Abstract

For existing bridges, proof-load testing can be a suitable assessment method. This paper addresses the evaluation of a posted reinforced concrete slab bridge over a highway through proof-load testing, detailing the preparation, execution, and analysis of the test. As the target proof-load and the required measurements for proof-load testing currently are not well-defined in the existing codes, this pilot case was used to develop and evaluate proposed recommendations for proof-load testing for a future guideline on proof-load testing for the Netherlands. Moreover, the pilot proof-load test is used to study the feasibility of proof-load testing for both shear and flexure.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors express their gratitude and sincere appreciation to the Dutch Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment (Rijkswaterstaat) and the Province of Noord Brabant for financing this research work. The contributions and help of colleagues Albert Bosman, Sebastiaan Ensink, and Yuguang Yang, and student Werner Vos of Delft University of Technology; of Witteveen + Bos, responsible for the logistics and safety; and of Mammoet, responsible for applying the load, are gratefully acknowledged. The fruitful discussions with Frank Linthorst and Danny den Boef of Witteveen + Bos, and with Otto Illing and the late Chris Huissen of Mammoet are also acknowledged.

References

AASHTO. (2016). The manual for bridge evaluation with 2016 interim revisions, 2nd Ed., Washington, DC.
ACI Committee 318. (2014). Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318-14) and commentary, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI.
ACI Committee 437. (2013). Code requirements for load testing of existing concrete structures (ACI 437.2M-13) and commentary, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MA.
Aguilar, C. V., Jáuregui, D. V., Newtson, C. M., Weldon, B. D., and Cortez, T. M. (2015). “Load rating a prestressed concrete double-tee beam bridge without plans by proof testing.” Proc., Transportation Research Board Annual Compendium of Papers, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 90–99.
Anay, R., Cortez, T. M., Jáuregui, D. V., ElBatanouny, M. K., and Ziehl, P. (2016). “On-site acoustic-emission monitoring for assessment of a prestressed concrete double-tee-beam bridge without plans.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 04015062.
Arangjelovski, T., Gramatikov, K., and Docevska, M. (2015). “Assessment of damaged timber structures using proof load test—Experience from case studies.” Constr. Build. Mater., 101(2), 1271–1277.
Ataei, S., Jahangiri Alikamar, M., and Kazemiashtiani, V. (2016). “Evaluation of axle load increasing on a monumental masonry arch bridge based on field load testing.” Constr. Build. Mater., 116, 413–421.
Barker, M. G. (2001). “Quantifying field-test behavior for rating steel girder bridges.” J. Bridge Eng., 254–261.
Bell, E. S., and Sipple, J. D. (2009). “Special topics studies for baseline structural modeling for condition assessment of in-service bridges.” Safety and reliability of bridge structures, CRC Press, London, 274–289.
Bentz, E. C., and Hoult, N. A. (2017). “Bridge model updating using distributed sensor data.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Bridge Eng., 170(1), 74–86.
Bretschneider, N., Fiedler, L., Kapphahn, G., and Slowik, V. (2012). “Technical possibilities for load tests of concrete and masonry bridges.” Bautechnik, 89(2), 102–110 (in German).
Bridge Diagnostics, Inc. (2012). “Integrated approach to load testing.” Bridge Diagnostics, Boulder, CO, 44.
Brühwiler, E., Vogel, T., Lang, T., and Lüechinger, P. (2012). “Swiss standards for existing structures.” Struct. Eng. Int., 22(2), 275–280.
Cai, C. S., and Shahawy, M. (2003). “Understanding capacity rating of bridges from load tests.” Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr., 209–216.
Casas, J. R., and Gómez, J. D. (2013). “Load rating of highway bridges by proof-loading.” KSCE J. Civ. Eng., 17(3), 556–567.
CEN (Comité Européen de Normalisation). (2002). Eurocode—Basis of structural design, NEN-EN 1990:2002, Brussels, Belgium.
CEN (Comité Européen de Normalisation). (2003). Eurocode 1: Actions on structures—Part 2: Traffic loads on bridges, NEN-EN 1991-2:2003, Brussels, Belgium.
CEN (Comité Européen de Normalisation). (2011). Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures—Concrete bridges—Design and detailing rules. NEN-EN 1992-2+C1:2011, Brussels, Belgium.
Cochet, D., et al. (2004). “Load tests on highway bridges and pedestrian bridges (in French).” Service d'Etudes techniques des routes et autoroutes, Setra, Bagneux-Cedex, France.
Code Committee 351001. (2011). “Assessement of structural safety of an existing structure at repair or unfit for use—Basic requirements, NEN 8700:2011 (in Dutch).” Civil center for the execution of research and standard, Dutch Normalisation Institute, Delft, Netherlands.
Deutscher Ausschuss für Stahlbeton. (2000). “DAfStb-guideline: Load tests on concrete structures.” Deutscher Ausschuss fur Stahlbeton (in German).
Dieteren, G. G. A., and den Uijl, J. A. (2009). “Evaluatie proefbelasting heidijk.” V. 2008-DWARS-MOlO, TNO Bouw en Ondergrond/TU Delft, Delft, Netherlands.
Faber, M. H., Val, D. V., and Stewart, M. G. (2000). “Proof load testing for bridge assessment and upgrading.” Eng. Struct., 22(12), 1677–1689.
Farhey, D. N. (2005). “Bridge instrumentation and monitoring for structural diagnostics.” Struct. Health Monit., 4(4), 301–318.
Fennis, S. A. A. M., and Hordijk, D. A. (2014). “Proof loading Halvemaans Bridge Alkmaar.” V. Stevin Rep. 25.5-14-05, Delft Univ. of Technology, Delft, Netherlands (in Dutch).
Frýba, L., and Pirner, M. (2001). “Load tests and modal analysis of bridges.” Eng. Struct., 23(1), 102–109.
Fu, G., Pezze III, F. P., and Alampalli, S. (1997). “Diagnostic load testing for bridge load rating.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1594, 125–133.
Fu, G. K., and Tang, J. G. (1995). “Risk-based proof-load requirements for bridge evaluation.” J. Struct. Eng., 542–556.
Gokce, H. B., Catbas, F. N., and Frangopol, D. M. (2011). “Evaluation of load rating and system reliability of movable bridge.” Transp. Res. Rec., 2251, 114–122.
Hag-Elsafi, O., and Kunin, J. (2006). “Load testing for bridge rating: Dean’s Mill Road over Hannacrois Creek.” V. Special Rep. 147, Transportation Research and Development Bureau, New York State Dept. of Transportation, Albany, NY.
Halding, P. S., Hertz, K. D., Schmidt, J. W., and Kennedy, B. J. (2017). “Full-scale load tests of pearl-chain arches.” Eng. Struct., 131, 101–114.
He, J., Liu, Y., Chen, A., and Dai, L. (2012). “Experimental investigation of movable hybrid GFRP and concrete bridge deck.” Constr. Build. Mater., 26(1), 49–64.
Hernandez, E. S., and Myers, J. J. (2015). “In-situ field test and service response of Missouri Bridge A7957.” Proc., European Bridge Conf., Edinburgh, UK.
ifem. (2013). “Brucke Vlijmen Oost (NL): Belastungsversuche mit dem BELFA.” V. Project 172013, ifem, Leipzig, Germany.
Institution of Civil Engineers–National Steering Committee for the Load Testing of Bridges. (1998). Guidelines for the supplementary load testing of bridges, London.
Iv-Infra. (2015). “51H-304-01—De Beek—Recalculation bridge deck.” Iv-Infra, Papendrecht, Netherlands (in Dutch).
Jáuregui, D. V., Licon-Lozano, A., and Kulkarni, K. (2010). “Higher level evaluation of a reinforced concrete slab bridge.” J. Bridge Eng., 172–182.
Juntunen, D. A., and Isola, M. C. (1995). “Proof load test of R01 of 61131 M-37 over CSX railroad, South of Bailey, Michigan.” V. Research Rep. No. R-1336, Michigan Dept. of Transportation, Lansing, MI.
Kim, Y. J., Tanovic, R., and Wight, R. G. (2009). “Recent advances in performance evaluation and flexural response of existing bridges.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 190–200.
Koekkoek, R. T., Lantsoght, E. O. L., and Hordijk, D. A. (2015a). “Proof loading of the ASR-affected viaduct Zijlweg over highway A59.” V. Stevin Rep. nr. 25.5-15-08, Delft Univ. of Technology, Delft, Netherlands.
Koekkoek, R. T., Lantsoght, E. O. L., Yang, Y., and Hordijk, D. A. (2016). “Analysis report for the assessment of viaduct De Beek by proof loading.” V. Stevin Rep. 25.5-16-01, Delft Univ. of Technology, Delft, Netherlands.
Koekkoek, R. T., Yang, Y., Fennis, S. A. A. M., and Hordijk, D. A. (2015b). “Assessment of Viaduct Vlijmen Oost by proof loading.” V. Stevin Rep. 25.5-15-10, Delft Univ. of Technology, Delft, Netherlands.
Lantsoght, E., van der Veen, C., and de Boer, A. (2016a). “Shear and moment capacity of the Ruytenschildt bridge.” Proc., IABMAS 2016, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, 1–8.
Lantsoght, E., Yang, Y., van der Veen, C., de Boer, A., and Hordijk, D. (2016b). “Ruytenschildt Bridge: Field and laboratory testing.” Eng. Struct., 128(December), 111–123.
Lantsoght, E. O. L., de Boer, A., Van der Veen, C., and Walraven, J. C. (2013a). “Peak shear stress distribution in finite element models of concrete slabs.” Proc., Research and Applications in Structural Engineering, Mechanics and Computation, Zingoni, A., ed., Cape Town, South Africa, 475–480.
Lantsoght, E. O. L., Koekkoek, R. T., Hordijk, D. A., and De Boer, A. (2017a). “Towards standardisation of proof load testing: Pilot test on viaduct Zijlweg.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 〈〉.
Lantsoght, E. O. L., van der Veen, C., de Boer, A., and Hordijk, D. A. (2016c). “Probabilistic prediction of the failure mode of the Ruytenschildt Bridge.” Eng. Struct., 127, 549–558.
Lantsoght, E. O. L., Van der Veen, C., De Boer, A., and Hordijk, D. A. (2017b). “Collapse test and moment capacity of the Ruytenschildt Reinforced Concrete Slab Bridge.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., 13(9), 1130–1145.
Lantsoght, E. O. L., Van der Veen, C., De Boer, A., and Hordijk, D. A. (2017c). “Proof load testing of reinforced concrete slab bridges in the Netherlands.” Struct. Concr., 18(4), 597–606.
Lantsoght, E. O. L., van der Veen, C., de Boer, A., and Walraven, J. C. (2013b). “Recommendations for the shear assessment of reinforced concrete slab bridges from experiments.” Struct. Eng. Int., 23(4), 418–426.
Lantsoght, E. O. L., Yang, Y., van der Veen, C., de Boer, A., and Hordijk, D. A. (2017d). “Beam experiments on acceptance criteria for bridge load tests.” ACI Structural Journal, 114(4), 1031–1041.
Maguire, M., Moen, C. D., Roberts-Wollmann, C., and Cousins, T. (2015). “Field verification of simplified analysis procedures for segmental concrete bridges.” J. Struct. Eng., D4014007.
Matta, F., Bastianini, F., Galati, N., Casadei, P., and Nanni, A. (2008). “Distributed strain measurement in steel bridge with fiber optic sensors: Validation through diagnostic load test.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 264–273.
Moen, C. D., Shapiro, E. E., and Hart, J. (2013). “Structural analysis and load test of a nineteenth-century iron bowstring arch-truss bridge.” J. Bridge Eng., 261–271.
Moses, F., Lebet, J. P., and Bez, R. (1994). “Applications of field testing to bridge evaluation.” J. Struct. Eng., 1745–1762.
Murià-Vila, D., Sánchez-Ramírez, A. R., Huerta-Carpizo, C. H., Aguilar, G., Pérez, J. C., and Cruz, R. E. C. (2015). “Field tests of elevated viaducts in Mexico City.” J. Struct. Eng., D4014001.
NCHRP (National Cooperative Highway Research Program). (1998). “Manual for bridge rating through load testing.” V. NCHRP Project 12-28(13)A, Washington, DC.
Nguyen, V. H., Schommer, S., Maas, S., and Zürbes, A. (2016). “Static load testing with temperature compensation for structural health monitoring of bridges.” Eng. Struct., 127, 700–718.
Nilimaa, J., Bagge, N., Blanksvärd, T., and Täljsten, B. (2015). “NSM CFRP strengthening and failure loading of a posttensioned concrete bridge.” J. Compos. Constr., 04015076.
NRA (National Roads Authority). (2014). Load testing for bridge assessment, Dublin, Ireland.
Ohanian, E., White, D., and Bell, E. S. (2017). “Benefit analysis of in-place load testing for bridges.” Transportation Research Board Annual Compendium of Papers, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 14.
Olaszek, P., Casas, J. R., and Świt, G. (2016). “On-site assessment of bridges supported by acoustic emission.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Bridge Eng., 169(2), 81–92.
Olaszek, P., Lagoda, M., and Ramon Casas, J. (2014). “Diagnostic load testing and assessment of existing bridges: Examples of application.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., 10(6), 834–842.
Olaszek, P., Świt, G., and Casas, J. R. (2012). “Proof load testing supported by acoustic emission. An example of application.” Proc., IABMAS 2012.
Puurula, A. M., et al. (2015). “Assessment of the strengthening of an RC railway bridge with CFRP utilizing a full-scale failure test and finite-element analysis.” J. Struct. Eng., D4014008.
Rijkswaterstaat. (2013). Guidelines assessment bridges—Assessment of structural safety of an existing bridge at reconstruction, usage and disapproval, Rijkswaterstaat, Utrecht, Netherlands (in Dutch).
Russo, F. M., Wipf, T. J., and Klaiber, F. W. (2000). “Diagnostic load tests of a prestressed concrete bridge damaged by overheight vehicle impact.” Transp. Res. Rec., 1696, 103–110.
Sanayei, M., Phelps, J. E., Sipple, J. D., Bell, E. S., and Brenner, B. R. (2012). “Instrumentation, nondestructive testing, and finite-element model updating for bridge evaluation using strain measurements.” J. Bridge Eng., 130–138.
Sanayei, M., Reiff, A. J., Brenner, B. R., and Imbaro, G. R. (2016). “Load rating of a fully instrumented bridge: Comparison of LRFR approaches.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 04015019.
Saraf, V. K. (1998). “Evaluation of existing RC slab bridges.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 20–24.
Saraf, V. K., Nowak, A. S., and Till, R. (1996). “Proof load testing of bridges.” Proc., Probabilistic Mechanics & Structural Reliability: Proc. of the Seventh Specialty Conf., Frangopol, D. M., and Grigoriu, M. D., eds., 526–529.
Schacht, G., Bolle, G., Curbach, M., and Marx, S. (2016a). “Experimental evaluation of the shear bearing safety.” Beton- und Stahlbetonbau, 111(6), 343–354 (in German).
Schacht, G., Bolle, G., and Marx, S. (2016b). “Load testing—International state of the art.” Bautechnik, 93(2), 85–97 (in German).
Schwesinger, P., and Bolle, G. (2000). “EXTRA—A new experiment supported condition assessment method for concrete bridges.” Proc., SPIE 3995, Nondestructive Evaluation of Highways, Utilities, and Pipelines IV, Aktan, A. E., and Gosselin, S. R., eds., 180–190.
Shahawy, M. A. (1995). “Nondestructive strength evaluation of Florida bridges.” Proc., SPIE, Oakland, CA.
Shenton, H. W., Chajes, M. J., and Huang, J. (2007). “Load rating of bridges without plans.” V. DCT 195, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Delaware; Dept. of Civil Engineering, Widener Univ., Newark, DE.
Shifferaw, Y., and Fanous, F. S. (2013). “Field testing and finite element analysis of steel bridge retrofits for distortion-induced fatigue.” Eng. Struct., 49, 385–395.
Spaethe, G. (1994). “The effect of proof load testing on the safety of a structure.” Bauingenieur, 69(12), 459–468 (in German).
Stroh, S. L., Sen, R., and Ansley, M. (2010). “Load testing a double-composite steel box girder bridge.” Transp. Res. Rec., 2200, 36–42.
Taylor, S. E., Rankin, B., Cleland, D. J., and Kirkpatrick, J. (2007). “Serviceability of bridge deck slabs with arching action.” Aci Struct. J., 104(1), 39–48.
Varela-Ortiz, W., Cintrón, C. Y. L., Velázquez, G. I., and Stanton, T. R. (2013). “Load testing and GPR assessment for concrete bridges on military installations.” Constr. Build. Mater., 38, 1255–1269.
Velázquez, B. M., Yura, J. A., Frank, K. H., Kreger, M. E., and Wood, S. L. (2000). “Diagnostic load tests of a reinforced concrete pan-girder bridge.” V. Research Rep. 7-2986-2, Univ. of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
Veneziano, D., Galeota, D., and Giammatteo, M. M. (1984). “Analysis of bridge proof-load data I: Model and statistical procedures.” Struct. Saf., 2(2), 91–104.
Willems, M., de Ruiter, P. B., and Heystek, A. P. (2015). “Inspection report object 51H-304-01.” V. Zaaknummer 31081272, Rijkswaterstaat, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Zhang, J., Peng, H., and Cai, C. S. (2011). “Field study of overload behavior of an existing reinforced concrete bridge under simulated vehicle loads.” J. Bridge Eng., 226–237.
Zwicky, D., and Brühwiler, E. (2015). “Chillon Viaduct deck slab strengthening using reinforced UHPFRC: Full-scale tests.” Proc., Concrete Repair, Rehabilitation and Retrofitting IV, Dehn, F., Beushausen, H.-D., Alexander, M. G., and Moyo, P., eds., Leipzig, Germany, 557–564.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 22Issue 12December 2017

History

Received: Dec 30, 2016
Accepted: May 19, 2017
Published online: Oct 12, 2017
Published in print: Dec 1, 2017
Discussion open until: Mar 12, 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Researcher, Concrete Structures, Delft Univ. of Technology, 2628CN, Delft, Netherlands; Full Research Professor, Politecnico, Univ. San Francisco de Quito, EC170157 Quito, Ecuador (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4548-7644. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected]
Rutger T. Koekkoek [email protected]
Researcher, Concrete Structures, Delft Univ. of Technology, 2628CN, Delft, Netherlands. E-mail: [email protected]
Cor van der Veen, Ph.D. [email protected]
Associate Professor, Concrete Structures, Delft Univ. of Technology, 2628CN, Delft, Netherlands. E-mail: [email protected]
Dick A. Hordijk, Ph.D. [email protected]
Full Professor, Concrete Structures, Delft Univ. of Technology, 2628CN, Delft, Netherlands. E-mail: [email protected]
Ane de Boer, Ph.D. [email protected]
Senior Advisor, Rijkswaterstaat, Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment, P.O. Box 24057, 3502MB, Utrecht, Netherlands. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share