Technical Papers
Sep 18, 2018

Determining the Capacity of Reused Bridge Foundations from Limited Information

Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 23, Issue 12

Abstract

Reuse of bridge foundations often requires determining the capacity of existing foundations, including driven piles. These piles have a proven history of load-carrying capacity but may lack test data from which the capacity can be obtained. In general, pile capacity can be estimated from the pile geometry and soil properties using empirical calculations. However, these produce highly uncertain results due to the variable nature of soil and pile-driving methods. As a result, LRFD practice uses low resistance factors for pile design based on these calculations, which can produce inefficient designs, sometimes with lower capacity than the loading observed during the initial service life. This research proposes a novel reliability-based methodology to update the capacity of individual piles based on previously observed loading to the pile group. A likelihood function is developed that accounts for the probability that a single pile has low capacity given that the total group capacity was greater than the observed loading during its initial service life. The results are tabulated to show the increases to the LRFD resistance factors that are possible while maintaining the reliability index (and corresponding probability of failure) for standard LRFD designs.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The research presented in this article was supported through the foundation characterization program of the Federal Highway Administration, Contract DTFH61-14-D-00010/0002. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Federal Highway Administration.

References

AASHTO. 2014. AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications, customary U.S. units. 7th ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
Abdallah, Y., S. Najjar, and G. Saad. 2015. “Impact of proof load test programs on the reliability of foundations.” In Proc., International Foundations Congress and Equipment Expo, 1850–1860. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Allen, T. M. 2005. Development of geotechnical resistance factors and downdrag load factors for LRFD foundation strength limit state design. Rep No. FHWA-NHI-05-052. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration, US DOT.
Ang, A. H.-S., and W. H. Tang. 1975. Vol. 1 of Probability concepts in engineering planning and design. Basic principles. New York: Wiley.
Ayyub, B., and I. Assakkaf. 1999. LRFD rules for naval surface ship structures: Reliability-based load and resistance factor design rules. Washington, DC: Naval Surface Warfare Center, Carderock Division, US Navy.
Ayyub, B. M., I. A. Assakkaf, D. P. Kihl, and M. W. Siev. 2002. “Reliability-based design guidelines for fatigue of ship structures.” Nav. Eng. J. 114 (2): 113–138. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-3584.2002.tb00127.x.
Barker, R., J. M. Duncan, K. B. Rojiani, P. S. K. Ooi, C. K. Tan, and S. G. Kim. 1991. Manuals for the design of bridge foundations. Rep. No. NCHRP 343. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Boeckmann, A. Z. and J. E. Loehr. 2017. Current Practices and Guidelines for the Reuse of Bridge Foundations. NCHRP Synthesis 505. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies.
Ellingwood, B., and T. V. Galambos. 1982. “Probability-based criteria for structural design.” Struct. Saf. 1 (1): 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4730(82)90012-1.
Ellingwood, B., T. V. Galambos, J. G. MacGregor, and C. A. Cornell. 1980. Development of a probability-based load criterion for American National Standard A58. NBS Special Publication 577. Washington, DC: US Department of Commerce.
Evangelista, A., A. Pellegrino, and C. Viggiani. 1977. “Variability among piles of the same foundation.” In Proc., 9th Int. Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 493–500. Tokyo: Japanese Society of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering.
GTR (Geosciences Testing and Research). 2014. Jackson Road over Route 2 evaluation of existing timber pile capacity report. Letter Rep. to Lin Associates Incorporated. North Chelmsford, MA: GTR.
Haley and Aldrich. 2013. Preliminary geotechnical design report U.S. Route 1 viaduct bridge rehabilitation MAINEDOT WIN 19273.00, Bath, Maine. Rep. No. 38751-30. Augusta, ME: Maine Dept. of Transportation.
Hasofer, A. M., M. C. Lind. 1974. “An exact and invariant first-order reliability format.” J. Eng. Mech. 100 (1): 111–121.
Huang, J., R. Kelly, D. Li, C. Zhou, and S. Sloan. 2016. “Updating reliability of single piles and pile groups by load tests.” Comput. Geotech. 73: 221–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2015.12.003.
Kay, J. N. 1976. “Safety factor evaluation for single piles in sand.” J. Geotech. Eng. Div. 102 (10): 1093–1108.
Krusinski, L. 2015. Geotechnical report for Haynesville Bridge U.S. Route 2A over Mattawamkeag River Haynesville. Rep. No. 2015-27. Augusta, ME: Maine Dept. of Transportation.
Moses, F., and D. Verma. 1987. Load capacity evaluation of existing bridges. Rep. No. NCHRP 301. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Nowak, A. 1999. Calibration of LRFD bridge design code. Rep. No. NCHRP 368. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Paikowsky, S. 2004. Load and resistance factor design (LRFD) for deep foundations. Rep. No. 507. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
Park, J. H., M. Chung, and J. Huh. 2015. “Reliability based resistance factor calibration and implementation of axially loaded piles.” In Proc., 25th Int. Ocean and Polar Engineering Conf. Mountain View, CA: International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers.
Phoon, K. K., and F. H. Kulhawy. 1996. “Practical reliability-based design approach for foundation engineering.” Transp. Res. Rec. 1546: 94–99. https://doi.org/10.3141/1546-11.
Zhang, J. 2017. Bayesian method: A natural tool for processing geotechnical information. Joint TC205/TC304 Working Group on Discussion of Statistical/Reliability Methods for Eurocodes Rep. London: International Society for Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering.
Zhang, L., and W. Tang. 2002. “Use of load tests for reducing pile length.” In Proc., Int. Deep Foundations Congress 2002, 993–1005. Reston, VA: ASCE.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 23Issue 12December 2018

History

Received: Jan 27, 2018
Accepted: May 31, 2018
Published online: Sep 18, 2018
Published in print: Dec 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Feb 18, 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Nathan Davis, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Tufts Univ., Medford 02155, MA (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Masoud Sanayei, M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Tufts Univ., Medford 02155, MA. Email: [email protected]
Anil Agrawal, M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, City College of CUNY, New York 10031, NY. Email: [email protected]
Frank Jalinoos, M.ASCE [email protected]
Research Structural Engineer, Federal Highway Administration, Office of Infrastructure R&D, McLean 22101. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share