Load Truncation Approach for Development of Live-Load Factors for Bridge Rating
Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 25, Issue 7
Abstract
Various local governments have developed state-specific vehicular live-load factors for bridge rating. However, a significant computational demand is often associated with such an effort. This is due to the large size of the weigh-in-motion (WIM) databases frequently used in the procedure. In this study, a method is proposed that can significantly reduce the computational cost of the analysis, while still maintaining reasonable accuracy. The proposed approach develops approximate live-load random-variable statistics by truncating the WIM database based on gross vehicle weight, and then a complete reliability analysis is conducted to develop new live-load factors that meet AASHTO-specified rating standards. Two WIM databases, one based on typically legal vehicles and another based on unusually heavy vehicles, are considered for evaluation. Results of the proposed approach are compared with an exact assessment as well as to a simplified method suggested by AASHTO. It was found that the proposed approach may provide very large reductions in computational cost with minimal loss of accuracy, whereas significant inaccuracies were found with the existing simplified approach.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The weigh-in-motion data used in this study was provided by the Michigan Department of Transportation, whose support is greatly acknowledged.
References
AASHTO. 1994. Manual for condition evaluation of bridges, (including 1998 interim revision). Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2003. Manual for condition evaluation and load and resistance factor rating (LRFR) of highway bridges. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2018. Manual for bridge evaluation. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Acar, E., M. Rais-Rohani, and C. Eamon. 2010. “Reliability estimation using univariate dimension reduction and extended generalised lambda distribution.” Int. J. Reliab. Saf. 4 (2/3): 166–187. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJRS.2010.032444.
Anitori, G., J. R. Casas, and M. Ghosn. 2017. “WIM-based live-load model for advanced analysis of simply supported short- and medium-span highway bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 22 (10): 04017062. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001081.
Curtis, R., and R. Till. 2008. Recommendations for Michigan specific load and resistance factor design loads and load and resistance factor rating procedures. MDOT Research Rep. R-1511. Lansing, MI: Michigan Dept. of Transportation.
Eamon, C. D., V. Kamjoo, and K. Shinki. 2014. Side by side probability for bridge design and analysis. MDOT Report RC-1601. Lansing, MI: Michigan Dept. of Transportation.
Eamon, C. D., V. Kamjoo, and K. Shinki. 2016. “Design live-load factor calibration for Michigan highway bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 21 (6): 04016014. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943 5592.0000897.
Eamon, C. D., and S. Siavashi. 2018. Developing representative Michigan truck configurations for bridge load rating. Rep. No. SPR-1640. Lansing, MI: Michigan Dept. of Transportation.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 1994. Federal size regulations for commercial motor vehicles. Code of Federal Regulations. 23 CFR Part 658. Washington, DC: FHWA.
Fu, G., J. Chi, and Q. Wang. 2019. Illinois-specific LRFR live-load factors based on truck data. Rantoul, IL: Illinois Center for Transportation/Illinois Dept. of Transportation.
Fu, G., and O. Hag-Elsafi. 2000. “Vehicular overloads: Load model, bridge safety, and permit checking.” J. Bridge Eng. 5 (1), 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2000)5:1(49).
Ghosn, M., B. Sivakumar, and F. Miao. 2011. Load and resistance factor rating (LRFR) in NYS. NYSDOT Rep. No. C-06-13. Albany, NY: New York State Dept. of Transportation.
Kamjoo, V., and C. D. Eamon. 2018. “Reliability-based design optimization of a vehicular live load model.” Eng. Struct. 168: 799–808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.05.033.
Kwon, O. S., S. Orton, H. Salim, E. Kim, and T. Hazlett. 2010. Calibration of the live load factor in LRFD design guidelines. MODOT Rep. No. ORI1-003. Jefferson City, MO: Missouri Dept. of Transportation.
Lee, C. E., and N. Souny-Slitine. 1998. Final research findings on traffic-load forecasting using weigh-in-motion data. Rep. No. 987-7. Austin, TX: Center for Transportation Research Bureau of Engineering Research, Univ. of Texas at Austin.
MDOT (Michigan Dept. of Transportation). 2005. Bridge analysis guide with 2009 interim update, parts 1 and 2. Lansing, MI: Michigan Dept. of Transportation Construction and Technology Support Area.
Miao, T. J., and T. H. T. Chan. 2002. “Bridge live load models from WIM data.” Eng. Struct. 24 (8): 1071–1084. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(02)00034-2.
Moses, F. 2001. Calibration of load factors for LRFR bridge evaluation. NCHRP Rep. No. 454. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Nowak A. S. 1999. Calibration of LRFD bridge design code. NCHRP Rep. No. 368. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Nowak, A. S., and P. Rakoczy. 2013. “WIM-based live load for bridges.” KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 17 (3): 568–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-013-0602-8.
O’Brien, E. J., and B. Enright. 2013. “Using weigh-in-motion data to determine aggressiveness of traffic for bridge loading.” J. Bridge Eng. 18 (3):232–239. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000368.
O’Brien, E. J., B. Enright, and A. Getachew. 2010. “Importance of the tail in truck weight modeling for bridge assessment.” J. Bridge Eng. 15 (2): 210–213. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000043.
Pelphrey, J., and C. Higgins. 2006. Calibration of LRFR live load factors using weigh-in-motion data. ODOT Rep. No. SPR 635. Salem, OR: Oregon Dept. of Transportation.
Siavashi, S. 2019. “Optimal assessment of weigh-in-motion data for structural reliability based rating of bridge superstructures.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Wayne State Univ.
Siavashi, S., and C. D. Eamon. 2019. “Development of traffic live-load models for bridge superstructure rating with RBDO and best selection approach.” J. Bridge Eng. 24(8), 04019084. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001457.
Sivakumar, B., and M. Ghosn. 2011. Recalibration of LRFR live load factors in the AASHTO manual for bridge evaluation. NCHRP Rep. No. 20-07. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Sivakumar, B., M. Ghosn, and F. Moses. 2011. Protocols for collecting and using traffic data in bridge design. NCHRP Rep. No. 683. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Tabatabai, H., J. Zhao, and C.-W. Lee. 2009. Statistical analysis of heavy truck loads using Wisconsin weigh-in-motion data. WDOT Project CFIRE 01-02. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Dept. of Transportation.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 25 • Issue 7 • July 2020
Copyright
© 2020 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jul 11, 2019
Accepted: Dec 19, 2019
Published online: Apr 28, 2020
Published in print: Jul 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Sep 28, 2020
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.