Acceptance of Corrosion-Resistant Steel in Design of Steel Girder Bridges Based on Expected Utility Theory
Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 25, Issue 11
Abstract
In a chloride-containing environment, steel bridges that use carbon steel can become corroded and require periodical inspection, repainting, and replacement to maintain an acceptable level of safety and serviceability during their service life. In recent years, several new bridges in the United States have adopted corrosion-resistant steels (i.e., ASTM A1010). Although corrosion-resistant steel can result in a substantial reduction in maintenance costs, its production cost is much higher than carbon steel. From a life-cycle cost perspective, the circumstances under which corrosion-resistant steel is economically advantageous remain unclear. The life-cycle costs that account for the uncertainties associated with traffic loads, including resistance, corrosion propagation, and maintenance activities further complicate this problem. The objective of this paper is to investigate the acceptance of corrosion-resistant steel in the design of steel girder bridges based on expected utility theory (EUT). The methodology developed will be exemplified on a steel girder bridge. Two types of utility functions will be used to characterize the preference of decision makers under uncertain conditions. The analysis results indicate that A1010 is the preferred solution for bridges in aggressive environments, or with severe failure consequences, or both, when the discount rate is low.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful for the financial support received from the US National Science Foundation Grant CMMI-1537926, the US Department of Transportation Region 3 University Transportation Center Award No. CIAM-UTC-REG6, and the Pennsylvania Infrastructure Technology Alliance. The opinions and conclusions presented in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsoring organizations.
References
AASHTO. 2017. AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2018. The manual for bridge evaluation. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Akgül, F., and D. M. Frangopol. 2003. “Rating and reliability of existing bridges in a network.” J. Bridge Eng. 8 (6): 383–392. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2003)8:6(383).
Akgül, F., and D. M. Frangopol. 2004. “Lifetime performance analysis of existing steel girder bridge superstructures.” J. Struct. Eng. 130 (12): 1875–1888. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:12(1875).
Albrecht, P., and A. H. Naeemi. 1984. Performance of weathering steel in bridges. NCHRP Rep. No. 272. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
ArcelorMittal USA. 2016. Duracorr®/A1010: Bridge applications and fabrication guidelines. East Chicago, IN: ArcelorMittal USA.
ASCE/SEI-AASHTO Ad-Hoc Group On Bridge Inspection, Rating, Rehabilitation, and Replacement. 2009. “White paper on bridge inspection and rating.” J. Bridge Eng. 14 (1): 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2009)14:1(1).
Barker, R. M., and J. A. Puckett. 2013. Design of highway bridges: An LRFD approach. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Bliss, R. R., and N. Panigirtzoglou. 2004. “Option-implied risk aversion estimates.” J. Finance 59 (1): 407–446. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00637.x.
Cha, E. J., and B. R. Ellingwood. 2012. “Risk-averse decision-making for civil infrastructure exposed to low-probability, high-consequence events.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 104: 27–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2012.04.002.
Cha, E. J., and B. R. Ellingwood. 2013. “Seismic risk mitigation of building structures: The role of risk aversion.” Struct. Saf. 40: 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2012.06.004.
Cheng, M., D. Y. Yang, and D. M. Frangopol. 2020. “Investigation of the effects of time preference and risk perception on life-cycle management of civil infrastructure.” J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst. Part A: Civ. Eng. 6 (1): 04020001. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0001039.
Czarnecki, A. A., and A. S. Nowak. 2008. “Time-variant reliability profiles for steel girder bridges.” Struct. Saf. 30 (1): 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2006.05.002.
Daghash, S. M., Q. Huang, and O. E. Ozbulut. 2019. “Tensile behavior and cost-efficiency evaluation of ASTM A1010 steel for bridge construction.” J. Bridge Eng. 24 (8): 04019078. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001449.
Estes, A. C., and D. M. Frangopol. 1999. “Repair optimization of highway bridges using system reliability approach.” J. Struct. Eng. 125 (7): 766–775. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1999)125:7(766).
FDOT (Florida Department of Transportation). 2016a. Manual of uniform minimum standards for design, construction and maintenance for streets and highways. Tallahassee, FL: FDOT.
FDOT (Florida Department of Transportation). 2016b. Transportation glossary of terms & acronyms. Tallahassee, FL: FDOT.
FDOT (Florida Department of Transportation). 2018. Structures manual, volume 1 of structures design guidelines. Tallahassee, FL: FDOT.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 1992. “National Bridge Inventory (NBI).” Accessed November 13, 2019. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/nbi.cfm.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2018. Bridge preservation guide: Maintaining a resilient infrastructure to preserve mobility. Washington, DC: FHWA.
Fishburn, P. C. 1981. “Subjective expected utility: A review of normative theories.” Theory Decis. 13 (2): 139–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00134215.
Fletcher, F. B. 2011. Improved corrosion-resistant steel for highway bridge construction. Washington, DC: FHWA.
Frangopol, D. M., Y. Dong, and S. Sabatino. 2017. “Bridge life-cycle performance and cost: Analysis, prediction, optimisation and decision-making.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 13 (10): 1239–1257. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2016.1267772.
Frangopol, D. M., and M. Soliman. 2016. “Life-cycle of structural systems: Recent achievements and future directions.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 12 (1): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2014.999794.
Goda, K., and H. P. Hong. 2006. “Optimal seismic design considering risk attitude, societal tolerable risk level, and life quality criterion.” J. Struct. Eng. 132 (12): 2027–2035. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2006)132:12(2027).
Gong, C., and D. M. Frangopol. 2020a. “Condition-based multi-objective maintenance decision-making for highway bridges considering risk perceptions.” J. Struct. Eng. 146 (5): 04020051. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002570.
Gong, C., and D. M. Frangopol. 2020b. “Time-variant hull girder reliability considering spatial dependence of corrosion growth, geometric and material properties.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 193: 106612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2019.106612.
Gong, C., D. M. Frangopol, and M. Cheng. 2019. “Risk-based life-cycle optimal dry-docking inspection of corroding ship hull tankers.” Eng. Struct. 195: 559–567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.05.063.
Hasan, M. A., K. Yan, S. Lim, M. Akiyama, and D. M. Frangopol. 2020. “LCC-based identification of geographical locations suitable for using stainless steel rebars in RC girder bridges.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 16 (9): 1201–1227. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2019.1703758.
Hong, H.-P., W. Zhou, S. Zhang, and W. Ye. 2014. “Optimal condition-based maintenance decisions for systems with dependent stochastic degradation of components.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 121: 276–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2013.09.004.
Kayser, J. R. 1988. “The effects of corrosion on the reliability of steel girder bridges.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Michigan.
Keeney, R. L., and H. Raiffa. 1993. Decisions with multiple objectives: Preferences and value trade-offs. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Kere, K. J., and Q. Huang. 2019. “Life-cycle cost comparison of corrosion management strategies for steel bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 24 (4): 04019007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001361.
Liu, L., D. M. Frangopol, A. Mondoro, and D. Y. Yang. 2018. “Sustainability-informed bridge ranking under scour based on transportation network performance and multiattribute utility.” J. Bridge Eng. 23 (10): 04018082. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001296.
Luce, R. D., and D. von Winterfeldt. 1994. “What common ground exists for descriptive, prescriptive, and normative utility theories?” Manage. Sci. 40 (2): 263–279. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.40.2.263.
MaineDOT (Maine Department of Transportation). 2015. Load rating guide. Augusta, ME: MaineDOT.
Nowak, A. S. 1995. “Calibration of LRFD bridge code.” J. Struct. Eng. 121 (8): 1245–1251. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1995)121:8(1245).
Nowak, A. S. 1999. Calibration of LRFD bridge design code. NCHRP Rep. No. 368. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Okasha, N. M., D. M. Frangopol, F. B. Fletcher, and A. D. Wilson. 2012. “Life-cycle cost analyses of a new steel for bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 17 (1): 168–172. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000219.
Padgett, J. E., K. Dennemann, and J. Ghosh. 2010. “Risk-based seismic life-cycle cost–benefit (LCC-B) analysis for bridge retrofit assessment.” Struct. Saf. 32 (3): 165–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2009.10.003.
Rodriguez, M. M., S. Labi, and Z. Li. 2006. “Enhanced bridge replacement cost models for Indiana’s bridge management system.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1958 (1): 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198106195800102.
Sabatino, S., D. M. Frangopol, and Y. Dong. 2015. “Sustainability-informed maintenance optimization of highway bridges considering multi-attribute utility and risk attitude.” Eng. Struct. 102: 310–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.07.030.
Sharp, S. R., J. Provines, A. K. Moruza, W. F. Via Jr., and K. N. Harrop. 2018. “Design, fabrication, construction, and cost assessment of Virginia’s first corrosion resistant ASTM A1010 plate girder bridge.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2672 (26): 68–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118773888.
Sobanjo, J. O., and J. D. Thompson. 2001. Development of agency maintenance, repair, and rehabilitation (MR&R) cost data for Florida’s bridge management systems. Technical Report. Tallahassee, FL: Florida Department of Transportation.
Soliman, M., and D. M. Frangopol. 2015. “Life-cycle cost evaluation of conventional and corrosion-resistant steel for bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 20 (1): 06014005. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000647.
Thanapol, Y., M. Akiyama, and D. M. Frangopol. 2016. “Updating the seismic reliability of existing RC structures in a marine environment by incorporating the spatial steel corrosion distribution: Application to bridge piers.” J. Bridge Eng. 21 (7): 04016031. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000889.
Tversky, A. 1975. “A critique of expected utility theory: Descriptive and normative considerations.” Erkenntnis 9 (2): 163–173.
Wakker, P. P. 2008. “Explaining the characteristics of the power (CRRA) utility family.” Health Eco. 17 (12): 1329–1344.
Wang, N., C. O’Malley, B. R. Ellingwood, and A.-H. Zureick. 2011. “Bridge rating using system reliability assessment. I: Assessment and verification by load testing.” J. Bridge Eng. 16 (6): 854–862. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000172.
WisDOT (Wisconsin Department of Transportation). 2018. WisDOT bridge manual. Madison, WI: WisDOT.
Yang, S-I., D. M. Frangopol, and L. C. Neves 2006. “Optimum maintenance strategy for deteriorating structures using lifetime functions.” Eng. Struct. 28 (2): 196–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.06.024.
Zhang, M., H. Song, S. Lim, M. Akiyama, and D. M. Frangopol. 2019. “Reliability estimation of corroded RC structures based on spatial variability using experimental evidence, probabilistic analysis and finite element method.” Eng. Struct. 192: 30–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.04.085.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 25 • Issue 11 • November 2020
Copyright
© 2020 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Nov 26, 2019
Accepted: Jun 9, 2020
Published online: Sep 10, 2020
Published in print: Nov 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Feb 10, 2021
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.