Bridge Damage and Repair Detection Using an Instrumented Train
Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 27, Issue 3
Abstract
The static and dynamic effects of a railway bridge subjected to train loads have been investigated and analyzed to assess its condition. This paper investigates the potential of using repeated dynamic measurements taken on a passing train to determine the condition of a bridge. The results indicated that instrumented trains could be successfully used for ongoing monitoring of condition and, by implication, for identification of the need for repair or rehabilitation. This full-scale approach expands the potential for applications of bridge–vehicle dynamic interaction responses, along with their ability to be demonstrators of successful implementations of decisions on public infrastructure. The work also provided insights into the impact of a stiffer foundation at one pier and greater stiffness in two spans of a viaduct, for which experimental evidence is rarely available. The work also identified some of the challenges of such detection, such as accurate positioning and variability in the speeds of the passing trains.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge Science Foundation Ireland for supporting this research under the Industry Fellowship Programme, ID 19/IFA/7433. The authors also acknowledge the support of the EU-funded SIRMA project (Strengthening Infrastructure Risk Management in the Atlantic Area – Grant No. EAPA\_826/2018). Vikram Pakrashi would like to acknowledge that this publication emanated from research Science Foundation Ireland under Grant number RC2302_2.
References
Brady, S. 2013. “Lessons from the Malahide.” In The structural engineer. London: Institution of Structural Engineers.
Cahill, P., A. Mathewson, and V. Pakrashi. 2018. “Experimental validation of piezoelectric energy-harvesting device for built infrastructure applications.” J. Bridge Eng. 23 (8): 04018056. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001262.
Cahill, P., N. A. Ninuallain, N. Jackson, A. Mathewson, R. Karoumi, and V. Pakrashi. 2014. “Energy harvesting from train-induced response in bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 19 (9): 04014034. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000608.
Cremona, C. 2004. “Dynamic monitoring applied to the detection of structural modifications: A high-speed railway bridge study.” Prog. Struct. Mater. Eng. 6 (3): 147–161. https://doi.org/10.1002/pse.177.
Delgado, R. M., and S. M. dos Santos. 1997. “Modelling of railway bridge-vehicle interaction on high speed tracks.” Comput. Struct. 63 (3): 511–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(96)00360-4.
Fitzgerald, P. C., A. Malekjafarian, B. Bhowmik, L. J. Prendergast, P. Cahill, C.-W. Kim, B. Hazra, V. Pakrashi, and E. J. OBrien. 2019a. “Scour damage detection and structural health monitoring of a laboratory-scaled bridge using a vibration energy harvesting device.” Sensors 19 (11): 2572. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19112572.
Fitzgerald, P. C., A. Malekjafarian, D. Cantero, E. J. OBrien, and L. J. Prendergast. 2019b. “Drive-by scour monitoring of railway bridges using a wavelet-based approach.” Eng. Struct. 191: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.04.046.
Guo, J., H. Shi, R. Luo, and P. Wu. 2019. “Parametric analysis of the car body suspended equipment for railway vehicles vibration reduction.” IEEE Access 7: 88116–88125. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2918777.
Karis, T., M. Berg, and S. Stichel. 2020. “Analysing the correlation between vehicle responses and track irregularities using dynamic simulations and measurements.” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part F: J. Rail Rapid Transit 234 (2): 170–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954409719840450.
Karis, T., M. Berg, S. Stichel, M. Li, D. Thomas, and B. Dirks. 2018. “Correlation of track irregularities and vehicle responses based on measured data.” Veh. Syst. Dyn. 56 (6): 967–981. https://doi.org/10.1080/00423114.2017.1403634.
Majka, M., and M. Hartnett. 2009. “Dynamic response of bridges to moving trains: A study on effects of random track irregularities and bridge skewness.” Comput. Struct. 87 (19–20): 1233–1252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2008.12.004.
Malekjafarian, A., F. Golpayegani, C. Moloney, and S. Clarke. 2019. “A machine learning approach to bridge-damage detection using responses measured on a passing vehicle.” Sensors 19 (18): 4035. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19184035.
Mızrak, C., and İ. Esen. 2015. “Determining effects of wagon mass and vehicle velocity on vertical vibrations of a rail vehicle moving with a constant acceleration on a bridge using experimental and numerical methods.” Shock Vib. 2015: 183450. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/183450.
OBrien, E. J., P. Quirke, C. Bowe, and D. Cantero. 2018. “Determination of railway track longitudinal profile using measured inertial response of an in-service railway vehicle.” Struct. Health Monit. 17 (6): 1425–1440. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921717744479.
Pakrashi, V., J. Kelly, and B. Ghosh. 2011. “Sustainable prioritization of bridge rehabilitation considering road user cost.” In Transportation Research Board 90th Annual Meeting. Accessed January 21, 2021. https://trid.trb.org/view/1092594.
Pakrashi, V., A. O’Connor, and B. Basu. 2010. “Effect of tuned mass damper on the interaction of a quarter car model with a damaged bridge.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 6 (4): 409–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732470701816850.
Quirke, P. 2017. “Drive-by detection of railway track longitudinal profile, stiffness and bridge damage.” Doctor of Philosophy, Dept. of Bridge and Transport Research Group, Univ. College Dublin.
Quirke, P., C. Bowe, E. J. OBrien, D. Cantero, P. Antolin, and J. M. Goicolea. 2017a. “Railway bridge damage detection using vehicle-based inertial measurements and apparent profile.” Eng. Struct. 153: 421–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.10.023.
Quirke, P., D. Cantero, E. J. OBrien, and C. Bowe. 2017b. “Drive-by detection of railway track stiffness variation using in-service vehicles.” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part F: J. Rail Rapid Transit 231 (4): 498–514. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954409716634752.
Song, M.-K., H.-C. Noh, and C.-K. Choi. 2003. “A new three-dimensional finite element analysis model of high-speed train–bridge interactions.” Eng. Struct. 25 (13): 1611–1626. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(03)00133-0.
Tsunashima, H., Y. Naganuma, A. Matsumoto, T. Mizuma, and H. Mori. 2012. “Condition monitoring of railway track using in-service vehicle.” Reliab. Saf. Railway 12: 334–356.
Ward, C. P., P. F. Weston, E. J. C. Stewart, H. Li, R. M. Goodall, C. Roberts, T. X. Mei, G. Charles, and R. Dixon. 2011. “Condition monitoring opportunities using vehicle-based sensors.” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part F: J. Rail Rapid Transit 225 (2): 202–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/09544097JRRT406.
Wenzel, H., and V. Pakrashi. 2019. “Guidelines and recommendations from COST TU 1406.” In IABSE Symp. 2019: Towards a Resilient Built Environment-Risk and Asset Management, 818–824. Braga, Portugal: University of Minho.
Weston, P., C. Roberts, G. Yeo, and E. Stewart. 2015. “Perspectives on railway track geometry condition monitoring from in-service railway vehicles.” Veh. Syst. Dyn. 53 (7): 1063–1091. https://doi.org/10.1080/00423114.2015.1034730.
Zhai, W. M., K. Y. Wang, and J. H. Lin. 2004. “Modelling and experiment of railway ballast vibrations.” J. Sound Vib. 270 (4–5): 673–683. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-460X(03)00186-X.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2021 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Apr 23, 2021
Accepted: Nov 3, 2021
Published online: Dec 17, 2021
Published in print: Mar 1, 2022
Discussion open until: May 17, 2022
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
Cited by
- Premjeet Singh, Shivank Mittal, Ayan Sadhu, Recent Advancements and Future Trends in Indirect Bridge Health Monitoring, Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, 10.1061/PPSCFX.SCENG-1259, 28, 1, (2023).
- Edson Florentino de Souza, Túlio Nogueira Bittencourt, Diogo Ribeiro, Hermes Carvalho, Feasibility of Applying Mel-Frequency Cepstral Coefficients in a Drive-by Damage Detection Methodology for High-Speed Railway Bridges, Sustainability, 10.3390/su142013290, 14, 20, (13290), (2022).
- George Vathakkattil Joseph, Vikram Pakrashi, Spiking Neural Networks for Structural Health Monitoring, Sensors, 10.3390/s22239245, 22, 23, (9245), (2022).
- Abdollah Malekjafarian, Muhammad Arslan Khan, Eugene J. OBrien, E. Alexandra Micu, Cathal Bowe, Ramin Ghiasi, Indirect Monitoring of Frequencies of a Multiple Span Bridge Using Data Collected from an Instrumented Train: A Field Case Study, Sensors, 10.3390/s22197468, 22, 19, (7468), (2022).
- Yifei Ren, Eugene J. OBrien, Daniel Cantero, Jennifer Keenahan, Railway Bridge Condition Monitoring Using Numerically Calculated Responses from Batches of Trains, Applied Sciences, 10.3390/app12104972, 12, 10, (4972), (2022).
- Bi Ge, Zuo-Cai Wang, Yu Xin, Shu Li, Zi-Qing Yuan, Dynamic real-time reliability prediction of bridge structures based on Copula–BHDLM and measured stress data, Measurement, 10.1016/j.measurement.2022.112006, 203, (112006), (2022).
- Abdollah Malekjafarian, Robert Corbally, Wenjie Gong, A review of mobile sensing of bridges using moving vehicles: Progress to date, challenges and future trends, Structures, 10.1016/j.istruc.2022.08.075, 44, (1466-1489), (2022).
- Premjeet Singh, Ayan Sadhu, A hybrid time-frequency method for robust drive-by modal identification of bridges, Engineering Structures, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114624, 266, (114624), (2022).