Benchmark for Evaluating Performance in Visual Inspection of Fatigue Cracking in Steel Bridges
Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 25, Issue 1
Abstract
Visual inspection is the primary means of ensuring the safety and functionality of in-service bridges in the United States and owners spend considerable resources on such inspections. While the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and many state departments of transportation have guidelines related to inspector qualification, training, and certification, an inspector’s actual capability to identify defects in the field under these guidelines is unknown. This paper describes the results from 30 hands-on, visual inspections performed on bridge specimens with known fatigue cracks. Background information was collected on each inspector and correlated with inspection performance. Field temperature, duration, experience, and training were significantly correlated with detection rate. Probability of detection (POD) curves were fit to the inspection results and the 50% and 90% detection rate crack lengths were determined. This POD study was conducted to provide a benchmark measure of visual inspection capability for detecting fatigue cracks in steel bridge components under controlled conditions. It is believed to be the first study in which a statistically significant set of data focused on visual detection of fatigue cracks in steel bridge components has been collected.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some or all data, models, or code generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request.
Acknowledgments
The research presented in this paper was funded by the Indiana Department of Transportation and various state and federal agencies under the Transportation Pooled Fund Program. The authors gratefully acknowledge their support. Additionally, the authors thank the bridge inspectors who participated in this study. The research would not have been possible without their help.
References
AASHTO. 2011. The manual for bridge evaluation. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Agrawal, A. K., and G. A. Washer. 2013. Consistency of the New York state bridge inspection program. Albany, NY: New York State Dept. of Transportation.
Annis, C. 2016. “Statistical best-practices for building probability of detection (POD) models.” Accessed March 1, 2016. http://StatisticalEngineering.com/mh1823/.
Connor, R. J., R. Dexter, and H. Mahmoud. 2005. Inspection and management of bridges with fracture-critical details. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Demsetz, L. A., R. Cario, R. T. Huang, and R. Schulte-Strathaus. 1996a. “Factors affecting marine structural inspection performance.” In Proc., Ship Structure Symp. New Jersey: Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers and Ship Structure Committee.
Demsetz, L. A., R. Cario, and R. Schulte-Strathaus. 1996b. Inspection of marine structures. SSC-389. Washington, DC: Ship Structure Committee.
DoD (Department of Defense). 2009. Nondestructive evaluation system reliability assessment. Washington, DC: Dept. of Defense.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2004. National bridge inspection standards. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2017. “National bridge inventory ASCII files.” Accessed November 1, 2017. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/nbi/ascii2017.cfm.
Gandossi, L., and C. Annis. 2010. Probability of detection curves: Statistical best-practices. Petten, Netherlands: European Network for Inspection and Qualification.
Graybeal, B., D. Rolander, B. Phares, M. Moore, and G. Washer. 2001. “Reliability and accuracy of routine inspection of highway bridges.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1749 (1): 93–99. https://doi.org/10.3141/1749-14.
Leach, J., and P. E. Morris. 1998. “Cognitive factors in the close visual and magnetic particle inspection of welds underwater.” Hum. Factors 40 (2): 187–197. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872098779480460.
Moore, M., B. Phares, B. Graybeal, D. Rolander, and G. Washer. 2001. Reliability of visual inspection for highway bridges. McLean, VA: Federal Highway Administration.
See, J. E. 2012. Visual inspection: A review of the literature. Albuquerque, NM: Sandia National Laboratories.
Shaw, R. E., Jr. 2002. “Ultrasonic testing procedures, technician skills, and qualifications.” J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 14 (1): 62–67. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2002)14:1(62).
Sherman, R., W. Collins, and R. Connor. 2016. “Towards an integrated fracture control plan.” In Proc., World Steel Bridge Symp. Chicago: Institute of Steel Construction and National Steel Bridge Alliance.
Spencer, F. W. 1996. Visual inspection research project report on benchmark inspections. Albuquerque, NM: Sandia National Laboratories.
Washer, G., R. Connor, and D. Looten. 2014. “Performance testing of inspectors to improve the quality of nondestructive testing.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2408 (1): 107–113. https://doi.org/10.3141/2408-12.
Whitehead, J. M. 2015. Probability of detection study for visual inspection of steel bridges. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue Univ.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 25 • Issue 1 • January 2020
Copyright
©2019 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Sep 27, 2018
Accepted: Jul 26, 2019
Published online: Oct 24, 2019
Published in print: Jan 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Mar 24, 2020
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.