Abstract

Rapid or unexpected bridge deterioration can lead to partial collapse, which can subsequently hinder transportation activities and result in economic and human losses. Heavily adopted by the research community, Markov chain-based deterioration models assume that bridge conditions exhibit stationary transitions over time. This assumption requires a significantly large, and often difficult to obtain, number of historical records. As such, Markov chain-based deterioration models have been developed within classical nonlinear optimization frameworks that might result in local optimal solutions. Therefore, to enhance the model capability to simulate the temporal state transition, this study develops a Markovian-based deterioration model embedded within a genetic algorithm (GA) framework—a class of evolutionary computing techniques, to overcome local optimality issues. To demonstrate its applicability, the developed model was applied to a relevant data set of previously rehabilitated and unrehabilitated concrete and steel bridges. The developed GA-Markovian model was able to replicate the actual state probabilities for the unrehabilitated bridges within both the calibration and validation periods. The model performance was slightly lower for the previously rehabilitated bridges due to the inherited nonstationary transition. The model developed in the present study can be used to guide effective rehabilitation and replacement strategies, prioritize available resources, and devise data-driven predictive bridge asset management policies and standards.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the support from the INTERFACE Institute for Multi-hazard Systemic Risk Studies in McMaster University.

References

Abdelkader, E. M., T. Zayed, and M. Marzouk. 2019. “A computerized hybrid Bayesian-based approach for modelling the deterioration of concrete bridge decks.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 15 (9): 1178–1199. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2019.1619782.
Agrawal, A. K., A. Kawaguchi, and Z. Chen. 2010. “Deterioration rates of typical bridge elements in New York.” J. Bridge Eng. 15 (4): 419–429. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000123.
Akiyama, M., D. M. Frangopol, and K. Takenaka. 2017. “Reliability-based durability design and service life assessment of reinforced concrete deck slab of jetty structures.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 13 (4): 468–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2016.1164725.
Baik, H.-S., H. S. Jeong, and D. M. Abraham. 2006. “Estimating transition probabilities in Markov chain-based deterioration models for management of wastewater systems.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 132 (1): 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2006)132:1(15).
Bennetts, J., G. T. Webb, P. J. Vardanega, S. R. Denton, and N. Loudon. 2018. “Using data to explore trends in bridge performance.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Smart Infrastruct. Constr. 171 (1): 14–28. https://doi.org/10.1680/jsmic.17.00022.
Bocchini, P., D. Saydam, and D. M. Frangopol. 2013. “Efficient, accurate, and simple Markov chain model for the life-cycle analysis of bridge groups.” Struct. Saf. 40: 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2012.09.004.
Bolukbas, M., J. Mohammadi, and D. Arditi. 2004. “Estimating the future condition of highway bridge components using national bridge inventory data.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr. 9 (1): 16–25. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0680(2004)9:1(16).
Bu, G., J. Lee, H. Guan, M. Blumenstein, and Y. C. Loo. 2014. “Development of an integrated method for probabilistic bridge-deterioration modeling.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil 28 (2): 330–340. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000421.
Cesare, M. A., C. Santamarina, C. Turkstra, and E. H. Vanmarcke. 1992. “Modeling bridge deterioration with Markov chains.” J. Transp. Eng. 118 (6): 820–833. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1992)118:6(820).
Chang, M., M. Maguire, and Y. Sun. 2019. “Stochastic modeling of bridge deterioration using classification tree and logistic regression.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 25 (1): 04018041. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000466.
Choi, S., and M. Do. 2020. “Development of the road pavement deterioration model based on the deep learning method.” Electronics 9 (1): 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics9010003.
Choi, Y., J. Lee, and J. Kong. 2020. “Performance degradation model for concrete deck of bridge using pseudo-LSTM.” Sustainability 12 (9): 3848. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093848.
Daryan, A. S., and S. Palizi. 2020. “New plastic analysis procedure for collapse prediction of braced frames by means of genetic algorithm.” J. Struct. Eng. 146 (1): 04019168. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002462.
Dawood, T., E. Elwakil, H. M. Novoa, and J. F. G. Delgado. 2020. “Artificial intelligence for the modeling of water pipes deterioration mechanisms.” Autom. Constr. 120: 103398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103398.
Dirksen, J., and F. H. L. R. Clemens. 2008. “Probabilistic modeling of sewer deterioration using inspection data.” Water Sci. Technol. 57 (10): 1635–1641. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2008.308.
Ellis, R. M., and P. D. Thompson. 2007. “Bridge asset valuation and the role of the bridge management system.” In 2007 Annual Conf. and Exhibition of the Transportation Association of Canada: Transportation-An Economic Enabler. Ottawa: Transportation Association of Canada.
Fang, Y., and L. Sun. 2019. “Developing A semi-markov process model for bridge deterioration prediction in Shanghai.” Sustainability 11 (19): 5524. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195524.
Goldberg, D. E. 1989. Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning. Boston: Addison-Wesley.
Gotshall, S., and B. Rylander. 2002. “Optimal population size and the genetic algorithm.” In World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society Int. Conf. on Soft Computing, Optimization, Simulation, and Manufacturing Systems, 1–5. Cancun, Mexico: Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS).
Hong, G., X. P. Wang, J. Lee, Y. C. Loo, and M. Blumenstein. 2011. “Modelling long-term bridge deterioration at structural member level using artificial intelligence techniques.” Appl. Mech. Mater. 99–100: 444–453. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.99-100.444.
Ilbeigi, M., and B. Pawar. 2020. “A probabilistic model for optimal bridge inspection interval.” Infrastructures 5 (6): 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures5060047.
Jiang, Y., M. Saito, and K. C. Sinha. 1988. “Bridge performance prediction model using the Markov chain.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1180: 25–32.
Jiang, Y., and K. C. Sinha. 1989. “Bridge service life prediction model using the Markov chain.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1223: 24–30.
Khodabandehlou, H., G. Pekcan, and M. S. Fadali. 2019. “Vibration-based structural condition assessment using convolution neural networks.” Struct. Control Health Monit. 26 (2): e2308. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2308.
Koljonen, J., and J. T. Alander. 2006. “Effects of population size and relative elitism on optimization speed and reliability of genetic algorithms.” In Proc., 9th Scandinavian Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, 54–60. Espoo, Finland: The Finnish Artificial Intelligence Society.
Lee, J., M. Blumenstein, H. Guan, and Y. C. Loo. 2010. “Long-term prediction of bridge element performance using time delay neural networks (TDNNs).” In Large Structures and Infrastructures for Environmentally Constrained and Urbanised Areas, 374–375. Venice, Italy: Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering (IABSE).
Li, Z., and X. Yan. 2019. “Ensemble model of wastewater treatment plant based on rich diversity of principal component determining by genetic algorithm for status monitoring.” Control Eng. Pract. 88 (130): 38–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conengprac.2019.04.008.
Lichtenstein, A. G. 1993. “The silver bridge collapse recounted.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil 7 (4): 249–261. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(1993)7:4(249).
Majumdar, J., and A. K. Bhunia. 2007. “Elitist genetic algorithm for assignment problem with imprecise goal.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 177 (2): 684–692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2005.11.034.
Mandiartha, P., C. F. Duffield, R. G. Thompson, and M. R. Wigan. 2017. “Measuring pavement maintenance effectiveness using Markov Chains analysis.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 13 (7): 844–854. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2016.1212901.
Micevski, T., G. Kuczera, and P. Coombes. 2002. “Markov model for storm water pipe deterioration.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 8 (2): 49–56. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2002)8:2(49).
Mohammad, A. T., M. A. Al-Obaidi, E. M. Hameed, B. N. Basheer, and I. M. Mujtaba. 2020. “Modelling the chlorophenol removal from wastewater via reverse osmosis process using a multilayer artificial neural network with genetic algorithm.” J. Water Process Eng. 33: 100993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2019.100993.
Morcous, G., H. Rivard, and A. M. Hanna. 2002. “Modeling bridge deterioration using case-based reasoning.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 8 (3): 86–95. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2002)8:3(86).
Rajeev, S., and C. S. Krishnamoorthy. 1992. “Discrete optimization of structures using genetic algorithms.” J. Struct. Eng. 118 (5): 1233–1250. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1992)118:5(1233).
Saeed, T. U., Y. Qiao, S. Chen, K. Gkritza, and S. Labi. 2017. “Methodology for probabilistic modeling of highway bridge infrastructure condition: Accounting for improvement effectiveness and incorporating random effects.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 23 (4): 04017030. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000389.
Santamaria Ariza, M., I. Zambon, H. S. Sousa, J. A. Campos e Matos, and A. Strauss. 2020. “Comparison of forecasting models to predict concrete bridge decks performance.” Struct. Concr. 21 (4): 1240–1253. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.201900434.
Saydam, D., P. Bocchini, and D. M. Frangopol. 2013a. “Time-dependent risk associated with deterioration of highway bridge networks.” Eng. Struct. 54: 221–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.04.009.
Saydam, D., and D. M. Frangopol. 2015. “Risk-based maintenance optimization of deteriorating bridges.” J. Struct. Eng. 141 (4): 04014120. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001038.
Saydam, D., D. M. Frangopol, and Y. Dong. 2013b. “Assessment of risk using bridge element condition ratings.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 19 (3): 252–265. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000131.
Sepahvand, R., H. R. Safavi, and F. Rezaei. 2019. “Multi-objective planning for conjunctive use of surface and ground water resources using genetic programming.” Water Resour. Manage. 33 (6): 2123–2137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-019-02229-4.
Srikanth, I., and M. Arockiasamy. 2020. “Deterioration models for prediction of remaining useful life of timber and concrete bridges: A review.” J. Traffic Transp. Eng. 7 (2): 152–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtte.2019.09.005.
Stantec Consulting. 2011. City of Hamilton State of the infrastructure review—Road network and traffic systems. Edmonton, AB, Canada: Stantec Consulting.
Thomas, O., and J. Sobanjo. 2013. “Comparison of Markov chain and semi-Markov models for crack deterioration on flexible pavements.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 19 (2): 186–195. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000112.
Tolliver, D., and P. Lu. 2012. “Analysis of bridge deterioration rates: A case study of the northern plains region.” J. Transp. Res. Forum 50 (2): 87–100. https://doi.org/10.5399/osu/jtrf.50.2.2736.
Tran, D. H., A. W. M. Ng, K. J. McManus, and S. Burn. 2008. “Prediction models for serviceability deterioration of stormwater pipes.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 4 (4): 287–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732470600792236.
Tran, H. D. 2016. “Markov-based reliability assessment for hydraulic design of concrete stormwater pipes.” J. Hydraul. Eng. 142 (7): 06016005. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0001130.
Wellalage, N. K. W., T. Zhang, and R. Dwight. 2015. “Calibrating Markov chain-based deterioration models for predicting future conditions of railway bridge elements.” J. Bridge Eng. 20 (2): 04014060. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000640.
Williams, E. A., and W. A. Crossley. 1998. “Empirically-derived population size and mutation rate guidelines for a genetic algorithm with uniform crossover.” In Soft computing in engineering design and manufacturing, edited by P. K. Chawdhry, R. Roy, and R. K. Pant, 163–172. London: Springer.
Wirahadikusumah, R., D. Abraham, and T. Iseley. 2001. “Challenging issues in modeling deterioration of combined sewers.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 7 (2): 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2001)7:2(77).
Yang, C. C., L. C. Chang, C. H. Yeh, and C. S. Chen. 2007. “Multiobjective planning of surface water resources by multiobjective genetic algorithm with constrained differential dynamic programming.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage. 133 (6): 499–508. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2007)133:6(499).
Yang, D. Y., and D. M. Frangopol. 2018. “Risk-informed bridge ranking at project and network levels.” J. Infrastruct. Syst. 24 (3): 04018018. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000430.
Yang, J., M. Gunaratne, J. J. Lu, and B. Dietrich. 2005. “Use of recurrent Markov chains for modeling the crack performance of flexible pavements.” J. Transp. Eng. 131 (11): 861–872. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2005)131:11(861).
Yang, Y., J. Peng, C. S. Cai, and J. Zhang. 2019. “Improved interval evidence theory-based fuzzy AHP approach for comprehensive condition assessment of long-span PSC continuous box-girder bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 24 (12): 04019113. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001494.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 26Issue 8August 2021

History

Received: Nov 17, 2020
Accepted: Apr 6, 2021
Published online: Jun 3, 2021
Published in print: Aug 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Nov 3, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Postdoctoral Fellow, INTERFACE Institute for Multi-hazard Systemic Risk Studies, McMaster Univ., Hamilton, ON, Canada L8S 4L7 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1956-5875. Email: [email protected]
Yasser Elleathy [email protected]
Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, McMaster Univ., Hamilton, ON, Canada L8S 4L7. Email: [email protected]
Sonia Hassini [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, McMaster Univ., Hamilton, ON, Canada L8S 4L7. Email: [email protected]
Professor and Director, INTERFACE Institute for Multi-hazard Systemic Risk Studies, McMaster Univ., Hamilton, ON, Canada L8S 4L7. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8617-261X. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share