Validated Lateral Seismic Force-Displacement Backbone Curves for High-Speed Rail Bridge Abutments
Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 25, Issue 4
Abstract
California’s high-speed rail (HSR) system is slated to traverse nearly the entire length of the state, and thus it will be exposed to seismic risks from almost every known major tectonic fault there. The present study deals with the seismic responses of bridge-abutment transition backfills (BATBs), which are essential components of HSR bridges. BATBs provide a gradual variation of vertical stiffness between the bridge deck and nominal engineered backfill, enabling smooth operations for trains traveling at high speeds. All prior investigations focused on this vertical stiffness in order to better characterize the localized vertical differential movements around BATBs under periodic high axial loads from train sets. Lateral behavior of BATBs, which would be important under seismic loads, has not previously been investigated. The present study offers a parametric nonlinear lateral force-displacement backbone curve for BATBs that is verified against three-dimensional finite-element models and validated against data from large-scale tests conducted at Brigham Young University. The parametric curve takes backwall height as well as abutment skew angle into account.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
ASTM. 2012. Standard test methods for laboratory compaction characteristics of soil using modified effort (56,000 ft-lbf/ft3 (2,700 kN-m/m3)). ASTMD1557. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
CAHSR (California High Speed Rail). 2013. California high speed train project design criteria. Sacramento, CA: CAHSR.
CAHSR (California High Speed Rail). 2018. California High-Speed Rail 2018 business plan. Sacramento, CA: CAHSR.
Caltrans. 2013. Seismic design criteria v.1.7. Sacramento, CA: California Dept. of Transportation.
Caltrans. 2018. Seismic design criteria v2.0. Sacramento, CA: California Dept. of Transportation.
Dahlberg, T. 2004. Railway track settlements—A literature review. Linköping, Sweden: Linköping Univ.
Dasmeh, A. 2019. “Lumped macroelement modeling of earth-retaining structures under seismic loading for nonlinear time-history analyses.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Los Angeles.
Hu, P., C. Zhang, S. Wen, and Y. Wang. 2019. “Dynamic responses of high-speed railway transition zone with various subgrade fillings.” Comput. Geotech. 108 (Apr): 17–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2018.12.011.
Khalili-Tehrani, P., A. Shamsabadi, J. P. Stewart, and E. Taciroglu. 2016. “Physically parameterized backbone curves for passive lateral response of bridge abutments with homogeneous backfills.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 14 (11): 3003–3023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-9934-3.
Obrzud, R., and A. Truty. 2018. The hardening soil model—A practical guidebook. Lausanne, Switzerland: Zace Services.
Rollins, K. M., and R. T. Cole. 2006. “Cyclic lateral load behavior of a pile cap and backfill.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 132 (9): 1143–1153. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:9(1143).
Schanz, T., P. A. Vermeer, and P. G. Bonnier. 1999. “The hardening soil model: Formulation and verification.” In Beyond 2000 in computational geotechnics—10 years of PLAXIS, edited by R. Brinkgreve, 1–16. Rotterdam, Netherlands: A.A. Balkema.
Schwicht, D. E. 2018. “Large-scale strength testing of high-speed railway bridge embankments: Effects of cement treatment and skew under passive loading.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Brigham Young Univ.
Shahraki, M., and K. J. Witt. 2015. “3d modeling of transition zone between ballasted and ballastless high-speed railway track.” J. Traffic Transp. Eng. 3 (4): 234–240. https://doi.org/10.17265/2328-2142/2015.04.005.
Shamsabadi, A., A. Dasmeh, A. Nojoumi, K. M. Rollins, and E. Taciroglu. 2019. “A lateral capcity model for backfills reacting against skew-angled abutments under seismic loading.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 146 (2): 04019129. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002183.
Shamsabadi, A., P. Khalili-Tehrani, J. P. Stewart, and E. Taciroglu. 2010. “Validated simulation models for lateral response of bridge abutments with typical backfills.” J. Bridge Eng. 15 (3): 302–311. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000058.
Shamsabadi, A., K. M. Rollins, and M. Kapuskar. 2007. “Nonlinear soil–abutment–bridge structure interaction for seismic performance-based design.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 133 (6): 707–720. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:6(707).
Shan, Y., B. Detmann, and S. Savidis. 2013. “Infuence of different transition zones on the dynamic response of track-subgrade systems.” Comput. Geotech. 48 (Mar): 21–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2012.09.006.
Smith, L., B. Doe, D. Li, D. Otter, and S. Uppal. 2003. Study of bridge approach and track transition degredation: Factors and mitigation. Washington, DC: US Dept. of Transportation, Federal Railroad Administration.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 25 • Issue 4 • April 2020
Copyright
©2020 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jan 17, 2019
Accepted: Oct 17, 2019
Published online: Jan 20, 2020
Published in print: Apr 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Jun 20, 2020
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.