Technical Papers
Sep 25, 2018

Aerodynamic Instability Investigations of a Novel, Flexible and Lightweight Triple-Box Girder Design for Long-Span Bridges

Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 23, Issue 12

Abstract

The present paper investigates the possibilities for avoiding classical flutter and static divergence for very long-span suspension bridges with a novel, flexible, and lightweight triple-box girder. Previous studies have shown that the critical classical flutter wind speed tends to decline with the main span width. Other studies have shown that flutter can be avoided if the torsional frequency is lower than the vertical. The road to get there in practice, however, is complicated. The possibility for tuning the torsional natural frequency without affecting the vertical frequency is used in the present paper. The effect on aerodynamic stability is analyzed in detail for low torsional-to-vertical frequency ratios typical for very long-span bridges with lightweight and flexible girders. The present study includes nonlinear finite-element analysis and static, free vibration and forced motion wind tunnel tests. Aerodynamic stability has been obtained in a section model test with a lightweight setup corresponding to a bridge girder mass of only 6.38 t/m in full scale. Flutter was not observed for any torsional-to-vertical frequency ratios in the range from 0.97γω1.55. Stability was observed up to wind speeds of approximately 88 m/s in full scale for a 2,125.2-m span. The aerodynamic stability obtained in the configurations of the present section at γω1.20 shows that this might be an economically feasible solution for future long-span suspension bridges because aerodynamic stability is achieved even though the torsional stiffness and the mass of the deck are low.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

Financial support from COWIfonden made the present wind tunnel tests possible, which is gratefully acknowledged. FORCE Technology made its wind tunnel and equipment available. Special thanks to Bartosz Siedziako and Ole Øiseth for supervision on the estimation of flutter derivatives from forced motion tests and multimodal flutter analysis. Benjamin Laustsen and Emrah Sahin are acknowledged for their contribution to the development finite-element tools used in the present work. Our extended thanks goes to Allan Larsen, Søren V. Larsen, and Mads B. Eriksen for valuable guidance in the planning and execution of the wind tunnel tests.

References

Agar, T. 1989. “Aerodynamic flutter analysis of suspension bridges by a modal technique.” Eng. Struct. 11 (2): 75–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-0296(89)90016-3.
Andersen, M., and A. Brandt. 2017. “Recent advances and challenges for the non-flutter design principle.” In Proc., 9th Asia-Pacific Conf. on Wind Engineering. Auckland, New Zealand: Univ. of Auckland.
Andersen, M., J. Johansson, A. Brandt, and S. Hansen. 2016. “Aerodynamic stability of long span suspension bridges with low torsional natural frequencies.” Eng. Struct. 120 (Aug): 82–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.04.025.
Andersen, M., M. Lenius, J. Læsø, and J. Johansson. 2015. “Non-flutter design principle for twin boxes.” In Proc., 14th Int. Conf. on Wind Engineering. Porto Allegre, Brazil: IAWE.
Andersen, M., O. Øiseth, J. Johansson, and A. Brandt. 2018. “Flutter derivatives from free decay tests of a rectangular B/D = 10 section estimated by optimized system identification methods.” Eng. Struct. 156 (Feb): 284–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.11.059.
Andersen, M., E. Sahin, B. Laustsen, M. Lenius, and J. Røssel. 2014. “Implementation of the non-flutter design principle.” In Proc., IN-VENTO, XIII Conf. of the Italian Association for Wind Engineering. Genoa, Italy: Genoa University Press.
Bartoli, G., P. D’Asdia, S. Febo, C. Mannini, S. Noe, and L. Procino. 2009. “Innovative configurations for long-span suspension bridges.” In Proc., 5th European and African Conf. on Wind Engineering. Florence, Italy: IAWE.
Bartoli, G., P. D’Asdia, S. Febo, C. Mannini, S. Pastó, and L. Procino. 2008. “Innovative solutions for long-span suspension bridges.” In Proc., BBAA VI Int. Colloquium on: Bluff Bodies Aerodynamics & Applications. Boston: Northeastern University.
Boonyapinyo, V., H. Yamada, and T. Miyata. 1994. “Wind-induced nonlinear lateral-torsional buckling of cable-stayed bridges.” J. Struct. Eng. 120 (2): 486–506. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1994)120:2(486).
Brandt, A. 2011. Noise and vibration analysis: Signal analysis and experimental procedures. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Brown, W. 1999. “Long span bridge projects—A personal view.” In Proc., Int. Seminar on Long-Span Bridge Aerodynamics Perspective, edited by T. Miyata, N. Fujisawa, H. Yamada. New York: Springer.
Brownjohn, J., and J. Jakobsen. 2001. “Strategies for aeroelastic parameter identification from bridge deck free vibration data.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 89 (13): 1113–1136. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(01)00091-5.
Caracoglia, L., P. P. Sarkar, F. L. Haan, Jr., H. Sato, and J. Murakoshi. 2009. “Comparative and sensitivity study of flutter derivatives of selected bridge deck sections. Part 2: Implications on the aerodynamic stability of long-span bridges.” Eng. Struct. 31 (9): 2194–2202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.04.003.
Chen, X., and A. Kareem. 2004. “Efficacy of the implied approximation in the identification of flutter derivatives.” J. Struct. Eng. 130 (12): 2070–2074. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:12(2070).
Cheng, J., J. Jiang, R. Xiao, and H. Xiang. 2002. “Nonlinear aerostatic stability analysis of Jiang Yin suspension bridge.” Eng. Struct. 24 (6): 773–781. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(02)00006-8.
Diana, G., G. Fiammenghi, M. Belloli, and D. Rocchi. 2013. “Wind tunnel tests and numerical approach for long span bridges: The Messina Bridge.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 122 (Nov): 38–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2013.07.012.
Dunham, K. 2016. “Coastal Highway Route E39—Extreme crossings.” Transp. Res. Procedia 14: 494–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.102.
Dyrbye, C., and S. Hansen. 1997. Wind loads on structures. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Ge, Y., and Y. Shao. 2013. “3D nonlinear aerostatic stability analysis for suspension bridges with ultra-long span.” In Proc., Eighth Asia-Pacific Conf. on Wind Engineering, edited by N. R. Iyer, P. Krishna, S. S. Rajan, and P. Harikrishna. Chennai, India: Research Publishing.
Gimsing, N. J., and C. T. Georgakis. 2012. Cable supported bridges: Concept and design. 3rd ed. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Han, Y., S. Liu, J. Hu, C. S. Cai, J. Zhang, and Z. Chen. 2014. “Experimental study on aerodynamic derivatives of a bridge cross-section under different traffic flows.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 133 (Oct): 250–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2014.08.003.
Jain, A., N. Jones, and R. Scanlan. 1996. “Coupled flutter and buffeting analysis of long-span bridges.” J. Struct. Eng. 122 (7): 716–725. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1996)122:7(716).
Johansson, J., M. Andersen, and M. Øvre. 2013. “Non-flutter design principle for long span bridges.” In Proc., Eighth Asia-Pacific Conf. on Wind Engineering, edited by N. R. Iyer, P. Krishna, S. S. Rajan, and P. Harikrishna. Chennai, India: Research Publishing.
Larsen, A. 2014. “Horizontal aerodynamic derivatives in bridge flutter analysis.” In Proc., ASME 2014 Pressure Vessels & Piping Div. Conf. New York: ASME.
Larsen, A., and G. Larose. 2015. “Dynamic wind effects on suspension and cable-stayed bridges.” J. Sound. Vib. 334 (Jan): 2–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2014.06.009.
Matsumoto, M. 1996. “Aerodynamic damping of prisms.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 59 (2–3): 159–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(96)00005-0.
Matsumoto, M., N. Shiraishi, H. Shirato, K. Shigetaka, and Y. Niihara. 1993. “Aerodynamic derivatives of coupled/hybrid flutter of fundamental structural sections.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 49 (1–3): 575–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(93)90051-O.
Nowicki, T., and A. Flaga. 2011. “Relation between shape and the phenomenon of flutter for bridge deck-like bluff bodies.” Arch. Mech. 63 (2): 201–220.
Poulsen, N., A. Damsgaard, and T. Reinhold. 1992. “Determination of flutter derivatives for the great belt bridge.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 41 (1–3): 153–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(92)90403-W.
Richardson, J. R. 1981. The development of the concept of the twin suspension bridge. Tech. Rep. NMIR 125. Feltham, UK: National Maritime Institution.
Sarkar, P., L. Caracoglia, F. Haan, Jr., H. Sato, and J. Murakoshi. 2009. “Comparative and sensitivity study of flutter derivatives of selected bridge deck sections. Part 1: Analysis of inter-laboratory experimental data.” Eng. Struct. 31 (1): 158–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.07.020.
Sarkar, P., N. Jones, and R. Scanlan. 1992. “System identification for estimation of flutter derivatives.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 42 (1–3): 1243–1254. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(92)90131-S.
Scanlan, R. 1997. “Amplitude and turbulence effects on bridge flutter derivatives.” J. Struct. Eng. 123 (2): 232–236. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1997)123:2(232).
Scanlan, R., and J. Tomko. 1971. “Airfoil and bridge deck flutter derivatives.” J. Eng. Mech. Div. 7 (6): 1717–1737.
Siedziako, B., O. Øiseth, and A. Rønnquist. 2017. “An enhanced forced vibration rig for wind tunnel testing of bridge deck section models in arbitrary motion.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 164 (May): 152–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2017.02.011.
Simiu, E., and R. Scanlan. 1986. Wind effects on structures: An introduction to wind engineering. New York: Wiley.
Singh, L., N. Jones, R. Scanlan, and O. Lorendeaux. 1996. “Identification of lateral flutter derivatives of bridge decks.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 60 (Apr): 81–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(96)00025-6.
Theodorsen, T. 1934. General theory of aerodynamic instability and the mechanism of flutter. NACA-TR-496, 291–311. Washington, DC: NASA.
Walshe, D., and T. Wyatt. 1992. “Bridge aerodynamics 50 years after Tacoma Narrows–Part 2: A new discipline world-wide.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 40 (3): 327–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(92)90000-7.
Walshe, D. E., G. G. Twidle, and W. Brown. 1977. “Static and dynamic measurements on a model of a slender bridge with a perforated deck.” In Proc., Int. Conf. on the Behaviour of Slender Structures. Great Britatin, London: Institution of Structural Engineers.
Xu, Y.-L. 2013. Wind effects on cable-supported bridges. Singapore: John Wiley & Sons.
Zasso, A. 1996. “Flutter derivatives: Advantages of a new representation convention.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 60 (Apr): 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6105(96)00022-0.
Zasso, A., S. Stoyanoff, G. Diana, E. Vullo, D. Khazem, K. Serzan, A. Pagani, T. Argentini, L. Rosa, and P. Dallaire. 2013. “Validation analyses of integrated procedures for evaluation of stability, buffeting response and wind loads on the Messina Bridge.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 122 (Nov): 50–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2013.07.013.
Zhang, X., H. Xiang, and B. Sun. 2002. “Nonlinear aerostatic and aerodynamic analysis of long-span suspension bridges considering wind-structure interactions.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 90 (9): 1065–1080. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6105(02)00251-9.
Zhang, Z., Y. Ge, and Z. Chen. 2015. “On the aerostatic divergence of suspension bridges: A cable-length-based criterion for the stiffness degradation.” J. Fluids Struct. 52 (Jan): 118–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2014.10.005.
Zhang, Z., Y. Ge, and Y. Yang. 2013. “Torsional stiffness degradation and aerostatic divergence of suspension bridge decks.” J. Fluids Struct. 40 (Jul): 269–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2013.05.001.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 23Issue 12December 2018

History

Received: Nov 9, 2017
Accepted: Jun 14, 2018
Published online: Sep 25, 2018
Published in print: Dec 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Feb 25, 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Univ. of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark; Consultant, Svend Ole Hansen ApS, Sankt Jørgens Allé 5C, DK-1615 Copenhagen V, Denmark (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8999-3226. Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Anders Brandt
Associate Professor, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Univ. of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share