Cyclic Experimental Behavior of Nonseismic Elastomeric Bearings with Stiffened Angle Side Retainer Fuses for Quasi-Isolated Seismic Bridge Response
Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 23, Issue 1
Abstract
Laminated elastomeric bridge bearings are commonly employed at bridges as expansion bearings to accommodate thermal displacements. In regions of low to moderate seismicity, these bearings can also be used as fusing components to effectively isolate the superstructure from the substructure during earthquakes. Stiffened angle retainers provide lateral restraint against transverse construction and service demands on a bridge but can also be used as fuses to establish a threshold of maximum inertial force transfer to the substructure. An experimental program has been carried out to evaluate the overall performance and key behavioral characteristics for assemblies of steel-reinforced, laminated elastomeric bridge bearings with stiffened angle retainers subjected to transverse bridge movement. The testing program demonstrated that the retainer-and-bearing assemblies possess significant force capacity, which should be calibrated to maximize the effectiveness of the fuse for protection of the substructure. The experimental configurations exhibited lateral force capacities as much as 100% of the applied vertical load. The structural response of the bearings depended strongly on the bearing type and the base width of the retainer in the direction of the load relative to bearing height. Bearings comprising only a reinforced elastomer block and a thick top plate achieved distinct pre- and postfusing response ranges if the retainer base width was sufficiently large, with a pinched, stiff hysteresis up to a maximum shear strain of 50–100%, followed by a sharp reduction in force capacity after retainer fusing. Elastomer-on-concrete sliding response diminished during initial cycles but stabilized at a consistent sliding friction coefficient. If the retainer base width was not sufficiently large, the behavior was complex, with concrete crushing at the retainer toe and interaction of the retainer heel with the elastomer block. Bearings with a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) sliding layer were fabricated with bottom steel plates, which permitted a more reliable fusing mechanism without the complications of concrete interaction at the retainer toe.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This article is based on the results of ICT R27-70, Calibration and refinement of Illinois’ earthquake resisting system bridge design methodology. ICT R27-70 was conducted in cooperation with the ICT, IDOT Division of Highways, and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) of the U.S. Department of Transportation. The contents of this article reflect the view of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the ICT, IDOT, or FHWA. The authors thank the members of the project Technical Review Panel, chaired by D. H. Tobias and M. D. Shaffer of the Illinois Department of Transportation, for their valuable assistance with this research.
References
AASHTO. (2014a). AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications, 7th Ed.,Washington, DC.
AASHTO. (2014b). Guide specifications for seismic isolation design, 4th Ed.,Washington, DC.
ASTM. (2003). “Standard specification for plain and steel-laminated elastomeric bearings for bridges.” D4014-03,West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2014). “Standard test methods for rubber property—Adhesion to rigid substrates.” D429-14,West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2016). “Standard specification for anchor bolts, steel, 36, 55, and 105-ksi yield strength.” F1554-15e1,West Conshohocken, PA.
Buckle, I. G., Constantinou, M. C., Dicleli, M., and Ghasemi, H. (2006). “Seismic isolation of highway bridges.” Rep. No. MCEER-06-SP07,Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research,Buffalo, NY.
Buckle, I. G., and Mayes, R. L. (1990). “Seismic isolation: History, application, and performance—A world view.” Earthquake Spectra,6(2), 161–201.
Buckle, I. G., Nagarajaiah, S., and Ferrell, K. (2002). “Stability of elastomeric isolation bearings: Experimental study.” J. Struct. Eng., 3–11.
Calvi, G. M., and Pavese, A. (1997). “Conceptual design of isolation systems for bridge structures.” J. Earthquake Eng.,1(1), 193–218.
El-Bahey, S., and Bruneau, M. (2011). “Buckling restrained braces as structural fuses for the seismic retrofit of reinforced concrete bridge bents.” Eng. Struct.,33, 1052–1061.
El-Bahey, S., and Bruneau, M. (2012a). “Bridge piers with structural fuses and bi-steel columns. I: Experimental testing.” J. Struct. Eng.,17(1), 25–35.
El-Bahey, S., and Bruneau, M. (2012b). “Bridge piers with structural fuses and bi-steel columns. II: Analytical investigation.” J. Struct. Eng.,17(1), 36–46.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). (2015). “National bridge inventory.” ⟨ https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/nbi/2003/CA03.txt〉 (Jul. 28, 2015).
Filipov, E. T., Fahnestock, L. A., Steelman, J. S., Hajjar, J. F., LaFave, J. M., and Foutch, D. A. (2013). “Evaluation of quasi-isolated seismic bridge behavior using nonlinear bearing models.” Eng. Struct.,49, 168–181.
IDOT (Illinois Dept. of Transportation). (2009). Bridge manual,Springfield, IL.
IDOT (Illinois Dept. of Transportation). (2012a). Bridge manual,Springfield, IL.
IDOT (Illinois Dept. of Transportation). (2012b). Standard specification for road and bridge construction,Springfield, IL.
Kikuchi, M., and Aiken, I. D. (1997). “An analytical hysteresis model for elastomeric seismic isolation bearings.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn.,26(2), 215–231.
Konstantinidis, D., Kelly, J. M., and Makris, N. (2008). “Experimental investigations on the seismic response of bridge bearings.” Rep. No. EERC 2008-02,Earthquake Engineering Research Center,Berkeley, CA.
Kulak, R. F., and Hughes, T. H. (1992). “Mechanical tests for validation of seismic isolation elastomer constitutive models.” DOE facilities programs, systems interaction, and active/inactive damping, C.-W. Lin et al.,. eds.,ASME,New York, 41–46.
LaFave, J., et al. (2013a). “Experimental investigation of the seismic response of bridge bearings.” Rep. No. FHWA-ICT-13-002,Illinois Center for Transportation,Springfield, IL.
LaFave, J., et al. (2013b). “Seismic performance of quasi-isolated highway bridges in Illinois.” Rep. No. FHWA-ICT-13-015,Illinois Center for Transportation,Springfield, IL.
Maleki, S. (2004). “Effect of side retainers on seismic response of bridges with elastomeric bearings.” J. Bridge Eng., 95–100.
Mayes, R. L., and Naeim, F. (2001). “Design of structures with seismic isolation.” Chapter 14, The seismic design handbook, 2nd Ed., F. Naeim, ed.,Springer,New York, 723–755.
Megally, S. H., Silva, P. F., and Seible, F. (2002). “Seismic response of sacrificial shear keys in bridge abutments.” Report No. SSRP-2001/23,Department of Structural Engineering, Univ. of California,San Diego, La Jolla, CA.
Mohebbi, A., Ryan, K. L., and Sanders, D. (2014). “Controlling the seismic damage in bridge columns using structural fuses.” Proc., 10th National Conf. in Earthquake Engineering,Earthquake Engineering Research Institute,Anchorage, AK.
Mori, A., Moss, P. J., Cooke, N., and Carr, A. J. (1999). “The behavior of bearings used for seismic isolation under shear and axial load.” Earthquake Spectra,15(2), 199–224.
Rabbat, B. G., and Russell, H. G. (1985). “Friction coefficient of steel on concrete or grout.” J. Struct. Eng., 505–515.
Roeder, C. W., Stanton, J. F., and Taylor, A. W. (1987). “Performance of elastomeric bearings.” NCHRP Rep. 298,Transportation Research Board,Washington, DC.
Stanton, J. F., and Roeder, C. W. (1982). “Elastomeric bearings design, construction, and materials.” NCHRP Rep.t 248,Transportation Research Board,Washington, DC.
Steelman, J. S. (2013). “Sacrificial bearing components for quasi-isolated response of bridges subject to high-magnitude, low-probability seismic hazard.” Ph.D. thesis,Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign,Champaign, IL.
Steelman, J. S., Fahnestock, L. A., Filipov, E. T., LaFave, J. M., Hajjar, J. F., and Foutch, D. A. (2013). “Shear and friction response of nonseismic laminated elastomeric bridge bearings subject to seismic demands.” J. Bridge Eng., 612–623.
Steelman, J. S., et al. (2014). “Experimental behavior of steel fixed bearings and implications for seismic bridge response.” J. Bridge Eng., A4014007.
Steelman, J., Fahnestock, L. A., Hajjar, J. F., and LaFave, J. M. (2016). “Performance of nonseismic PTFE sliding bearings when subjected to seismic demands.” J. Bridge Eng., 04015028.
Taylor, A. W., and Igusa, T. (2004). Primer on seismic isolation,ASCE,Reston, VA.
Tobias, D. H., Anderson, R. E., Hodel, C. E., Kramer, W. M., Wahab, R. M., and Chaput, R. J. (2008). “Overview of earthquake resisting system design and retrofit strategy for bridges in Illinois.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr., 147–158.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 23 • Issue 1 • January 2018
Copyright
© 2017 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jan 25, 2017
Accepted: Jul 24, 2017
Published online: Nov 2, 2017
Published in print: Jan 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Apr 2, 2018
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.