Seismic Vulnerability Assessment and Retrofitting Design of a Multispan Highway Bridge: Case Study
Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 23, Issue 2
Abstract
Seismic vulnerability is a critical issue in Italy, because the bulk of existing structures were designed before enforcement of the new national building code in 2008 and the ensuing seismic risk map, which assigns a nonnegligible peak ground acceleration (PGA) to previously nonseismic areas. Thus, seismic retrofitting becomes of primary importance even though often challenging, because remarkable limitations mostly due to structure geometry, site features, and economical issues should be tackled. All of the aforementioned aspects were a primary concern for the Tanaro and Bormida Bridges (Alessandria, Italy), discussed herein, of the A21 Highway. The main criticalities came from (1) the presence of three different superstructure deck types (simply supported RC and prestressed concrete beam decks, and a continuous prestressed concrete box girder deck), (2) geometrical and feasibility restraints (limited deck-to-deck gaps and bearing heights), and (3) instream foundations. Whereas vulnerability assessment showed the need for retrofitting, seismic isolation of the bridge with friction pendulum bearings (FPBs) was studied. The preliminary design was performed through the simplified linear single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) model, and the final solution was checked by means of linear modal analyses via finite-element simulations. The use of a SDOF model proved to be very useful in designing the isolation system thanks to its flexibility and possibility of easily managing the main parameters. The final designed isolation system was shown to be very effective owing to the significant reduction (even higher than 80% in the present work) of the base shear force and the limitation of the seismic displacements allowed by high energy dissipation capability.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Giuseppe Pasqualato of Sineco Spa (Milan, Italy) and Valter Re of Satap Spa (Turin, Italy) for the technical assistance and the interesting discussions that were useful in the development of the present work.
References
Al-Hussaini, T. M., Zayas, V. A., and Constantinou, M. C. (1994). “Seismic isolation of a multistory frame structure using spherical sliding isolation systems.” Technical Rep. NCEER-94-0007, National Center for Earthquake Engineering and Research, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY.
Almazàn, J. L., and De la Llera, J. C. (2003). “Physical model for dynamic analysis of structures with FPS isolators.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 32(8), 1157–1184.
Bedon, C., and Morassi, A. (2014). “Dynamic testing and parameter identification of a base-isolated bridge.” Eng. Struct., 60, 85–99.
Boroschek, R. L., Moroni, M. O., and Sarrazin, M. (2003). “Dynamic characteristics of a long span seismic isolated bridge.” Eng. Struct., 25(12), 1479–1490.
Buckle, I., Friedland, I., Mander, J., Martin, G., Nutt, R. and Power, M. (2006). “Seismic retrofitting manual for highway structures: Part 1—Bridges.” Rep. No. FHWA-HRT-06-032, U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC, p. 610.
Cardone, D., Dolce, M., and Palermo, G. (2009). “Direct displacement-based design of seismically isolated bridges.” Bull. Earthquake Eng., 7(2), 391–410.
Cardone, D., Perrone, G., and Sofia, S. (2011). “A performance-based adaptive methodology for the seismic evaluation of multi-span simply supported deck bridges.” Bull. Earthquake Eng., 9(5), 1463–1498.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). (2004a). “Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures. Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings.” EN 1992-1-1:2004, Brussels, Belgium.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). (2004b). “Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings.” EN 1998-1:2004, Brussels, Belgium.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). (2005a). “Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures. Part 2 Concrete bridges—Design and detailing rules.” EN 1992-2:2005, Brussels, Belgium.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). (2005b). “Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 2: Bridges.” EN 1998-2:2005, Brussels, Belgium.
Chopra, A. K. (1997). Dynamics of structures: Theory and application to earthquake engineering, Prentice-Hall Ltd, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Constantinou, M. C., and Papageorgiou, A. (1990). “Stochastic response of practical sliding isolation systems.” Probab. Eng. Mech., 5(1), 27–34.
Dicleli, M., and Mansour, M. Y. (2003). “Seismic retrofitting of highway bridges in Illinois using friction pendulum seismic isolation bearings and modeling procedures.” Eng. Struct., 25(9), 1139–1156.
Dicleli, M., Mansour, M., and Constantinou, M. (2005). “Efficiency of seismic isolation for seismic retrofitting of heavy substructured bridges.” J. Bridge Eng., 429–441.
Dolce, M., Cardone, D., and Croatto, F. (2005). “Frictional behavior of steel-PTFE interfaces for seismic isolation.” Bull. Earthquake Eng., 3(1), 75–99.
Dolce, M., Cardone, D., and Palermo, G. (2007). “Seismic isolation of bridges using isolation system based on flat sliding bearings.” Bull. Earthquake Eng., 5(4), 491–509.
Dolce, M., Ponzo, F. C., Di Cesare, A., and Arleo, G. (2010). Progetto di edifici con isolamento sismico, 2nd Ed., IUSS Press, Pavia, Italy.
Franchin, P., and Pinto, P. E. (2014). “Performance-based seismic design of integral abutment bridges.” Bull. Earthquake Eng., 12(2), 939–960.
Kappos, A. J., Saiidid, M. S., Aydinoglu, M. N., and Isakovic, T. (eds). (2012). Seismic design and assessment of bridges, Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg, New York, p. 221.
Karayannis, C. G., and Sirkelis, G. M. (2008). “Strengthening and rehabilitation of RC beam-column joints using carbon-FRP jacketing and epoxy resin injection.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 37(5), 769–790.
Kawashima, K. (2000). “Seismic design and retrofit of bridges.” Bull. N. Z. Soc. Earthquake Eng., 33(3), 265–285.
Kawashima, K., and Unjoh, S. (1996). “Impact of Hanshin-Awaji earthquake on seismic design strengthening of highway bridges.” Struct. Earthquake Eng., 13(2), 211–240.
Liu, T., Zordan, T., Briseghella, B., and Zhang, Q. (2014). “Evaluation of equivalent linearization analysis methods for seismically isolated buildings characterized by SDOF systems.” Eng. Struct., 59, 619–634.
Mitoulis, S. A., Tegos, I. A., and Stylianidis, K. C. (2013). “A new scheme for the seismic retrofit of multi-span simply supported bridges.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., 9(7), 719–732.
Moghaddasi, M., Cubrinovski, M., Chase, J. G., Pampanin, S., and Carr, A. (2011). “Effects of soil–foundation–structure interaction on seismic structural response via robust Monte Carlo simulation.” Eng. Struct., 33(4), 1338–1347.
Mokha, A., Constantinou, M., and Reinhorn, A. (1990). “Teflon bearings in base isolation I: Testing.” J. Struct. Eng., 438–454.
NTC (Norme Tecniche per le Costruzioni). (2008). “Norme Tecniche per le Costruzioni.” G.Un, Italy. 29.
OPCM 3274. (2003). “Ordinanza del Presidente del Consiglio dei Ministri n.3274.” Primi elementi in materia di criteri generali per la classificazione sismica del territorio nazionale e di normative tecniche per le costruzioni in zona sismica”, Italy (in Italian).
Pantelides, C. P., and Gergely, J. (2002). “Carbon-fiber reinforced polymer seismic retrofit of RC bridge bent: Design and in situ validation.” J. Compos. Constr., 52–60.
Penelis, G. G., Stylianidis, K.-A., and Ignatakis, C. (1998). “Retrofitting of an existing concrete bridge using base isolation concept.” Proc., 2nd Japan-U.K. Workshop on Implications of Recent Earthquakes on Seismic Risk, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, pp. 331–341.
Pinto, P. E., and Franchin, P. (2010). “Issues in the upgrade of Italian highway structures.” J. Earthquake Eng., 14(8), 1221–1252.
Pinto, P. E., Franchin, P., and Lupoi, A. (2009). Valutazione e consolidamento sismico dei ponti esistenti (seismic assessment and strengthening of existing bridges, manual in italian), IUSS Press, Pavia, Italy.
Pozzuoli, C., Lo Monte, F., Mola, F., Mola, E., Pasqualato, G., and Re, V. (2014). “Seismic analysis and retrofitting of the highway bridge over the rivers Tanaro and Bormida.” Proc., Second European Conf. on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Istanbul, Turkey.
Priestley, M. J. N., Calvi, G. M., and Kowalsky, M. J. (2007). Displacement-based seismic design of structures, IUSS Press, Pavia, Italy.
PRO_SAP [Computer software]. 2S.I., Ferrara, Italy.
RD (Regio Decreto). (1939), “Norme per la esecuzione delle opere in conglomerato cementizio semplice e armato.” R.D. 16/11/1939 N.2229, G.U. n.92, Italy (in Italian).
Saadeghvaziri, M. A., and Yazdani-Motlagh, A. (1999). “Nonlinear response of MSSS bridges under earthquake ground motions.” FHWA Final Rep., FHWA/NJ-99-026-7270.
Saiidi, M., Randall, M., Maragakis, E., and Isakovic, T. (2001). “Seismic restrainer design methods for simply supported bridges.” J. Bridge Eng., 307–315.
Sarraf, M., and Bruneau, M. (2004). “Performance tests of innovative ductile steel retrofitted deck-truss bridges.” Proc., 13th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver (Canada), p. 1803.
Sarrazin, M., Moroni, O., and Roesset, J. M. (2005). “Evaluation of dynamic response characteristics of seismically isolated bridges in Chile.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 34(4–5), 425–448.
Su, L., Ahmadi, G., and Tadjbakhsh, I. G. (1989). “Comparative study of base isolation systems.” J. Eng. Mech., 1976–1992.
Unjoh, S., Kobayashi, K., and Ogura, Y. (2004). “Seismic retrofit of existing highway bridges considering displacement restraint effect of abutments.” Proc., Comparative U.S.-Japan highway bridges design: I. Design methods.
Wilson, J. G., and Panian, L. (1997). “Innovative techniques for the seismic retrofit of bixby creek concrete arch bridge.” Proc., Practical Solutions for Bridge Strengthening Conf., 8110.
Zayas, V. A., Low, S. S., and Mahin, S. A. (1990). “A simple pendulum technique for achieving seismic isolation.” Earthquake Spectra, 6(2), 317–333.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 23 • Issue 2 • February 2018
Copyright
© 2017 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jan 9, 2017
Accepted: Jun 12, 2017
Published online: Dec 5, 2017
Published in print: Feb 1, 2018
Discussion open until: May 5, 2018
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.