Technical Papers
Sep 15, 2022

Scaling Factors Quantifying Seismic Load Uncertainty with Soil Nonlinearity Effect in Displacement-Based Design of Bridge Abutments

Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 27, Issue 11

Abstract

The displacement-based design methods for bridge abutments, essentially cantilever retaining walls, require an input of expected ground motion on-site. For major projects, these motions are obtained based on site-specific response studies. In other projects, it is merely a guess based on the PGA values prescribed in the design codes. Further, the seismic displacements in retaining walls are usually estimated using simplified rigid–plastic analytical models. These models do not account for the effect of soil nonlinearity, alteration of input signal due to soil–structure interaction, amplification effects, or material damping. The currently followed seismic load factor of 1 on the prescribed PGA does not account for the induced uncertainties for the reasons given here, which can often be unconservative and lead to failure. This study statistically quantifies the effect of these uncertainties and proposes scaling factors on the design PGA of the input motion to estimate more reliable seismic displacements accounting for the assumptions in the simplified rigid–plastic model. The nonlinear finite-element analysis of retaining wall in OpenSees has been compared with the analytical double-wedge model considering a realistic V-shaped mechanism in backfill. It includes analysis for 83 different cases of earthquake motions scaled to four different PGAs. Finally, the scaling factors are proposed to estimate residual as well as peak sliding and in-plane rotational displacements of cantilever retaining walls with and without shear key.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

Financial support from IIT Gandhinagar is gratefully acknowledged. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions related to this research article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of IIT Gandhinagar.

Notation

The following symbols are used in this paper:
COV
coefficient of variation;
amax
peak ground acceleration;
f
scaling factor;
W
weight of wall with locked soil mass;
Ws
weight of soil wedge;
δ
interface friction angle between wall and soil;
γ
load factor;
ησ
constant representing the number of standard deviations required to obtained desired probability of exceedance;
λ
mean of bias of load;
ϕ
angle of shearing resistance;
θ1
angle of inclination of inner rupture plane with horizontal; and
θ2
angle of inclination of inner rupture plane with vertical.

References

AASHTO. 2020. AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Al Atik, L., and N. Sitar. 2009. Experimental and analytical study of the seismic performance of retaining structures. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center.
Allen, T. M., A. S. Nowak, and R. J. Bathurst. 2005. Calibration to determine load and resistance factors for geotechnical and structural design. Transportation Research Circular, (E-C079). Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Anderson, D. G. 2008. Seismic analysis and design of retaining walls, buried structures, slopes, and embankments. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Athanasopoulos-Zekkos, A., V. S. Vlachakis, and G. A. Athanasopoulos. 2013. “Phasing issues in the seismic response of yielding, gravity-type earth retaining walls – Overview and results from a FEM study.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 55: 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2013.08.004.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 1998. Design provisions for earthquake resistance of structures – Part 5: Foundations, retaining structures and geotechnical aspects. EN 1998-5 (Eurocode 8). Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
Garini, E., G. Gazetas, and I. Anastasopoulos. 2011. “Asymmetric “Newmark” sliding caused by motions containing severe “directivity” and “fling” pulses.” Géotechnique 61 (9): 733–756. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.9.P.070.
Gazetas, G., E. Garini, and T. Georgarakos. 2008. “Effects of near-fault ground shaking on sliding systems.” In Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics IV, Geotechnical Special Publication 181, edited by D. Zeng, M. T. Manzari, and D. R. Hiltunen, 1–23. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Geraili Mikola, R., G. Candia, and N. Sitar. 2016. “Seismic earth pressures on retaining structures and basement walls in cohesionless soils.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 142 (10): 4016047. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001507.
Green, R. A., and R. L. Michalowski. 2006. “Shear band formation behind retaining structures subjected to seismic excitation.” Found. Civ. Environ. Eng. 7: 157–169.
Hilber, H. M., T. J. R. Hughes, and R. L. Taylor. 1977. “Improved numerical dissipation for time integration algorithms in structural dynamics.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 5 (3): 283–292. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290050306.
Huang, C.-C., and Y.-H. Chen. 2004. “Seismic stability of soil retaining walls situated on slope.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 130 (1): 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:1(45).
Huang, C.-C., S.-H. Wu, and H.-J. Wu. 2009. “Seismic displacement criterion for soil retaining walls based on soil strength mobilization.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 135 (1): 74–83. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2009)135:1(74).
Ishibashi, I., and X. Zhang. 1993. “Unified dynamic shear moduli and damping ratios of sand and clay.” Soils Found. 33 (1): 182–191. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.33.182.
Jadhav, P. R. 2019. Deformation-based seismic design of cantilever retaining walls. Gandhinagar, India: Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar.
Jadhav, P. R., and A. Prashant. 2019. “Double-wedge model for computing seismic sliding displacements of cantilever retaining walls.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 116: 570–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.09.047.
Jadhav, P. R., and A. Prashant. 2020. “Computation of seismic translational and rotational displacements of cantilever retaining wall with shear key.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 130: 105966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.105966.
Kloukinas, P., A. Scotto di Santolo, A. Penna, M. Dietz, A. Evangelista, A. L. Simonelli, C. Taylor, and G. Mylonakis. 2015. “Investigation of seismic response of cantilever retaining walls: Limit analysis vs shaking table testing.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 77: 432–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.05.018.
Kolay, C., A. Prashant, and S. K. Jain. 2013. “Nonlinear dynamic analysis and seismic coefficient for abutments and retaining walls.” Earthquake Spectra 29 (2): 427–451. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.4000141.
Koseki, J., M. Tateyama, F. Tatsuoka, and K. Horiiet al. 1995. Back analyses of soil retaining walls for railway embankments damaged by the 1995 Hyogoken-nanbu earthquake, 31–56. Joint Rep.on 1995 Kobe Earthquake by INCEDE, ERS and KOBE net, Institute of Industrial Science. Tokyo: Univ. of Tokyo.
Kulicki, J. M., W. G. Wasser, D. R. Mertz, and A. S. Nowak. 2015. Bridges for service life beyond 100 years: Service limit state design. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Lysmer, J., and R. L. Kuhlemeyer. 1969. “Finite dynamic model for infinite media.” J. Eng. Mech. Div. 95 (4): 859–877. https://doi.org/10.1061/JMCEA3.0001144.
Marsh, M. L., I. G. Buckle, and E. Kavazanjian, Jr. 2014. LRFD seismic analysis and design of bridges: Reference manual. Publication No. FHWA-NHI-15-004. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration.
Matsuo, O., K. Yokoyama, and Y. Saito. 1998. “Shaking table tests and analyses of geosynthetic-reinforced soil retaining walls.” Geosynth. Int. 5 (1–2): 97–126. https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.5.0116.
Mazzoni, S., F. McKenna, M. H. Scott, and G. L. Fenves et al. 2006. Vol. 264 of Opensees command language manual, 137–158. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center.
Newmark, N. M. 1965. “Effects of earthquakes on dams and embankments.” Géotechnique 15 (2): 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1965.15.2.139.
Ortiz, L. A., R. F. Scott, and J. Lee. 1983. “Dynamic centrifuge testing of a cantilever retaining wall.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 11 (2): 251–268. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290110207.
PEER (Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center). 2017. “NGA Database.” https://ngawest2.berkeley.edu/.
Penna, A., A. Scotto di Santolo, P. Kloukinas, C. Taylor, G. Mylonakis, A. Evangelista, and A. L. Simonelli. 2014. “Advanced measurements on cantilever retaining wall models during earthquake simulations.” In Proc., 20th IMEKO TC4 Int. Symp. and 18th Int. Workshop on ADC Modelling and Testing Research on Electric and Electronic Measurement for the Economic Upturn, 127–132. Hungary: International Measurement Confederation (IMEKO).
Richards, R., Jr., and D. G. Elms. 1979. “Seismic behavior of gravity retaining walls.” J. Geotech. Eng. Div. 105 (4): 449–464. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJGEB6.0000783.
Roberts, L. A., and A. Misra. 2010. “LRFD of shallow foundations at the service limit state.” Georisk 4 (1): 13–21.
Sarma, S. K., and M. Scorer. 2009. “The effect of vertical accelerations on seismic slope stability.” In Proc., Int. Conf. on Performance-Based Design in Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, 889–896. London: Taylor and Francis.
Scott, B., B. J. Kim, and R. Salgado. 2003. “Assessment of current load factors for use in geotechnical load and resistance factor design.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 129 (4): 287–295. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2003)129:4(287).
Seed, H. B., and R. V. Whitman. 1970. “Design of earth retaining structures for dynamic loads.” In ASCE Specialty Conf.-Lateral Stress in the Ground and Design of Earth Retaining Structures, 103–147. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ.
Watanbe, K., Y. Munaf, J. Koseki, M. Tateyama, and K. Kojima. 2003. “Behaviors of several types of model retaining walls subjected to irregular excitation.” Soils Found. 43 (5): 13–27. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.43.5_13.
Zarrabi-Kashani, K. 1979. Sliding of gravity retaining wall during earthquakes considering vertical acceleration and changing inclination of failure surface. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Zhang, Y., J. P. Conte, Z. Yang, A. Elgamal, J. Bielak, and G. Acero. 2008. “Two-dimensional nonlinear earthquake response analysis of a bridge-foundation-ground system.” Earthquake Spectra 24 (2): 343–386. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2923925.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 27Issue 11November 2022

History

Received: Oct 11, 2021
Accepted: Jul 14, 2022
Published online: Sep 15, 2022
Published in print: Nov 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Feb 15, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Prajakta R. Jadhav [email protected]
Former Ph.D. Student, Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar, Gandhinagar 382355, India. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar, Gandhinagar 382355, India (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0841-5951. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share