Technical Papers
May 16, 2022

Structural Assessment of AASHTO Type II Prestressed Concrete Girder with GFRP or Stainless-Steel Shear Reinforcement

Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 27, Issue 7

Abstract

Concrete bridges in extremely aggressive environments deteriorate mainly from corrosion of carbon steel prestressing strands and rebars. In prestressed concrete girders, corrosion might occur in the transverse reinforcement, which results in a decrease in shear resistance. Corrosion-free glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) rebars and corrosion-resistant stainless steel rebars are promising solutions to address corrosion. However, GFRP rebars have lower ultimate strain, elastic modulus, and transverse shear capacity than stainless steel rebars. Two full-scale 12.8-m (42-ft) long AASHTO (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials) Type II girders with a deck slab on top of them were tested in shear at both ends. One girder was reinforced with duplex stainless steel Grade 520 (75) stirrups, and the other was reinforced with GFRP stirrups. Both girders had 11 carbon steel prestressing strands, each initially stressed to 75% of the strand’s ultimate stress. The girders were composite with a deck slab and had a smooth interface between the girder and slab. The objective was to experimentally assess the structural behavior of the girders. The girder reinforced with stainless steel stirrups failed in flexural shear while the girder reinforced with GFRP stirrups failed in interface shear due to the lower transverse shear capacity of GFRP rebars and smooth interface between the girder and slab. The experimental shear force at the failure of the girder reinforced with stainless steel stirrups was 9.1% greater than that reinforced with GFRP stirrups. Also, the direct replacement of stainless steel confinement reinforcement with GFRP resulted in strand slippage. It was found that the current AASHTO LRFD shear design provisions are conservative in predicting the vertical shear resistance of a girder reinforced with stainless steel stirrups or GFRP stirrups. The research findings will be helpful in the development of design guide specifications for prestressed concrete girders reinforced with GFRP stirrups.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors express their gratitude and sincere appreciation to the Florida Department of Transportation for funding this study. The authors are grateful to Steve Nolan for reviewing and providing thoughtful comments on this paper. Special thanks are extended to Sam Fallaha, Will Potter, and Vickie Young for their technical guidance. Also, the authors thank Steve Eudy, Justin Robertson, Paul Tighe, Ben Allen, Miguel Ramirez, and Michael Waters at the Florida Department of Transportation Structures Research Center for their assistance in testing specimens; the work was enjoyable and well-executed because of their expertise and enthusiasm. The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Florida Department of Transportation or the U.S. Department of Transportation.

References

AASHTO. 2017. AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications. 8th ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2018. AASHTO LRFD bridge design guide specifications for GFRP-reinforced concrete. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
ACI (American Concrete Institute). 2014. Guide for the design and construction of structural concrete reinforced with fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) bars. ACI 440. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI.
Ahmed, E. A., E. F. El-Salakawy, and B. Benmokrane. 2010a. “Shear performance of RC bridge girders reinforced with carbon FRP stirrups.” J. Bridge Eng. 15 (1): 44–54. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000035.
Ahmed, E. A., E. F. El-Salakawy, and B. Benmokrane. 2010b. “Fibre-reinforced polymer composite shear reinforcement: Performance evaluation in concrete beams and code prediction.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 37 (8): 1057–1070. https://doi.org/10.1139/L10-046.
Ahmed, E. A., E. F. El-Salakawy, and B. Benmokrane. 2010c. “Performance evaluation of glass fiber-reinforced polymer shear reinforcement for concrete beams.” ACI Struct. J. 107 (1): 53–62.
Al-Kaimakchi, A., and M. Rambo-Roddenberry. 2021a. “Measured transfer length of 15.2-mm (0.6-in.) duplex high-strength stainless steel strands in pretensioned girders.” Eng. Struct. 237: 112178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112178.
Al-Kaimakchi, A., and M. Rambo-Roddenberry. 2021b. “Flexural behavior of concrete bridge girders prestressed with stainless steel strands.” ACI Struct. J. 118 (4): 137–152.
Alkatan, J. 2016. “FRP shear transfer reinforcement for composite concrete construction.” M.S. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Windsor.
ASTM. 2011a. Standard test method for tensile properties of fiber reinforced polymer matrix composite bars. ASTM D7205-11. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2011b. Standard test method for transverse shear strength of fiber-reinforced polymer matrix composite bars. ASTM D7617-11. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2017. Standard specification for solid round glass fiber reinforced polymer bars for concrete reinforcement. ASTM D7957-17. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Belarbi, A., M. Dawood, P. Poudel, M. Reda, H. Tahsiri, B. Gencturk, S. H. Rizkalla, and H. G. Russell. 2019. Design of concrete bridge beams prestressed with CFRP systems. NCHRP Rep. 907. Washington, DC: National Cooperative Highway Research Program.
Benmokrane, B., C. Nazair, M.-A. Loranger, and A. Manalo. 2018. “Field durability study of vinyl-ester–based GFRP rebars in concrete bridge barriers.” J. Bridge Eng. 23 (12): 04018094. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001315.
Castro-Borges, P., O. Troconis-Rincón, E. I. Moreno, A. A. Torres-Acosta, M. Martinez-Madrid, and A. Knudsen. 2002. “Performance of a 60-year-old concrete pier with stainless steel reinforcement.” Mater. Perform. 41 (10): 50–55.
CSA (Canadian Standard Association). 2017. Design and construction of building structures with fibre-reinforced polymers. CAN/CSA-S806-17. Rexdale, ON, Canada: CSA.
El-Sayed, A. K., E. F. El-Salakawy, and B. Benmokrane. 2006. “Shear capacity of high-strength concrete beams reinforced with FRP bars.” ACI Struct. J. 103 (3): 383–389.
FDOT (Florida Department of Transportation). 2020a. Structures design guidelines. Tallahassee, FL: FDOT.
FDOT (Florida Department of Transportation). 2020b. Standard plans for bridge construction. Tallahassee, FL: FDOT.
Fremch, T. 2021. “Designing for resilience and durability on the longest spliced precast concrete girder bridge in Vermont.” ASPIRE 15 (3): 28–31.
Guadagnini, M., K. Pilakoutas, and P. Waldron. 2006. “Shear resistance of FRP RC beams: Experimental study.” J. Compos. Constr. 10 (6): 464–473. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2006)10:6(464).
Johnson, D. T., and S. A. Sheikh. 2016. “Experimental investigation of glass fiber-reinforced polymer-reinforced normal-strength concrete beams.” ACI Struct. J. 113 (6): 1165–1174. https://doi.org/10.14359/51689017.
Mattock, A. H. 1974. “Shear transfer in concrete having reinforcement at an angle to the shear plane.” ACI Spec. Publ. 42: 17–42.
Patzlaff, Q., G. Morcous, K. Hanna, and M. K. Tadros. 2012. “Bottom flange confinement reinforcement in precast prestressed concrete bridge girders.” J. Bridge Eng. 17 (4): 607–616. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000287.
Rabi, M., K. Cashell, and R. Shamass. 2019. “Flexural analysis and design of stainless steel reinforced concrete beams.” Eng. Struct. 198: 109432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109432.
Rambo-Roddenberry, M., and A. Al-Kaimakchi. 2020. Stainless steel strands and lightweight concrete for pretensioned concrete girders. Tallahassee, FL: Florida Dept. of Transportation.
Zhang, P., Y. Cong, M. Vogel, Z. Liu, H. S. Müller, Y. Zhu, and T. Zhao. 2017. “Steel reinforcement corrosion in concrete under combined actions: The role of freeze–thaw cycles, chloride ingress, and surface impregnation.” Constr. Build. Mater. 148: 113–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.078.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 27Issue 7July 2022

History

Received: Jun 5, 2021
Accepted: Mar 22, 2022
Published online: May 16, 2022
Published in print: Jul 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Oct 16, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Bridge Designer at Corven Engineering, Hardesty & Hanover Company, Tallahassee, FL 32308; Former Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Florida A&M Univ.—Florida State Univ. College of Engineering, Tallahassee, FL 32310 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5313-6417. Email: [email protected]
Michelle Rambo-Roddenberry, Ph.D., F.ASCE https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3295-5824
P.E.
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, and Associate Dean for Student Services and Undergraduate Affairs, Florida A&M Univ.—Florida State Univ. College of Engineering, Tallahassee, FL 32310. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3295-5824

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share