Analytical Assessment of Main Cable Shape for Three-Pylon Suspension Bridge with Unequal Main-Span Lengths: Thermal Effect Consideration
Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 25, Issue 1
Abstract
Three-pylon suspension bridges with unequal main-span lengths are terrain-adaptive, and this feature makes them suitable for broad applications. However, the design and construction control of such bridges requires an accurate assessment of the main cable shape. In this study, an analytical approach for shape finding of the main cable is proposed within the framework of multisegment catenary theory. For the determination of the ratio of the secondary main span and the height of its side pylon, the basic principles were formulated. These imply that the elevation of the lowest hanging point of the main cable in the secondary main span should be equal to the main cable elevation at the midspan point in the main span. An analytical algorithm for estimating the thermal effect on the shape of the main cable was presented. Given the intermediary role of pylon top displacement and rotation angle of the splay saddle, a set of simultaneous equations was established and solved for all spans under three conditions: closure of elevation difference, moment equilibrium of splay saddle, and conservation of the unstressed length of the main cable. The proposed method was applied to a three-pylon suspension bridge with unequal spans of . The results obtained proved the feasibility and efficacy of the proposed approach. The application of these principles made it possible to reduce the height of the side pylon on the side of the secondary main span. This not only reduced the material consumption of hangers in the secondary main span but also improved the overall appearance of the bridge. Further analysis of the thermal effects revealed a linear correlation between the structural deformation and temperature variation. Span length variation caused by the bending deformation of pylons was shown to have a significant impact on the temperature sensitivity coefficient of the main cable elevation. This impact can be counteracted by the thermal contraction/expansion in the left and right side spans, whereas the superposition of both effects occurs in the main and secondary main spans.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The work described in this paper was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 51678148, the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20181277) and the National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2017YFC0806009), which is gratefully acknowledged.
References
Ahmadi-Kashani, K., and A. J. Bell. 1988. “The analysis of cables subject to uniformly distributed loads.” Eng. Struct. 10 (3): 174–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-0296(88)90004-1.
Cao, H. Y., X. D. Qian, Y. L. Zhou, Z. J. Chen, and H. P. Zhu. 2018. “Feasible range for midtower lateral stiffness in three-tower suspension bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 23 (3): 06017009. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001196.
Cao, H. Y., Y. L. Zhou, Z. J. Chen, and M. A. Wahab. 2017. “Form-finding analysis of suspension bridges using an explicit Iterative approach.” Struct. Eng. Mech. 62 (1): 85–95. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2017.62.1.085.
Chai, S. B., R. C. Xiao, and X. L. Wang. 2016. “Approximate calculation for deformation of multi-tower suspension bridges.” Struct. Eng. Int. 26 (1): 45–51. https://doi.org/10.2749/101686616X14480232444324.
Chen, Z. J., H. Y. Cao, and H. P. Zhu. 2013. “An iterative calculation method for suspension bridge’s cable system based on exact catenary theory.” Baltic J. Road Bridge Eng. 8 (3): 196–204. https://doi.org/10.3846/bjrbe.2013.25.
Cheng, Z. Y., Q. H. Zhang, Y. Bao, D. L. Jia, Y. Z. Bu, and Q. Li. 2018. “Analytical models of frictional resistance between cable and saddle equipped with friction plates for multispan suspension bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 23 (1): 04017118. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001176.
Choi, D. H., S. G. Gwon, H. Yoo, and H. S. Na. 2013. “Nonlinear static analysis of continuous multi-span suspension bridges.” Int. J. Steel Struct. 13 (1): 103–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-013-1010-0.
Collings, D. 2016. “Multiple-span suspension bridges: State of the art.” Bridge Eng. 169 (BE3): 215–231. https://doi.org/10.1680/jbren.15.00035.
Forsberg, T. 2001. “Multi-span suspension bridges.” Steel Struct. 1 (1): 63–73.
Fukuda, T. 1967. “Analysis of multi-span suspension bridges.” J. Struct. Div. 13 (9): 63–86.
Huddleston, J. V. 1981. “Computer analysis of extensible cables.” J. Eng. Mech. Div. 7 (l): 27–37.
Irvine, H. M. 1975. “Statics of suspended cables.” J. Eng. Mech. Div. 101 (13): 187–205.
Jia, L. J., Z. B. Lin, R. C. Xiao, and Y. Jiang. 2018. “Parameter effects on the mechanical performance of triple-tower four-span suspension bridges.” Adv. Struct. Eng. 21 (2): 256–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433217717115.
Jung, M. R., D. J. Min, and M. Y. Kim. 2013. “Nonlinear analysis methods based on the unstrained element length for determining initial shaping of suspension bridges under dead loads.” Comp. Struct. 128 (5): 272–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2013.06.014.
Jung, M. R., D. J. Min, and M. Y. Kim. 2015. “Simplified analytical method for optimized initial shape analysis of self-anchored suspension bridges and its verification.” Math. Prob. Eng. 2015: 923508. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/923508.
Juozapaitis, A., R. Kliukas, G. Sandovic, O. Lukoseviciene, and T. Merkevicius. 2013. “Analysis of modern three-span suspension bridges with stiff in bending cables.” Baltic J. Road Bridge Eng. 8 (3): 205–211. https://doi.org/10.3846/bjrbe.2013.26.
Karoumi, R. 1999. “Some modeling aspects in the nonlinear finite element analysis of cable supported bridges.” Comp. Struct. 71 (4): 397–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(98)00244-2.
Kim, H. K., and M. Y. Kim. 2012. “Efficient combination of a TCUD method and an initial force method for determining initial shapes of cable-supported bridges.” Int. J. Steel Struct. 12 (2): 157–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-012-2002-1.
Kim, H. K., M. J. Lee, and S. P. Chang. 2002. “Nonlinear shape finding analysis of a self-anchored suspension bridge.” Eng. Struct. 24 (12): 1547–1559. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(02)00097-4.
Kim, K. S., and H. S. Lee. 2001. “Analysis of target configurations under dead loads for cable-supported bridges.” Comp. Struct. 79 (29): 2681–2692. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(01)00120-1.
Liang, P., X. N. Wu, and Y. Xu. 2011. “Static and dynamic behaviours of three-tower suspension bridges and the structure selection of the mid-tower.” Adv. Mater. Res. 163–167: 2343–2349. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.163-167.2343.
Ma, X. W., J. G. Nie, and J. S. Fan. 2016. “Longitudinal stiffness of multispan suspension bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 21 (5): 06015010. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000878.
Nazir, C. P. 1986. “Multi-span balanced suspension bridge.” J. Struct. Eng. 112 (11): 2512–2527. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1986)112:11(2512).
O’Brien, W. T., and A. J. Francis. 1964. “Cable movements under two-dimensional loads.” J. Struct. Div. 90 (3): 89–123.
Pizarro, D., M. A. Hube, M. Valenzuela, and M. Márquez. 2015. “Dynamic characteristics of a longitudinally asymmetrical multi-span suspension bridge: The Chacao Bridge.” In Proc., IABSE Conf.—Structural Engineering: Providing Solutions to Global Challenges. Zürich, Switzerland: International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering.
Ruan, X., J. Y. Zhou, and C. C. Caprani. 2016. “Safety assessment of the antisliding between the main cable and middle saddle of a three-pylon suspension bridge considering traffic load modeling.” J. Bridge Eng. 21 (10): 04016069. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000927.
Thai, H. T., and D. H. Choi. 2013. “Advanced analysis of multispan suspension bridges.” J. Constr. Steel Res. 90 (41): 29–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2013.07.015.
Wang, X. L., and S. B. Chai. 2018. “Determining the middle tower stiffness value in an in-plane double-cable triple-tower suspension bridge.” J. Bridge Eng. 23 (7): 06018001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001254.
Wang, X. L., S. B. Chai, and Y. Xu. 2016. “Deformation characteristics of double-cable multispan suspension bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 21 (4): 06015007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000858.
Yamada, H., and H. Katsuchi. 2005. “Study on flutter characteristics of 4-span suspension bridge.” In Proc., 4th European and African Conf. on Wind Engineering. Prague, Czech Republic: ITAM AS CR.
Yoshida, O., M. Okuda, and T. Moriya. 2004. “Structural characteristics and applicability of four-span suspension bridge.” J. Bridge Eng. 9 (5): 453–463. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2004)9:5(453).
Zhang, W. M., and Y. J. Ge. 2014. “Flutter mode transition of a double-main-span suspension bridge in full aeroelastic model testing.” J. Bridge Eng. 19 (7): 06014004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000625.
Zhang, W. M., L. Y. Shi, L. Li, and Z. Liu. 2018. “Methods to correct unstrained hanger lengths and cable clamps’ installation positions in suspension bridges.” Eng. Struct. 171 (Sep): 202–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.05.039.
Zhang, X. J. 2010. “Study of structural parameters on the aerodynamic stability of three-tower suspension bridge.” Wind Struct. 13 (5): 471–485. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2010.13.5.471.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 25 • Issue 1 • January 2020
Copyright
©2019 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Mar 2, 2019
Accepted: Aug 29, 2019
Published online: Nov 8, 2019
Published in print: Jan 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Apr 8, 2020
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.