Abstract

Bridges are an integral part of a country’s transportation infrastructure system. Earthquake-induced damages to bridges could result in fatalities and injuries, disturbances to the transportation infrastructure system, and incur significant repair costs. Furthermore, bridges must stay functional following an earthquake to maintain the continuity of transportation. Thus, innovative high-performance materials in the critical regions of structures and/or structural systems must be used located in regions of high seismic activity to mitigate the impacts of earthquakes. Despite having a higher seismic resilience, these structures, in general, tend to require a greater capital investment as a result of utilizing expensive material and special workmanship. However, when accounting for the postearthquake repair and maintenance costs, these seismically enhanced bridges can deliver significant cost advantages over conventional structures in the long run. Even so, the outcomes depend on the frequency and severity of the seismic damage, the lifespan of the bridge, the cost of materials, and the embodied emissions of the structures. To ensure better overall results, the cost–benefit analysis should be done with a life-cycle thinking perspective when comparing and making a decision related to multiple bridge systems. In this regard, a decision framework is developed to evaluate the overall life cycle performance of such a novel bridge, using fuzzy logic to integrate uncertainty. The proposed framework will assist engineers and the construction industry as a whole in making informed decisions regarding bridge infrastructure planning under dynamic conditions.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The financial contribution of the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada through the Discover grant is gratefully acknowledged to conduct this research.

References

Aydan, O. 2008. “A reconnaissance report on 2008 Wenchuan earthquake.” Tokyo, Japan: Japan Society of Civil Engineers.
Baker, J. W., and C. Allin Cornell. 2005. “A vector-valued ground motion intensity measure consisting of spectral acceleration and epsilon.” Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 34: 1193–1217. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.474.
Billah, A. H. M. M., and M. S. Alam. 2016. “Performance-based seismic design of shape memory alloy–reinforced concrete bridge piers. I: Development of performance-based damage states.” J. Struct. Eng. 142: 04016140. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001458.
Billah, A. H. M. M., and M. S. Alam. 2015. “Seismic fragility assessment of highway bridges: A state-of-the-art review.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 11 (6): 804–832. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2014.912243.
Billah, A. H. M. M., and M. S. Alam. 2012. “Seismic performance of concrete columns reinforced with hybrid Shape Memory Alloy (SMA) and Fiber Reinforced Polymer (FRP) bars.” Constr. Build. Mater. 28: 730–742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.10.020.
Bizjak, K. F., and S. Lenart. 2018. “Life cycle assessment of a geosynthetic-reinforced soil bridge system—A case study.” Geotext. Geomembranes 46: 543–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2018.04.012.
Capacci, L., F. Biondini, and A. Titi. 2020. “Lifetime seismic resilience of aging bridges and road networks.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 16: 266–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2019.1653937.
Chancellor, N. B., M. R. Eatherton, D. A. Roke, and T. Akbaş. 2014. “Self-centering seismic lateral force resisting systems: High performance structures for the city of tomorrow.” Buildings 4: 520–548. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings4030520.
Chen, S.-H. 1985. “Ranking fuzzy numbers with maximizing set and minimizing set.” Fuzzy Sets Syst. 17: 113–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(85)90050-8.
Cho, S., P. Gordon, J. E. II Moore, H. W. Richardson, M. Shinozuka, and S. Chang. 2001. “Integrating transportation network and regional economic models to estimate the costs of a large urban earthquake.” J. Reg. Sci. 41: 39–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4146.00206.
Clifton Associates. 2012. Pothole identification, assessment and repair guidelines. Alberta, CA, Canada: Clifton Associates.
Cornell, C. A., F. Jalayer, R. O. Hamburger, and D. A. Foutch. 2002. “Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC federal emergency management agency steel moment frame guidelines.” J. Struct. Eng. 128: 526–533. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:4(526).
CSA (Canadian Standards Association). 2019. Canadian highway bridge design code. CSA-S6-19. Rexdale, ON, Canada: CSA.
Dong, Y., and D. M. Frangopol. 2015. “Risk and resilience assessment of bridges under mainshock and aftershocks incorporating uncertainties.” Eng. Struct. 83: 198–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.10.050.
Du, G. 2012. Towards sustainable construction: Life cycle assessment of railway bridges. Stockholm, Sweden: KTH Royal Institute of Technology.
Du, G., and R. Karoumi. 2013. “Life cycle assessment of a railway bridge: Comparison of two superstructure designs.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 9: 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2012.670250.
Eguchi, R. T., J. D. Goltz, C. E. Taylor, S. E. Chang, P. J. Flores, L. A. Johnson, H. A. Seligson, and N. C. Blais. 1998. “Direct economic losses in the Northridge earthquake: A three-year post-event perspective.” Earthq. Spectra 14: 245–264. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585998.
Elnashai, A. S., B. Gencturk, O. S. O.-S. Kwon, I. L. Al-Qadi, Y. Hashash, J. R. Roesler, S. J. S. J. Kim, S.-H. Jeong, J. Dukes, and A. Valdivia. 2010. The Maule (Chile) earthquake of February 27, 2010: Consequence assessment and case studies. MAE Center Report No. 10-04. Urbana, IL: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Elwood, K. J. 2013. “Performance of concrete buildings in the 22 February 2011 Christchurch earthquake and implications for Canadian codes.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 40: 759–776. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2011-0564.
FEMA. 2003. HAZUS-MH software. Washington, DC: FEMA.
Franchin, P., and F. Cavalieri. 2015. “Probabilistic assessment of civil infrastructure resilience to earthquakes.” Comput. Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 30: 583–600. https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12092.
Frangopol, D. M., K.-Y. Lin, and A. C. Estes. 1997. “Life-cycle cost design of deteriorating structures.” J. Struct. Eng. 123: 1390–1401. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1997)123:10(1390).
Freddi, F., J. E. Padgett, and A. D. Asta. 2012. “Life cycle cost analysis of low ductility RC frame buildings retrofitted by modern retrofit techniques.” In Eur. Conf., on Structural Control. Genoa, Italy: Erredi Grafiche Editoriali.
Gervásio, H., and L. S. da Silva. 2008. “Comparative life-cycle analysis of steel–concrete composite bridges.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 4: 251–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732470600627325.
Goedkoop, M., A. De Schryver, and M. Oele. 2006. Introduction to LCA with SimaPro 7. Amersfoort, The Netherlands: PRé Consultants.
Hale, D. 2018. Heavy construction costs with RSMeans data. 32nd ed. R S Means Co.
Hammervold, J., M. Reenaas, and H. Brattebø. 2013. “Environmental life cycle assessment of bridges.” J. Bridg. Eng. 18: 153–161. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000328.
Hawk, H. 2003. Bridge life-cycle cost analysis. NCHRP Report 483. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Hedayati-Dezfuli, F., and M. S. Alam. 2019. “Seismic vulnerability assessment of a multi-span continuous steel-girder bridge isolated by SMA wire-based natural rubber bearings (SMA-NRB).” In Proc., Structures Congress 2015, edited by N. Ingraffea and M. Libby. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Hischier, R., B. Weidema, H. Althaus, and C. Bauer. 2010. Implementation of life cycle impact assessment methods. Final Report Ecoinvent version 2. Dübendorf, Switzerland: Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories.
Hong, T., and M. Hastak. 2007. “Life-cycle cost assessment model for fiber reinforced polymer bridge deck panels.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 34: 976–991. https://doi.org/10.1139/l07-019.
Horwich, G. 2000. “Economic lessons of the Kobe earthquake.” Econ. Dev. Cult. Change 48: 521–542. https://doi.org/10.1086/452609.
Hwang, H., J. B. Liu, and Y.-H. Chiu. 2001. Seismic fragility analysis of highway bridges. Tech. Rep. MAEC RR-4. Memphis, TN: Center for Earthquake Research and Information, The Univ. of Memphis.
ISO. 2006. Environmental management—Life cycle assessment—Principles and framework. Geneva: ISO.
Karunathilake, H., K. Hewage, J. Brinkerhoff, and R. Sadiq. 2019a. “Optimal renewable energy supply choices for net-zero ready buildings: A life cycle thinking approach under uncertainty.” Energy Build. 201: 70–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.07.030.
Karunathilake, H., K. Hewage, W. Mérida, and R. Sadiq. 2019b. “Renewable energy selection for net-zero energy communities: Life cycle based decision making under uncertainty.” Renew. Energy 130: 558–573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.06.086.
Kawashima, K. 2012. “Damage of bridges due to the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake.” J. Japan Assoc. Earthq. Eng. 12 (4): 319–338.
Kendall, A., G. A. Keoleian, and G. E. Helfand. 2008. “Integrated life-cycle assessment and life-cycle cost analysis model for concrete bridge deck applications.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 14: 214–222. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2008)14:3(214).
Kim, K. J., W. G. Yun, N. Cho, and J. Ha. 2017. “Life cycle assessment based environmental impact estimation model for pre-stressed concrete beam bridge in the early design phase.” Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 64: 47–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2017.02.003.
Kongar, I., S. Esposito, and S. Giovinazzi. 2017. “Post-earthquake assessment and management for infrastructure systems: Learning from the Canterbury (New Zealand) and L’Aquila (Italy) earthquakes.” Bull. Earthq. Eng. 15: 589–620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-015-9761-y.
Lee, W. K., and S. L. Billington. 2011. “Performance-based earthquake engineering assessment of a self-centering, post-tensioned concrete bridge system.” Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 40: 887–902. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1065.
Li, S., F. Hedayati Dezfuli, J. Wang, and M. S. Alam. 2020a. “Performance-based seismic loss assessment of isolated simply-supported highway bridges retrofitted with different shape memory alloy cable restrainers in a life-cycle context.” J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 31 (8): 1053–1075. https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X20906018.
Li, S., F. Hedayati Dezfuli, J. Wang, and M. Shahria Alam. 2020b. “Seismic vulnerability and loss assessment of an isolated simply-supported highway bridge retrofitted with optimized superelastic shape memory alloy cable restrainers.” Bull. Earthq. Eng. 18: 3285–3316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-00812-4.
Mackie, K. R., J.-M. Wong, and B. Stojadinović. 2009. “Post-earthquake bridge repair cost and repair time estimation methodology.” Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 39: 281–301.
Mander, J. B. 1999. Fragility curve development for assessing the seismic vulnerability of highway bridges. Technical Report. Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research (MCEER), University at Buffalo, State University of New York.
Muthukumarana, T. T., H. P. Karunathilake, H. K. G. Punchihewa, M. M. I. D. Manthilake, and K. N. Hewage. 2018. “Life cycle environmental impacts of the apparel industry in Sri Lanka: Analysis of the energy sources.” J. Clean. Prod. 172: 1346–1357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.261.
Nielson, B. G., and W. C. Pang. 2011. “Effect of ground motion suite size on uncertainty estimation in seismic bridge fragility modeling.” In Structures Congress 2011, edited by D. Ames, T. L. Droessler, and M. Hoit, 23–34. Reston, VA: ASCE.
O’Born, R. 2018. “Life cycle assessment of large scale timber bridges: A case study from the world’s longest timber bridge design in Norway.” Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 59: 301–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2018.01.018.
Palermo, A., S. Pampanin, and D. Marriott. 2007. “Design, modeling, and experimental response of seismic resistant bridge piers with posttensioned dissipating connections.” J. Struct. Eng. 133: 1648–1661. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:11(1648).
Pan, Y., A. K. Agrawal, M. Ghosn, and S. Alampalli. 2010. “Seismic fragility of multispan simply supported steel highway bridges in New York State. II: Fragility analysis, fragility curves, and fragility surfaces.” J. Bridge Eng. 15 (5): 462–472.
Penadés-Plà, V., T. García-Segura, J. Martí, and V. Yepes. 2018. “An optimization-LCA of a prestressed concrete precast bridge.” Sustainability 10: 685. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030685.
Ruparathna, R., K. Hewage, and R. Sadiq. 2017. “Economic evaluation of building energy retrofits: A fuzzy based approach.” Energy Build. 139: 395–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.01.031.
Safi, M. A. E. 2009. Bridge life cycle cost optimization. Stockholm, Sweden: KTH Royal Institute of Technology.
SAIC (Scientific Applications International Corporation). 2006. Life cycle assessment: Principles and practice. Reston, VA: SAIC.
Saiidi, M. S., and H. Wang. 2006. “Exploratory study of seismic response of concrete columns with shape memory alloys reinforcement.” ACI Struct. J. 103: 435–442.
Saini, A., and M. S. Saiidi. 2013. Post-earthquake damage repair of various reinforced concrete bridge components. Caltrans Final Rep. CA, 142179.
TxDOT (Texas Department of Transportation). 2018. Asphalt overlays on bridges. Austin, TX: TxDOT.
Vamvatsikos, D., and M. Fragiadakis. 2010. “Incremental dynamic analysis for estimating seismic performance sensitivity and uncertainty.” Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 39: 141–163.
Van Leekwijck, W., and E. E. Kerre. 1999. “Defuzzification: Criteria and classification.” Fuzzy Sets Syst. 108: 159–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(97)00337-0.
Wang, Y.-M., and K.-S. Chin. 2011. “Technical importance ratings in fuzzy QFD by integrating fuzzy normalization and fuzzy weighted average.” Comput. Math. with Appl. 62: 4207–4221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2011.10.005.
Wei, H.-H., M. J. Skibniewski, I. M. Shohet, and X. Yao. 2016. “Lifecycle environmental performance of natural-hazard mitigation for buildings.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 30: 04015042. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000803.
Welsh-Huggins, S. J., and A. B. Liel. 2017. “A life-cycle framework for integrating green building and hazard-resistant design: Examining the seismic impacts of buildings with green roofs.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 13: 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2016.1198396.
Werner, S. D., C. E. Taylor, S. Cho, J. P. Lavoie, C. Huyck, C. Eitzel, H. Chung, and R. T. Eguchi. 2006. REDARS 2 methodology and software for seismic risk analysis of highway systems (MCEER-06-SP08). Buffalo, NY: DOT, FHWA.
Xiang, N., X. Chen, and M. S. Alam. 2020. “Probabilistic seismic fragility and loss analysis of concrete bridge piers with superelastic shape memory alloy–steel coupled reinforcing bars.” Eng. Struct. 207: 110229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110229.
Yeheyis, M., K. Hewage, M. S. Alam, C. Eskicioglu, and R. Sadiq. 2013. “An overview of construction and demolition waste management in Canada: A lifecycle analysis approach to sustainability.” Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 15: 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-012-0481-6.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 27Issue 6June 2022

History

Received: Feb 27, 2021
Accepted: Feb 27, 2022
Published online: Apr 15, 2022
Published in print: Jun 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Sep 15, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Graduate Research Assistant, School of Engineering, Univ. of British Columbia (Okanagan Campus), 1137 Alumni Ave., Kelowna, BC, Canada V1V 1V7. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3331-0905. Email: [email protected]
Graduate Research Assistant, School of Engineering, Univ. of British Columbia (Okanagan Campus), 1137 Alumni Ave., Kelowna, BC, Canada V1V 1V7. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9845-5107. Email: [email protected]
Senior Lecturer, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Univ. of Moratuwa, Katubedda, Moratuwa 10400, Sri Lanka. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1350-7444. Email: [email protected]
Instructor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, British Columbia Institute of Technology, 3700 Willingdon Ave. Burnaby, BC, Canada V5G 3H2. Email: [email protected]
Kasun Hewage [email protected]
Professor and FortisBC Smart Energy Chair, Civil Engineering, School of Engineering, Univ. of British Columbia (Okanagan Campus), 1137 Alumni Ave., Kelowna, BC, Canada V1V 1V7. Email: [email protected]
Professor and Tier-1 Principal’s Research Chair in Resilient & Green Infrastructure, Civil Engineering, School of Engineering, Univ. of British Columbia (Okanagan Campus), 1137 Alumni Ave., Kelowna, BC, Canada V1V 1V7 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9092-1473. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share