Technical Papers
Dec 28, 2019

System Fragility Assessment of Tall-Pier Bridges Subjected to Near-Fault Ground Motions

Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 25, Issue 3

Abstract

Numerous bridges with piers over 40 m are constructed in Southwest China, which is known as a region of high seismicity. In current research, this type of bridge is commonly simplified as a single-column system, and researchers mainly focused on how seismic performance is affected by the higher modes of columns. This study aims to investigate the seismic behavior of the entire system of tall-pier bridges subjected to near-fault ground motions, using probability-based fragility analysis. A numerical model of the entire bridge system is constructed incorporating the effects of higher-order modes of pier columns and the influence of various structural components as bearings, shear keys, and end abutments. Both pier columns and rubber bearings are considered as vulnerable components during fragility analysis. With probability seismic demand models (PSDMs) developed from extensive nonlinear time history analyses, both component-level and system-level fragility curves of the prototype bridge are constructed and compared. The results show that bridge performance is usually dominated by rubber bearings, rather than pier columns, and the relative vulnerability of components might change with the intensity of input motions. This fact implies that only focusing on the seismic demands of pier columns, as is usual in current investigations, is insufficient in estimating the damage states of tall-pier bridges; failure of bearings should be carefully considered in engineering practice as well. Furthermore, compared with fragility curves of individual components, higher seismic vulnerability is observed in those corresponding to the entire system, indicating that the seismic fragility of tall-pier bridges should be assessed at the system level rather than component level.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, or code generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2019M651468), the National Natural Science Foundation (Nos. 51908348 and 51678434), and the Project of State Key Laboratory for Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering of China (No. SLDRCE15-A-01).

References

Alam, M. S., M. R. Bhuiyan, and A. M. Billah. 2012. “Seismic fragility assessment of SMA-bar restrained multi-span continuous highway bridge isolated by different laminated rubber bearings in medium to strong seismic risk zones.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 10 (6): 1885–1909. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-012-9381-8.
Baker, J. W. 2007. “Quantitative classification of near-fault ground motions using wavelet analysis.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 97 (5): 1486–1501. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120060255.
Billah, A. M., M. S. Alam, and M. R. Bhuiyan. 2012. “Fragility analysis of retrofitted multicolumn bridge bent subjected to near-fault and far-field ground motion.” J. Bridge Eng. 18 (10): 992–1004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000452.
Bray, J. D., and A. Rodriguez-Marek. 2004. “Characterization of forward-directivity ground motions in the near-fault region.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 24 (11): 815–828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2004.05.001.
Caltrans. 2010. Seismic design criteria. Sacramento, CA: California Dept. of Transportation.
Cao, L., and C. Li. 2019. “Tuned tandem mass dampers-inerters with broadband high effectiveness for structures under white noise base excitations.” Struct. Control Health Monit. 26 (4): e2319. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2319.
Chen, X., Z. Guan, J. Li, and B. F. Spencer Jr. 2018. “Shake table tests of tall-pier bridges to evaluate seismic performance.” J. Bridge Eng. 23 (9): 04018058. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001264.
Chen, X., J. Li, and Z. Guan. 2019. “Fragility analysis of tall pier bridges subjected to near-fault pulse-like ground motions.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2019.16835894.
Choi, E., R. DesRoches, and B. Nielson. 2004. “Seismic fragility of typical bridges in moderate seismic zones.” Eng. Struct. 26 (2): 187–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2003.09.006.
Chopra, A. K. 2001. Dynamics of structures theory applications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Cornell, C. A., F. Jalayer, R. O. Hamburger, and D. A. Foutch. 2002. “Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC federal Emergency Management Agency steel moment frame guidelines.” J. Struct. Eng. 128 (4): 526–533. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:4(526).
Duncan, J. M., and R. L. Mokwa. 2001. “Passive earth pressures: Theories and tests.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 127 (3): 248–257. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2001)127:3(248).
Elgamal, A., L. Yan, Z. Yang, and J. P. Conte. 2008. “Three-dimensional seismic response of Humboldt Bay bridge-foundation-ground system.” J. Struct. Eng. 134 (7): 1165–1176. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:7(1165).
FEMA. 2008. HAZUS-MH MR3: Technical manual. Washington, DC: FEMA.
Gardoni, P., K. M. Mosalam, and A. der Kiureghian. 2003. “Probabilistic seismic demand models and fragility estimates for RC bridges.” J. Earthquake Eng. 7 (Spec.1): 79–106.
Guan, Z., J. Li, Y. Xu, and H. Lu. 2011. “Higher-order mode effects on the seismic performance of tall piers.” Front. Archit. Civ. Eng. China 5 (4): 496–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-011-0131-9.
Guirguis, J., and S. Mehanny. 2012. “Evaluating code criteria for regular seismic behavior of continuous concrete box girder bridges with unequal height piers.” J. Bridge Eng. 18 (6): 486–498. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000383.
Güneş, N., and Z. Ç. Ulucan. 2019. “Nonlinear dynamic response of a tall building to near-fault pulse-like ground motions.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 17 (6): 2989–3013.
Hall, J. F., T. H. Heaton, M. W. Halling, and D. J. Wald. 1995. “Near-source ground motion and its effects on flexible buildings.” Earthquake Spectra 11 (4): 569–605. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585828.
Housner, G. W., and D. E. Hudson. 1958. “The Port Hueneme earthquake of March 18, 1957.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 48 (2): 163–168.
Jalayer, F., J. L. Beck, and F. Zareian. 2012. “Analyzing the sufficiency of alternative scalar and vector intensity measures of ground shaking based on information theory.” J. Eng. Mech. 138 (3): 307–316. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000327.
Li, C. X., and B. Y. Cao. 2015. “Hybrid active tuned mass dampers for structures under the ground acceleration.” Struct. Control Health Monit. 22 (4): 757–773. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.1716.
Li, J., L. Fan, and X. Song. 2005. “Investigation for displacement ductility capacity of tall piers.” In Proc., Third PRC-US Workshop on Seismic Analysis and Design of Special Bridges. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
Li, J., N. Xiang, H. Tang, and Z. Guan. 2016. “Shake-table tests and numerical simulation of an innovative isolation system for highway bridges.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 86 (Jul): 55–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.05.002.
Li, X., Z. X. Li, and A. J. Crewe. 2018. “Nonlinear seismic analysis of a high-pier, long-span, continuous RC frame bridge under spatially variable ground motions.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 114 (Nov): 298–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.07.032.
Luco, N., and C. A. Cornell. 2007. “Structure-specific scalar intensity measures for near-source and ordinary earthquake ground motions.” Earthquake Spectra 23 (2): 357–392. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2723158.
Mackie, K., and B. Stojadinović. 2007. “Performance-based seismic bridge design for damage and loss limit states.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 36 (13): 1953–1971. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.699.
Mazzoni, S., F. McKenna, M. H. Scott, and G. L. Fenves. 2006. The Open System For Earthquake Engineering Simulation (OpenSEES) user command-language manual. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research.
Mehanny, S. S. F. 2009. “A broad-range power-law form scalar-based seismic intensity measure.” Eng. Struct. 31 (7): 1354–1368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.02.003.
Nielson, B. G., and R. DesRoches. 2007. “Seismic fragility methodology for highway bridges using a component level approach.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 36 (6): 823–839. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.655.
Padgett, J. E., and R. DesRoches. 2008. “Methodology for the development of analytical fragility curves for retrofitted bridges.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 37 (8): 1157–1174. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.801.
Padgett, J. E., B. G. Nielson, and R. DesRoches. 2008. “Selection of optimal intensity measures in probabilistic seismic demand models of highway bridge portfolios.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 37 (5): 711–725. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.782.
Priestley, M. N., F. Seible, and G. M. Calvi. 1996. Seismic design and retrofit of bridges. New York: Wiley.
Scott, B., R. Park, and M. Priestley. 1982. “Stress-strain behavior of concrete confined by overlapping hoops at low and high strain rates.” J. Am. Concrete Inst. 79 (1): 13–27.
Shamsabadi, A., K. M. Rollins, and M. Kapuskar. 2007. “Nonlinear soil–abutment–bridge structure interaction for seismic performance-based design.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 133 (6): 707–720. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:6(707).
Tang, W. H., and A. Ang. 2007. Probability concepts in engineering: Emphasis on applications to civil and environmental engineering. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Taucer, F., E. Spacone, and F. C. Filippou. 1991. Vol. 91 of A fiber beam-column element for seismic response analysis of reinforced concrete structures. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California Berkekey.
Tekie, P. B., and B. R. Ellingwood. 2003. “Seismic fragility assessment of concrete gravity dams.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 32 (14): 2221–2240. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.325.
Tubaldi, E., M. Barbato, and A. Dall’Asta. 2011. “Influence of model parameter uncertainty on seismic transverse response and vulnerability of steel-concrete composite bridges with dual load path.” J. Struct. Eng. 138 (3): 363–374. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000456.
Tubaldi, E., M. Barbato, and A. DallAsta. 2010. “Transverse seismic response of continuous steel-concrete composite bridges exhibiting dual load path.” Earthquake Struct. 1 (1): 21–41. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2010.1.1.021.
Tubaldi, E., L. Tassotti, A. Dall’Asta, and L. Dezi. 2014. “Seismic response analysis of slender bridge piers.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 43 (10): 1503–1519. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2408.
Wang, X., A. Shafieezadeh, and A. Ye. 2018. “Optimal intensity measures for probabilistic seismic demand modeling of extended pile-shaft-supported bridges in liquefied and laterally spreading ground.” Bull. Earthquake Eng. 16 (1): 229–257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0199-2.
Wilson, P., and A. Elgamal. 2006. “Large scale measurement of lateral earth pressure on bridge abutment back-wall subjected to static and dynamic loading.” In Proc., New Zealand Workshop on Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering, 307–315. Christchurch, New Zealand: Univ. of Canterbury.
Xia, X. S., X. C. Chen, C. F. Wang, and Y. L. Zhang. 2010. “Study on seismic performance of tall-pier and long-span continuous rigid-framed bridge.” Northwest Seismol. J. 32 (1): 17.
Xiang, N., and J. Li. 2018. “Effect of exterior concrete shear keys on the seismic performance of laminated rubber bearing-supported highway bridges in China.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 112 (Sep): 185–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.04.033.
Xu, H., and P. Gardoni. 2016. “Probabilistic capacity and seismic demand models and fragility estimates for reinforced concrete buildings based on three-dimensional analyses.” Eng. Struct. 112 (Apr): 200–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.01.005.
Xu, L. 2012. “Experimental research on seismic behavior of reinforced concrete transverse retainers.” [In Chinese.] Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Bridge Engineering, Tongji Univ.
Zhai, C., L. Zhang, S. Li, and L. Xie. 2010. “Influence of near-fault motions on long-span rigid-frame bridges.” [In Chinese.] Supplement, J. Disaster Prev. Mitigation Eng. 30 (S1): 143–147.
Zhao, G., L. Xu, and L. Xie. 2016. “A simple and quantitative algorithm for identifying pulse-like ground motions based on zero velocity point method.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 106 (3): 1011–1023. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120150226.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 25Issue 3March 2020

History

Received: Apr 5, 2019
Accepted: Sep 12, 2019
Published online: Dec 28, 2019
Published in print: Mar 1, 2020
Discussion open until: May 28, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Postdoctoral Researcher, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Mechanics in Energy Engineering, Shanghai Institute of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, School of Mechanism and Engineering Science, Shanghai Univ., Shanghai 200072, China; Postdoctoral Researcher, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Shanghai Univ., 333 Nanchen Rd., Shanghai 200444, China. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3862-2257. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share