Roll Stiffness of Reinforced Neoprene Bearing Pads under Imposed Skew and Slope Angles
Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 24, Issue 8
Abstract
During bridge construction, the flexible support conditions provided to precast, prestressed concrete girders by steel reinforced neoprene bearing pads allow for a rolling motion about an axis parallel to the span of the girders and may lead to girder instability. Imposed skew and/or slope angles significantly reduce the roll stiffness of bearing pads, which reduces the ultimate buckling capacity of the girders under the gravity loading condition. In this paper, roll stiffnesses for bearing pads under skew and slope conditions are derived from experimental data gathered from a test device designed to measure such values. The test device reproduces the forces acting on a bearing pad in the field while simultaneously permitting axial load, skew angle, and slope angle to be controlled independently, isolating the influence that each parameter has on bearing pad roll stiffness. A total of 108 tests were performed on three different standard bearing pads, with varying severity of imposed skew and slope angle.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) for providing financial support, under Contract BDK-75-977-03, which made this study possible.
References
AASHTO. 2016. Standard specification for plain and laminated elastomeric bridge bearings. AASHTO M 251. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
AASHTO. 2017. LRFD bridge design specifications. 8th ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Allen, D. T., R. A. Cook, and M. H. Ansley. 2010. “Shear stiffness of neoprene bearing pads under long-term loads.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2172 (1): 38–46. https://doi.org/10.3141/2172-05.
ASTM. 2018. Standard specification for plain and steel-laminated elastomeric bearings for bridges. ASTM Standard D4014-03. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
Belivanis, K. V., L. Han, C. Sun, T. Helwig, M. Engelhardt, J. Tassoulas, and E. Williamson. 2016. Extending use of steel-laminated elastomeric bearings to higher demand applications. FHWA/TX-16/0-6785-1. Technical Rep. Prepared for Center for Transportation Research, Texas Dept. of Transportation, and Federal Highway Administration. Austin, TX: Univ. of Texas at Austin.
Consolazio, G. R., H. R. Hamilton, III, L. Bui, and J. Chung. 2007. Lateral bracing of long-span Florida Bulb-Tee girders. Structures Research Rep. No. 2007/52290 Prepared for Florida Dept. of Transportation. Gainesville, FL: Dept. of Civil and Coastal Engineering, Univ. of Florida.
Doody, M. E., and J. E. Noonan. 1999. “Long-term performance of elastomeric bridge bearings.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1688 (1): 139–146. https://doi.org/10.3141/1688-16.
FDOT (Florida Dept. of Transportation). 2017. Structures design guidelines. Vol. 1 of Structures manual. Tallahassee, FL: FDOT.
Gent, A. N. 2001. Engineering with rubber. 2nd ed., 312–313. Cincinnati, OH: Hanser Publications.
Green, T., N. Yazdani, L. Spainhour, and C. S. Cai. 2001. “Effect of bearing stiffness and skew angle on performance of precast concrete bridges.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1770 (1): 27–33. https://doi.org/10.3141/1770-04.
Harper, Z. S., and G. R. Consolazio. 2013. “Calculation method for quantifying axial and roll stiffnesses of rectangular steel-reinforced elastomeric bridge bearing pads.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2331 (1): 3–13. https://doi.org/10.3141/2331-01.
Lehman, D. E., C. W. Roeder, and R. A. Larsen. 2005. “Design of cotton duck bridge bearing pads.” J. Bridge Eng. 10 (5): 555–563. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2005)10:5(555).
Muscarella, J. V., and J. A. Yura. 1995. An experimental study of elastomeric bridge bearings with design recommendations. FHWA/TX-98/1304-3. Technical Rep. Prepared for Center for Transportation Research, Texas Dept. of Transportation, and Federal Highway Administration. Austin, TX: Univ. of Texas at Austin.
PCI (Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute). 2011. Precast prestressed concrete bridge design manual. Chicago: PCI.
Salvetti Beery, M. 2012. “Experimental validation of bracing recommendations for long-span concrete girders.” M.S. thesis, Univ. of Florida. http://ufdcimages.uflib.ufl.edu/UF/E0/04/42/26/00001/BEERY_M.pdf.
Vidot-Vega, A. L., B. Possiel, B. Robinson, M. J. Kowalsky, and M. A. Gabr. 2009. “Evaluation of rotational stiffness of elastomeric bearing pad-anchor bolt connections on deep foundation bents.” J. Bridge Eng. 14 (6): 487–495. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000010.
Yazdani, N., S. Eddy, and C. S. Cai. 2000. “Effect of bearing pads on precast prestressed concrete bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 5 (3): 224–232. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2000)5:3(224).
Yura, J., A. Kumar, A. Yakut, C. Topkaya, E. Becker, and J. Collingwood. 2001. Elastomeric bridge bearings: Recommended test methods. NCHRP Rep. No. 449. Technical Rep. Prepared for National Cooperative Highway Research Program. Austin, TX: Univ. of Texas Austin.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 24 • Issue 8 • August 2019
Copyright
© 2019 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Aug 5, 2018
Accepted: Mar 11, 2019
Published online: May 20, 2019
Published in print: Aug 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Oct 20, 2019
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.