Galvanic Corrosion Risk of Using Galvanized A325 Bolts in Corrosion-Resistant Steel Bridges
Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 24, Issue 6
Abstract
This experimental study was the first to evaluate the galvanic corrosion risk of using galvanized ASTM A325 Type I bolts with ASTM A1010 steel girders in the construction of A1010 steel bridges. The emerging construction of A1010 steel bridges is intended to extend the service life of bridges and reduce the need for maintenance under atmospheric corrosion attack, particularly in regions subject to severe saline exposure. However, combining high-corrosion-resistant A1010 steel with connection bolts that have a lower corrosion-resistance rating can lead to galvanic corrosion that accelerates the metal dissolution of bolts after installation and while in service. The results of this study indicate that under light saline exposure, the galvanic corrosion rate of galvanized ASTM A325 bolts used with A1010 steel was similar to the corrosion rate of A325 bolts used with ASTM A588 weathering steel. Under heavy saline exposure, however, the galvanic corrosion rate of A325 bolts was significantly higher when used with A1010 steel than when used with A588 weathering steel. Reducing the galvanic corrosion rate can be achieved by painting the joints of the steel girders, thereby reducing the cathode-to-anode area ratio. The results of this study suggest that the corrosion compatibility of the bolt and steel materials must be considered when designing corrosion-resistant A1010 steel bridges, and that the compatibility must be confirmed with an experimental validation.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by the Highway Infrastructure Innovation Funding Program (HIIFP) of the MTO for open research and conducted at the Construction Research Centre at the National Research Council Canada. The authors acknowledge Ms. Julie McKelvey for her valuable comments.
References
ASTM. 2009. Standard guide for conducting and evaluating galvanic corrosion tests in electrolytes. ASTM G71-81. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2010. Standard specification for structural steel for bridges. ASTM A709/A709M-10. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2013. Standard specification for higher-strength martensitic stainless steel plate, sheet, and strip. ASTM A1010/A1010M-13. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2014. Standard specification for structural bolts, steel, heat treated, 120/105 ksi minimum tensile strength. ASTM A325-14. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2015. Standard specification for high-strength low-alloy structural steel, up to 50 ksi [345 mpa] minimum yield point, with atmospheric corrosion resistance. ASTM A588/A588M-15. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Coomarasamy, A., D. Lai, F. Pianca, T. Turi, S. Ramamurthy, B. Kobe, M. J. Walzak, and J. Sawicki. 2008. “Analysis of corrosion products formed on some of Ontario’s weathering steel bridges.” In Proc., Corrosion 2008 Conf. and Expo. Houston: NACE International.
Ebrahimi, N., J. Zhang, B. Baldock, and D. Lai. 2018. “Galvanic corrosion risk assessment of bolt materials in contact with ASTM A1010 steel bridges.” In Proc., Corrosion 2018. Houston: NACE International.
Fletcher, F. B., A. D. Wilson, J. Strasky, J. N. Kilpatrick, T. Mlcoch, and J. Wrysinski. 2006. “Stainless steel for accelerated bridge construction.” Corrosion (102): 2–7.
Jones, D. A. 1992. Principles and prevention of corrosion. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Kogler, R. 2015. Steel bridge design handbook: Corrosion protection of steel bridges. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
Kulak, G. 2005. High strength bolting for Canadian engineers. Markham, ON, Canada: Canadian Institute of Steel Construction.
Mansfeld, F. 1971. “Area relationships in galvanic corrosion.” Corrosion 27 (10): 436–442. https://doi.org/10.5006/0010-9312-27.10.436.
Mansfeld, F., D. H. Hengstenberg, and J. V. Kenkel. 1974. “Galvanic corrosion of al alloys I. Effect of dissimilar metal.” Corrosion 30 (10): 343–353. https://doi.org/10.5006/0010-9312-30.10.343.
Mansfeld, F., and J. V. Kenkel. 1975. “Galvanic corrosion of al alloys—III. The effect of area ratio.” Corros. Sci. 15 (4): 239–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-938X(75)80019-9.
Okasha, N. M., D. M. Frangopol, F. B. Fletcher, and A. D. Wilson. 2012. “Life-cycle cost analyses of a new steel for bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 17 (1): 168–172. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000219.
Seradj, H. 2015. “Oregon’s experience with ASTM A1010.” In Proc., Transportation Research Board 94th Annual Meeting. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Soliman, M., and D. M. Frangopol. 2015. “Life-cycle cost evaluation of conventional and corrosion-resistant steel for bridges.” J. Bridge Eng. 20 (1): 06014005. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000647.
Virmani, Y. P. 2009. Improved corrosion-resistant steel for highway bridge construction knowledge-based design. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 24 • Issue 6 • June 2019
Copyright
© 2019 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jun 29, 2018
Accepted: Nov 9, 2018
Published online: Mar 26, 2019
Published in print: Jun 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Aug 26, 2019
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.