.” Compos. Struct., 92(12), 2927–2935.
Frostig, Y., and Barush, M. (1996). “Localized load effects in high-order bending of sandwich panels with flexible core.” J. Eng. Mech., 1069–1076.
Islam, M. M., and Aravinthan, T. (2010). “Behaviour of structural fibre composite sandwich panels under point load and uniformly distributed load.” Compos. Struct., 93(1), 206–215.
Keller, T., Haas, C., and Vallee, T. (2008). “Structural concept, design, and experimental verification of a glass fiber-reinforced polymer sandwich roof structure.” J. Compos. Constr., 454–468.
Kim, J., and Swanson, S. R. (2001). “Design of sandwich structures for concentrating loading.” Compos. Struct., 52(3–4), 365–373.
Lee, C., Take, W. A., and Hoult, N. A. (2012). “Optimum accuracy of two-dimensional strain measurements using digital image correlation.” J. Comput. Civ. Eng., 795–803.
Lu, H., and Cary, P. D. (2000). “Deformation measurements by digital image correlation: Implementation of a second-order displacement gradient.” Exp. Mech., 40(4), 393–400.
National Research Council Canada (NRCC). (2010). National building code of Canada, 53301, Ottawa, 1245.
Ojalvo, I. V. (1977). “Departures from elastic beam theory in laminated sandwich and short beams.” AIAA J., 15(10), 1518–1521.
Reis, E., and Rizkalla, S. (2008). “Material characteristics of 3-D FRP sandwich panels.” Constr. Build. Mater., 22(6), 1009–1018.
Reissner, E. (1948). “Finite deflections of sandwich plates.” J. Aerosp. Sci., 15(7), 435–440.
Sharaf, T., and Fam, A. (2011). “Experimental investigation of large scale cladding sandwich panels under out-of-plane transverse loading for building applications.” J. Compos. Constr., 422–430.
Sharaf, T., and Fam, A. (2012). “Numerical modelling of sandwich panels with soft core and different rib configurations.” J. Reinf. Plast. Compos., 31(11), 771–784.
Sharaf, T., Shawkat, W., and Fam, A. (2010). “Structural performance of sandwich wall panels with different foam core densities in one-way bending.” J. Compos. Mater., 44(19), 2249–2263.
Shawkat, W., Honickman, H., and Fam, A. (2008). “Investigation of a novel composite cladding wall panel in flexure.” J. Compos. Mater., 42(3), 315–330.
White, D. J., and Take, W. A. (2002). “GeoPIV: Particle image velocimetry (PIV) software for use in geotechnical testing.”, Dept. of Engineering, Cambridge Univ., Cambridge, U.K.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Composites for Construction
Volume 18 • Issue 2 • April 2014
Copyright
© 2013 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Apr 1, 2013
Accepted: Sep 26, 2013
Published online: Nov 18, 2013
Published in print: Apr 1, 2014
Discussion open until: Apr 18, 2014
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.