Case Studies
Aug 25, 2021

Field Load Rating and Grillage Analysis Method for Skewed Steel Girder Highway Bridges

Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 26, Issue 11

Abstract

An innovative load rating method for skewed highway bridges with steel girders is proposed in this paper. In the proposed method, a field test coupled with a grillage analysis is used to determine the actual safe load-carrying capacity of a bridge and the key factors that contribute to the capacity. Because the actual behavior of the bridge is incorporated via the field test, the method provides a justifiable evaluation of system behavior. The effect of additional system stiffness due to bridge skew is determined using a grillage analysis. The proposed method allows the factors that contribute to the load rating, such as critical span adjustment, longitudinal and lateral load distribution, unintended composite action, slab flexure, and additional system stiffness, to be quantified and qualified. The proposed method is illustrated using a case study of a symmetric steel girder bridge with a 43° skew angle. The case study demonstrates that the proposed method provides an accurate determination of the skew effect, compared to approximate methods of analysis, because the location of the girder and moment under consideration, the cross frames and parapets, and the location of the applied loading are explicitly incorporated.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the Wyoming Department of Transportation (WYDOT) and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) under Grant No. RS06216. The first author was also supported through a graduate teaching assistantship provided by the State of Wyoming. The authors recognize Paul G. Cortez, WYDOT Assistant State Bridge Engineer, Operations, Randy Ringstmeyer, WYDOT Bridge Inspection Engineer, and WYDOT District 3 personnel for their assistance in the field tests. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of those acknowledged.

Notation

The following symbols are used in this paper:
Agirder
cross-sectional area of the girder;
Aseq
equivalent shear area;
A1
design load factor for dead load effect;
A2
design load factor for live load effect;
a
distance between the girder and slab centers of gravity; equivalent to eg in the LRFD Bridge Design Specifications (AASHTO 2020);
CFA
analytical adjustment factor due to skew;
CFE
experimental adjustment factor due to skew;
D
dead load effect on the bridge member;
DFA
analytical live load distribution factor;
DFE
experimental live load distribution factor;
(EI)girder
girder flexural stiffness;
(EI)slab
slab flexural stiffness;
Fy
minimum specified yield stress of steel;
fc
minimum specified compressive stress of concrete;
I
dynamic impact factor;
Ieq
equivalent moment of inertia;
Igirder
moment of inertia about the strong axis of the girder;
Izz
moment of inertia of the cross section relative to the strong axis;
IA
analytical dynamic impact factor;
IE
experimental dynamic impact factor;
Jeq
equivalent torsion constant;
Kg
bridge longitudinal stiffness;
L
bridge span length;
LL
live load effect on the bridge member;
LLA
analytical live load effect;
LLE
experimental live load effect;
M
moment corresponding to MTRK_OS (M+ is the corresponding positive moment of MTRK_OS, and M is the corresponding negative moment of MTRK+);
Mdesign_truck
maximum analytical moment due to a standardized design truck;
Mexp.
negative moment obtained experimentally;
Mexperimental
moment corresponding to Mtotal (Mexperimental+ is the corresponding positive moment of Mtotal, and Mexperimental is the corresponding negative moment of Mtotal+);
Mgirder
internal moment due to live load in the noncomposite girder about its own axis;
Mmax+
maximum positive moment at bridge outer span;
Mpier
negative moment at the outer pier;
Mslab
internal moment due to live load in the slab about its own axis;
Mtotal
total internal moment due to live load (Mtotal+, total internal moment at the positive moment and Mtotal, total internal moment at the negative moment);
MHS20
maximum analytical moment due to the standardized HS20 design truck (MHS20+, maximum positive analytical moment due to the standardized HS20 design truck and MHS20, maximum negative analytical moment due to the standardized HS20 design truck);
MLE
elastic longitudinal adjustment moment;
MTRK
maximum analytical moment due to the calibrated truck used in the field test (MTRK+, maximum analytical moment due to the calibrated truck used in the field test at the positive moment);
MTRK_OS
maximum analytical moment due to the calibrated truck used in the field test when the truck is at the outer span (MTRKOS, maximum analytical moment due to the calibrated truck used in the field test when the truck is at the outer span at the negative moment);
mA
analytical live load multipresence factor;
mE
experimental live load multipresence factor;
N
axial force due to live load in the girder;
n
modular ratio between steel and concrete;
nr
number of lanes loaded (used for the calculation of DFE);
Rn
capacity of the bridge member;
RF
rating factor;
RFA
analytical rating factor;
RFE
experimental rating factor;
S
spacing between girders;
Sgirder
section modulus of the girder cross section;
STAT
total the statical moment;
STAT+
positive contribution of the statical moment;
STAT
negative contribution of the statical moment;
ts
bridge slab thickness;
θ
bridge skew angle;
σcg
total stress due to live load at the center of gravity of the girder;
σ0
total stress due to live load at bottom of the bottom flange of the girder;
Mtotal
summation of the total internal moment due to live load in each girder;
STATA
analytical statical moment;
STATA_SK
statical moment based on the skewed bridge grillage model;
STATA_ST
statical moment based on the nonskewed bridge grillage model; and
STATE
experimental statical moment.

References

AASHTO. 1996. AASHTO standard specifications for highway bridges. 16th ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2018. AASHTO manual for bridge evaluation. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2020. AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications. 9th ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO/NSBA (National Steel Bridge Alliance) Steel Bridge Collaboration. 2019. Guidelines for steel girder bridge analysis G13.1. Washington, DC: AASHTO/NSBA.
Ahmed, M. Z., and F. E. Weisberger. 1996. “Torsion constant for matrix analysis of structures including warping effect.” Int. J. Solids Struct. 33 (3): 361–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7683(95)00045-C.
Al-Mahaidi, R., G. Taplin, and A. Giufre. 2000. “Load distribution and shear strength evaluation of an old concrete T-beam bridge.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1696 (1): 52–62. https://doi.org/10.3141/1696-08.
Amer, A., M. Arockiasamy, and M. Shahawy. 1999. “Load distribution of existing solid slab bridges based on field tests.” J. Bridge Eng. 4 (3): 189–193. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(1999)4:3(189).
Ashebo, D. B., T. Chan, and L. Yu. 2007. “Evaluation of dynamic loads on a skew box girder continuous bridge—Part I: Field test and modal analysis.” Eng. Struct. 29 (6): 1052–1063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.07.014.
Badwin, I. Z., and R. Y. Liang. 2007. “Reaction distribution in highly skewed continuous steel girder bridge.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2028 (1): 163–170. https://doi.org/10.3141/2028-18.
Barker, M. G. 1999. “Steel girder bridge field test procedures.” Constr. Build. Mater. 13 (4): 229–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-0618(99)00013-6.
Barker, M. G. 2001. “Quantifying field-test behavior for rating steel girder bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 6 (4): 254–261. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2001)6:4(254).
Barker, R. M., and J. A. Puckett. 2007. Design of highway bridges an LRFD approach. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Barr, P. J., and M. N. Amin. 2006. “Shear live-load distribution factors for I-girder bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 11 (2): 197–204. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2006)11:2(197).
Barr, P. J., M. O. Eberhard, and J. F. Stanton. 2001. “Live-load distribution factors in prestressed concrete girder bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 6 (5): 298–306. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2001)6:5(298).
Bishara, A. G., M. C. Liu, and N. D. El-Ali. 1993. “Wheel load distribution on simply supported skew I-beam composite bridges.” J. Struct. Eng. 119 (2): 399–419. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1993)119:2(399).
Breña, S. F., A. E. Jeffrey, and S. A. Civjan. 2013. “Evaluation of a noncomposite steel girder bridge through live-load field testing.” J. Bridge Eng. 18 (7): 690–699. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000398.
Cai, C. S. 2005. “Discussion on AASHTO LRFD load distribution factors for slab-on-girder bridges.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 10 (3): 171–176. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0680(2005)10:3(171).
Cai, C. S., M. Shahawy, and R. J. Peterman. 2002. “Effect of diaphragms on load distribution of prestressed concrete bridges.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1814 (1): 47–54. https://doi.org/10.3141/1814-06.
Catbas, F. N., H. B. Gokce, and M. Gul. 2012. “Practical approach for estimating distribution factor for load rating: Demonstration on reinforced concrete T-beam bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 17 (4): 652–661. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000284.
Chajes, M. J., H. W. Shenton, and W. W. Finch. 2001. “Diagnostic and in-service testing of transit railway bridge.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1770 (1): 51–57. https://doi.org/10.3141/1770-08.
Choo, T., D. G. Linzell, J. I. Lee, and J. A. Swanson. 2005. “Response of a continuous, skewed, steel bridge during deck placement.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 61 (5): 567–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2004.10.009.
Coletti, D., B. Chavel, and W. J. Gatti. 2011. “Challenges of skew in bridges with steel girders.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2251 (1): 47–56. https://doi.org/10.3141/2251-05.
Cross, B., B. Vaughn, N. Panahshahi, D. Petermeier, Y. S. Siow, and T. Domagalski. 2009. “Analytical and experimental investigation of bridge girder shear distribution factors.” J. Bridge Eng. 14 (3): 154–163. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2009)14:3(154).
CSI (Computers and Structures, Inc.). 2010. CSI analysis reference manual for SAP2000, ETABS, SAFE and CSIBridge. Berkeley, CA: CSI.
Dicleli, M., and F. Yalcin. 2018. “Incorporation of skew effects in live-load distribution factors developed for typical integral bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 23 (2): 04017135. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001188.
Gull, J., A. Azizinamini, and T. A. Helwig. 2017. “Comparison of detailing methods for straight skewed steel I-girder bridges.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 136: 24–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.05.003.
Gupta, T., and M. Kumar. 2018. “Flexural response of skew-curved concrete box-girder bridges.” Eng. Struct. 163: 358–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.02.063.
Hambly, E. C. 1991. Bridge deck behavior. 2nd ed. London: Chapman & Hall.
He, X. H., X. W. Sheng, A. Scanlon, D. G. Linzell, and X. D. Yu. 2012. “Skewed concrete box girder bridge static and dynamic testing and analysis.” Eng. Struct. 39: 38–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.01.016.
Huang, H., H. W. Shenton, and M. J. Chajes. 2004. “Load distribution for a highly skewed bridge: Testing and analysis.” J. Bridge Eng. 9 (6): 558–562. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2004)9:6(558).
Hughs, E., and R. Idriss. 2006. “Live-load distribution factors for prestressed concrete, spread box-girder bridge.” J. Bridge Eng. 11 (5): 573–581. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2006)11:5(573).
Huo, X. S., E. P. Wasserman, and P. Zhu. 2004. “Simplified method of lateral distribution of live load moment.” J. Bridge Eng. 9 (4): 382–390. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2004)9:4(382).
Huo, X. S., and Q. Zhang. 2008. “Effect of skewness on the distribution of live load reaction at piers of skewed continuous bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 13 (1): 110–114. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2008)13:1(110).
Jáuregui, D. V., and P. J. Barr. 2004. “Nondestructive evaluation of the I-40 bridge over the Rio Grande River.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil 18 (4): 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2004)18:4(195).
Khaloo, A. R., and H. Mirzabozorg. 2003. “Load distribution factors in simply supported skew bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 8 (4): 241–244. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2003)8:4(241).
Lantsoght, E. O., C. van der Veen, A. de Boer, and D. A. Hordijk. 2017. “State-of-the-art on load testing of concrete bridges.” Eng. Struct. 150 (1): 231–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.07.050.
Lu, R. 2020. “Experimental load rating of skewed steel girder highway bridges.” Ph.D. thesis. Dept. of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Univ. of Wyoming.
Lu, R., and J. P. Judd. 2019. “Field evaluation of unintended composite action between plate girders and concrete slab in highway bridges.” In Vol. 3 of XII Congresso de Construção Metálica e Mista, 171–180. Berlin: Ernst und Sohn Verlag für Architektur und technische Wissenschaften GmbH und Co.
McConnell, J. R., M. Radovic, and K. Ambrose. 2016. “Field evaluation of cross-frame and girder live-load response in skewed steel I-girder bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 21 (3): 04015062. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000846.
McDaniel, W. T. 1998. “Field test of bridge R-289 by utilizing University of Missouri bridge field test unit.” Master’s thesis. Dept. of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Univ. of Missouri.
Menassa, C., M. Mabsout, K. Tarhini, and G. Frederick. 2007. “Influence of skew angle on reinforced concrete slab bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 12 (2): 205–214. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2007)12:2(205).
Millam, J. L., and Z. J. Ma. 2005. “Single-lane live load distribution factor for decked precast, prestressed concrete girder bridges.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1928: 142–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198105192800116.
Minervino, C., B. Sivakumar, F. Moses, D. Mertz, and W. Edberg. 2004. “New AASHTO guide manual for load and resistance factor rating of highway bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 9 (1): 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2004)9:1(43).
Mutashar, R., S. Sargand, F. T. Al Rikabi, and I. Khoury. 2019. “Response of a composite-adjacent box beam bridge with skewed beams under static and quasi-static loads.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil 33 (3): 04019022. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001283.
Nielsen, R. J., and E. R. Schmeckpeper. 2002. “Single-span prestressed girder bridge: LRFD design and comparison.” J. Bridge Eng. 7 (1): 22–30. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2002)7:1(22).
Norton, E. K., D. G. Linzell, and J. A. Laman. 2003. “Examination of response of a skewed steel bridge superstructure during deck placement.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1845: 66–75. https://doi.org/10.3141/1845-08.
Nouri, G., and Z. Ahmadi. 2012. “Influence of skew angle on continuous composite girder bridge.” J. Bridge Eng. 17 (4): 617–623. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000273.
Sanayei, M., J. E. Phelps, J. D. Sipple, E. S. Bell, and B. R. Brenner. 2012. “Instrumentation, nondestructive testing, and finite-element model updating for bridge evaluation using strain measurements.” J. Bridge Eng. 17 (1): 130–138. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000228.
Sanayei, M., A. J. Reiff, B. R. Brenner, and G. R. Imbaro. 2016. “Load rating of a fully instrumented bridge: Comparison of LRFR approaches.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 30 (2): 04015019. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000752.
Schanck, A. P., and W. G. Davids. 2020. “Capacity assessment of older t-beam bridges by nonlinear proxy finite-element analysis.” Structures 23 (1): 267–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2019.09.012.
Schwarz, M., and J. A. Laman. 2001. “Response of prestressed concrete I-girder bridges to live load.” J. Bridge Eng. 6 (1): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2001)6:1(1).
Shahawy, M., and A. M. Okeil. 2004. “Hybrid bridge strengthening structural rehabilitation of Blue Heron bridge, West Palm Beach, Florida.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1892: 256–261. https://doi.org/10.3141/1892-27.
Sun, Y., S. Dai, D. Xu, H. Zhu, and X. Wang. 2020. “New extended grillage methods for the practical and precise modeling of concrete box-girder bridges.” Adv. Struct. Eng. 23 (6): 1179–1194. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433219891559.
Surana, C. S., and R. Agrawal. 1998. Grillage analogy in bridge deck analysis. New Delhi, India: Narosa Publishing House.
Terzioglu, T., M. D. Hueste, and J. B. Mander. 2017. “Live load distribution factors for spread slab beam bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 22 (10): 04017067. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001100.
Théoret, P., B. Massicotte, and D. Conciatori. 2012. “Analysis and design of straight and skewed slab bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 17 (2): 289–301. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000249.
Tobias, D. H., R. E. Anderson, S. Y. Khayyat, Z. B. Uzman, and K. L. Riechers. 2004. “Simplified AASHTO load and resistance factor design girder live load distribution in Illinois.” J. Bridge Eng. 9 (6): 606–613. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2004)9:6(606).
TRB (Transportation Research Board). 2007. Simplified live load distribution factor equations. NCHRP (National Cooperative Highway Research Program) Rep. 592. Washington, DC: TRB.
TRB (Transportation Research Board). 2019. Primer on bridge load testing. Transportation Research Circular E-C257. Washington, DC: TRB.
White, D. W., et al. 2012. Guidelines for analysis methods and construction engineering of curved and skewed steel girder bridges. NCHRP (National Cooperative Highway Research Program) Rep. 725. Washington, DC: TRB.
Wyss, J., D. Su, and Y. Fujino. 2011. “Prediction of vehicle-induced local responses and application to a skewed girder bridge.” Eng. Struct. 33 (4): 1088–1097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.12.020.
Yang, J., O. M. Hamutcuoglu, Y. Ni, and M. Ghosn. 2016. “Structural redundancy of prestressed concrete box girder bridges.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2592: 17–26. https://doi.org/10.3141/2592-03.
Yarnold, M., T. Golecki, and J. Weidner. 2018. “Identification of composite action through truck load testing.” Front. Built Environ. 4 (74): 1–13.
Yousif, Z., and R. Hindi. 2007. “AASHTO-LRFD live load distribution for beam-and-slab bridges: Limitations and applicability.” J. Bridge Eng. 12 (6): 765–773. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2007)12:6(765).
Zokaie, T. 2000. “AASHTO-LRFD live load distribution specifications.” J. Bridge Eng. 5 (2): 131–138. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2000)5:2(131).
Zokaie, T., R. A. Imbsen, and T. A. Osterkamp. 1991. “Distribution of wheel loads on highway bridges.” In Vol. 1290 of Proc., 3rd Bridge Engineering Conf., 119–126. Washington, DC: TRB.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 26Issue 11November 2021

History

Received: Sep 23, 2020
Accepted: Jul 27, 2021
Published online: Aug 25, 2021
Published in print: Nov 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Jan 25, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Postdoctoral Researcher, Civil and Architectural Engineering, Univ. of Wyoming, 1000 E. Univ. Ave., Laramie, WY 82072 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0681-6436. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Brigham Young Univ., 430 Engineering Building, Provo, UT 84602. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5466-3940.
Michael Barker
Professor, Civil and Architectural Engineering, Univ. of Wyoming, 1000 E. Univ. Ave., Laramie, WY 82072.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Field-Deployable Fiber Optic Sensor System for Structural Health Monitoring of Steel Girder Highway Bridges, Infrastructures, 10.3390/infrastructures7020016, 7, 2, (16), (2022).
  • Development of natural frequency in multi-span composite bridges with variable cross-section: Analytical and numerical solutions, Structures, 10.1016/j.istruc.2022.09.082, 45, (1657-1666), (2022).
  • Effect of Bridge Skew on the Analytical and Experimental Responses of a Steel Girder Highway Bridge, Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Civil Engineering, 10.1007/978-981-19-1260-3_7, (70-81), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share