Strength-Based Out-of-Flatness Tolerance for Bottom Flanges of Steel Box Girders
Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 25, Issue 2
Abstract
This study determined an explicit tolerance for bottom flanges of tub girders giving computed first yield moment including the strength reduction due to initial out-of-flatness of tub girders higher than the flexural design capacity for the limit state of bottom flange local buckling in current standards. Finite-element analysis (FEA) was used to construct flexural strength–reduction curves for tub girders with various out-of-flatness magnitudes covering a range of girder cross sections and spans. Tub bottom flange slenderness ratios between 25 and 120 were modeled as covering the practical range. Models were built with coexisting out-of-flatness in both webs and flanges. The appropriate residual stress pattern was created using heat analysis. Models were laterally supported to ensure the local buckling limit state controls. Both 344.7-MPa (Grade 50 Steel) and 689.4-MPa (Grade 100 Steel) yield steel plates were considered with elastic-perfectly plastic material behavior. Large deflection theory was used to iteratively capture the secondary moments due to out-of-flatness. The current tolerance of out-of-flatness for the fascia web of an I-shaped plate girder was shown to implicitly accept a 20% strength reduction. Results showed that compressive flexural design formulas for tub girders in current standards conservatively reduce the strength to account for local buckling. Code adoption of is recommended for the tub girder bottom flange out-of-flatness tolerance, where represents the bottom flange width.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some data, models, or code generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request, including finite-element model coding, spreadsheets, and design calculations.
References
AASHTO. 2002. AASHTO standard specifications for highway bridges. 17th ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2017. AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications. 8th ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AISC (American Institute of Steel Construction). 2017. Steel construction manual. 15th ed. Chicago: AISC.
Alpsten, G. A., and L Tall. 1970. “Residual stresses in heavy welded shapes.” Weld. J. 49 (3): 93s–105s.
ANSYS. 2013. Finite element program user’s manual, version 15.0. Canonsburg, PA: ANSYS.
Asadnia, M. 2018. “Out-of-flatness plate tolerance for steel I-shaped and tub highway bridge plate girders.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, George Washington Univ.
Asadnia, M., and W. M. K. Roddis. 2018. “Modeling out-of-flatness and residual stresses in steel plate girders.” In Proc., Annual Stability Conf. on Structural Stability Research Council. Chicago: AISC.
ASTM. 2017. Standard specification for general requirements for rolled structural steel bars, plates shapes and sheet piling. ASTM A6/A 6M. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
AWS (American Welding Society). 2015. Bridge welding code—Steel. ANSI/AASHTO/AWS D1.5M/D1.5. Miami: AWS.
Bjorhovde, R., J. Brozzetti, G. A. Alpsten, and L. Tall. 1972. “Residual stresses in thick welded plates.” Weld. J. 51: 392s–405s.
Chandar, G., M. D. Hyzak, and L. M. Wolf. 2010. “Rapid, economical bridge replacement.” Modern Steel Construction. Accessed July 15, 2018. https://www.aisc.org/globalassets/modern-steel/archives/2010/12/2010v12_rapid_replacement.pdf.
Chavel, B., and J. Carnahan. 2015. Vol. 24 of Steel bridge design handbook design example 4: Three-span continuous straight composite steel tub girder bridge. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
Fan, Z. F. 1999. “Field and computational studies of steel trapezoidal box girder bridges.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Houston.
Helwig, T., and J. Yura. 2012. Vol. 13 of Steel bridge design handbook: Bracing system design. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
Helwig, T., J. Yura, R. Herman, E. B. Williamson, and D. Li. 2007. Design guidelines for steel trapezoidal box girder systems. Austin, TX: Texas DOT.
Herman, R. S. 2001. “Behavior of stiffened compression flanges of trapezoidal box girder bridges.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Texas, Austin.
Kishima Y., G. Alpsten, and L. Tall. 1969. Welded columns and flame-cut plates: Residual stresses in welded shapes of flame-cut plates in ASTM A572(50) steel. Bethlehem, PA: Lehigh Univ.
Korol, R. M., E. G. Thimmhardy, and M. S. Cheung. 1984. “Field investigation of out-of-plane deviations for steel tub girder bridges.” Can. J. Civ. Eng. 11 (3): 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1139/l84-058.
Lee, S. C. 2002. “Ultimate bending strength of steel box girders subjected to negative moment.” In Proc., 15th ASCE Engineering Mechanics Conf. New York: Columbia Univ.
Li, D. 2004. “Behavior of trapezoidal box girders with skewed supports.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Houston.
Sadovsky, Z. 1978. “A theoretical approach to the problem of the most dangerous initial deflection shape in stability type structural problems.” Aplikace Matematiky 23 (4): 248–266.
Zhang, Y. 2007. “Strength-based plate tolerances for steel bridge girders.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Houston.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
©2019 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Aug 31, 2018
Accepted: Aug 29, 2019
Published online: Dec 4, 2019
Published in print: Feb 1, 2020
Discussion open until: May 4, 2020
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.