Heavy Truck Collision with Bridge Piers: Computational Simulation Study
Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 24, Issue 6
Abstract
The vast majority of research studies on vehicular collision with bridge piers have been carried out with single-unit trucks, which are typically classified as medium-duty vehicles weighing about 90 kN (20,000 lb). Yet, collision events that involve severe bridge damage are generally caused by heavy-duty trucks, generally tractor-semitrailers weighing 360 kN (80,000 lb). The handful of tests that were conducted to study heavy truck collisions used rigid piers, which means that the energy absorption potential of the piers, and their failure mechanisms, were neglected. In this study, validated, high-fidelity finite-element simulations of collisions between heavy-duty tractor-semitrailers and reinforced concrete bridge piers have been carried out to investigate the demands imposed upon, and the damage modes of, concrete piers. Trucks with three different weights and piers with six different configurations were used in the simulations. The approach speeds for the trucks ranged from 48 to 113 km/h. The simulation results showed that impact from the engine block usually delivered the highest peak force, which was closely associated with the impact velocity of the vehicle. Once the pier’s resistance has been compromised by this event, the subsequent trailer impact, which has a lower force demand but longer duration, causes further significant damage or even destroys the pier. The current provisions regarding vehicular impact demands in AASHTO requirements are critiqued based on the results of parametric simulations using the heavy truck model.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This material is based upon work supported by the Federal Highway Administration under contract number DTFH61-14-D-00010. This research was supported, in part, under National Science Foundation grants CNS-0958379, CNS-0855217, ACI-1126113 and the City University of New York High-Performance Computing Center at the College of Staten Island. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Federal Highway Administration or the National Science Foundation.
References
AASHTO. 2017. AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications. 8th ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Abdelkarim, O. I., and M. A. ElGawady. 2016. “Design of short reinforced concrete bridge columns under vehicle collision.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2592 (1): 27–37. https://doi.org/10.3141/2592-04.
Abdelkarim, O. I., and M. A. ElGawady. 2017. “Performance of bridge piers under vehicle collision.” Eng. Struct. 140 (Jun): 337–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.02.054.
Agrawal, A. K., S. El-Tawil, R. Cao, X. Xu, X. Chen, and W. Wong. 2018. A performance based approach for loading definition of heavy vehicle impact events. Rep. No. FHWA-HIF-18-062. McLean, VA: Federal Highway Administration.
Agrawal, A. K., G. Y. Liu, and S. Alampalli. 2013. “Effects of truck impacts on bridge piers.” Adv. Mater. Res. 639–640 (Jan): 13–25. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.639-640.13.
AuYeung, S. J., and A. Alipour. 2016. “Performance of RC members under impact loads.” In Proc., Geotechnical and Structural Engineering Congress, edited by C. Y. Chandran, and M. I. Hoit, 14–24. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Buth, C. E., M. S. Brackin, W. F. Williams, and G. T. Fry. 2011. Collision loads on bridge piers: phase 2. Report of guidelines for designing bridge piers and abutments for vehicle collisions. Rep. No. FHWA/TX-11/9-4973-2. College Station, TX: Texas Transportation Institute.
Buth, C. E., W. F. Williams, M. S. Brackin, D. Lord, S. R. Geedipally, and A. Y. Abu-Odeh. 2010. Analysis of large truck collisions with bridge piers: phase 1. Report of guidelines for designing bridge piers and abutments for vehicle collisions. Rep. No. FHWA/TX-10/9-4973-1. College Station, TX: TX Transportation Institute.
Chen, L., S. El-Tawil, and Y. Xiao. 2016a. “Reduced models for simulating collisions between trucks and bridge piers.” J. Bridge Eng. 21 (6): 04016020. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000810.
Chen, L., S. El-Tawil, and Y. Xiao. 2017. “Response spectrum-based method for calculating the reaction force of piers subjected to truck collisions.” Eng. Struct. 150 (Nov): 852–863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.07.092.
Chen, L., Y. Xiao, and S. El-Tawil. 2016b. “Impact tests of model RC columns by an equivalent truck frame.” J. Struct. Eng. 142 (5): 04016002. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001449.
Deng, L., W. Wang, and Y. Yu. 2016. “State-of-the-art review on the causes and mechanisms of bridge collapse.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 30 (2): 04015005. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000731.
Deng, L., W. Yan, and L. Nie. 2019. “A simple corrosion fatigue design method for bridges considering the coupled corrosion-overloading effect.” Eng. Struct. 178 (Jan): 309–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.10.028.
El-Tawil, S., E. Severino, and P. Fonseca. 2005. “Vehicle collision with bridge piers.” J. Bridge Eng. 10 (3): 345–353. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2005)10:3(345).
Fujikake, K., B. Li, and S. Soeun. 2009. “Impact response of reinforced concrete beam and its analytical evaluation.” J. Struct. Eng. 135 (8): 938–950. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000039.
Hallquist, J. O. 2006. “Section 3.9: Integral difference scheme as basis for 2D solids.” Chap. 3 in LS-DYNA theory manual, 3.25–3.31. Livermore, CA: Livermore Software Technology Corporation.
Joshi, A. S., and L. M. Gupta. 2012. “A simulation study on quantifying damage in bridge piers subjected to vehicle collisions.” Int. J. Adv. Struct. Eng. 4 (1): 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/2008-6695-4-8.
Liu, G. 2012. “Behavior of bridge piers during vehicular impacts.” Ph.D. thesis, City College of New York, City Univ. of New York.
Miele, C. R., C. Plaxico, D. Stephens, and S. Simunovic. 2010. U26: Enhanced finite element analysis crash model of tractor-trailers (phase C). Knoxville, TN: National Transportation Research Center, Inc., Univ. Transportation Center.
SAE. 1995. J211-1 instrumentation for impact test—Part 1—Electronic instrumentation. SAE J211/1_201403. Warrendale, PA: SAE International.
Xu, X. 2017. “Performance based approach for loading and design of bridge piers impacted by medium weight trucks.” Ph.D. thesis, City College of New York, City Univ. of New York.
Xu, X., R. Cao, S. El-Tawil, A. K. Agrawal, and W. Wong. 2019. “Loading definition and design of bridge piers impacted by medium weight trucks.” J. Bridge Eng. 24 (6): 04019042. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001397.
Zaouk, A. K., N. E. Bedewi, C.-D. Kan, and D. Marzougui. 1996. “Validation of a non-linear finite element vehicle model using multiple impact data.” In Applied Mechanics Div., Vol. 218 of Proc., ASME Winter Annual Congress and Exposition, Crashworthiness and Occupant Protection in Transportation System, 91–106. New York: ASME.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2019 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Apr 30, 2018
Accepted: Nov 16, 2018
Published online: Apr 12, 2019
Published in print: Jun 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Sep 12, 2019
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.