Technical Papers
Sep 3, 2019

Full-Model Shaking Table Tests of Seismic Behavior of a Super-Long-Span Cable-Stayed Bridge with Pile Foundations

Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 24, Issue 11

Abstract

A cable-stayed bridge is a very competitive structural type owing to its aesthetic shape, structural efficiency, and spanning ability. Pile groups are an often-used foundation type in China, even for the piers and towers of long-span cable-stayed bridges. The seismic behavior of a bridge depends on its structural system type. The soil, pile foundation, and structure interaction is a significant influencing factor, especially for flexible structures such as super-long-span cable-stayed bridges. However, experimental studies on long-span cable-stayed bridges with pile foundations are scarce. In this study, a full-model shaking table test of a super-long-span cable-stayed bridge was conducted. The 1/70-scale model, which is of a preliminary-design cable-stayed bridge with a central span of 1,400 m, includes both superstructures and pile group foundations embedded in artificial soil contained in laminar shear boxes. The full model was subjected to a suite of ground motions in the longitudinal direction by using a shaking table array. The seismic performance of the bridge model with three types of structural systems—a floating structural system, elastically constrained structural system, and supporting pier structural system—was investigated experimentally. The experimental results show that the effects of the supporting pier structural system on reducing the longitudinal relative displacement at the tower top as well as between the tower and girder are superior to those of the elastically constrained structural system and floating structural system. However, the seismic demands of the supporting piers designed as sacrificial components increase noticeably. Moreover, the dynamic characteristics of the full model obtained from the numerical simulation are in good agreement with the experimental counterparts.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This study was sponsored by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 91515101-5 and 51608282) and the K. C. Wong Magna Fund in Ningbo University. The authors greatly acknowledge Professors Menglin Lou, Fayun Liang, Qingjun Chen, and Wancheng Yuan from Tongji University for their comments on the experiment. The authors also thank graduate students Miss Dan Nie, Mr. Jianguo Wang, Mr. Yajie Jia, Mr. Haibing Chen, Mr. Sheng Jiao, Mr. Yaohua Yang, and Mr. Chao Luo from Tongji University and Dr. Chengyu Yang from the State Key Laboratory for Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering for their dedicated assistance during the shaking table testing.

References

Abdel-Ghaffar, A. M., and A. S. Nazmy. 1991. “3-D nonlinear seismic behavior of cable-stayed bridges.” J. Struct. Eng. 117 (11): 3456–3476. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1991)117:11(3456.
Ali, H.-E. M., and A. M. Abdel-Ghaffar. 1994. “Seismic energy dissipation for cable-stayed bridges using passive devices.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 23 (8): 877–893. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290230805.
Bontempi, F., F. Casciati, and M. Giudici. 2003. “Seismic response of a cable-stayed bridge: Active and passive control systems (Benchmark Problem).” J. Struct. Control 10 (3–4): 169–185. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.24.
Boulanger, R. W., C. J. Curras, B. L. Kutter, D. W. Wilson, and A. Abghari. 1999. “Seismic soil-pile-structure interaction experiments and analyses.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 125 (9): 750–759. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1999)125:9(750.
Caetano, E., A. Cunha, and C. A. Taylor. 2000. “Investigation of dynamic cable–deck interaction in a physical model of a cable-stayed bridge. Part II: Seismic response.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 29 (4): 499–521. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(200004)29:4%3C499::AID-EQE919%3E3.0.CO;2-A.
Camara, A., and M. A. Astiz. 2012. “Pushover analysis for the seismic response prediction of cable-stayed bridges under multi-directional excitation.” Eng. Struct. 41 (8): 444–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.03.059.
Chang, K. C., Y. L. Mo, C. C. Chen, L. C. Lai, and C. C. Chou. 2004. “Lessons learned from the damaged Chi-Lu cable-stayed bridge.” J. Bridge Eng. 9 (4): 343–352. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2004)9:4(343.
Combault, J., A. Pecker, J.-P. Teyssandier, and J.-M. Tourtois. 2005. “Rion-Antirion Bridge, Greece—concept, design, and construction.” Struct. Eng. Int. 15 (1): 22–27. https://doi.org/10.2749/101686605777963387.
Garevski, M. A., and R. T. Severn. 1993. “Damping and response measurement on a small-scale model of a cable-stayed bridge.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 22 (1): 13–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290220103.
Guan, Z., H. You, and J.-Z. Li. 2017. “Lateral isolation system of a long-span cable-stayed bridge with heavyweight concrete girder in a high seismic region.” J. Bridge Eng. 22 (1): 04016104. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000965.
Harris, H. G., and G. M. Sabnis. 1999. Structural modeling and experimental techniques. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Iemura, H., and M. H. Pradono. 2002. “Passive and semi-active seismic response control of a cable-stayed bridge.” J. Struct. Control 9 (3): 189–204. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.12.
Lou, M.-L., G. Zong, W.-X. Niu, and G.-D. Chen. 2006. “Shaking table model test of soil-steel structure interaction system.” [In Chinese.] Earthquake Eng. Eng. Vib. 26 (5): 226–230.
Martínez-Rodrigo, M. D., and A. Filiatrault. 2015. “A case study on the application of passive control and seismic isolation techniques to cable-stayed bridges: A comparative investigation through non-linear dynamic analyses.” Eng. Struct. 99: 232–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.04.048.
Mazzoni, S., et al. 2006. Open system for earthquake engineering simulation (OpenSees): OpenSees command language manual. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California.
Nagasawa, M., K. Sumi, K. Tasaki, and H. Iemura. 2010. “Seismic retrofit of the all-free type cable-stayed Higashi-Kobe Bridge with new energy dissipation devices.” In Proc., 5th World Conf. on Structural Control and Monitoring, 5WCSCM-110. Los Angeles, CA: International Association for Structural Control and Monitoring.
Pipinato, A. 2016. “Case study: The Russky Bridge.” Chap. 25 in Innovative bridge design handbook, 671–680. Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Seim, C. 2002. “The seismic retrofit of the Golden Gate bridge.” In Proc., 1st PRC-US Workshop on Seismic Analysis and Design of Special Bridges, 119–128. Buffalo, NY: Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research.
Shoji, G., J. Kitahara, A. Kojima, T. Kanakubo, K. Shimizu, and Y. Sakai. 2008. “Mechanism of seismic response of a PC cable-stayed bridge subjected to a long-period seismic excitation.” Doboku Gakkai Ronbunshuu A 64 (4): 982–1001. https://doi.org/10.2208/jsceja.64.982.
Soneji, B. B., and R. S. Jangid. 2010. “Response of an isolated cable-stayed bridge under bi-directional seismic actions.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 6 (3): 347–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732470701596833.
Sun, B., J. Cheng, and R. C. Xiao. 2010. “Preliminary design and parametric study of 1400 m partially earth-anchored cable-stayed bridge.” Sci. China Technol. Sci. 53 (2): 502–511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-010-0041-4.
Sun, L., W. Xie, and J. Wei. 2011. “Seismic damage control of long span cable-stayed bridges by energy dissipation subsidiary piers.” In Proc., IABSE-IASS Symp, 0262. Zürich, Switzerland: IABSE.
Taucer, F. F., E. Spacone, and F. C. Filippou. 1991. A fiber beam-column element for seismic response analysis for reinforced concrete structures. Rep. No. UCB/EERC-91/17. Berkeley, CA: Research Center College of Engineering, Univ. of California.
Vader, T. S., and C. C. McDaniel. 2007. “Influence of dampers on seismic response of cable-supported bridge towers.” J. Bridge Eng. 12 (3): 373–379. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2007)12:3(373.
Van Overschee, P., and B. De Moor. 2012. Subspace identification for linear systems: Theory—implementation—applications. Berlin: Springer Science and Business Media.
Wesolowsky, M. J., and J. C. Wilson. 2003. “Seismic isolation of cable-stayed bridges for near-field ground motions.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 32 (13): 2107–2126. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.318.
Wood, S. et al. 2004. “Using NEES to investigate soil-foundation-structure interaction.” In Proc., 13th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, 2344. Vancouver, BC: WCEE.
Wu, X.-P., L.-M. Sun, S.-D. Hu, and L.-C. Fan. 2002. “Development of laminar shear box used in shaking table test.” [In Chinese.] J. Tongji Univ. 30 (7): 781–785.
Xie, W., and L. Sun. 2019. “Experimental and numerical verification on effects of inelastic tower links on transverse seismic response of tower of bridge full model.” Eng. Struct. 182: 344–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.12.046.
Xie, W., L.-M. Sun, and J. Wei. 2014. “Experimental study on seismic performance of bridge piers with structural fuses and its application.” [In Chinese.] China J. Highway Transp. 27 (3): 59–70.
Xu, Y., R. Wang, and J. Li. 2016. “Experimental verification of a cable-stayed bridge model using passive energy dissipation devices.” J. Bridge Eng. 21 (12): 04016092. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000966.
Yan, X.-Y., Zh.-X. Li, Y. Li, and X.-L. Du. 2013. “Shake tables test study on seismic response of a long-span rigid-framed bridge under multi-support excitations.” [In Chinese.] China Civ. Eng. J. 46 (11): 98–104.
Yang, C.-Y., and M. M. S. Cheung. 2011. “Shake table test of cable-stayed bridge subjected to non-uniform excitation.” Procedia Eng. 14: 931–938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.07.117.
Zong, Z.-H., R. Zhou, X.-Y. Huang, and Z.-H. Xia. 2014. “Seismic response study on a multi-span cable-stayed bridge scale model under multi-support excitations. Part I: Shaking table tests.” J. Zheijang Univ.-Sci. 15 (5): 351–363. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A1300339.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 24Issue 11November 2019

History

Received: Jan 7, 2018
Accepted: May 7, 2019
Published online: Sep 3, 2019
Published in print: Nov 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Feb 3, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Limin Sun, Ph.D. [email protected]
Professor, State Key Laboratory for Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji Univ., Shanghai 200092, China. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Ningbo Univ., Ningbo 315211, China (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5231-5173. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share