Technical Papers
Mar 10, 2022

Pseudostatic Behavior of Precast Piers with Composite Pier–Pile Cap Connections: Experimental Investigation

Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 27, Issue 5

Abstract

A novel composite connection, the steel–concrete composite connection with notched perfobond connectors (NPCs), is proposed for bridge pier–pile cap joint in this paper. In the steel–concrete composite connection with NPCs (SCCN), connection steel plates pre-embedded at the bottom of the pier column are bolted to the pile cap. The load from the pier column to the pile cap is transferred through a steel–steel connection rather than a traditional concrete–concrete connection. To investigate the failure modes and the hysteretic behaviors of precast piers with SCCN, pseudostatic capacity tests of two half-scale specimens have been conducted, with the axial compression ratio (n) of 0.17 and 0.06, respectively. The results show that the precast piers with SCCN present typical flexural failure, the same as cast-in-place (CIP) piers. Concrete cracking, longitudinal rebar yielding, concrete spalling and crushing, and longitudinal rebar fracture are successively observed. Concrete cracking and crushing both appear at the bottom of the pier columns but above the steel jacket. The hysteretic curves of the precast piers have a large shape with a slight pinching. The ductility and equivalent damping coefficient of the specimens are close to CIP piers. Compared to a specimen with n = 0.06, the flexural capacity and initial stiffness of a specimen with n = 0.17 increase by 44% and 37%, respectively. Furthermore, the residual drift ratios of the specimens with n = 0.17 and n = 0.06 are 1/4–1/2 to CIP piers, as 1.28% and 1.00%, respectively. Consequently, the proposed connection can significantly improve elastic deformation and self-centering ability.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

CCCC Highway Consultants. 2015. General specifications for design of highway bridges and culverts. JTG D64-2015. Beijing: China Communications Press.
CCCC Highway Consultants. 2018. Specification for design of highway reinforced concrete and prestressed concrete bridges and culverts. JTG 3362-2018. Beijing: China Communications Press.
Cha, K.-R., J. Seo, S. Kim, Y.-J. Kang, and D. Won. 2018. “Cyclic response of a precast composite hollow reinforced concrete column using longitudinal rebars and base plate.” Structural Concrete 19 (3): 758–770. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.201700044.
Chen, J., Z. Wang, Z. Liu, and S. Ju. 2020. “Experimental investigation of mechanical behaviour of rebar in steel half-grouted sleeve connections with defects in water/binder ratio.” Structures 26 (4): 487–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.04.051.
Cheng, H., H. Li, D. Wang, Z. Sun, G. Li, and J. Jin. 2016. “Research on the influencing factors for residual displacements of RC bridge columns subjected to earthquake loading.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 14 (8): 2229–2257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-9902-y.
Culmo, M. P. 2009. Connection details for prefabricated bridge elements and systems. Report No. FHWA-IF-09-010. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
Di Sarno, L., M. R. Pecce, and G. Fabbrocino. 2007. “Inelastic response of composite steel and concrete base column connections.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 63 (6): 819–832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2006.08.007.
Einea, A., T. Yamane, and M. K. Tadros. 1995. “Grout-filled pipe splices for precast concrete construction.” PCI Journal 40 (1): 82–93. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.01011995.82.93.
Fan, J.-J., D.-C. Feng, G. Wu, S. Hou, and Y. Lu. 2020. “Experimental study of prefabricated RC column–foundation assemblies with two different connection methods and using large-diameter reinforcing bars.” Eng. Struct. 205: 110075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.110075.
Hajjar, J. F. 2002. “Composite steel and concrete structural systems for seismic engineering.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 58 (5-8): 703–723. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-974X(01)00093-1.
Haraldsson, O. S., T. M. Janes, M. O. Eberhard, and J. F. Stanton. 2013. “Seismic resistance of socket connection between footing and precast column.” J. Bridge Eng. 18 (9): 910–919. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000413.
Hieber, D. G., J. M. Wacker, M. O. Eberhard, and J. F. Stanton. 2005. State-of-the-art report on precast concrete systems for rapid construction of bridges. Olympia, WA. Washington State Transportation Center (TRAC).
Industry Handbook Committee. 2010. PCI design handbook: Precast and prestressed concrete. 7th ed. Chicago: PCI.
Kadoya, H., J. Kawaguchi, and S. Morino. 2006. “Experimental study on strength and stiffness of bare type CFT column base with central reinforcing bars.” In Proc., 5th Int. Conf. Composite Construction in Steel and Concrete V, edited by R. T. Leon and J. Lange, 127–136. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Kang, T. H., and D. J. Lee. 2013. “Special precast beam–column connection using pure dry cast method.” In The 2013 World Congress on Advances in Structural Engineering and Mechanics (2013 ASEM Congress). Daejeon, South Korea: Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology.
Kitada, T. 1998. “Ultimate strength and ductility of state-of-the-art concrete-filled steel bridge piers in Japan.” Eng. Struct. 20 (4–6): 347–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00026-6.
Kurama, Y. C., S. Sritharan, R. B. Fleischman, J. I. Restrepo, R. S. Henry, N. M. Cleland, S. K. Ghosh, and P. Bonelli. 2018. “Seismic-resistant precast concrete structures: State of the art.” J. Struct. Eng. 144 (4): 03118001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001972.
Kwan, W.-P., and S. L. Billington. 2003. “Unbonded posttensioned concrete bridge piers. I: Monotonic and cyclic analyses.” J. Bridge Eng. 8 (2): 92–101. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2003)8:2(92).
Liu, Y., X. Li, X. Zheng, and Z. Song. 2020. “Experimental study on seismic response of precast bridge piers with double-grouted sleeve connections.” Eng. Struct. 221: 111023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111023.
Marsh, M. L., J. F. Stanton, M. Wernli, M. O. Eberhard, B. E. Garrett, and M. D. Weinert. 2011. Application of accelerated bridge construction connections in moderate-to-high seismic regions. NCHRP Rep. No. 698. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies.
Nzabonimpa, J. D., W.-K. Hong, and S.-C. Park. 2017. “Experimental investigation of dry mechanical beam–column joints for precast concrete based frames.” The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings 26 (1): e1302. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1302.
Park, R. 1989. “Evaluation of ductility of structures and structural assemblages from laboratory testing.” Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering 22 (3): 155–166. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.22.3.155-166.
Podolny, W., and J. M. Muller. 1982. Construction and design of prestressed concrete segmental bridges. New York: Wiley.
Qian, K., and B. Li. 2018. “Performance of precast concrete substructures with dry connections to resist progressive collapse.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil 32 (2): 04018005. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001147.
Qiao, Q.-Y., W.-W. Zhang, B. Mou, and W.-l. Cao. 2019. “Seismic behavior of exposed concrete filled steel tube column bases with embedded reinforcing bars: Experimental investigation.” Thin-Walled Structures 136: 367–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2018.12.039.
Ralls, M. L., B. Tang, S. Bhidé, B. Brecto, and E. Calvert. 2005. Prefabricated bridge elements and systems in Japan and Europe. Rep. No. FHWA-PL-05-003. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
Rodrigues, H., H. Varum, A. Arêde, and A. Costa. 2012. “A comparative analysis of energy dissipation and equivalent viscous damping of RC columns subjected to uniaxial and biaxial loading.” Eng. Struct. 35: 149–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.11.014.
Senturk, M., S. Pul, A. Ilki, and I. Hajirasouliha. 2020. “Development of a monolithic-like precast beam–column moment connection: Experimental and analytical investigation.” Eng. Struct. 205: 110057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.110057.
White, S., and A. Palermo. 2016. “Quasi-static testing of posttensioned nonemulative column–footing connections for bridge piers.” J. Bridge Eng. 21 (6): 04016025. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000872.
Zheng, S. J., Y. Q. Liu, Y. Q. Liu, and C. Zhao. 2019a. “Experimental and numerical study on shear resistance of notched perfobond shear connector.” Materials 12 (3): 341. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12030341.
Zheng, S., Y. Liu, T. Yoda, and W. Lin. 2016. “Parametric study on shear capacity of circular-hole and long-hole perfobond shear connector.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 117: 64–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.09.012.
Zheng, S., C. Zhao, and Y. Liu. 2019b. “Analytical model for load–slip relationship of perfobond shear connector based on push-out test.” Materials 12 (1): 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12010029.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 27Issue 5May 2022

History

Received: Mar 8, 2021
Accepted: Dec 28, 2021
Published online: Mar 10, 2022
Published in print: May 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Aug 10, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Doctoral Candidate, Dept. of Bridge Engineering, Tongji Univ., Shanghai 200092, China. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Bridge Engineering, Tongji Univ., Shanghai 200092, China. Email: [email protected]
Senior Engineer, Shanghai Municipal Engineering Design Institute (Group), Shanghai 200092, China (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Precast bridge piers: Construction techniques, structural systems, and seismic response, Advances in Structural Engineering, 10.1177/13694332221133596, 26, 4, (611-639), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share