Technical Papers
Oct 10, 2022

Field Test of a Shear Force Measurement Technique Using Fiber Optic Sensing under Variable Speed Truck Loading

Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 27, Issue 12

Abstract

The measurement of reaction forces at bridge bearings would enable engineers tasked with maintaining bridges to detect potential damage to the bearing and bridge by detecting changes in the load distribution at the supports with time. Currently, measuring the load in the bearing requires sensors built into the bearing, which means that they are hard to repair when damaged and cannot be installed after the bridge is built (unless the bearings are replaced). A potential alternative is the use of distributed fiber optic sensors (DFOS) that could be used to measure curvature in the beams of a bridge, which can then be used to calculate the moment, shear, and ultimately reaction force due to live loading. To investigate this, a DFOS system was installed on a newly built steel girder bridge on a single beam near one of the piers. A series of load tests were undertaken using a truck with a known load and driving along the bridge directly over the instrumented beam at speeds ranging from pseudo-static up to 30 km/h. The maximum measured strain in the bridge beam was 15 microstrain, which was lower than can be measured with certain DFOS systems, and highlighted the need to select a system with appropriate accuracy and precision. The measured strains were used to calculate the beam shear at the pier as the truck moved across the bridge. These results were compared with a continuous beam and two grillage analyses, and it was found that, based on the continuous beam model, about 25% of the total truck load was being carried by the beam, which was lower than the code live load distribution factor suggested. The grillage models provided better estimates of load spreading but were still conservative and dependent on the choice of transverse stiffness.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada and Transport Canada for their financial support of this research. They also gratefully acknowledge the support of the City of Kingston, Hatch, and the Ministry of Transportation Ontario for providing access to necessary resources and personnel. They would also like to thank Jack Poldon, Jacob Yager, and Paul Thrasher for their assistance with the experiments. And thanks to Richard Sturm for his assistance with the grillage analyses and changes to the figures.

References

AASHTO. 2007. AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications SI Units 4th ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2017. AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 8th ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Ashkenazi, V., and G. W. Roberts. 1997. “Experimental monitoring of the Humber Bridge using GPS.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Civ. Eng. 120 (4): 177–182. https://doi.org/10.1680/icien.1997.29810.
Barker, C., N. A. Hoult, and M. Zhang. 2021. “Development of an axial strain measurement system for rails.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 35 (1): 04020145. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001559.
Behrooz, M., S. Yarra, D. Mar, N. Pinuelas, B. Muzinich, N. G. Publicover, G. Pekcan, A. Itani, and F. Gordaninejad. 2016. “A self-sensing magnetorheological elastomer-based adaptive bridge bearing with a wireless data monitoring system.” Vol. 9803 of Sensors and Smart Structures Technologies for Civil, Mechanical, and Aerospace Systems, 1–11. Bellingham, Washington: SPIE.
Bentz, E. C., and N. A. Hoult. 2017. “Bridge model updating using distributed sensor data.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Bridge Eng. 170 (1): 74–86. https://doi.org/10.1680/jbren.15.00030.
Caussignac, J.-M., M. Barbachi, and A. Chabert. 1996. “Bridge bearings equipped with optical fiber sensor for measuring vertical load through the support.” In Vol. 2719 of Smart Structures and Materials 1996: Smart Systems for Bridges, Structures, and Highways, 220–228. Bellingham, Washington: SPIE.
Chang, S.-J., and N.-S. Kim. 2013. “Development of smart seismic bridge bearing using fiber optic Bragg-grating sensors.” In Vol. 8692 of Sensors and Smart Structures Technologies for Civil, Mechanical, and Aerospace Systems. Bellingham, Washington: SPIE.
CSA (Canadian Standard Association). 2019. Design of concrete structures. CSA A23.3:19. Toronto: CSA.
DeWolf, J. T., R. G. Lauzon, and M. P. Culmo. 2002. “Monitoring bridge performance.” Struct. Health Monit. 1 (2): 129–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921702001002001.
Eom, J., and A. S. Nowak. 2001. “Live load distribution for steel girder bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 6 (6): 489–497. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2001)6:6(489).
Gastineau, A., T. Johnson, and A. Schultz. 2009. Bridge health monitoring and inspections—A survey of methods. St. Paul, MN: Minnesota Dept. of Transportation Research Services Section.
Gillham, J., E. C. Bentz, and N. A. Hoult. 2022. “Measuring support reactions and damage detection in steel beams using distributed strain sensing.” Eng. Struct. 262: 114389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114389.
Glišić, B., D. Posenato, and D. Inaudi. 2007. “Integrity monitoring of old steel bridge using fiber optic distributed sensors based on Brillouin scattering.” In Vol. 6531 of Non-destructive Characterization for Composite Materials, Aerospace Engineering, Civil Infrastructure, and Homeland Security, 1–9. Bellingham, Washington: SPIE.
Grubb, M. A., K. E. Wilson, C. D. White, and W. N. Nicklas. 2015. Load and resistance factor design (LRFD) for highway bridge superstructures. Arlington, VA :National Highway Institute.
Hoult, N. A., O. Ekim, and R. Regier. 2014. “Damage/deterioration detection for steel structures using distributed fiber optic strain sensors.” J. Eng. Mech. 140 (12): 04014097. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000812.
IBJ Technology. 2013. “Bridge bearing stress sensor.” Accessed February 19, 2022. https://www.ibj-technology.com/BRIDGE%20BEARING%20STRESS%20and%20LOAD%20SENSOR_Datasheet_1.pdf.
Jaeger, L. G., and B. Bakht. 1982. “The grillage analogy in bridge analysis.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 9 (2): 224–235. https://doi.org/10.1139/l82-025.
Luna Innovations Inc. 2021. “ODiSI 6 User’s Guide.” Accessed December 2, 2021. https://lunainc.com/sites/default/files/assets/files/resourcelibrary/ODiSI%206100%20User%20Guide.pdf.
Lynch, J. P., Y. Wang, K. J. Loh, J. H. Yi, and C. B. Yun. 2006. “Performance monitoring of the Geumdang Bridge using a dense network of high-resolution wireless sensors.” Smart Mater. Struct. 15 (6): 1561–1575. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/15/6/008.
Matta, F., F. Bastianini, N. Galati, P. Casadei, and A. Nanni. 2008. “Distributed strain measurement in steel bridge with fiber optic sensors: Validation through diagnostic load test.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 22 (4): 264–273. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2008)22:4(264).
Mazurek, D. F., and J. T. DeWolf. 1990. “Experimental study of bridge monitoring technique.” J. Struct. Eng. 116 (9): 2532–2549. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1990)116:9(2532).
Mohamad, H., K. Soga, A. Pellew, and P. J. Bennett. 2011. “Performance monitoring of a secant-piled wall using distributed fiber optic strain sensing.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 137 (12): 1236–1243. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000543.
Moses, F. 1979. “Weigh-in-motion system using instrumented bridges.” Transp. Eng. J. 105 (3): 233–249. https://doi.org/10.1061/TPEJAN.0000783.
Murray, C., A. Hoag, N. A. Hoult, and W. A. Take. 2015. “Field monitoring of a bridge using digital image correlation.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Bridge Eng. 168 (1): 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1680/bren.13.00024.
Regier, R., and N. A. Hoult. 2014. “Distributed strain behavior of a reinforced concrete bridge: Case study.” J. Bridge Eng. 19 (12): 05014007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000637.
Sartor, R. R., M. P. Culmo, and J. T. DeWolf. 1999. “Short-term strain monitoring of bridge structures.” J. Bridge Eng. 4 (3): 157–164. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(1999)4:3(157).
Selvakumaran, S., C. Rossi, A. Marinoni, G. Webb, J. Bennetts, E. Barton, S. Plank, and C. Middleton. 2020. “Combined InSAR and terrestrial structural monitoring of bridges.” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 58 (10): 7141–7153. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2020.2979961.
Shah, A., E. Haq, and S. Khan. 2011. “Analysis and design of disturbed regions in concrete structures.” Procedia Eng. 14: 3317–3324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.07.419.
Sigurdardottir, D. H., and B. Glisic. 2013. “Neutral axis as damage sensitive feature.” Smart Mater. Struct. 22 (7): 075030. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/22/7/075030.
Simpson, B., N. A. Hoult, and I. D. Moore. 2015. “Distributed sensing of circumferential strain using fiber optics during full-scale buried pipe experiments.” J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract. 6 (4): 04015002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000197.
Stanton, J. F., and C. W. Roeder. 1982. Elastomeric bearings design, construction, and materials. NCHRP Rep. 248. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Sun, F., N. A. Hoult, L. J. Butler, and M. Zhang. 2022. “Distributed monitoring of rail lateral buckling under axial loading.” J. Civ. Struct. Health Monit. 12: 757–774. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-021-00504-w.
Udd, E., W. L. Schulz, J. M. Seim, K. Corona-Bittick, J. Dorr, K. T. Slattery, H. M. Laylor, and G. E. McGill. 1999. “Fibre optic smart bearing load structure.” In Vol. 3587 of Non-Destructive Evaluation of Bridges and Highways III, 40–48. Bellingham, Washington: SPIE.
Wheeler, L. N., W. A. Take, N. A. Hoult, and H. Le. 2019. “Use of fiber optic sensing to measure distributed rail strains and determine rail seat forces under a moving train.” Can. Geotech. J. 56 (1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2017-0163.
Yoon, H. J., K. Y. Song, H. M. Kim, and J. S. Kim. 2011. “Strain monitoring of composite steel girder bridge using distributed optical fibre sensor system.” Procedia Eng. 10: 2544–2547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.04.419.
Yu, Y., C. S. Cai, and L. Deng. 2016. “State-of-the-art review on bridge weigh-in-motion technology.” Adv. Struct. Eng. 19 (9): 1514–1530. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433216655922.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 27Issue 12December 2022

History

Received: Feb 19, 2022
Accepted: Aug 12, 2022
Published online: Oct 10, 2022
Published in print: Dec 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Mar 10, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Jack Gillham [email protected]
Researcher, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Queen’s Univ., Kingston, ON K7L 3N9, Canada. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Queen’s Univ., Kingston, ON K7L 3N9, Canada (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2819-7410. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Mineral Engineering, Univ. of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A4, Canada. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9368-8681. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Measuring Support Reactions in a Composite Model Bridge Using Distributed Fiber Optic Sensing, Journal of Structural Engineering, 10.1061/JSENDH.STENG-12151, 149, 7, (2023).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share