Abstract

The most common type of bridge on South Dakota local roads is a precast prestressed double-tee (DT) girder bridge. For old and/or deteriorated bridges, the estimation of the bridge safe live load is necessary to ensure the safety of the traveling public and to prevent excessive bridge damage and collapse. Nevertheless, load rating of damaged bridges is challenging mainly because of a lack of information regarding the capacity and distribution of the live load between damaged components. The main goal of the present work is to propose a systematic analytical load rating methodology for precast bridges, specifically those with DT girders when girders are damaged with different damage levels. First, quantitative definitions in-line with those from AASHTO were modified and proposed to identify all damage types and condition states specific to DT girders. Subsequently, a statistical analysis was performed on the South Dakota DT bridge inventory to comment on the most frequent observed damages. Then, two DT bridges, which had a significant girder-to-girder joint damage, were field tested, and the measured data was used to recommend girder distribution factors and dynamic load allowance specific to DT bridges with deteriorated longitudinal joints. Furthermore, two 45-year-old DT girders, each with significant damage, were used in a strength test, and the measured data from these tests and others collected from the literature was used to validate the capacity estimation method for old and/or damaged DT girders. The verified methods were then utilized to calculate the shear and moment capacities of 23 different DT sections, which have been used in South Dakota. Based on the statistical, experimental, and analytical studies, a new methodology was proposed for load rating of typical damaged DT bridges.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The contents of this document, which was jointly funded by the South Dakota Department of Transportation (SDDOT) and the US Department of Transportation (USDOT) through the Mountain Plains Consortium (MPC)—University Transportation Center (UTC), reflect the views of the authors who are responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of SDDOT, the State Transportation Commission, or the Federal Highway Administration. This document does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. The authors are thankful to Brian Anderson and Brian Jenner of Forterra Pipe & Precast, LLC., for providing shop drawings of double-tee bridges, Don Hammond of Brosz Engineering, Inc. and Steve Myer of Clark Engineering for sharing inspection reports, Corr Construction Services, Inc. for providing the girder test specimens, and GeoTek Engineering & Testing Services, Inc. for technical services. The assistance and valuable feedback are greatly appreciated from Bob Longbons of the Research Office at the SDDOT, and Zachary Gutzmer of South Dakota State University.

References

AASHTO. 2011. Manual for bridge evaluation (2nd edition) with 2011, 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2016 interim revisions. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2013. Manual for bridge element inspection (1st edition) with 2015 interim revisions. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2014. AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications (7th edition) with 2015 and 2016 interim revisions. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
ASTM. 2003. Standard test method for obtaining and testing drilled cores and sawed beams of concrete. ASTM C42/C42-03. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2016. Standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials. ASTM E8/E8M-16a. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2017. Standard specification for low-relaxation, seven-wire steel strand for prestressed concrete. A416/A416M-17. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
BSCM (Bridge System Code Manual). 1998. South Dakota bridge system code manual. Pierre, South Dakota: South Dakota Dept. of Transportation.
Dasar, A., R. Irmawaty, H. Hamada, Y. Sagawa, and D. Yamamoto. 2016. “Prestress loss and bending capacity of pre-cracked 40 year-old PC beams exposed to marine environment.” MATEC Web Conf. 47: 02008. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20164702008.
Eder, R. W., R. A. Miller, T. M. Baseheart, and J. A. Swanson. 2005. “Testing of two 50-year-old precast post-tensioned concrete bridge girders.” PCI J. 50 (3): 90–95. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.05012005.90.95.
Halsey, J. T., and R. Miller. 1996. “Destructive testing of two forty-year-old prestressed concrete bridge beams.” PCI J. 41 (5): 84–93. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.09011996.84.93.
Hughs, E., and R. Idriss. 2006. “Live-load distribution factors for prestressed concrete, spread box-girder bridge.” J. Bridge Eng. 11 (5): 573–581. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2006)11:5(573).
Kuchma, D. A., N. M. Hawkins, S.-H. Kim, S. Sun, and K. S. Kim. 2008. “Simplified shear provisions of the AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications.” PCI J. 53 (3): 53–73. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.05012008.53.73.
Labia, Y., M. S. Saiidi, and B. Douglas. 1997. “Full scale testing and analysis of 20-year-old pretensioned concrete box girders.” ACI Struct. J. 94: 471–482.
Nassif, H., and A. S. Nowak. 1995. “Dynamic load spectra for girder bridges.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1476: 69–83.
Pessiki, S., M. Kaczinski, and H. H. Wescott. 1996. “Evaluation of effective prestress force in 28-year-old prestressed concrete bridge beams.” PCI J. 41 (6): 78–89. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.11011996.78.89.
Pettigrew, C. S., P. J. Barr, M. Maguire, and M. W. Halling. 2016. “Behavior of 48-year old double-tee bridge girders made with lightweight concrete.” J. Bridge Eng. 21 (9): 04016054. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000921.
Rimal, S., B. Kidd, M. Tazarv, J. Seo, and N. Wehbe. 2019. Methodology for load rating double-tee bridges. MPC Rep. No. 19-389. Fargo, MD: Mountain-Plains Consortium, North Dakota State Univ.—Upper Great Plains Transportation Institute.
Seo, J., T. M. Czaplewski, J. H. Kimn, and G. Hatfield. 2015. “Integrated structural health monitoring system and multi-regression models for determining load ratings for complex steel bridges.” Measurement 75: 308–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2015.07.043.
Seo, J., and J. W. Hu. 2015. “Influence of atypical vehicle types on girder distribution factors of secondary road steel–concrete composite bridges.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 29 (2): 04014064. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000566.
Seo, J., C. T. Kilaru, B. Phares, and P. Lu. 2017. “Agricultural vehicle load distribution for timber bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 22 (11): 04017085. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001112.
Seo, J., B. Phares, and T. J. Wipf. 2014a. “Lateral live-load distribution characteristics of simply supported steel girder bridges loaded with implements of husbandry.” J. Bridge Eng. 19 (4): 04013021. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000558.
Seo, J., B. M. Phares, J. Dahlberg, T. J. Wipf, and A. Abu-Hawash. 2014b. “A framework for statistical distribution factor threshold determination of steel–concrete composite bridges under farm traffic.” Eng. Struct. 69: 72–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.03.005.
Shenoy, C. V., and G. C. Frantz. 1991. “Structural tests of 27-year-old prestressed concrete bridge beams.” PCI J. 36 (6): 80–90. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.09011991.80.90.
Tazarv, M., L. Bohn, and N. Wehbe. 2019. “Rehabilitation of longitudinal joints in double-tee bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 24 (6). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001412.
Vecchio, F. J., and M. P. Collins. 1998. “Predicting the response of reinforced concrete beams subjected to shear using the modified compression field theory.” ACI Struct. J. 85 (4): 258–268.
Wehbe, N., M. Konrad, and A. Breyfogle. 2016. “Joint detailing between double tee bridge girders for improved serviceability and strength.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2592 (1): 108–116. https://doi.org/10.3141/2592-12.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 26Issue 1January 2021

History

Received: Jan 31, 2020
Accepted: Jul 27, 2020
Published online: Oct 23, 2020
Published in print: Jan 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Mar 23, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Sandip Rimal, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Former Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, South Dakota State Univ., Brookings, SD 57007. Email: [email protected]
Brian Kidd, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Former Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, South Dakota State Univ., Brookings, SD 57007. Email: [email protected]
Mostafa Tazarv, Ph.D., M.ASCE [email protected]
P.E.
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, South Dakota State Univ., Brookings, SD 57007. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor with Tenure, Chairman of ASCE Timber Bridges Committee, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, South Dakota State Univ., Brookings, SD 57007 (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6046-9319. Email: [email protected]
Nadim Wehbe, Ph.D., F.ASCE [email protected]
P.E.
Professor, Head of the Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, South Dakota State Univ., Brookings, SD 57007. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share